Oral admissions of documentary contents become relevant only with permissible secondary evidence or where the produced document's genuineness is disputed. Oral admissions concerning the contents of a document are generally irrelevant. They become relevant only when the relying party establishes entitlement ... Summary
Oral admissions of documentary contents become relevant only with permissible secondary evidence or where the produced document's genuineness is disputed.
Oral admissions concerning the contents of a document are generally irrelevant. They become relevant only when the relying party establishes entitlement to adduce secondary evidence of the contents, or when the genuineness of a produced document is in issue. This restricts proof of documentary contents through oral admissions while allowing them where secondary evidence is permissible or authenticity is challenged.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 1 
