Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article ✕
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search ❮
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date
Like 0 Bookmark Print or Download

When Government fails to keep track of Notifications issued by itself, how can common people be expected to follow the same.

Date 13 Jul 2017
Replies 5 Replies
Written by
Amendment of non existent notification creates confusion over customs exemptions for passenger import of gold and silver.
An amendment provision in a customs notification attempted to modify Notification No. 172/1994, but that notification had already been superseded and its successor rescinded; the operative exemptions for passenger import of gold and silver are instead contained in the consolidated Mega Exemption Notification, creating an inconsistency that warrants a corrigendum or clarification to avoid compliance confusion. (AI Summary)

Vide notification no. 42/2017 Cus dated 30.6.2017, various notifications proposed to be amended to make consequential changes to replace erstwhile CVD to IGST.

Sr. no. 3 of this notification amends notification no. 172/1994, dated the 30th September, 1994.  

But, the notification no. 172/1994-Customs dated 30.9.2017 was  superseded vide  Notification No. 3/2012-Customs, dated 16.1.2012. 

Further, the superseding notification no. 3/2012-Customs was rescinded vide Notification No.22/2012-Customs, dated 17.03.2012

These notifications were to provide Exemption / Prescribes rate of custom duty on Import of Gold & Silver by an eligible Passenger.

Effective rate of duty of Customs on import of Gold / silver by an eligible passenger were incorporated in the Mega Exemption Notification no. 12/2012 Customs dated 17.3.2012 and now under notification no. 50/2017-Customs dated 30-6-2017 (w.e.f. 1.7.2017), as amended from time to time.

Therefore:

It is beyond any imagination that where notification no.172/1994, dated the 30th September, 1994 is no more, what purpose would be achieved by amending the non-existing notification.

We hope government may issue some corrigendum or clarification in this regard in due course.

 

5 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Articles