Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Act Rules Bills
    Legal Implications of Faceless Schemes in Income Tax : Clause 260 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. S...
    Act Rules Bills
    Continuity and Change in the Powers of Tax Authorities to Make Enquiries : Clause 256 of the Income ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Inspection Powers of Tax Authorities over Company Registers : Clause 255 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 an...
    Act Rules Bills
    The Transformation of Information-Gathering Powers : Clause 259 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Act Rules Bills
    Statutory Powers to Collect Information in Tax Administration : Clause 254 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Act Rules Bills
    Transformation of Income-tax Survey Provisions in India : Clause 253 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Act Rules Bills
    Powers to Call for Information under the Income Tax Law : Clause 252 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Act Rules Bills
    Balancing Revenue Recovery and Taxpayer Rights : Clause 250 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section...
    Act Rules Bills
    Balancing Tax Enforcement and Procedural Fairness in the Search and Seizure : Clause 249 of the Inco...
    Act Rules Bills
    Evolution and Implications of Requisition Powers in Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 248 of the Income...
    Act Rules Bills
    Procedural Safeguards and Retention of Seized Materials during search and seizure operations : Claus...
    Act Rules Bills
    Non-Disclosure of Reasons in Income Tax Search and Seizure : Clause 249 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025...
    Act Rules Bills
    Evolution of Tax Enforcement : Clause 247 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 132, Income-tax Act, ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Quasi-Judicial Powers of Income-tax Authorities : Clause 246 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Act Rules Bills
    Transformation of Tax Jurisdiction : Clause 245 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 130 of the...
    Act Rules Bills
    Legal Safeguards and Procedural Continuity under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 244 of Income Tax Bi...
    Act Rules Bills
    Modernizing the Statutory Framework for Jurisdictional Transfers and Natural Justice : Clause 243 of...
    Act Rules Bills
    Legal and Administrative Framework Determining the Jurisdiction of Assessing Officers : Clause 242 o...
    Act Rules Bills
    Jurisdictional Architecture under the income tax : Clause 241 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Secti...
    Act Rules Bills
    Statutory Foundations of the Taxpayer's Charter : Clause 240 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Faceless collection of information: executive empowered to implement digital, non interface tax information schemes with parliamentary oversight.
Clause 260 empowers the Central Government, by notification, to create a faceless collection of information scheme for calling for and collecting tax information, inspecting company registers, and exercising assessing powers, enabling elimination of physical interfaces, centralised resource optimisation, team based dynamic jurisdiction, and exceptions or modifications to other statutory provisions to implement the scheme, with the requirement that notifications be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Powers of competent authority: generic clause grants Assessing Officer equivalent enquiry powers, raising definition and safeguard concerns.
Clause 256 gives a competent authority the power to make any enquiry under the Act with all the powers of an Assessing Officer, mirroring Section 135 of the 1961 Act but replacing an enumerative list of officials with a generic term whose scope depends on definitions and notifications; the clause defers procedural safeguards to the general framework of the Act, making clear definition and transparent designation critical to avoid arbitrariness and jurisdictional overlap.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Inspection of company registers enables tax units to verify ownership and financial interests under faceless assessment reforms.
Inspection of company registers authorises specified income-tax authorities to inspect and copy registers of members, debenture holders and mortgagees to verify ownership and transactions; such inspections require specific written authorisation and Clause 255 expands exercisable authority to unit-based entities like assessment and verification units, enabling centralized and faceless access while raising questions on necessity thresholds, coverage of electronic records, and procedural safeguards.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Power to call for information: targeted verification notices enable centralized processing while raising data privacy and procedural safeguard concerns.
Clause 259 empowers a prescribed income tax authority to issue notices to any person to furnish information useful for or relevant to verifying information already in the authority's possession, requiring specification of form, manner and time. Sub clause (2) permits processing and utilisation of received information under a scheme to be notified under section 260, indicating standardized, centralized data handling while leaving procedural safeguards, definition of "proceeding," and privacy protections to the forthcoming scheme.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Power to collect information: authorised tax officers may require prescribed business records during business hours with non-removal safeguards.
Clause 254 empowers designated income-tax officers to enter premises where a business or profession is carried on during business hours and require proprietors, employees or other persons to furnish prescribed information, while expressly prohibiting removal of books, documents, cash, stock or valuable articles. The power is linked to subordinate rules that prescribe the form and content of information, limits activity to collection (not search or seizure), and includes specified ranks and authorised inspectors subject to delegation and procedural safeguards.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Survey powers modernisation expands access to digital records while preserving timing limits and prior approval safeguards.
Clause 253 expands survey powers to include computer systems, electronic media and virtual digital space, permits entry to any place where business is carried on or where records are kept, and obliges persons present to provide access and technical assistance. It limits entry hours, restricts removal of assets, authorises marking, extracts, oath-recorded statements, time limited impounding with recorded reasons and inventories, mandates prior senior approval for surveys and allows enforcement measures for non-cooperation.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Power to call for information enables tax authorities to require verified data from wide categories to support tax enquiries.
Clause 252 confers an expansive authority on specified income-tax officers to require verified information, accounts, and returns from a wide range of persons and intermediaries - including banks, firms, HUFs, trustees, assessees in relation to specified payments, and dealers/brokers/exchanges - to support enquiries, assessments, investigations and international information-exchange, while prescribing approval safeguards where no proceedings are pending and authorising prescribed forms and verification.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Application of seized assets: statute permits AO to appropriate assets for tax recovery while preserving release safeguards.
Clause 250 authorises the Assessing Officer to apply assets seized or requisitioned towards tax, penalty and interest liabilities (excluding advance tax), covering liabilities under the new Act, the Income tax Act and the Black Money Act. It preserves application of money first, permits appropriation and sale of non monetary assets as prescribed, and allows other recovery modes. Assets may be released on application within thirty days subject to AO satisfaction and senior officer approval and must be released within 120 days; excess assets must be returned and interest is payable on prolonged retention under a specified formula.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Non-disclosure of reason to believe or suspect limits appellate access while preserving investigative secrecy in tax searches.
Clause 249 bars disclosure of the reason to believe or reason to suspect recorded by income-tax authorities under sections 247 and 248 to any person, authority, or the Appellate Tribunal, thereby insulating the subjective satisfaction that authorises search, seizure, or requisition from appellate scrutiny while leaving constitutional courts able to review reasons in appropriate proceedings.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Requisition powers enable tax authorities to obtain material held by other agencies for tax proceedings.
Clause 248 authorises a senior approving authority, on forming a reason to believe that summoned books, documents, electronic records or assets are in another authority's custody or will not be produced, to empower specified officers to requisition such material; on delivery the material is treated as if seized, invoking seizure related procedural safeguards while allowing the original authority to retain material until it is no longer necessary for its own proceedings.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Retention limits on seized materials ensure time-bound return and supervised copying rights under the proposed income tax clause.
Clause 251 governs copying, extraction, retention and release of seized books, documents and electronic records, requiring transfer to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer where necessary, preserving a supervised right to make copies or extracts on application, and imposing a default retention period with extensions only on recorded reasons and higher approval; an absolute cap prohibits retention beyond thirty days after completion of all proceedings, and affected persons may object to continued retention before the Board which must hear them.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Non-disclosure of reasons protects search and seizure confidentiality while limiting appellate access and focusing review on procedural defects.
Clause 249 creates an absolute statutory bar on disclosure of the "reason to believe" or "reason to suspect" recorded for authorising searches and seizures, preventing disclosure to any person, authority, or the Appellate Tribunal. It preserves the requirement to record reasons and follow procedures but confines challenges to procedural defects, manifest arbitrariness, or jurisdictional absence; constitutional courts may still examine reasons in camera in exceptional cases of mala fides or lack of jurisdiction.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Search and seizure powers modernized to encompass electronic records, provisional attachment, and expanded evidentiary presumptions.
Clause 247 modernises search and seizure for income tax enforcement by explicitly covering electronic records and undisclosed foreign assets, authorising entry, search, extraction, seizure or prohibitory orders, requisitioning technical assistance, and provisional attachment subject to prior approval and recorded reasons, while retaining the reason to believe standard and rebuttable statutory presumptions regarding ownership and authenticity of seized material.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Quasi judicial powers enable tax authorities to compel discovery, attendance, and document production with procedural safeguards.
Clause 246 vests specified income tax authorities with civil court-equivalent powers for discovery, inspection, compulsory attendance, production of books and documents, examination on oath, and issuance of commissions; permits exercise of those powers in the absence of pending proceedings where there is a reason to suspect or by Board notification; authorises impounding of produced documents subject to recorded reasons, a limited retention period excluding holidays, and sanctioned extensions.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Faceless jurisdiction transforms tax administration by institutionalizing remote assessment and team-based dynamic jurisdiction.
Clause 245 creates a statutory Scheme for faceless jurisdiction, authorising the Central Government to operate specified income-tax powers and functions remotely, including vesting jurisdiction in assessing officers, transferring cases, and ensuring continuity on change of incumbency; it permits notifications to modify Act provisions to implement the Scheme and requires such notifications to be laid before Parliament, balancing administrative flexibility with concerns about the scope of delegated legislation and safeguards for procedural fairness.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Change of incumbent of an office: successor may continue proceedings but assessee can demand reopening or rehearing.
Clause 244 provides that when an income-tax authority ceases to exercise jurisdiction and is succeeded by another, the successor may continue the proceeding from the stage left by the predecessor, and before such continuation the assessee may demand that the previous proceeding or any part thereof be reopened or that the assessee be reheard before any assessment order is passed.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Power to transfer cases: modernised transfer framework preserves opportunity to be heard while enabling cross jurisdictional transfers.
Clause 243 empowers designated senior income tax authorities to transfer any "case"-defined to include pending, completed and future proceedings-among Assessing Officers within or across jurisdictions; transfers between different authorities require agreement or, failing that, Board intervention. The clause mandates, where practicable, a reasonable opportunity of being heard and recording of reasons, exempts intra city/locality transfers from prior hearing, permits transfers at any stage without re issuing notices, and consolidates authority designations under the term "specified income tax authority."
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Assessing Officer jurisdiction clarified: territorial nexus, strict time bars and internal administrative resolution govern assessment authority.
The clause anchors AO jurisdiction to the taxpayer's principal place of business, profession, or residence and empowers a specified income-tax authority to determine jurisdictional questions, with escalation to the Board where multiple authorities are involved. It mandates strict time limits for raising jurisdictional objections linked to notice service or assessment stages, requires AO referral of unresolved objections before completing assessment, and preserves AO powers over income arising within their area despite jurisdictional disputes.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Centralized jurisdiction and delegation: Board directions reallocate tax authorities' powers, shaping jurisdictional clarity and administrative flexibility.
Clause 241 vests income-tax authorities with powers exercisable in accordance with directions issued by the Board, permits higher authorities to exercise functions of lower authorities, authorizes delegated written orders for subordinates, and sets jurisdictional criteria including territorial area, persons, classes of income and cases. It enables the Board to issue general or special orders empowering specified senior officers to perform others' functions, contains deeming provisions treating references to the Assessing Officer as references to substituted officers and removes certain approval requirements, and expands notification powers to prescribe the manner of returns and designate responsible authorities.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Taxpayer's Charter mandated: statutory duty to adopt a charter, but enforceability and remedies remain undefined.
Clause 240 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 119A of the Income-tax Act require the Central Board of Direct Taxes to adopt and declare a Taxpayer's Charter and empower the Board to issue orders, instructions, directions or guidelines for its administration. Both provisions mandate adoption while leaving substantive content, enforceability, remedies, review, and stakeholder consultation to the Board's discretion, creating interpretive issues concerning legal status, variability of protections, and mechanisms for accountability.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Interpreting Section 153A: ITAT Delhi's Stand on Incriminating Material in Assessments: Assessments following search and seizure operation.

21 January, 2024

Contents
Acts
Plus +
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

Reported as:

2024 (1) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI

I. Introduction

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi, in a recent judgment, dealt with a pivotal issue pertaining to the legitimacy of assessments under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), in cases where the assessment is claimed to be based on incriminating material unrelated to the assessee. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the legal principles and the ITAT's decision in this matter.

II. Background and Facts

The case involved a series of appeals arising from orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in assessments conducted under Section 153A of the Act. These assessments followed a search and seizure operation under Section 132 against certain individuals and groups, including the assessee(s) in question. The core dispute revolved around the validity of additions and disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the absence of incriminating material specifically pertaining to the assessee(s).

III. Legal Framework

  1. Section 153A of the Income Tax Act: This provision is crucial in the context of search and seizure operations. It allows for the assessment or reassessment of the total income of the assessee for six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the search is conducted.

  2. Jurisdiction under Section 153A: The pivotal legal question is the extent of the AO's jurisdiction under Section 153A, particularly concerning assessments that are not based on any incriminating material unearthed during the search operation.

IV. Assessee’s Contentions

  1. Absence of Incriminating Material: The primary contention was the lack of any incriminating material specifically pertaining to the assessee(s) that could justify the additions and disallowances under Section 153A.

  2. Reference to Third-Party Statements: The assessee(s) argued that the assessment was based on statements from third parties obtained during separate search operations, which should not be considered incriminating material against the assessee(s).

  3. Legal Precedents: The assessee(s) relied on various judicial precedents to support their contention that assessments under Section 153A should be based on incriminating material pertaining to the assessee(s) themselves.

V. Revenue’s Argument

The Revenue supported the AO's actions, emphasizing that once proceedings under Section 153A are initiated, the AO has broad powers to assess or reassess the total income, including reliance on evidence gathered from parallel search operations.

VI. ITAT’s Decision

  1. Invalidity of Assessments Based on Third-Party Statements: The ITAT held that the statement of a third party obtained in separate search proceedings cannot be considered incriminating material against the assessee(s). The Tribunal noted the absence of any specific incriminating material related to the assessee(s) that could justify the additions and disallowances.

  2. Precedents and Legal Principles: The ITAT relied on several judicial precedents, including the principles laid down by the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court, which emphasize the need for incriminating material specifically pertaining to the assessee for valid assessments under Section 153A.

  3. Quashing of Additions and Disallowances: The Tribunal concluded that in the absence of incriminating material related to the assessee(s), the additions and disallowances made by the AO under Section 153A were unjustified and thus quashed them.

VII. Implications and Concluding Remarks

This judgment underscores the principle that assessments under Section 153A must be based on incriminating material specifically related to the assessee(s). It limits the AO's authority to make additions and disallowances based on evidence unrelated to the assessee(s). This decision is significant in safeguarding taxpayers' rights and ensuring that assessments under Section 153A are conducted in line with legal precedents and principles.

 


Full Text:

2024 (1) TMI 750 - ITAT DELHI

Topics

Acts Income Tax