Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the shortage of imported goods was to be computed with reference to the quantity actually landed and, on that basis, whether the customs duty demand based on the end-use shortage could be sustained.
Analysis: The landed quantity shown in the out-turn report had to be treated as the relevant base for determining shortage. Goods that were never landed could not be counted while working out the alleged deficit. Once the short-landing figure was excluded, the shortage fell below the 1% loss permitted by the Central Government. The demand had been worked out on the basis of the full quantity shown in the bill of lading rather than the quantity actually discharged.
Conclusion: The demand was unsustainable and the appeal was allowed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the customs demand failed because the shortage had to be assessed only on the quantity actually landed.
Ratio Decidendi: For assessing a shortage where goods are partly not landed, the relevant base is the quantity actually discharged, and quantities never landed cannot be included in the computation of shortage or breach of the import condition.