Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    News Bills
    Rationalisation of taxation of capital gains on transfer of capital assets by non-residents
    News Bills
    Rationalization of tax deducted at source (TDS) rates
    News Bills
    TDS rate reduction for section 194LBC
    News Bills
    TDS threshold rationalization TDS provisions have various thresholds of amount of payment or amount ...
    News Bills
    Section 193 – Interest on securities
    News Bills
    Section 194 – Dividends
    News Bills
    Section 194A – Interest other than interest on securities
    News Bills
    Section 194B - Winnings from lottery or crossword puzzle
    News Bills
    Section 194BB - Winnings from horse race
    News Bills
    Section 194D – Insurance commission
    News Bills
    Section 194G - Commission, etc., on sale of lottery tickets.
    News Bills
    Section 194H - Commission or brokerage.
    News Bills
    Section 194-I – Rent
    News Bills
    Section 194J - Fees for professional or technical services.
    News Bills
    Section 194K – Income in respect of units
    News Bills
    Section 194LA - Payment of compensation on acquisition of certain immovable property.
    News Bills
    Definition of “forest produce” rationalised
    News Bills
    Reduction in compliance burden by omission of TCS on sale of specified goods
    News Bills
    Amendments proposed in provisions of Block assessment for search and requisition cases under Chapter...
    News Bills
    Non-applicability of Section 271AAB of the Act
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Taxation of long-term capital gains increased for non-resident securities transfers to align rates with the resident regime.
The Finance Bill proposes amending section 115AD so that income-tax on long-term capital gains arising from transfer of securities (other than units under section 115AB) not covered by section 112A, when included in the total income of specified funds or foreign institutional investors, shall be calculated at the harmonised higher rate applicable to other assessees, with effect from the specified assessment year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Rationalization of TDS rates aims to simplify withholding rules and raise applicability thresholds to improve compliance and business ease.
Rationalization of Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) rates is proposed in the Union Budget 2025 26 and Finance Bill, 2025, to simplify multiple TDS rates and raise threshold limits for applicability, with the aim of reducing fragmentation, lowering compliance burdens, and promoting ease of doing business.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS rate reduction for securitisation trust payments under section 194LBC lowers withholding and eases compliance.
The Finance Bill reduces TDS under section 194LBC on income paid by securitisation trusts to resident investors from the earlier rates of 25% (individuals/HUF) and 30% (others) to a uniform 10%, on the basis that the sector is sufficiently organised and regulated; the amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025 as Clause 63 of the Bill.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS threshold rationalization raises and standardizes withholding triggers, reducing routine tax deductions on smaller payments.
The proposal titled TDS threshold rationalization raises and standardizes the monetary thresholds that trigger tax deduction at source for multiple categories-interest (including securities), dividends to individuals, mutual fund/unit incomes, various winnings, insurance commission, lottery-related income, brokerage and commission, professional and technical fees, rent, and enhanced compensation-altering per-transaction and annual benchmarks and distinguishing treatment by payer type and payment mode for withholding obligations.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on interest on securities: threshold increased to reduce small-value deductions and limit routine withholding.
Section 193 requires deduction of tax on interest on securities at time of credit or payment to a resident. The Finance Bill, 2025 proposes that tax shall be deducted under this section only when the amount or aggregate amount of interest on securities exceeds a specified monetary threshold during a financial year, and consequentially amends the proviso relating to debenture interest; the amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Dividend tax withholding: higher exemption threshold for individual shareholders reduces small-payment TDS obligations from next fiscal year.
Section 194 requires the principal officer of an Indian company, or a company with prescribed arrangements for dividend payments (including preference shares), to deduct tax at source from dividend payments to resident shareholders at the rate provided in the section. The Finance Bill raises the aggregate exemption threshold for individual shareholders under the first proviso so that no tax is required to be deducted on small aggregate dividend payments, with the amendment effective from the start of the next fiscal year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on interest thresholds increased, raising exemption limits for banks, cooperatives and post office deposits next fiscal year.
Amendments raise thresholds under Section 194A for deduction of tax at source on interest other than interest on securities, increasing payer-specific limits for banks, cooperative banks, certain cooperative societies and notified post office deposits from forty thousand to fifty thousand and raising the baseline for other payers from five thousand to ten thousand; senior citizen thresholds for the specified payer categories are increased to one hundred thousand and to ten thousand for other payers. The revised thresholds take effect from the first day of the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Tax deduction on lottery winnings now triggers per single transaction rather than by annual aggregation.
The Finance Bill, 2025 amends Section 194B to remove the aggregate-year threshold and instead require tax withholding on each single transaction that exceeds the statutory threshold, changing the trigger for deduction from annual aggregation to per-transaction basis; this amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025 (Clause 54).
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Tax deduction on horse race winnings: threshold now applies per single payout, altering withholding obligation at payment.
Section 194BB requires a bookmaker or licensed person paying horse-race winnings to deduct tax at source at the rates in force at the time of payment. The Finance Bill 2025 removes the aggregate-year threshold and makes the deduction requirement apply where a single transaction exceeds the threshold, shifting the test from annual aggregation to single-transaction application.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Insurance commission TDS threshold raised, reducing mandatory withholding on smaller commission payments from the Bill's effective financial year.
Section 194D requires deduction of income-tax at source on remuneration or reward for soliciting or procuring insurance business paid to a resident where payments in a financial year exceed a prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 raises that threshold, reducing the instances where TDS is required, and makes the amendment effective from the commencement of the specified financial year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on lottery commissions: threshold raised, reducing instances of deduction at source; new rule effective next fiscal year.
Amendment to Section 194G raises the monetary threshold that triggers a two percent TDS obligation on commission, remuneration or prize payments to persons engaged in stocking, distributing, purchasing or selling lottery tickets, thereby reducing instances where tax must be deducted at source. The two percent deduction rate remains unchanged, and the amendment takes effect from the commencement of the next fiscal year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on commission: threshold for deduction raised, narrowing scope of withholding for small payees next fiscal year
Persons other than individuals and HUFs paying commission or brokerage to resident payees must deduct tax at source at a two percent rate where annual payments exceed the prescribed threshold; the Finance Bill proposes to raise that threshold, reducing the number of payments subject to deduction while excluding insurance commission treated under a separate provision, effective from the commencement of the relevant fiscal year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on rent threshold lowered, expanding deduction requirement to monthly rent payments effective next fiscal year.
The amendment expands the requirement to deduct tax at source on rent by replacing the prior annual exemption with a monthly (or part-month) threshold for payers other than individuals and HUFs; rent exceeding the specified monthly amount will attract withholding, and the change is effective from the start of the next fiscal year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on professional and technical fees: higher thresholds reduce mandatory withholding obligations from the next financial year.
The Finance Bill increases the threshold for tax deduction at source on payments characterised as fees for professional services, fees for technical services, royalty and other specified sums made by persons other than individuals or HUFs; deductions are required only when aggregate payments in a financial year exceed the revised thresholds, with the amendment effective from the start of the specified financial year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on mutual fund unit income: threshold for mandatory deduction increased, narrowing instances where withholding is required.
Persons paying income in respect of mutual fund units, administrators of specified undertakings, or specified companies must deduct tax at source at the prescribed rate only when the payee's income from such units exceeds the revised threshold; the amendment narrows the circumstances requiring deduction and applies prospectively from the effective date specified in the Finance Bill.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on compensation for compulsory acquisition: deduction threshold raised while the deduction rate is retained, effective next fiscal April.
Section 194LA requires tax deduction at source on compensation or enhanced compensation and consideration for compulsory acquisition of immovable property (other than agricultural land) where amounts in a financial year exceed the prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 proposes to raise that threshold while retaining the existing deduction rate and mechanism; the amendment is to take effect from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Definition of forest produce clarified to align with State Acts or Indian Forest Act, narrowing TCS scope to leased produce.
The Finance Bill aligns the definition of forest produce with any State Act or the Indian Forest Act, 1927, to clarify TCS coverage; it confines TCS on "other forest produce" (excluding timber and tendu leaves) to items obtained under a forest lease, and sets TCS at two per cent for timber or other forest produce under lease and two per cent for timber obtained otherwise, effective from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Tax Collection at Source exemption removes duplicate TCS/TDS obligation, streamlining seller and buyer compliance from April 1, 2025.
The Finance Bill proposes omission of the sub section imposing Tax Collection at Source by sellers on sale of specified goods where the buyer is liable to deduct Tax Deduction at Source, to prevent overlapping TCS/TDS obligations and ease compliance; the amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Block assessment scope expanded to include virtual digital assets; computation, revival and timeline rules updated.
Amendments bring virtual digital asset within the definition of undisclosed income for Chapter XIV-B; add "recomputation", "reference" and "order" to the list of proceedings that may revive if a Chapter XIV-B proceeding is annulled; replace "pending" with assessments "required to be made" for subsequent searches; amend computation rules to recognise undisclosed income declared in return and include returns filed before search or requisition for credit; exclude income from international or specified domestic transactions from block period income; and change the block assessment time limit to twelve months from the end of the quarter of the last authorisation.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Non-applicability of penalty under section 271AAB clarified for searches under section 132 after block assessment introduction.
The amendment provides that section 271AAB shall not apply to an assessee in whose case a search under section 132 was initiated on or after 1 September 2024, aligning the penalty provision with the block assessment regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2024 and removing any ambiguity about applicability; the amendment takes effect from 1 September 2024.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Interpreting Section 153A: ITAT Delhi's Stand on Incriminating Material in Assessments: Assessments following search and seizure operation.

21 January, 2024

Contents
Acts
Plus +
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

Reported as:

2024 (1) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI

I. Introduction

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi, in a recent judgment, dealt with a pivotal issue pertaining to the legitimacy of assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), in cases where the assessment is claimed to be based on incriminating material unrelated to the assessee. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the legal principles and the ITAT's decision in this matter.

II. Background and Facts

The case involved a series of appeals arising from orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in assessments conducted under Section 153A of the Act. These assessments followed a search and seizure operation under Section 132 against certain individuals and groups, including the assessee(s) in question. The core dispute revolved around the validity of additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the absence of incriminating material specifically pertaining to the assessee(s).

III. Legal Framework

  1. Section 153A of the Income Tax Act: This provision is crucial in the context of search and seizure operations. It allows for the assessment or reassessment of the total income of the assessee for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the search is conducted.

  2. Jurisdiction under Section 153A: The pivotal legal question is the extent of the AO's jurisdiction under Section 153A, particularly concerning assessments that are not based on any incriminating material unearthed during the search operation.

IV. Assessee’s Contentions

  1. Absence of Incriminating Material: The primary contention was the lack of any incriminating material specifically pertaining to the assessee(s) that could justify the additions and disallowances under Section 153A.

  2. Reference to Third-Party Statements: The assessee(s) argued that the assessment was based on statements from third parties obtained during separate search operations, which should not be considered incriminating material against the assessee(s).

  3. Legal Precedents: The assessee(s) relied on various judicial precedents to support their contention that assessments under Section 153A should be based on incriminating material pertaining to the assessee(s) themselves.

V. Revenue’s Argument

The Revenue supported the AO's actions, emphasizing that once proceedings under Section 153A are initiated, the AO has broad powers to assess or reassess the total income, including reliance on evidence gathered from parallel search operations.

VI. ITAT’s Decision

  1. Invalidity of Assessments Based on Third-Party Statements: The ITAT held that the statement of a third party obtained in separate search proceedings cannot be considered incriminating material against the assessee(s). The Tribunal noted the absence of any specific incriminating material related to the assessee(s) that could justify the additions and disallowances.

  2. Precedents and Legal Principles: The ITAT relied on several judicial precedents, including the principles laid down by the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court, which emphasize the need for incriminating material specifically pertaining to the assessee for valid assessments under Section 153A.

  3. Quashing of Additions and Disallowances: The Tribunal concluded that in the absence of incriminating material related to the assessee(s), the additions and disallowances made by the AO under Section 153A were unjustified and thus quashed them.

VII. Implications and Concluding Remarks

This judgment underscores the principle that assessments under Section 153A must be based on incriminating material specifically related to the assessee(s). It limits the AO's authority to make additions and disallowances based on evidence unrelated to the assessee(s). This decision is significant in safeguarding taxpayers' rights and ensuring that assessments under Section 153A are conducted in line with legal precedents and principles.

 


Full Text:

2024 (1) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI

Topics

Acts Income Tax