TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the downgraded warehoused Aviation Turbine Fuel, cleared as Superior Kerosene Oil after deterioration during storage, was liable to be re-assessed as SKO under the warehousing provisions, and whether demand of differential duty and penalty could be sustained.
Analysis: The goods were admittedly warehoused and had deteriorated during storage, making them unfit for sale as ATF and capable of disposal only as SKO. Rule 159 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 provides for re-assessment where warehoused goods are sorted, separated, or subjected to any process that changes the duty liability. The alteration in the present case fell within that provision, and duty was correctly paid on the goods as SKO on removal. The situation did not attract Rule 143, because there was no voluntary dealing with the goods to alter them, nor Rule 149, because the goods were not destroyed as unusable refuse but were actually sold after downgrading. In the absence of any short levy, Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could not be invoked, and penalty under Rule 173Q also had no basis.
Conclusion: The demand of differential duty and the penalty were not sustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
TaxTMI 
