Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Act RulesBills
    Tax Recovery from Directors of Private Companies : Clause 323 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Secti...
    Act RulesBills
    Personal Liability and Tax Compliance in Liquidation of companies : Clause 322 of Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Act RulesBills
    Assessment and Enforcement against Dissolved Associations : Clause 321 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Act RulesBills
    Accelerated Assessment upon Business Discontinuance ; Clause 320 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Act RulesBills
    Preventing Tax Avoidance by Asset Transfer : Clause 319 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 175...
    Act RulesBills
    Taxation of AOPs, BOIs, and AJPs Formed for Specific Purposes : Clause 318 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Act RulesBills
    Assessment of Individuals Leaving India : Clause 317 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 174 of...
    Act RulesBills
    Enforcement of Tax Recovery from Non-Residents : Clause 422 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section...
    Act RulesBills
    Presumptive Taxation of Foreign Shipping Companies : Clause 316 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Act RulesBills
    Taxation of Hindu Undivided Families after Partition : Clause 315 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Act RulesBills
    Aligning Tax Assessments with Business Reorganisation and Modified Returns : Clause 314 of the Incom...
    Act RulesBills
    Continuity of Tax Obligations in Business Succession : Clause 313 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Secti...
    Act RulesBills
    Rights and Obligations of executors of Deceased Estates regarding the recovery of taxes : Clause 312...
    Act RulesBills
    Taxation of income arising from the estate of a deceased individual : Clause 312 of Income Tax Bill,...
    Act RulesBills
    Joint and Several Liability of LLP Partners in Liquidation: Clause 331 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. ...
    Act RulesBills
    Legal and Practical Implications of Taxing AOPs/BOIs with Unknown Shares under Indian Income Tax Law...
    Act RulesBills
    Understanding the Assessment and Taxation of Partnership Firms - Clause 324 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Act RulesBills
    Remedies Against Property of Representative Assessees : Clause 304(5) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Act RulesBills
    Direct assessment or recovery from Representative assessees : Clause 304(3) of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Act RulesBills
    Proportional Taxation of Trust Beneficiaries : Clause 304(4) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Tax Recovery from Directors of Private Companies : Clause 323 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Secti...
    Show AI Summary
    Director liability for unpaid company taxes: joint and several personal exposure subject to defence of absence of gross neglect.
    Clause 323 imposes joint and several personal liability on every person who was a director at any time during the relevant tax year where tax due from a private company cannot be recovered, with "tax due" including penalty, interest, fees and other sums; the director may avoid liability only by proving that non recovery was not attributable to gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty, and the provision overrides contrary company law provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Personal Liability and Tax Compliance in Liquidation of companies : Clause 322 of Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Show AI Summary
    Liquidator personal liability: enforced civil responsibility to secure tax dues during liquidation while aligning with insolvency priorities.
    Clause 322 requires any liquidator or receiver to notify the assessing officer within thirty days of appointment and, after the assessing officer notifies an amount sufficient to cover tax liabilities (within three months), to set aside that sum and refrain from disposing of assets without leave; exceptions permit payment of tax, secured creditors with legal priority, and reasonable winding up expenses. Non compliance attracts personal civil liability for the liquidator, capped at the notified amount where applicable, and obligations are joint and several, with Clause 322 subject to the primacy of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
    Act RulesBills
    Assessment and Enforcement against Dissolved Associations : Clause 321 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Show AI Summary
    Assessment continuity: Dissolution of an AOP does not prevent assessment, penalty imposition, or recovery from members.
    Clause 321 permits assessment of an association of persons as if no discontinuance or dissolution had taken place, applying all statutory provisions including penalties and other sums. It empowers original and appellate officers to impose penalties specified in the penalty chapter, imposes joint and several liability on members and their legal representatives, and allows continuation of proceedings already commenced against such persons from the stage they stood at dissolution. A saving clause preserves interaction with specified cross referenced provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Accelerated Assessment upon Business Discontinuance ; Clause 320 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Show AI Summary
    Accelerated assessment on business discontinuance enables taxation up to cessation with mandatory notice and taxation of post-cessation receipts.
    Clause 320 permits discretionary accelerated assessment of income up to the date of business discontinuance, mandates separate assessments for each completed tax year or part thereof, requires mandatory notification of discontinuance within fifteen days, empowers notice and information-gathering powers on persons, partners or officers, and deems post-discontinuance receipts to be taxable as income of the recipient while clarifying that tax charged under the clause is additional to any other tax liability.
    Act RulesBills
    Preventing Tax Avoidance by Asset Transfer : Clause 319 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 175...
    Show AI Summary
    Preventive assessment of likely asset transfers: current year taxation triggered by AO belief of tax avoidance intent.
    Clause 319 empowers the Assessing Officer to tax the total income of persons believed likely to dispose of assets to avoid tax, charging income in the current tax year from its first day until proceedings commence; it requires formation of an AO opinion based on credible material, applies procedural provisions analogous to those for persons leaving the jurisdiction, and raises interpretive issues including the undefined scope of "assets", the standard for AO satisfaction, the truncated assessment period, and overlap with other anti avoidance rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Taxation of AOPs, BOIs, and AJPs Formed for Specific Purposes : Clause 318 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of short lived entities: income of event specific AOPs/BOIs/AJPs charged in the tax year up to dissolution.
    Clause 318 empowers the Assessing Officer to treat the total income of an AOP, BOI or AJP formed for a particular event or purpose as chargeable to tax for the tax year from its first day up to the date of dissolution where the AO is satisfied the entity is likely to dissolve, and applies the Bill's expedited procedural machinery for assessment, provisional determination and recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Assessment of Individuals Leaving India : Clause 317 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 174 of...
    Show AI Summary
    Assessment of persons leaving India: expedited tax assessment from the tax year start to departure with short notice requirements.
    Clause 317 permits the Assessing Officer to assess an individual's total income from the first day of the current tax year up to the probable date of departure where the AO reasonably believes the individual intends not to return; income is assessed by completed tax years or part-years at rates in force, may be estimated if not readily determinable, and the AO may require an expedited return within a minimum seven-day period, with taxes charged under this provision being additional to other tax liabilities.
    Act RulesBills
    Enforcement of Tax Recovery from Non-Residents : Clause 422 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section...
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery of tax from non residents: source withholding and attachment of any assets within India enable enforcement.
    Clause 422 and Section 173 authorise two primary enforcement mechanisms against non residents: recovery by deduction at source imposed on payers, agents or representative assessees, and recovery by attachment of any assets of the non resident that are, or may at any time come, within India. These powers apply whether tax is assessed in the non resident's name or in the name of a representative assessee and operate without prejudice to other assessment and recovery provisions, creating a continuing domestic enforcement right subject to definitional, procedural and treaty interaction issues.
    Act RulesBills
    Presumptive Taxation of Foreign Shipping Companies : Clause 316 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Show AI Summary
    Presumptive taxation of foreign shipping secures Indian tax on carriage income via deemed income and port clearance linkage.
    Clause 316 introduces a presumptive regime deeming a fixed proportion of amounts paid or payable for carriage from Indian ports as income of non resident ship owners or charterers, includes demurrage and similar charges, requires the ship's master to file a pre departure return with the Assessing Officer (with limited deferred filing), empowers assessment within nine months, ties tax payment or satisfactory arrangements to port clearance, and preserves an option for regular assessment with payments treated as advance tax.
    Act RulesBills
    Taxation of Hindu Undivided Families after Partition : Clause 315 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Show AI Summary
    HUF partition rules preserve deemed continuity and joint liability, limiting recognition of partial partitions and strengthening tax recovery.
    Clause 315 deems an assessed HUF to remain undivided for tax purposes until a formal finding of partition is recorded; mandates AO inquiry with notice to all members when a partition is claimed; assesses HUF income up to the partition date as if no partition occurred; imposes joint and several liability on former members for tax, penalties, interest and other sums; allows recovery from pre-partition members; computes several liability in proportion to property allotted; and disallows recognition of partial partitions for tax purposes within the specified post-cut-off period.
    Act RulesBills
    Aligning Tax Assessments with Business Reorganisation and Modified Returns : Clause 314 of the Incom...
    Show AI Summary
    Modified return requirement ensures tax assessments follow business reorganisation orders and must be adjusted accordingly.
    Clause 314 mandates that a successor entity furnish a modified return within the prescribed period after a business reorganisation order, limited to changes necessitated by that order, and requires the Assessing Officer to modify completed assessments or complete pending assessments in accordance with the order and the modified return; ordinary Act provisions apply unless expressly overridden, and key terms including business reorganisation and successor are defined with coverage of insolvency-sanctioned reorganisations.
    Act RulesBills
    Continuity of Tax Obligations in Business Succession : Clause 313 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Secti...
    Show AI Summary
    Continuity of tax liability on business succession: successor taxed post succession and may bear predecessor's unrecoverable dues.
    Clause 313 mandates that the predecessor is assessed for income up to the succession date and the successor for income thereafter in the same tax year; pending proceedings against the predecessor are deemed on the successor; if the predecessor cannot be found or dues are irrecoverable, assessment and recovery may be effected on the successor, who may then recover amounts from the predecessor. The clause explicitly includes gains from transfer in "income" and defines "pendency" for insolvency and tribunal contexts, aligning tax continuity with insolvency processes.
    Act RulesBills
    Rights and Obligations of executors of Deceased Estates regarding the recovery of taxes : Clause 312...
    Show AI Summary
    Executor's right of recovery: statutory mechanism to reclaim taxes paid from the estate, subject to procedural adaptations.
    Clause 312(7) makes Section 305 applicable to executors "so far as may be" in respect of tax paid or payable by them, treating executors as representative assessees and thereby enabling statutory recovery of taxes from the estate or beneficiaries while permitting necessary adaptations of procedures and raising questions on priority and apportionment in insolvent or contested estates.
    Act RulesBills
    Taxation of income arising from the estate of a deceased individual : Clause 312 of Income Tax Bill,...
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of deceased estates: executor liable for estate income until complete distribution, with legatee inclusion on distributed income.
    Clause 312 taxes income of a deceased person's estate in the hands of the executor or administrator, with a single executor assessed as an individual and multiple executors as an association of persons; the executor is deemed to have the deceased's residential status for the tax year of death, assessments of estate income are separate from the executor's personal returns, separate assessments apply for each tax year or part thereof until complete distribution, and income distributed to specific legatees is excluded from the estate's income and included in the legatees' income.
    Act RulesBills
    Joint and Several Liability of LLP Partners in Liquidation: Clause 331 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. ...
    Show AI Summary
    Joint and several liability of LLP partners applies where tax dues cannot be recovered from the LLP, subject to exculpation.
    Clause 331 makes every person who was a partner of an LLP during the relevant tax year jointly and severally liable for any tax, penalty, interest, fees or other sums payable under the Income tax law that cannot be recovered from the LLP or relevant persons, expressly overriding LLP Act protections. Liability is triggered only after non recovery from the LLP and is rebuttable: a partner can escape liability by proving that the non recovery was not due to his gross neglect, misfeasance, or breach of duty.
    Act RulesBills
    Legal and Practical Implications of Taxing AOPs/BOIs with Unknown Shares under Indian Income Tax Law...
    Show AI Summary
    Taxation of AOPs/BOIs with unknown member shares: maximum marginal rate applied to deter tax avoidance.
    Clause 311 mandates taxation of an AOP/BOI's total income at the maximum marginal rate where members' shares are indeterminate or unknown, and requires taxation at any higher rate applicable to any member; when shares are determinate, it taxes the whole income at the maximum marginal rate if a member's other income exceeds the exemption threshold, while portions attributable to members chargeable at higher rates are taxed at those higher rates, with a deeming provision treating shares as indeterminate if so at formation or thereafter.
    Act RulesBills
    Understanding the Assessment and Taxation of Partnership Firms - Clause 324 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Show AI Summary
    Firm taxation: firms taxed on total income at rates set annually in the Finance Act.
    Clause 324 charges a firm which is assessable as a firm with tax on its total income at the rate specified in the Finance Act for the relevant year, applying only to entities that qualify as firms and requiring alignment with definitional, computation and allocation provisions elsewhere in the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Remedies Against Property of Representative Assessees : Clause 304(5) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Show AI Summary
    Representative assessee liability: authorities may use the same remedies against property under a representative's control to recover tax dues.
    Clause 304(5) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, mirrors Section 167 by empowering the Assessing Officer to exercise the same remedies in the same manner against all property vested in, or under the control or management of, a representative assessee as would be available against a person directly liable for tax, covering all kinds of property and applying regardless of whether the tax demand is raised against the representative or the beneficiary.
    Act RulesBills
    Direct assessment or recovery from Representative assessees : Clause 304(3) of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Show AI Summary
    Direct assessment empowers tax authorities to bypass representative assessees and pursue beneficiaries directly, preserving recovery powers.
    Clause 304(3) (Income Tax Bill, 2025) and Section 166 (Income tax Act, 1961) are non obstante provisions empowering the AO to directly assess and recover tax from the person entitled to income, irrespective of the existence of a representative assessee; these powers are discretionary, cover both assessment and recovery, preserve procedural safeguards for the beneficiary, and operate as alternative (not cumulative) mechanisms to prevent revenue loss due to procedural technicalities or representative non cooperation.
    Act RulesBills
    Proportional Taxation of Trust Beneficiaries : Clause 304(4) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Show AI Summary
    Proportional apportionment clarifies how beneficiaries' trust distributions are computed for tax using a statutory formula.
    Clause 304(4) prescribes that where only part of a trust's income is chargeable, the taxable portion of a beneficiary's receipts is determined by multiplying the beneficiary's receipt by the ratio of the trust's chargeable part to its whole income (A x C / B), thereby codifying proportional apportionment and imposing related recordkeeping and reporting obligations on trustees and representative assessees.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Benami Property › Case-Laws › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Benami Property

      Application of provisions of section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 - non-retrospective application of punitive legal provisions.

      13 January, 2024

      Contents
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      2023 (12) TMI 620 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

      The case of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Benami Prohibition) and Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Benami Prohibition) versus M/s. Advance Infra Developers Pvt Ltd represented by its Director Ravi Rajagopal involves a complex dispute related to alleged benami transactions and property.

      Key Issues

      1. Alleged Benami Transactions: The case revolves around alleged benami transactions within the Marg Group of Companies. The Income Tax Department conducted a search revealing intricate transactions involving numerous shell companies.

      2. Property Acquisition and Transactions: The case particularly focused on the acquisition of 17.702 acres of land at Muttam Village, Nagore Vattam, by M/s. Advance Infra Developers Pvt Ltd, which was allegedly funded through a network of shell companies connected to Marg Limited.

      3. Legal Proceedings and Appeals: The proceedings have seen a series of legal developments, including writ petitions, appeals, and orders by various courts, including the Madras High Court and the Supreme Court.

      Court's Observation and Decision

      1. Review of Appellate Tribunal's Order: The Madras High Court reviewed the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988, which had concluded that the proceedings against the respondent were not legally sustainable.

      2. Prospective Application of the Amended Act: The court noted that the Appellate Tribunal, in its decision, relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India vs. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt Ltd.[2022 (8) TMI 1047 - SUPREME COURT] , which held that the provisions under Section 5 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016, being punitive in nature, could only be applied prospectively and not retrospectively. This meant that transactions prior to the coming into force of the Amendment Act in 2016 could not be prosecuted under the new provisions.

      3. Constitutionality and Legal Interpretation: The court observed the declarations made by the Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of certain sections of the unamended 1988 Act and the 2016 Amendment Act. The Supreme Court had declared Section 3(2) of the unamended 1988 Act as unconstitutional for being manifestly arbitrary, and the same section in the 2016 Act was also declared unconstitutional.

      4. Relevance of Supreme Court's Decision: The High Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the Supreme Court's ruling, stating that the High Courts must decide matters based on the law as it stands, without awaiting the outcome of a reference or a review petition unless specifically directed by the Supreme Court.

      5. Disposition of Appeals: The court disposed of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the appellants, with the observation that it would always be open for the appellants to proceed further based on the outcome of the Review Petition pending before the Supreme Court.

      Implications

      1. Legal Precedent on Retrospectivity: This judgment reinforces the legal principle that punitive laws, especially those involving property and financial transactions, cannot be applied retrospectively unless explicitly stated.

      2. Clarity in Enforcement of Benami Laws: The decision provides clarity on the enforcement of benami laws, particularly in the context of transactions that occurred before the implementation of the 2016 Amendment Act.

      3. Guidance for Future Cases: The judgment serves as a guideline for handling similar cases, stressing the need for alignment with the highest court's interpretations and rulings.

      4. Implications for Tax and Property Laws: The case highlights the complexity of tax and property laws in India, especially concerning benami transactions and the interplay between various amendments and legal interpretations.

      Conclusion

      The 2023 (12) TMI 620 judgment by the Madras High Court provides significant insights into the application and interpretation of laws related to benami transactions in India. It underscores the importance of following the Supreme Court's rulings and the non-retrospective application of punitive legal provisions. The case is a noteworthy example of the dynamic nature of legal interpretations in the context of financial and property-related laws in India.

       

      Full Text:

      2023 (12) TMI 620 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔