Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Comparative Legal Analysis of Aadhaar Intimation Fee Provisions : Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Compliance Fee for Delay in Furnishing Statements and Certificates : Clause 429 of Income Tax Bill, ...
    Fee for Delay in Income Tax Return Filing under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 428 of the Income Tax...
    Fee for Default in Furnishing Statements of TDS/TCS : Clause 427 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Legal and Practical Implications of Charging Interest on Excess Refunds under the Income Tax Regime ...
    Modernizing Interest Provisions for Advance Tax : Clause 425 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Modernizing Interest Liability for Advance Tax Defaults : Clause 424 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs...
    Interest for Defaults in Furnishing Return of Income : Clause 423 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Government's Rights to Recover Tax Arrears : Clause 421 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 232...
    Delegated Powers in Indian Tax Law : Clause 532 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 231 of the ...
    Legal and Practical Perspectives on Tax Clearance for Departing Individuals under Indian Tax Law : C...
    Uniform Recovery Mechanisms in Indian Tax Law : Clause 419 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section ...
    International Tax Recovery Mechanisms under Indian Law : Clause 418 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Evaluating the Mechanism for Income Tax Recovery via State Governments in India : Clause 417 of the ...
    Garnishee Proceedings and Tax Recovery : Clause 416 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 226 of ...
    Analysis of Stay and Amendment Provisions in Tax Recovery: Clause 415 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 v...
    Validity and Amendment of Tax Recovery Certificates : Clause 413(4) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Jurisdiction and Procedure for Tax Recovery : Clause 414 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 22...
    Evolution and Implications of Tax Recovery Provisions in India : Clause 413 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Legal and Practical Aspects of Penalty for Tax Default under the New and Old Income Tax Laws : Claus...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Aadhaar intimation fee imposed for belated compliance, payable on late intimation through subordinate legislation.
    Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 prescribes an administrative fee for failure to intimate Aadhaar by the prescribed date: the fee is payable at the time of belated intimation, is to be set by subordinate rules subject to a statutory ceiling, and operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act. The provision delegates essential operational elements-prescribed date, fee quantum, and collection mechanism-to rule-making while retaining a maximum cap and signalling continuity with the existing compliance approach.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for delay in furnishing statements requires payment before submission and is capped at the amount concerned.
    Clause 429 imposes an administrative fee for failure to deliver or furnish prescribed statements or certificates by scientific research and charitable institutions, accruing daily and capped at the amount in respect of which the failure occurred; payment of the fee is required before the delayed document or certificate may be filed, and the levy operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Late filing fee for income tax returns: income linked penalties retained, alongside other liabilities and administrative discretion.
    Clause 428 imposes a fee where a person required to furnish a return under Section 263 fails to file within the prescribed time, with an income linked structure: a higher fee for those above a specified income threshold and a capped lower fee otherwise; the clause operates without prejudice to interest, penalties, or prosecution and retains administrative discretion through "not exceeding" wording for the lower slab.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements requires pre payment before filing and is capped by tax liability.
    Clause 427 imposes a statutory fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements as triggered by section 393(3)(b), prescribing a fixed per day charge for each day of delay, capped at the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and requiring payment of the fee before delivery of the delayed statement; the provision operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act and mirrors the substantive structure of Section 234E while omitting explicit commencement and detailed procedural rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on excess refunds: Bill imposes interest from refund grant to regular assessment, with reduction if appellate orders confirm refund.
    Clause 426 charges simple interest on refunds granted under section 270(1) that exceed amounts determined on regular assessment, with interest computed from the date of grant to the date of regular assessment. Assessments under section 279 are deemed "regular assessment" for this purpose. Interest is reduced where appellate or revisionary orders ultimately validate the refund in whole or part. The clause mirrors Section 234D's core mechanics but changes cross-references and lacks an explicit retrospective application, raising transitional and interpretational concerns.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest for deferment of advance tax simplified to lump-sum rates, changing computation and compliance implications.
    Clause 425 prescribes lump-sum interest rates on shortfalls in advance tax instalments tied to specified due dates and percentage targets, retains partial compliance safe-harbours and exemptions for certain unpredictable income categories provided tax is paid by the final instalment, and defines the tax base for interest by allowing deductions for TDS/TCS and specified tax credits; it shifts from monthly computation to a simplified tabled regime while leaving interpretive gaps around new cross-references and treatment of early rectification of shortfalls.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on advance tax: default triggers automatic monthly interest until assessment or regular assessment is completed.
    Clause 424 establishes interest for failure to pay advance tax or where advance payments are below the prescribed benchmark, charging monthly interest from the first April following the tax year until determination of total income or completion of regular assessment. Interest is computed on net assessed tax after reductions for TDS/TCS, foreign tax reliefs and specified credits. The clause clarifies interpretative points about regular assessments, excludes certain additional income-tax from the assessed base, allows reduction of interest upon pre-assessment payment, and prescribes additional interest on increments arising from reassessment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on late tax returns: monthly interest applied under new provision with clarified computation and adjustment mechanism.
    A formulaic charging provision imposes simple monthly interest on tax due where returns are filed late or not filed, with a matrix of scenarios specifying for each the starting date, ending date and tax base for interest computation. The clause mandates adjustment of interest following appellate or revisional orders to reflect the final tax, permits reduction by previously paid interest and credits, excludes certain additional taxes from the tax base, and deems specified first time assessments as regular assessments for interest purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Government's right to recover tax arrears preserved, allowing concurrent statutory and civil recovery remedies.
    Clause 421 preserves the Government's right to recover tax arrears by methods beyond the statutory recovery modes, expressly allowing reliance on any other law for recovery and the institution of civil suits; it authorises assessing officers or the Government to pursue such alternative or concurrent remedies notwithstanding that recovery under the tax statute is being undertaken.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Delegated legislative power to frame broad tax schemes may permit statutory modification, raising oversight and legal certainty concerns.
    Clause 532 grants the Central Government a broad power to frame schemes for any purpose under the Income Tax Act by notification, aiming to eliminate taxpayer interface where technologically feasible and to optimise resources; it permits notifications to disapply or modify statutory provisions to implement schemes, validates amendment of existing schemes under the 1961 Act, and requires notifications to be laid before Parliament, raising questions about the scope of delegated legislation and safeguards for legal certainty and taxpayer rights.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax clearance certificate requirement conditions departure to secure tax liabilities and imposes carrier liability for non-compliance.
    Clause 420 requires a tax clearance certificate or an undertaking from an employer/payer before certain non-domiciled persons who earn Indian-source income may depart, excepting tourists; domiciled persons must furnish prescribed information (including PAN) and may be restricted from leaving if the tax authority records reasons and obtains senior approval. Owners or charterers of ships and aircraft are vicariously liable for departures without clearance, and the Board may make rules for implementation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery of ancillary tax liabilities: non tax sums become recoverable using the same arrears procedures and enforcement tools.
    Clause 419 provides that any sum imposed by way of interest, fine, penalty, or any other sum payable under the Act shall be recoverable in the manner provided in this Part for the recovery of arrears of tax, thereby subjecting ancillary monetary liabilities to the same procedural recovery tools as tax arrears.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Mutual tax recovery enables cross-border enforcement by domestic authorities acting on foreign tax collection requests under treaty terms.
    Clause 418 creates a mutual tax recovery framework under international agreements: foreign authorities may send a certificate to the central tax board to be executed by the Tax Recovery Officer against residents or property in India in the same manner as domestic tax arrears, with recovered sums remitted net of expenses; conversely, the TRO may forward domestic recovery certificates to the Board for action abroad when the assessee is a foreign resident or has foreign property, with the Board acting pursuant to the terms of the relevant agreement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery through State Government: central income tax may be collected with local taxes when entrusted, expanding local enforcement.
    Recovery through State Government permits State Governments, upon entrustment under Article 258(1), to direct that central income tax be recovered in specified areas with, and as an addition to, municipal taxes or local rates by the same person and in the same manner as local taxes, creating a legal mechanism to integrate central tax enforcement into local recovery machinery while raising concerns about procedural safeguards, accounting, and dispute-resolution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Third-party recovery enabling garnishee notices and conversion of non-compliant payers into defaulters for tax arrears enforcement.
    Clause 416 empowers the Assessing Officer and the Tax Recovery Officer to use alternative recovery modes pre- and post-certificate, including recovery from salary with statutory protection for exempt portions, a comprehensive third-party recovery regime through notices to debtors or asset holders (including joint holders, objection and indemnity mechanisms, discharge on compliance, and conversion of non-compliant recipients into assessees in default), court-application for funds held in judicial custody, and distraint and sale of movable property subject to prescribed manner and supervisory approval.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Stay of tax recovery: TRO must pause enforcement and amend or cancel certificates to reflect appellate reductions.
    Clause 415 requires the Tax Recovery Officer to grant time for payment and automatically stay recovery during that period; when a demand is reduced on appeal or other proceeding the TRO must stay recovery to the extent of the reduction while further proceedings are pending and must amend or cancel the recovery certificate once the reduction is final, establishing a mandatory, real-time mechanism to align enforcement with appellate outcomes and protect taxpayers from unjust recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Finality of tax recovery certificates: TRO may cancel or correct certificates while assessees are barred from challenging them.
    Clause 413(4) empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to cancel a recovery certificate "if, for any reason, he considers it necessary so to do" and to correct "any clerical or arithmetical mistake"; Clause 413 as a whole bars the assessee from disputing the certificate's correctness at the recovery stage, while the correction power is limited to mechanical errors and procedural safeguards such as notice or recorded reasons are not specified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Recovery Officer jurisdiction clarified: transferable recovery certificates enable inter jurisdictional enforcement subject to prescribed certification.
    Clause 414 sets the rule for which Tax Recovery Officer may effect recovery: the TRO where the assessee carries on business or has a principal place of business, and the TRO where the assessee resides or any of the assessee's movable or immovable property is situated. It permits transfer of recovery certificates between TROs when assets span jurisdictions or recovery cannot be effected locally, authorises the receiving TRO to act as if the certificate were its own, and requires certification in the prescribed form to ensure procedural integrity.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax recovery certificate empowers administrative enforcement and bars collateral challenges to expedite arrears collection.
    Clause 413 empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to draw up a prescribed-form certificate under signature specifying arrears and to initiate recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable property, arrest, or appointment of a receiver. It permits parallel recovery proceedings, allows administrative cancellation or correction of certificates, and bars the assessee from disputing the correctness of the certificate at the recovery stage. Clause 413 expands recoverable property to include certain intra-family transfers made without adequate consideration from 1 June 1973, preserving liability for arrears predating a minor transferee's majority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for tax default: discretionary but capped enforcement with mandatory hearing and refund if liability is set aside.
    An assessee defaulting on tax payment is liable to a discretionary penalty in addition to arrears and interest, with the Assessing Officer empowered to impose successive penalties for continuing default. Aggregate penalties are capped at the amount of tax in arrears. Procedural safeguards mandate a reasonable opportunity of being heard and exemption where good and sufficient reasons are shown. Payment of tax before penalty does not extinguish liability, but penalty is cancelled and refunded if the tax liability is finally reduced to nil.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of SCHEDULE V "INCOME NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME OF CERTAIN ELIGIBLE PERSONS INCLUDING INVESTMENT FUNDS, BUSINESS TRUSTS AND THEIR UNIT HOLDERS" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      18 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      SCHEDULE V - INCOME NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME OF CERTAIN ELIGIBLE PERSONS INCLUDING INVESTMENT FUNDS, BUSINESS TRUSTS AND THEIR UNIT HOLDERS

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      SCHEDULE V (See section 11) sets out categories of income that are excluded from total income for specified eligible persons, including investment funds, business trusts, venture capital vehicles and certain foreign sovereign/pension wealth investors. It matters to institutional investors, business trusts (including REITs/InvITs), alternative investment funds, venture capital entities, and certain foreign public investment vehicles. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      The Schedule is framed as a supplementary schedule to the Income Tax Bill, 2025, relying on section 11 for placement ("See section 11"). It creates explicit exclusions from "total income" for defined classes of persons and specified income streams, subject to conditions set out in the Table and Notes. The Schedule relies heavily on cross-references to other statutory provisions and external regulatory instruments (SEBI regulations, RBI notifications, IFSC Regulations). Definitions relevant to the Table are supplied in a series of Notes (Note 1 through Note 5). The Schedule does not otherwise provide legislative history or policy rationales. Definitions provided include "investment fund" (Note 1 by cross-reference to section 224(10)(a)), "special purpose vehicle" (Note 2), "real estate asset" (Note 3 via SEBI REIT regulation), definitions for "venture capital company/fund/undertaking" (Note 4), and an expansive Note 5 defining "specified person" and related concepts (investee, loan and borrowing, eligible infrastructure entity, eligible AIF, eligible domestic company, eligible NBFC, eligible InvIT).

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The Schedule operates as a negative list: when computing total income for the tax year of an eligible person (column C), specified income (column B) "shall not be included", subject to conditions (column D) and meanings in the Notes. The Table has eight numbered entries:

      • Sl. No.1: Entire income other than "Profits and gains of business or profession" is excluded for an "investment fund" (meaning per section 224(10)(a)).
      • Sl. No.2: A unit-holder of an investment fund will not include any income referred to in section 224 that accrues/arises/is received to that unit-holder being the proportion of income which is of the same nature as income chargeable under "Profits and gains of business or profession".
      • Sl. No.3: A business trust is exempt from including interest/dividend received or receivable from a "special purpose vehicle" (defined as an Indian company in which the trust holds controlling interest and any specific percentage as required by registration law).
      • Sl. No.4: A business trust that is a real estate investment trust is exempt from including income by way of renting/leasing/letting out real estate assets owned directly by such trust (with "real estate asset" cross-referenced to SEBI REIT regulation 2(1)(zj)).
      • Sl. No.5: Any unit holder of a business trust is not required to include distributed income u/s 223, subject to carve-outs: exemption will not be allowed to the extent the distributed income is of the same nature as (a) interest from an SPV to the business trust, (b) dividend from an SPV to the business trust where SPV exercised option u/s 200, or (c) income of a REIT by renting/leasing/letting directly owned real estate.
      • Sl. No.6: Venture capital companies or venture capital funds (other than being an "investment fund" per section 224(10)(a)) are exempt from including income from investment in a venture capital undertaking, subject to the detailed definitions in Note 4.
      • Sl. No.7: A broad exemption for "specified persons" from including dividend, interest, certain sums referred to in section 92(2)(k), or long-term capital gains arising from investments in India (debt/equity/units) is set out, subject to detailed conditions in clause (a)-(h). Conditions include investment dates (on or after 1 April 2020 and on or before 31 March 2030), minimum holding period of three years, specified types of investee entities, guideline-making powers for the Board with parliamentary oversight, clawback where conditions are no longer met, proportional calculation rules for partially invested entities, and an express exclusion where sovereign wealth or pension funds have loans/borrowings for investment in India.
      • Sl. No.8: Income falling sections 10(23F)/(23FA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is excluded subject to conditions specified in those sections.

      Interpretation

      The Schedule is drafted to provide targeted tax neutrality/exemption for institutional investment vehicles and certain foreign public investors, with protective conditions and calculation rules. Interpretive principles implicit in the text include reliance on external definitions and regulatory instruments to determine qualifying investments (SEBI/AIF/RBI instruments). The Schedule grants the Board guideline-making power for interpretive/implementation difficulties in respect of Sl. No.7, subject to prior approval of the Central Government and parliamentary laying, and states such guidelines will be binding on the Income-tax Authority and the specified person.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The Schedule contains several carve-outs: Sl. No.5 limits exemption for unit-holders where the distributed income is of the same nature as certain income streams (interest/dividend from SPV; REIT rental income). Sl. No.7 contains multiple provisos including time limits for investment, holding periods, investment type restrictions, proportional computation rules for mixed investments, a clawback on failure to satisfy conditions, and an explicit non-eligibility where sovereign funds/pension funds have borrowings for the purpose of investment in India.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: An investment fund (as per section 224(10)(a)) receives dividend and interest but does not carry on a business. Under Sl. No.1, that income other than "Profits and gains of business or profession" is not included in total income. (Text supports exclusion; specific mechanics of computation are "Not stated in the document.")
      • Example 2: A business trust (not a REIT) receives interest from an SPV in which it has controlling interest. Sl. No.3 excludes interest received from an SPV from the trust's total income. (No further procedure for documentation or withholding given in the Schedule: "Not stated in the document.")
      • Example 3: A sovereign wealth fund that borrowed to finance its investment into an eligible infrastructure entity in India. Note 5(h) expressly deems such a fund not eligible for exclusion. (Effect is exclusion of the tax benefit.)

      Interplay

      The Schedule expressly interacts with section 224 and section 223 of the principal Act, and with sections 10(23F)/(23FA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also depends on SEBI regulations (REIT Regulations, AIF Regulations), IFSC Regulations, RBI notifications/directions and other external instruments for qualifying definitions and regulatory thresholds. The Schedule contemplates guidelines by the Board in certain situations, which will be binding once issued with Central Government approval and laid before Parliament.

      Differences between SCHEDULE V - Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1) and Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version (Document 2)

      • Scope descriptions and defined cross-references: Document 1 uses phrasing like "being an eligible InvIT" in Note 5(f) whereas Document 2 says "a business trust" in Sl. No. 7(iii)(A). There are several small differences in the wording of definitions and cross-references (for instance, section references where Document 1 cites section 138 generally and Document 2 cites section 138(11) in Note 5(d)).
        • Practical impact: Potential for interpretive nuance. Where a provision in the Bill cites a more specific sub-clause (e.g., 138(11)), it narrows or clarifies the statutory hook; where the Act uses a broader reference, administrative or judicial interpretation may be slightly more expansive. However, based on the two documents provided, these are editorial variations and would need authoritative consolidation to determine any change in legal effect.
      • Clarifications in Note language: Document 2's Notes include different parenthetical or explanatory labels (e.g., "hereinafter referred to as..."/"as provided herein") that are absent or phrased differently in Document 1.
        • Practical impact: Mostly drafting style differences; where Document 2 explicitly states "as provided herein" or "as prescribed," there is a clear pointer to internal calculation or prescription requirements. Document 1 sometimes uses slightly different language but does not materially change obligations.
      • References to regulatory instruments: In Note 4 and other notes, Document 2 contains slightly different citations and elaborations of the SEBI/AIF/IFSC statutory instruments and RBI directions (for example, mention of "Infrastructure Debt Fund - Non-Banking Financial Companies (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2011" in Document 2 versus other RBI instruments or phrasing in Document 1).
        • Practical impact: Could affect which external regulations are treated as the relevant regulatory standard for qualifying entities; in practice, tax administrators and regulated entities will look to the final consolidated law text and the referenced regulation texts for compliance. On face value, these are drafting distinctions requiring harmonisation with the final statute/regulations.
      • Eligibility carve-outs for specified persons: Both documents set out an extensive definition of "specified person" in Note 5. The Act (Document 1) and Bill (Document 2) are materially similar, but there are small syntactic differences (e.g., the Act explicitly lists "eligible InvIT" in some parts).
        • Practical impact: No clear substantive difference from the provided text; any practical impact depends on which of the two wordings is enacted and the interpretive approach of authorities.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Entities seeking the exclusions must track qualifying status under multiple regulatory frameworks (SEBI/AIF/RBI) and the temporal/holding period conditions for Sl. No.7 (investment window 1 April 2020-31 March 2030; three-year hold). Failure to satisfy conditions triggers clawback charging the income in the tax year of failure.

      • Record-keeping/evidence: While the Schedule does not specify documentary requirements, the text implies that entities will need to maintain evidence of investment dates, holding durations, proportions of qualifying investments (for proportional computations), registration/certification under SEBI/RBI frameworks, and the absence of borrowings for sovereign/pension funds where applicable. Specific forms, timelines or procedural steps are "Not stated in the document."

      Key Takeaways

      • SCHEDULE V provides targeted exclusions from total income for investment funds, business trusts (including REITs), venture capital vehicles and certain foreign public investment vehicles.
      • Exemptions are conditional: e.g., timing and minimum holding periods for specified persons, and carve-outs for income of the same nature as SPV interest/dividend or REIT rentals.
      • Important definitions and thresholds are supplied by cross-reference to other statutes and regulatory rules (SEBI, RBI, IFSC), making qualification dependent on compliance with those external regimes.
      • The Board is empowered to issue guidelines for Sl. No.7 with Central Government approval and parliamentary laying; such guidelines will be binding when issued.
      • There is an explicit non-eligibility rule where sovereign/pension funds have loans or borrowings for the purpose of making investments in India.
      • Several provisions require proportional computation when qualifying vehicles have less than 100% investment/lending in eligible entities; the detailed method is to be prescribed.
      • Procedural details (filing, certificates, timelines, documentary proof, rates) are generally not set out in this Schedule and are "Not stated in the document."

      Full Text:

      SCHEDULE V - INCOME NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME OF CERTAIN ELIGIBLE PERSONS INCLUDING INVESTMENT FUNDS, BUSINESS TRUSTS AND THEIR UNIT HOLDERS

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax