Expert-opinion relevance permits otherwise irrelevant supporting or contradictory facts where expert views bear on poisoning or causation. Facts bearing on expert opinions become relevant, though independently irrelevant, when they support or contradict an expert opinion that is relevant to ... Summary
Expert-opinion relevance permits otherwise irrelevant supporting or contradictory facts where expert views bear on poisoning or causation.
Facts bearing on expert opinions become relevant, though independently irrelevant, when they support or contradict an expert opinion that is relevant to the issue. Comparative evidence may test the reliability and evidentiary weight of expert conclusions, including evidence of symptoms in other poison-exposure cases or similar harbour conditions bearing on causation of obstruction.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.