Civil Admissions remain inadmissible where evidence is excluded by express or inferred agreement, subject to compelled professional evidence. Section 23 excludes from relevance admissions in civil proceedings where an express condition prevents their use in evidence or where circumstances ... Summary
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Civil Admissions remain inadmissible where evidence is excluded by express or inferred agreement, subject to compelled professional evidence.
Section 23 excludes from relevance admissions in civil proceedings where an express condition prevents their use in evidence or where circumstances support an inferred agreement against evidentiary use. This exclusion does not release a barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil from providing evidence that may be compelled under section 126.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.