Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    PMLA and Predicate Offenses: Deciphering the Scope of Proceeds of Crime under PMLA: A Supreme Court ...
    Resolution Applicant's Eligibility under the IBC: A Balancing Act Between Stringent Rules and MSME P...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Dynamics of Tax Exemption Registrations: A Comprehensive Analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s Decision on ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Transfer Pricing Litigation: The Evolving Landscape of Arm's Length Price Determination in India
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Pre-deposit Compliance in Appeals: Judicial Overreach by CESAT
    Revisiting Shareholder Rights in Securities Law: Deciphering the Bounds of Confidentiality in Corpor...
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Professional Conduct in Auditing: Exploring the Jurisdiction and Compliance in Auditor (Chartered Ac...
    Comprehensive Legal Analysis of Jurisdictional Challenges and SEBI's Regulatory Framework in Securit...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Revisiting the Scope of Revisionary Powers U/s 263: Assessing the Adequacy of Assessment Procedures ...
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel in Governmental Policy Decisions: Tax Incentives and Public Inte...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Maintaining the Sanctity of Search and Seizure Procedures: Emphasizing the rigorous compliance with ...
    The Confluence of Insolvency and Limitation Laws: Insights from a NCLAT Decision
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Analyzing the Tax Implications of Cross-Border Payments: Recognizing the payments as either 'Royalty...
    Case LawsCustoms
    A Judicial Perspective on Duty Assessment and Procedural Fairness in Customs Law: Validity of CBIC C...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Non-Delegability of Discretionary Powers in Income Tax Assessments: Administrative Discretion in Spe...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of Domain Registration Services in Godaddy.Com LLC Case: Tax Implications for Digital Serv...
    Reinforcing Fair Administrative Processes in GST Registration Cancellation: An In-Depth Case Study
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    The Arbitration Conundrum: Enforceability of Unstamped Agreements
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Reassessing Tax Penalties: HDFC Bank's Challenge under the DVAT Act
    Input Tax Credit Eligibility under GST Legislation: Time-Bound Compliance in GST ITC Cases
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsPMLA
    Show AI Summary
    Proceeds of crime: PMLA targets handling of tainted assets even where the person is not named in the predicate offence, scope narrowed for conspiracies.
    Existence of proceeds of crime is a prerequisite for an offence under the PMLA and must be derived from a scheduled offence; the PMLA reaches persons who handle, conceal or possess tainted proceeds even if not named in the predicate offence. Conspiracy under Section 120B becomes a scheduled offence only when the conspiracy aims to commit an offence already listed in the PMLA Schedule, narrowing scheduled-offence scope. Property acquired prior to the scheduled offence cannot be treated as proceeds, whereas disputed acquisitions require trial determination of their linkage to tainted funds.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Resolution applicant eligibility under Section 29A clarified; MSME exemption under Section 240A applies at plan submission stage.
    Whether a resolution applicant is disqualified under Section 29A depends on the ineligibility criteria and the timing of assessment; the operative date for eligibility is the submission of the resolution plan, and Section 240A provides an MSME-targeted exemption from certain disqualifications to protect continuity and livelihoods.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax exemption registration: tribunal ordered reconsideration where delay arose from bona fide reliance on provisional registration and circulars.
    The Tribunal held that rejection of the final registration application under Section 80G for being time barred was improper where the Commissioner did not consider administrative circulars extending filing timelines and the trust's bona fide reliance on provisional registration; the ITAT set aside the order and directed reconsideration with an opportunity to be heard.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Arm's Length Principle enforcement: comparables, functional profiling, and admissibility of additional evidence determine transfer pricing outcomes.
    Dispute concerns determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, focusing on comparable selection, adjustments for functional differences, and functional profiling's effect on ALP reliability. The Tribunal also deals with the admissibility of additional evidence on appeal and scrutiny of changes in benchmarking approaches across assessment years, stressing contemporaneous, consistent documentation and justification for methodological changes while balancing procedural finality and factual completeness.
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Show AI Summary
    Pre-deposit requirement undermined by tribunal restoration without compliance, raising jurisdictional and laches concerns in excise appeals procedure scrutiny.
    The Tribunal's restoration and allowance of excise appeals without a prior pre-deposit requirement raises whether a lower tribunal may waive mandatory pre-deposit obligations and whether such action aligns with supervisory limits imposed by higher court directives and doctrines like functus officio and res judicata.
    Case LawsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Shareholder access to confidential corporate documents affirmed where confidentiality is overstretched, strengthening minority investor protections.
    Minority shareholders are entitled to access corporate documents where confidentiality claims are overstated; confidentiality and privilege cannot be used to withhold information necessary for assessing compliance with securities law. SEBI's settlement framework cannot shield material information from shareholder scrutiny; regulatory processes must balance investigatory integrity with transparency and natural justice. Non compliance with Minimum Public Shareholding norms undermines market integrity and minority rights, and settlements of serious violations require sufficient transparency to protect investor interests.
    Case LawsCorporate Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Retrospective jurisdiction of regulator challenged; effect on auditor liability, standards compliance and sanctions under companies law.
    Allegations of professional misconduct assert auditors failed to comply with statutory audit obligations, disclose material facts, exercise due diligence, obtain necessary information, and identify departures from accepted audit procedures. Appellants challenge the regulator's retrospective jurisdiction, invoke constitutional protection against retrospective penalization, and allege procedural breaches of natural justice; the regulator maintains jurisdiction, contends it afforded hearing opportunities, and asserts substantive non compliance with Standards on Auditing.
    Case LawsSEBI
    Show AI Summary
    Territorial jurisdiction disputes in securities cases shape venue decisions and challenge regulatory settlement revocations and discretion.
    Disputes over venue in securities enforcement pivot on territorial jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens, using cause of action and convenience factors to determine appropriate forum. SEBI's settlement regime under the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulation 2018 and the regulator's power to revoke settlements raise questions about regulatory discretion, enforceability of negotiated resolutions, and implications for corporate governance and market integrity, while High Courts' supervisory role under Article 226 intersects with statutory enforcement mechanisms.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisionary powers under Section 263 limited where assessment thoroughly examined transactions and no specific error is shown.
    Scope of revisionary powers under Section 263 is limited where the original assessment shows a detailed examination and allowance of losses; direction for re-examination without specific findings of error prejudicial to revenue is insufficient. Transactions integral to business and carried out as hedging do not fall within the definition of speculative transactions under Section 43(5).
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Promissory estoppel prevents withdrawal of promised tax incentives for industrial units that invested in reliance on them.
    The dispute concerns whether the State could withdraw tax incentives by reclassifying areas and thereby affect units that invested relying on those incentives. Applying promissory estoppel, the court determined that promises inducing substantive investment could not be retracted to the detriment of the beneficiaries during the promised exemption period, balancing that protection against the State's public interest prerogative and subsequent structural tax reform.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Search and seizure procedural compliance: satisfaction note requirement under section 153C governs validity of assessments.
    Assessments against persons other than the searched individual require a recorded satisfaction by the assessing officer that seized assets or documents belong to that other person; absence of a satisfaction note in the searched person's file invalidates consequential assessments under the search-derived assessment provisions. Determination of the applicable assessment years hinges on whether the assessment period is tied to the date of search, the date satisfaction is recorded, or the date seized material is received, requiring harmonious construction to align enforcement with taxpayer protections.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation in insolvency: admissibility requires established debt and default and bars further merits inquiry at admission.
    Where a claim establishes debt and default and the petition is within limitation, the Tribunal's role at the admission stage is limited to admitting the corporate insolvency resolution process without undertaking an extensive merits inquiry into the underlying debt or default.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Characterisation of cross-border payments as royalty or service fees determines withholding obligations under tax treaty and domestic law.
    Characterisation of cross-border payments under the Income Tax Act and the India-USA DTAA focused on whether payments to a US non-resident constituted royalty or fees for included services under section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12, whether TDS obligations arose, and whether sections 201(1) and 201(1A) could be invoked; the Karnataka High Court and ITAT concluded the payments were not royalty/fees for included services, services were rendered outside India, the payee lacked an Indian permanent establishment, and therefore withholding obligations did not arise.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Procedural fairness in customs law limits administrative conditions on provisional release, ensuring statutory discretion and fair hearing.
    The court evaluated whether the impugned Circular and order unlawfully limited the adjudicating authority's statutory discretion by imposing conditions on provisional release, and whether those measures violated principles of natural justice; it emphasised that executive instructions may supplement but cannot supplant statutory provisions and that administrative actions must preserve statutory discretion and fair hearing requirements.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Non-delegability of discretionary powers: extension of tax audit report time must be granted by assessing officer, not delegate.
    The power to order a special audit and to extend the timeframe for submission of the audit report is vested in the Assessing Officer and must be exercised by that officer alone; administrative convenience cannot justify delegation to the Commissioner. An extension granted by the Commissioner, even if prompted by the AO's recommendation, is inconsistent with the statutory scheme and can render subsequent assessment orders vulnerable to being barred by limitation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterization of domain registration fees requires a transfer of proprietary or use rights; mere registrar facilitation does not qualify.
    Whether fees for domain name registration qualify as royalty depends on whether the registrar transfers a proprietary or right-to-use interest; a registrar acting as intermediary under its accreditation agreement that disclaims ownership and does not convey exclusive or transferable rights does not convert registration fees into royalty.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Natural justice in GST registration: deficient show cause notices require reconsideration and a fresh opportunity to respond.
    Cancellation of GST registration on grounds such as fraud or suppression must comply with natural justice; a show cause notice lacking specific allegations and a decision that does not consider the taxpayer's response constitutes procedural deficiency, necessitating administrative reconsideration with a reasoned notice that permits an adequate reply.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Arbitration agreement enforceability tested against stamp duty compliance, affecting admissibility and tribunal jurisdiction.
    The central issue is whether an arbitration agreement in an unstamped instrument is enforceable, engaging the Arbitration Act, Stamp Act and Contract Act and asking if courts must examine only the existence of an arbitration clause or also its validity when stamp duty non compliance is alleged. The text contrasts lines of authority treating non stamping as either a jurisdictional bar that voids enforceability or a curable defect affecting admissibility, and highlights statutory mechanisms for stamping, impoundment, and remediation while mapping the practical consequences for arbitration access and enforcement.
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty proportionality: penalties require deceptive conduct and mens rea before applying to disputed tax assessments.
    The decision analyzes penalties under the DVAT framework in relation to sales of repossessed vehicles, stressing that taxability remained unsettled and that penalties require conduct that is false, misleading, or deceptive. It highlights that mens rea is central to quasi criminal tax penalties and that proportionality and reasoned discretion are prerequisites to lawful penal levies; absent those elements, penalty imposition lacks statutory support.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit time limits require strict compliance with statutory filing conditions, not relaxation for business constraints.
    The court construes Input Tax Credit as a concession contingent on strict compliance with statutory prerequisites, holding that time-bound procedural conditions operate as substantive preconditions to claiming ITC. The non-obstante clause is given a limited operative scope and does not nullify mandatory temporal conditions; established principles of tax-statute interpretation require literal application of the scheme and adherence to filing timelines despite commercial hardships.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Rationalisation of the provisions of Charitable Trust and Institutions

      1 February, 2023

      Contents
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Union Budget 2023-24 + FINANCE Bill, 2023

      Rationalisation of the provisions of Charitable Trust and Institutions

      1. Background

      1.1 Income of any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in sub-clause (iv) or subclause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act or any trust or institution registered u/s 12AA or 12AB of the Act is exempt subject to the fulfilment of the conditions provided under various sections. The exemption to these trusts or institutions is available under the two regimes-

      (i) Regime for any fund or institution or trust or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in subclause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as trust or institution under first regime); and

      (ii) Regime for the trusts registered under section 12AA/12AB of the Act (hereinafter referred to as trust or institution under the second regime).

      1.2 Section 12A of the Act, inter alia, provides for procedure to make application for the registration of the trust or institution to claim exemption under section 11 and 12 of the Act. Section 12AB of the Act is the new section which comes into effect from the 1st April, 2021.

      2. Depositing back of corpus and repayment of loans or borrowings

      2.1 Under the existing provisions of the Act, corpus donations received by trusts and institutions under both regimes are exempt as follows:

      a) Explanation 1 to the third proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act provides that income of the funds or trust or institution or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution, shall not include income in the form of voluntary contributions made with a specific direction that they shall form part of the corpus subject to the condition that such voluntary contributions are invested or deposited in one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 of the Act maintained specifically for such corpus.

      b) Clause (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Act provides that voluntary contributions made with a specific direction that they shall form part of the corpus of the trust or institution shall not be included in the total income of the trust or institution subject to the condition that such voluntary contributions are invested or deposited in one or more of the forms or modes specified in subsection (5) of section 11 of the Act maintained specifically for such corpus.

      c) Application out of corpus shall not be considered as application for charitable or religious purposes for the purposes of third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act and clauses (a) and (b) of section 11 of the Act. However, when it is invested or deposited back, into one or more of the forms or modes specified in sub-section (5) of section 11 of the Act maintained specifically for such corpus, from the income of the previous year, such amount shall be allowed as application in the previous year in which it is deposited back to corpus to the extent of such deposit or investment.

      d) Application from loans and borrowings shall not be considered as application for charitable or religious purposes for the purposes of third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act and clauses (a) and (b) of section 11 of the Act. However, when loan or borrowing is repaid from the income of the previous year, such repayment shall be allowed as application in the previous year in which it is repaid to the extent of such repayment.

      2.2 While implementing the recent changes vide the Finance Act, 2021 to the provisions related to corpus and loan or borrowing, it has come to the notice that application from corpus or loan or borrowings have already been claimed as application prior to 01.04.2021. Hence, allowing such amount to be application again as investment or reposting back in corpus or repayment of loan or borrowing will amount to double deduction.

      2.3 It was also noted that, a trust may invest or deposit back the amount in to corpus or repay the loan after many years of application from the corpus or loan and claim such repayment of loan or investment/depositing back in to corpus as application for charitable or religious purposes. Availability of indefinite period for the investment or depositing back to the corpus or repayment of loan will make the implementation of the provisions quite difficult.

      2.4 Further, it was noted that conditions that are required to be satisfied in the case of application for charitable or religious purposes must also be satisfied while making the application from the corpus or loan or borrowing. These conditions are as follows:

      (i) Such application should not be in the form of corpus donation to another trust [twelfth proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act for the trust or institution under first regime and Explanation 2 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act for the trust or institution under second regime];

      (ii) TDS, if applicable, should be deducted on such application [thirteenth proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act for the trust or institution under first regime and Explanation 3 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act for the trust or institution under second regime];

      (iii) Application whereby payment or aggregate of payments made to a person in a day exceeds Rs 10,000 in other than specified modes (such as cash) is not allowed (thirteenth proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act for the trust or institution under first regime and Explanation 3 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act for the trust or institution under second regime);

      (iv) Carry forward and set off of excess application is not allowed [Explanation 2 to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act for the trust or institution under first regime and Explanation 5 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act for the trust or institution under second regime];

      (v) Application is allowed in the year in which it is actually paid [Explanation 3 to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act for the trust or institution under first regime and Explanation to section 11 of the Act for the trust or institution under second regime];

      (vi) Application should not directly or indirectly benefit any person referred to in sub-section (1) of section 13 of the Act and the income of the trust or institution should not enure any benefit to such person [twenty-first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act for the trust or institution under first regime and clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the Act for the trust or institution under second regime];

      (vii) Application should be in India except with the approval of the Board in accordance with the provisions of clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act.

      2.5 In order to ensure proper implementation of both the exemption regimes, it is proposed to provide that application out of corpus or loans or borrowings before 01.04.2021 should not be allowed as application for charitable or religious purposes when such amount is deposited back or invested in to corpus or when the loan or borrowing is repaid. It is further proposed to provide that if the trust or institution invests or deposits back the amount in to corpus or repays the loan within 5 years of application from the corpus or loan, then such investment/depositing back in to corpus or repayment of loan will be allowed as application for charitable or religious purposes. It is also proposed to provide that where the application from corpus or loan did not satisfy the conditions as stated in paragraph 2.4, the repayment of loan or investment/depositing back in to corpus of such amount will not be treated as application.

      2.6 In view of the above, the following amendments are proposed:

      (i) insert a second proviso to clause (i) of Explanation 2 to the third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act so as to provide that the provisions of the first proviso shall apply only if there was no violation of the conditions specified in the twelfth, thirteenth and twenty- first proviso to, and Explanation 2 and Explanation 3 of, clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act, at the time the application was made from the corpus;

      (ii) insert third proviso to clause (i) of Explanation 2 to the third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act so as to provide that the amount invested or deposited back shall not be treated as application for charitable or religious purposes under the first proviso unless such investment or deposit is made within a period of five years from the end of the previous year in which such application was made from corpus;

      (iii) insert a fourth proviso to clause (i) of Explanation 2 to the third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act to provide that so as to provide that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply where application from corpus is made on or before the 31st day of March, 2021;

      (iv) insert a second proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 2 to the third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act so as to provide that the provisions of the first proviso shall apply only if there was no violation of the conditions specified in the twelfth, thirteenth and twenty- first proviso to, and Explanation 2 and Explanation 3 of, clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act, at the time the application was made from loan or borrowing;

      (v) insert a third proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 2 to the third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act to provide that the amount repaid shall not be treated as application for charitable or religious purposes under the first proviso, unless such repayment is made within a period of five years from the end of the previous year in which such application was made from loan or borrowing;

      (vi) insert a fourth proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 2 to the third proviso of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act to provide that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply where application, from any loan or borrowing is made on or before the thirty first day of March, 2021;

      (vii) insert a second proviso to clause (i) of Explanation 4 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act so as to provide that the provisions of the first proviso shall apply only if there was no violation of the conditions, specified in clause (c) of, and Explanations 2, 3 and 5 of, sub-section (1) and Explanation to section 11 of the Act and clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the Act, at the time the application was made from the corpus;

      (viii) insert a third proviso to clause (i) of Explanation 4 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act so as to provide that the amount invested or deposited back shall not be treated as application for charitable or religious purposes under the first proviso unless such investment or deposit is made within a period of five years from the end of the previous year in which such application was made from corpus;

      (ix) insert a fourth proviso to clause (i) of Explanation 4 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act so as to provide that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply where application from corpus is made on or before the 31st day of March, 2021;

      (x) insert a second proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 4 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act so as to provide that the provisions of the first proviso shall apply only if there was no violation of the conditions, specified in clause (c) of, and Explanations 2, 3 and 5 of, sub-section (1) and Explanation to section 11 of the Act or clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13 of the Act, at the time the application was made from loan or borrowing;

      (xi) insert a third proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 4 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act so as to provide that the amount repaid shall not be treated as application for charitable or religious purposes under the first proviso unless such repayment is made within a period of five years from the end of the previous year during which such application was made form loan or borrowing;

      (xii) insert a fourth proviso to clause (ii) of Explanation 4 to sub-section (1) of section 11 of the Act so as to provide that nothing contained in the first proviso shall apply where application from any loan or borrowing is made on or before the thirty first day of March, 2021.

      2.7 These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2023 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2023-24 and subsequent assessment years.

      [clauses 5 & 7]

       


      Full Text:

      Union Budget 2023-24 + FINANCE Bill, 2023

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax