Binding effect of government circulars: administrative clarifications do not bind courts or quasi judicial authorities and cannot create estoppel. Government circulars and clarifications represent administrative understanding of statutory provisions and do not bind courts or quasi judicial authorities; they cannot create an estoppel against the statute and do not prevent recovery of tax lawfully leviable despite prior communications to taxpayers.
Service elements in works contracts taxable when classifiable under construction or erection services, not limited to a new label. Service elements within a composite works contract that correspond in nature to Commercial or Industrial Construction Service, Construction of Complex Service or Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service are taxable under those service heads; such service elements need not be classified exclusively under the subsequently inserted sub clause, and levy under the existing defined service categories is proper based on the substantive character of the activities.
Resident firm classification for advance ruling expands eligible applicants under service tax advance ruling framework. Notification declares resident firm as a class of persons eligible for advance rulings under section 96A of the Finance Act, 1994 for service tax. It defines "firm" to include partnerships under the Indian Partnership Act, limited liability partnerships (including those without a company partner), sole proprietorships, and One Person Companies, and links the term "resident" to the meaning in the Income-tax Act as applicable to a resident firm.
Service tax payment under wrong head still discharges liability; misclassification does not negate tax payment responsibility. Payment of service tax under an incorrect service classification does not, by itself, prevent the tax liability from being regarded as discharged; the ... Summary
Service tax payment under wrong head still discharges liability; misclassification does not negate tax payment responsibility.
Payment of service tax under an incorrect service classification does not, by itself, prevent the tax liability from being regarded as discharged; the essential consideration is that tax was remitted on behalf of the taxable activity, so recording the remittance under a different accounting head ordinarily cannot be used to deny satisfaction of the service tax demand.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 123 
