Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Countervailing Duty on Subsidized Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (From Rule 1 to Annexure 4)
Countervailing duty investigation termination applies where evidence, subsidy levels, or subsidised import volumes are insufficient or negligible. Termination of a countervailing duty investigation must be notified publicly where the initiating domestic industry seeks withdrawal, evidence of subsidisation or applicable injury is insufficient, or subsidy levels fall below prescribed thresholds. Termination is also required where subsidised imports or applicable injury are negligible. Developing-country imports below the individual import-share threshold are treated as negligible unless their collective share exceeds the specified aggregate threshold.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Countervailing duty investigation termination applies where evidence, subsidy levels, or subsidised import volumes are insufficient or negligible.
Termination of a countervailing duty investigation must be notified publicly where the initiating domestic industry seeks withdrawal, evidence of subsidisation or applicable injury is insufficient, or subsidy levels fall below prescribed thresholds. Termination is also required where subsidised imports or applicable injury are negligible. Developing-country imports below the individual import-share threshold are treated as negligible unless their collective share exceeds the specified aggregate threshold.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
