Territorial jurisdiction limits information exchange: a state need not provide information it does not hold or control. Article 2 provides that a Requested Party is not obliged to provide information which is neither held by its authorities nor is in the possession or control of persons who are within its territorial jurisdiction under the Maldives DTAA exchange-of-information framework, limiting information requests to information actually held or controlled within the Requested Party's jurisdiction.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Territorial jurisdiction limits information exchange: a state need not provide information it does not hold or control.
Article 2 provides that a Requested Party is not obliged to provide information which is neither held by its authorities nor is in the possession or control of persons who are within its territorial jurisdiction under the Maldives DTAA exchange-of-information framework, limiting information requests to information actually held or controlled within the Requested Party's jurisdiction.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.