Inclusive exemption definition governs yarn classification where synthetic staple waste is covered by the notification.

An exemption notification was construed to include waste within the term "synthetic textile material" for classification under Sr. No. 14. Because the yarn was manufactured from synthetic staple waste, the inclusive explanation in the notification governed and the product could not be treated as outside that expression. The yarn was therefore classifiable under Sr. No. 14(a) and not Sr. No. 14(b), and the classification claim based on the narrower reading failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether yarn manufactured from indigenous or imported synthetic staple waste fell under Sr. No. 14(a) or Sr. No. 14(b) of Notification No. 53/91-C.E. dated 25-7-91.

Analysis: The notification contained an explanation providing that, for the purposes of Sr. No. 14 of the Table, the expression "synthetic textile material" included waste falling under Heading Nos. 54.01 or 55.03 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Since the product was manufactured from synthetic staple waste, the contention that it did not contain synthetic textile material could not be accepted.

Conclusion: The yarn was covered by Sr. No. 14(a) and not Sr. No. 14(b); the appellants' classification plea failed.

Final Conclusion: The exemption entry was construed against the appellants on the basis of the notification's explanation, and the appeals were dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification expressly includes specified waste within the definition of a term used in the entry, that inclusive explanation governs classification and the product must be placed accordingly.

---