Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Doctrine of Reasonable Cause in Tax Penalties : Clause 470 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Voluntary Disclosure and Penalty Waiver under Indian Tax Law : Clause 469 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
    Penalties for Non-Compliance with TDCAN/TAN Requirements : Clause 468 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Penalty Provision for PAN/Aadhaar Non-Compliance in Indian Tax Law : Clause 467 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Penalty Provisions for deterrence against non-cooperation with tax authorities : Clause 466 of Incom...
    Procedural Defaults and Penalties in Indian Tax Law : Clause 465 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Ensuring Compliance Among Tax-Exempt Entities : Clause 464 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Professionals(i.e. Accountant, Marchant Banker, Registered Valuer) Accountability under Indian Incom...
    Enforcement of Information Disclosure in Cross-Border Transactions : Clause 462 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Penalty Provisions for Non-Filing and Incorrect Filing of TDS/TCS Statements : Clause 461 of the Inc...
    Enforcement of Reporting Obligations by a non-resident having liaison office : Clause 460 of Income ...
    Penalties for Reporting Non-Compliance by Resident constituent entity of an international group unde...
    Legal Implications of Non-Compliance with Reporting Requirements : Clause 458 of the Income Tax Bill...
    Strengthening Transfer Pricing Enforcement : Clause 457 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 271...
    Compliance and Penalty Mechanisms for Investment Funds under Indian Tax Law : Clause 456 of the Inco...
    Penalties for Inaccurate Financial Reporting under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 455 of the Income ...
    Penalties for Non-Compliance in Financial Transaction Reporting : Clause 454 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Penalty Provisions for Non-compliant Loan Repayments in India's Income Tax Law : Clause 453 of the I...
    Mandatory Electronic Payments and Penalty Regimes : Clause 452 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sect...
    Evolving Penalty Regimes for Monetary Transaction Violations : Clause 451 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable cause defense protects taxpayers from penalties for bona fide, non culpable defaults and encourages documented compliance.
    Clause 470 creates an exception to specified penalty provisions: no penalty shall be imposed if the assessee proves there was reasonable cause for the failure. It functions as a non obstante provision covering enumerated sections, shifts the burden of proof to the taxpayer, and is aimed primarily at bona fide procedural or technical lapses rather than deliberate violations.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Voluntary disclosure and penalty waiver enable administrative relief when pre detection disclosure, cooperation and payment conditions are met.
    Clause 469 empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to reduce or waive penalties under section 439 where a taxpayer has made a full and true voluntary disclosure before detection, cooperated in assessment and paid or arranged payment of tax or interest; it includes a deeming rule for full disclosure, prior approval safeguards for high value cases, a bar on multiple reliefs, a genuine hardship route with recorded reasons, a twelve month disposal limit, opportunity to be heard, and finality of orders.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to quote TDCAN/TAN: discretionary fixed sanctions apply for non compliance and knowingly false quoting.
    Clause 468 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a fixed monetary penalty for failure to comply with Section 397 and for quoting a false Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number in prescribed documents where the person knows or believes it to be false, making the penalty discretionary and imposing a mens rea requirement for false quoting while not expressly providing for a statutory opportunity of being heard.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    PAN/Aadhaar compliance: new per-default penalty regime distinguishes intentional false quoting from strict liability omissions and extends responsible person liability.
    Clause 467 establishes a per-default penalty regime for non-compliance with section 262, differentiating intentional false PAN/Aadhaar quoting-which requires proof of knowledge or belief-from omissions treated as strict liability, and extends liability to persons responsible for ensuring correct quoting/authentication; it emphasizes authentication and digital e KYC integration while remaining silent on express procedural safeguards such as the opportunity to be heard, creating potential due process and transitional issues.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for non cooperation: new provision allows senior tax officers to impose a moderate monetary penalty without explicit hearing safeguards.
    Clause 466 empowers specified senior tax officers to impose a moderate monetary penalty for failure to comply with section 254, mirroring prior penalty structure in authority and capped quantum but omitting express procedural safeguards such as an opportunity of being heard, defences like reasonable cause, and a requirement to record reasons, thereby raising concerns about procedural fairness and consistency in imposition.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for procedural defaults: fixed and daily fines, capped to tax collectible, with delegated authority to impose them.
    Clause 465 creates a penalty regime for procedural non compliance under the Income Tax Bill, 2025: a fixed penalty for discrete defaults, a daily penalty for continuing defaults, a cap tying certain penalties to the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and specified authorities empowered to impose penalties; it broadens the definition of income tax authority and updates cross references to the restructured Bill, while notably omitting an explicit provision requiring an opportunity to be heard before penalty imposition.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty regime for failure to furnish prescribed statements strengthens compliance under tax exempt reporting obligations.
    A statutory penalty regime targets failure by specified research institutions and charitable funds to furnish prescribed documents, statements, or certificates within prescribed timeframes; penalties fall within a prescribed band and are imposed at the discretion of the Assessing Officer, operating as a civil compliance measure alongside general procedural safeguards and requiring stakeholders to update compliance processes to align with re referenced substantive sections.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Professional accountability: penalty for furnishing incorrect information in professional reports or certificates under the new income tax bill.
    Clause 463 imposes a strict-liability penalty regime on accountants, merchant bankers and registered valuers for furnishing incorrect information in any report or certificate under the Act or rules. It prescribes a fixed per-instance monetary penalty and empowers the Assessing Officer, Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or Commissioner (Appeals) to impose the penalty upon satisfaction that incorrect information was furnished. The clause updates definitional references for valuers, omits an explicit definition of "accountant," and operates without prejudice to other civil or criminal consequences.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish information: fixed sanction for inaccurate or missing cross-border disclosure, raising proportionality concerns.
    Clause 462 penalises any person required to furnish information under section 397(3)(d) who fails to supply such information or furnishes inaccurate information; the Assessing Officer may impose a fixed monetary penalty, the provision mirrors Section 271I in structure and intent, lacks an express reasonable-cause defence or gradation of penalty, and raises interpretative issues as to the scope of "inaccurate information," procedural safeguards, and proportionality in enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish statements: discretionary fines with short grace period where tax is paid and statement filed promptly.
    Clause 461 creates a penalty for failure to deliver statements under section 397(3)(b) or for furnishing incorrect information, authorising the Assessing Officer to impose a discretionary monetary penalty equivalent in range to the existing Section 271H. Clause 461(2) exempts penalty where tax, fee and interest are paid to the Central Government and the statement is filed within a short grace period, thereby balancing deterrence with relief for prompt substantive compliance while leaving procedural safeguards and definitions, such as "incorrect information," unclearly specified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to submit statements may be imposed by the assessing officer as a daily or capped sanction, discretion preserved.
    Clause 460 permits the Assessing Officer to impose discretionary monetary penalties on any person required to furnish a statement under section 505 for failure to file within the prescribed period, using a two-tier structure of a daily sanction for short-term delay and a capped penalty for longer default, with applicability dependent on the scope of the parent reporting obligation and subject to the general procedural and appellate framework of the tax law.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reporting penalties: new clause preserves escalating daily fines and a large fixed penalty for inaccurate international tax reports.
    Clause 459 establishes a tiered penalty regime under section 511 for reporting entities: daily penalties for failure to furnish reports, daily penalties for failure to produce information after the allowed period, an escalated daily penalty if default continues after service of a penalty order, and a substantial fixed penalty for furnishing inaccurate information or failing to correct known or discovered inaccuracies. The prescribed authority under section 511 is empowered to impose these penalties, and the clause mirrors Section 271GB in quantum and triggers while raising issues about reasonable cause relief and procedural safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to report transfers of management or control triggers significant compliance and enforcement consequences.
    Clause 458 creates a penalty for failure by an Indian concern to furnish information or documents under section 506, authorising the prescribed income-tax authority to impose either a transaction-value-based penalty where a transaction effects a direct or indirect transfer of management or control, or a fixed monetary penalty otherwise, and otherwise mirrors the substantive framework and enforcement objectives of Section 271GA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer pricing documentation penalty: failure to furnish documents leads to transaction value based penalties and enforcement by tax authorities.
    Failure to furnish prescribed transfer pricing information or documentation for international or specified domestic transactions triggers a transaction value based penalty under Clause 457, enforceable by the Assessing Officer, authorised Transfer Pricing Officer and the Commissioner (Appeals); the clause ties this enforcement directly to the obligations in section 171(2) and raises interpretive issues concerning the meaning of failure, computation of transaction value, overlap with other penalties, and the availability of a reasonable cause defence.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish statements: eligible investment funds face a fixed sanction under the bill; authority may impose it.
    Clause 456 imposes a fixed penalty where an eligible investment fund fails to furnish required statements or information within the prescribed time; the prescribed income-tax authority may direct payment of the fixed sanction. The reporting deadline is set by the substantive eligibility reporting provision; the penalty is discretionary rather than automatic, lacks a graded scale, and does not expressly specify procedural safeguards such as criteria for discretion or an opportunity to be heard.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for inaccurate financial reporting imposes institutional and account-holder liability while enabling recovery of penalties from account holders.
    Clause 455 mandates penalties for persons required to furnish statements of financial transactions or reportable accounts for providing inaccurate information or failing to meet due diligence obligations, and imposes an additional per-account penalty on reporting financial institutions where inaccuracies stem from account-holder-supplied false information; reporting institutions may recover such additional penalties from the responsible account holders by direct recovery or retention of funds, with imposition directed by the prescribed income-tax authority and substantive continuity with the former Section 271FAA.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish financial transaction statements - escalating daily sanctions for continued non-compliance after notice.
    Clause 454 creates a statutory penalty regime for failure to furnish a statement of financial transaction or reportable account, prescribing a daily penalty accruing from the date the filing deadline lapses, with an escalated daily rate where default continues after a formal notice, and vesting discretionary imposition authority in the income-tax authority subject to procedural safeguards and rights to challenge.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for non-compliant loan repayments: Assessing Officer may impose a penalty equal to the amount repaid for procedural breaches.
    Clause 453 permits the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty equal to any loan, deposit or specified advance repaid in contravention of section 188, applying to all persons and covering repayments made by non-transparent modes. The provision creates strict liability based on procedural breach rather than mens rea, centralizes enforcement with the Assessing Officer, and omits an explicit reasonable-cause defence, raising potential interpretative and transitional issues regarding the scope of specified advances and procedural safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Electronic payment mandate triggers daily penalties for non compliance unless a taxpayer proves good and sufficient reason.
    Clause 452 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a fixed per day monetary penalty for failure to provide prescribed electronic modes of payment under section 187, subject to a saving where the person proves good and sufficient reason for the failure; the provision mirrors the former section 271DB framework but streamlines authority and lacks detailed procedural guidance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Monetary transaction penalty: discretion to impose a penalty equal to prohibited receipt unless good and sufficient reasons are proved.
    Clause 451 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty equal to the sum received in contravention of section 186 unless the recipient proves good and sufficient reasons; the provision emphasises proportionality, vests discretion in enforcement, omits explicit procedural safeguards and mens rea, and mirrors the substantive penalty quantum and defence in the earlier statutory regime while differing in statutory tone and procedural concision.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 336 "Taxable Regular income." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      11 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 336 Taxable regular income

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      This document compares two textual versions of Clause/Section 336 concerning the "taxable regular income" of a registered non-profit organisation: the "Old Version" as appearing in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and the later text as enacted (Section 336 of the Income-tax Act, 2025). The provision sets out when a registered non-profit's taxable regular income is nil and how taxable regular income is computed otherwise. The change primarily clarifies the reference to application (section 341) and accumulation (section 342). Affected parties include registered non-profit organisations, tax authorities, and advisors. Effective date or assent date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause/Section 336 is located in the Income-tax Bill/Act, 2025 and is cast within the Part dealing with income of registered non-profit organisations. The provision addresses computation of "taxable regular income" for any tax year. The text invokes two related provisions: section 341 (application for charitable or religious purposes) and section 342 (accumulation for charitable or religious purposes). Definitions of "regular income", "registered non-profit organisation", "application", "accumulation", and related terms: Not stated in the document. The Bill version includes a short legislative note - "Clause 336 of the Bill seeks to deal with the taxable regular income of a registered non-profit organisation." No other contextual material is provided in the documents.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The operative text in both versions establishes two alternative outcomes for the taxable regular income of a registered non-profit organisation for a tax year:

      • Where 85% or more of the regular income of that tax year has been applied or accumulated for charitable or religious purposes in that tax year as per the provisions of the Part, the taxable regular income is nil.
      • In any other case, taxable regular income is 85% of the regular income for that tax year, reduced by the amount applied for charitable or religious purposes or accumulated for such purposes in that tax year as per the Part.

      Differences in wording between the versions are limited to phrasing that links "application" with section 341 and "accumulation" with section 342 in the enacted text; the Bill's older wording conflates the statutory cross-references in a manner that is less precise.

      Interpretation

      The enacted wording indicates an interpretive distinction: "applied as per provisions of section 341 or accumulated u/s 342" (Act text) - this ties application specifically to section 341 and accumulation to section 342. The Bill's earlier wording reads "applied or accumulated u/s 342" in one instance and in another instance omits reference to section 341; therefore the Bill version is ambiguous as to whether "application" must conform to section 341 or whether both application and accumulation were to be governed by section 342.

      Legislative intent (as discernible from the text): to exempt from tax that portion of regular income actually devoted to charitable/religious purposes (subject to the 85% threshold), and otherwise to require that 85% of regular income (less amounts applied/accumulated for charitable purposes) be treated as taxable regular income. Whether the statutory 85% operates as a minimum threshold for nil tax or as a base for computation when the threshold is not met is stated in the text; deeper policy rationale or legislative history: Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No explicit provisos, exceptions, or thresholds other than the 85% quantitative threshold are provided in the texts shown. There are no provisos detailing what qualifies as "application" or "accumulation", time limits, or permissible uses of accumulated funds in the documents supplied: Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1 (nil taxable regular income): A registered non-profit has regular income of 1,000,000 in a tax year and applies or accumulates 850,000 (85%) for charitable or religious purposes in that same tax year as per the Part. Under the provision, taxable regular income = nil.
      • Example 2 (taxable regular income computed): A registered non-profit has regular income of 1,000,000 but applies only 600,000 in the tax year for charitable purposes and accumulates none. Under the provision, taxable regular income = 85% of 1,000,000 reduced by 600,000 = 850,000 - 600,000 = 250,000.
      • Example 3 (aggregation of application and accumulation): A registered non-profit has regular income 1,000,000, applies 500,000 and accumulates 200,000 in that tax year for charitable purposes. Total applied or accumulated = 700,000 (<85%); taxable regular income = 850,000 - 700,000 = 150,000.

      Interplay

      The provision expressly references sections 341 and 342 (in the enacted text) as the governing provisions for application and accumulation. Any rules, notifications, circulars, or further clarifications about what constitutes application u/s 341 or accumulation u/s 342: Not stated in the document. Interaction with other Parts of the Act beyond the stated sections (e.g., treatment of accumulated funds in later years, restrictions on application, or conditions for approval): Not stated in the document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: The enacted text reduces an ambiguity present in the Bill by expressly linking application to section 341 and accumulation to section 342. This reduces interpretive risk about which section governs "application" versus "accumulation". Assessing officers and taxpayers will rely on the separate regimes in sections 341 and 342 to determine whether funds have been validly applied or validly accumulated within the tax year.
      • Calculation mechanics: Taxable regular income is not simply the shortfall from 85% but explicitly 85% of regular income less amounts applied/accumulated in that tax year as per the Part. Practitioners must therefore compute 85% of regular income first, and then subtract qualifying amounts applied/accumulated, rather than, for example, computing net income then applying 85%.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: While the documents do not set forms or procedural requirements, the reliance on sections 341 and 342 implies that documentation showing compliance with those sections will be material to claim nil status or to substantiate deductions from the 85% base. Specific records required: Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • The provision establishes a two-step rule: nil taxable regular income when 85% or more of regular income is applied/accumulated for charitable/religious purposes in the tax year; otherwise taxable regular income equals 85% of regular income reduced by applicable applied/accumulated amounts.
      • The enacted text clarifies that "application" is governed by section 341 and "accumulation" by section 342; the Bill's older text was less precise on this point.
      • Computation is anchored to 85% of regular income; amounts applied/accumulated in the same tax year under the Part are then deducted from that 85% figure to arrive at taxable regular income.
      • This drafting clarification reduces interpretive uncertainty between application and accumulation and focuses attention on compliance with sections 341 and 342.
      • Details about definitions, recordkeeping, timing rules, and procedural requirements u/ss 341/342 are not contained in the documents and remain necessary to implement the provision.

      Differences Between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 336 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025Section 336 of the Income-tax Act, 2025
      Reference to application vs accumulationUses the phrase "applied or accumulated u/s 342" in one instance and omits an explicit reference to section 341; this conflates or omits the separate statutory bases for application and accumulation.Uses the phrase "applied as per provisions of section 341 or accumulated u/s 342", explicitly distinguishing application (s.341) from accumulation (s.342).
      ClarityAmbiguous as to which section governs "application".Clear linkage: application -> s.341; accumulation -> s.342.
      Practical impactCreates potential for disputes over whether an amount claimed as "applied" need satisfy s.341 or could be governed by s.342; raises compliance risk and administrative uncertainty.Reduces ambiguity; taxpayers and authorities must assess qualification under the appropriate section (341 or 342), thereby narrowing interpretive disputes and guiding evidence and documentation requirements toward the relevant section.

      Action Points

      • Registered non-profit organisations should review their disbursement and accumulation practices to ensure they meet the conditions of section 341 for application and section 342 for accumulation, because the enacted text expressly ties the tax outcome to compliance with those sections.
      • Tax advisors and in-house counsel should prepare documentation demonstrating that applied or accumulated amounts comply with the relevant section, given that the computation subtracts only amounts applied/accumulated "as per the provisions of this Part".
      • Tax officers should apply the separate tests in sections 341 and 342 when verifying claims u/s 336 rather than treating application and accumulation as governed by a single rule.

      Full Text:

      Section 336 Taxable regular income

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax