Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Article 8 of the India-UK DTAA and Taxability of Ground Handling and Engineering Service Receipts
    Cancellation of GST Registration for Continuous Non-Filing of Returns under Section 29 and Rule 22
    Finality of Approved Resolution Plans and Extinguishment of Pending Operational-Creditor Claims unde...
    Case Laws Customs
    Interest on Refund of Amounts Deposited under Protest during Customs Investigation
    Case Laws Indian Laws
    Admitted Cheque Signature and Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt under Sections 118 and 139 of ...
    Case Laws Customs
    Principal Function, Network Capability and Customs Classification of Composite Electronic Devices (G...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Enhanced Tax Rate Under Section 115BBE for Financial Year 2016-17: Classification of Unexplained Inc...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Retrenchment Compensation under Section 10(10B) and Leave Encashment Exemption under Section 10(10AA...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Renewal of Registration under Section 12AB for Charitable Hospitals Engaged in Medical Relief: Retro...
    Contractual Reimbursement of Incremental GST on Works Contracts and the Statutory-Contractual Divide
    Case Laws Customs
    Waiver of Late Fee on Supplementary Bills of Entry under Section 46(3) of the Customs Act, 1962: Exc...
    Detention and Confiscation of Inter-State Consignments: Territorial Limits on State GST Officers - J...
    Common Show Cause Notices across Multiple Financial Years: Scope of Sections 73 and 74 and Limitatio...
    Input Tax Credit Eligibility under the CGST Act: Supplier Tax Non-Payment and Recipient ITC Claims: ...
    Actionable Claims, Contingent Winnings and Gross Valuation in GST on Gaming Transactions
    Invocation of Extended Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act: Foundational Facts, Prima Facie ...
    Assignment of Leasehold Rights in Industrial Plots under the CGST Act: Distinguishing Lease Services...
    Service of GST Show Cause Notices and Orders through the Common Portal: Validity of Service, Hearing...
    News GST
    Bill-To Ship-To E-Way Bill Compliance, Portal Closure and Transit Controls: GST E-Way Bills: Rule 13...
    E-Way Bill Requirements Under Rule 138: GST E-Way Bill Framework for Movement of Goods, Transit Docu...
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Article 8 treaty protection excludes independent third-party ground handling and engineering receipts lacking a direct transportation nexus.
Article 8 of the India-UK DTAA confines protection to profits derived from treaty-defined international aircraft operations and qualifying participation in air-transport pools. Engineering and ground-handling services supplied to other airlines are independently organised commercial services where they lack a direct nexus to the enterprise's own international transportation. A qualifying pool requires substantive evidence of its legal and commercial structure, including reciprocal arrangements and settlement mechanisms; industry arrangements or aviation-sector relevance alone are insufficient.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
GST registration cancellation for return default remains reversible only through complete, time-bound filing and payment compliance.
GST registration may be cancelled for continuous non-filing of returns, but cancellation does not discharge pre-cancellation tax liabilities. Before cancellation, Rule 22(4) requires proceedings to be dropped where the taxpayer files all pending returns and pays tax, interest and late fee. Post-cancellation revocation under Rule 23 is a separate mechanism requiring complete filing and payment compliance within the applicable time limits. Conditional restoration may be appropriate where liabilities are fully regularised, while absence of fraud does not excuse default or replace statutory compliance.
Case Laws IBC
Show AI Summary
Resolution-plan finality extinguishes unresolved operational-creditor proceedings unless the plan expressly preserves liability and payment rights.
Finality of an approved resolution plan fixes the treatment of corporate-debtor liabilities and binds creditors within the corporate insolvency resolution process. A disputed or unadjudicated right to payment may be submitted as a claim during CIRP, but does not independently preserve civil or arbitral proceedings after plan approval. Where the final claims list and the plan provide for discharge of pre-effective-date liabilities and extinguishment of related proceedings, unresolved operational-creditor claims survive only if the plan expressly preserves them through a defined payment or reservation mechanism.
Case Laws Customs
Show AI Summary
Investigation deposits: refund interest may differ from statutory appellate pre-deposit interest when the underlying demand fails.
Interest on the refund of amounts deposited under protest during a customs investigation depends on the legal character of the payment, rather than its later appropriation towards a differential-duty demand. An amount paid pending investigation does not become a statutory appellate pre-deposit merely because part of the overall payment is treated as a pre-deposit for appeal purposes. The rate fixed at 6% for Section 129EE is confined to amounts deposited under Section 129E, while an investigation deposit requires assessment under the applicable refund framework and binding jurisdictional precedent.
Case Laws Indian Laws
Show AI Summary
Admitted cheque signatures trigger presumptions of consideration and enforceable debt, requiring evidence-based probable defences in dishonour proceedings.
Once execution of a cheque is admitted or proved, consideration must be presumed and the holder must be presumed to have received the cheque towards discharge, wholly or partly, of a legally enforceable debt or other liability. The drawer may rebut these presumptions on a preponderance of probabilities, but the defence must have a factual foundation. Bare denials, unsupported misuse allegations, and blank-cheque or security-cheque assertions ordinarily do not displace the presumptions. Financial capacity becomes material only upon a credible, specific, and evidence-based challenge.
Case Laws Customs
Show AI Summary
Bluetooth headset classification turns on active wireless network communication, not audio form, when determining principal function and essential character.
Bluetooth-enabled personal audio devices are classified by objective technical function rather than wearable form, product label, audio output or microphone. Heading 8517 applies where Bluetooth capability makes the device an active wireless-network apparatus that receives, converts and transmits voice or data; heading 8518 covers ordinary headphones or earphones carrying only audio signals. Classification begins with the heading terms and relevant notes, with essential character and principal function applied only through the sequential General Rules where competing headings remain.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Unexplained-income taxation requires valid deeming classification, while enhanced special rates apply prospectively under the stated effective-date framework.
Section 115BBE applies only where income is validly assessed under the deeming provisions for unexplained income; a surrender, disclosure or addition alone is insufficient. The assessing authority must identify the relevant provision and reject the explanation of nature and source where required. The special computation denies deductions, allowances and loss set-off against qualifying income. The Rajasthan High Court treated the enhanced rate introduced with effect from 1 April 2017 as prospective, preserving the earlier rate for financial year 2016-17. Penalty under section 271AAC depends on a valid section 115BBE determination.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Substance-over-form treatment of VRS compensation can place retrenchment-linked payments within the distinct full-exemption framework for approved workforce reduction schemes.
Tax treatment of VRS-labelled separation payments depends on their substantive character. Payments connected with Government-supported workforce restructuring may qualify as retrenchment compensation under section 10(10B), rather than as voluntary-retirement compensation under section 10(10C), where the special-protection requirements are satisfied. Leave encashment must be examined separately under section 10(10AA), according to employee status and the applicable conditions or notified limit. Settlement components should be segregated and supported by scheme documents, approvals, computations, and tax records.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Charitable hospital renewal depends on genuine medical relief, charitable application of income, and material regulatory compliance.
Renewal of section 12AB registration for a charitable hospital depends on genuine activities in furtherance of medical relief, application of income and assets to charitable objects, and compliance with other laws only where material to those objects. Receipts, premium facilities, tariff differentials, sophisticated infrastructure and professional management do not alone negate charitable status. Other-law non-compliance requires attention to the specified-violation framework and competent regulatory determinations. Retrospective cancellation is distinct from refusing renewal and requires an independent statutory and factual foundation, with reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Contractual GST reimbursement in works contracts depends on tax-risk clauses and cannot alter statutory compliance obligations.
GST liability for a works contractor is governed by statute, while reimbursement of incremental GST from an employer depends on the contract's allocation of tax risk. An inclusive-tax clause must be read with change-in-law, price-adjustment, tender and amendment terms. Contract-wise reconciliation of pre-transition and post-transition work may support a supplementary agreement and revised GST-inclusive value where contractual entitlement exists. It cannot alter statutory valuation, return, limitation, interest or penalty requirements, which remain governed by GST law.
Case Laws Customs
Show AI Summary
Sufficient cause for delayed supplementary Bills of Entry requires a reasoned waiver assessment, not automatic system-generated late charges.
Late-presentation charges under Section 46(3) require the proper officer to be satisfied that no sufficient cause existed for delayed filing. Regulation 4(3) prescribes the late-charge framework and permits waiver where the reasons for delay are satisfactory. A delayed supplementary Bill of Entry for excess cargo is not automatically liable or automatically exempt; the assessment depends on timely original filing, linkage of the excess cargo to the same consignment, prompt amendment efforts, absence of importer fault, bona fides and duty compliance. Electronic calculation cannot substitute for a reasoned determination on sufficient cause.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Territorial GST jurisdiction limits detention and confiscation of inter-State consignments when the intercepting State lacks fiscal nexus.
Physical presence of goods in an intermediate State therefore does not alone create authority to detain, seize, penalise or confiscate. Cross-empowerment is functional and taxpayer-linked, preserving the single-interface administrative structure without creating geographically unlimited enforcement power. Where verification establishes that both origin and destination lie outside the intercepting State, the officer may verify documents, identify and record apparent discrepancies, and communicate them to the proper officers of the consignor and consignee, but lacks coercive jurisdiction over a pure transit supply.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Consolidated GST show cause notices may cover multiple financial years, while each demand component remains independently subject to limitation.
Sections 73 and 74 do not expressly bar a common show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years. The expressions "for any period" and "such periods" support consolidation, while financial-year references in the limitation provisions govern the deadline for adjudication orders rather than the scope of notice issuance. Each component demand must independently satisfy applicable limitation requirements. Section 74 requires disclosed material supporting fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax; its extended limitation is not automatic.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Supplier tax payment remains a substantive input tax credit condition, requiring reversal and allowing re-availment after compliance.
Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act makes actual payment of tax to the Government a substantive condition for input tax credit. The conditions under Section 16(2) operate cumulatively, and invoice reflection, receipt of supplies, or supplier return filing do not independently establish tax payment. Section 41 requires reversal of credit where the supplier has not paid tax, with re-availment allowed after payment. Rule 37A prescribes reversal and re-availment where the supplier fails to furnish the corresponding GSTR-3B within the prescribed period.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
GST valuation of stake-based gaming treats committed stakes as consideration for taxable actionable claims, irrespective of skill.
GST on stake-based gaming applies to the supply of actionable claims where money or money's worth is committed to an uncertain outcome in an organised betting or gambling arrangement. Skill in the underlying game does not remove the stake-based character of the transaction. Participants acquire contingent beneficial interests in pooled movable property, and committed stakes become consideration for participation. The platform is the supplier where it controls pooling, participation, gameplay and payouts. Gross stake valuation applies unless a statutory deduction is authorised, with specialised valuation mechanisms governing online gaming and casinos.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Extended GST limitation requires disclosed prima facie material linking tax shortfall to fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression.
Section 74 permits extended GST limitation only where available material supports a rational prima facie view that a tax shortfall, erroneous refund or wrongful credit arose by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. Final proof is not required at initiation, but suspicion or bare statutory labels are insufficient. Prior scrutiny, audit, inspection or pre-notice communications may provide the factual foundation if actually communicated and linked to the notice. The notice and final order must preserve fair opportunity, disclose the material basis, and remain within the grounds stated.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Complete assignment of industrial leasehold rights can fall outside GST when it transfers the entire proprietary estate.
A complete assignment of an industrial lessee's entire leasehold interest, together with the building on the plot, is distinguished from leasing, renting, or sub-leasing. Where the assignor retains no reversionary interest or continuing right to earn rent, the consideration is for transfer of proprietary rights constituting benefits arising out of land. Schedule II classification of an original lease as a service does not govern the subsequent absolute assignment. Section 7(2), read with Schedule III, excludes a qualifying transfer of immovable-property benefits from the scope of supply.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Common Portal service requires effective access to complete GST notices and orders, preserving hearing rights and appellate limitation.
GST service through the Common Portal is an express statutory mode, but portal availability must be distinguished from effective service of an adjudicatory communication. Rule 142 preserves the distinction between a substantive show cause notice or order and its electronic summary in FORM GST DRC-01 or DRC-07. Electronic summaries do not, without more, demonstrate communication of complete allegations, grounds, facts and reasons. Portal-based service must be assessed by statutory compliance, accessibility of the complete communication, and the taxpayer's real opportunity to respond, particularly where appellate limitation is involved.
News GST
Show AI Summary
E-way bill compliance strengthens traceability through Ship-To GSTIN capture, voluntary closure, and disciplined transit controls.
Rule 138 and Rule 138A require pre-movement e-way bill generation, carriage of the prescribed invoice or challan documents, and distance-based validity, with cancellation confined to cases where goods are not transported as declared. The portal advisory adds mandatory Ship-To GSTIN capture in Bill-To/Ship-To transactions and a voluntary post-delivery closure facility, while circular guidance treats transporter godowns as an additional place of business when declared by the recipient. Enforcement under Section 129 and Section 130 distinguishes detention for transit contravention from confiscation linked to intent to evade tax, and minor e-way bill defects are described as technical lapses rather than automatic proof of evasion.
Act Rules GST
Show AI Summary
E-way bill compliance under GST rules governs prior movement information, transit documents, validity, cancellation, and special goods regimes.
Rule 138 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 governs the e-way bill system for movement of goods and requires prior electronic information before movement begins in specified cases, generally where consignment value exceeds fifty thousand rupees. The rule allocates responsibility for Part A and Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 among registered persons, authorised transporters, e-commerce operators, courier agencies and fallback transporters, while also covering special cases such as job work, handicraft goods, consolidated movement and transport by road, rail, air or vessel. Rule 138A specifies the documents that must accompany the conveyance, Rule 138 provides validity, cancellation and exemption rules, and Rule 138F creates a special intra-State regime for notified precious goods.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Comparison of section 336 "Taxable Regular income." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

11 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 336 Taxable regular income

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

This document compares two textual versions of Clause/Section 336 concerning the "taxable regular income" of a registered non-profit organisation: the "Old Version" as appearing in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and the later text as enacted (Section 336 of the Income-tax Act, 2025). The provision sets out when a registered non-profit's taxable regular income is nil and how taxable regular income is computed otherwise. The change primarily clarifies the reference to application (section 341) and accumulation (section 342). Affected parties include registered non-profit organisations, tax authorities, and advisors. Effective date or assent date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: Clause/Section 336 is located in the Income-tax Bill/Act, 2025 and is cast within the Part dealing with income of registered non-profit organisations. The provision addresses computation of "taxable regular income" for any tax year. The text invokes two related provisions: section 341 (application for charitable or religious purposes) and section 342 (accumulation for charitable or religious purposes). Definitions of "regular income", "registered non-profit organisation", "application", "accumulation", and related terms: Not stated in the document. The Bill version includes a short legislative note - "Clause 336 of the Bill seeks to deal with the taxable regular income of a registered non-profit organisation." No other contextual material is provided in the documents.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

The operative text in both versions establishes two alternative outcomes for the taxable regular income of a registered non-profit organisation for a tax year:

  • Where 85% or more of the regular income of that tax year has been applied or accumulated for charitable or religious purposes in that tax year as per the provisions of the Part, the taxable regular income is nil.
  • In any other case, taxable regular income is 85% of the regular income for that tax year, reduced by the amount applied for charitable or religious purposes or accumulated for such purposes in that tax year as per the Part.

Differences in wording between the versions are limited to phrasing that links "application" with section 341 and "accumulation" with section 342 in the enacted text; the Bill's older wording conflates the statutory cross-references in a manner that is less precise.

Interpretation

The enacted wording indicates an interpretive distinction: "applied as per provisions of section 341 or accumulated u/s 342" (Act text) - this ties application specifically to section 341 and accumulation to section 342. The Bill's earlier wording reads "applied or accumulated u/s 342" in one instance and in another instance omits reference to section 341; therefore the Bill version is ambiguous as to whether "application" must conform to section 341 or whether both application and accumulation were to be governed by section 342.

Legislative intent (as discernible from the text): to exempt from tax that portion of regular income actually devoted to charitable/religious purposes (subject to the 85% threshold), and otherwise to require that 85% of regular income (less amounts applied/accumulated for charitable purposes) be treated as taxable regular income. Whether the statutory 85% operates as a minimum threshold for nil tax or as a base for computation when the threshold is not met is stated in the text; deeper policy rationale or legislative history: Not stated in the document.

Exceptions/Provisos

No explicit provisos, exceptions, or thresholds other than the 85% quantitative threshold are provided in the texts shown. There are no provisos detailing what qualifies as "application" or "accumulation", time limits, or permissible uses of accumulated funds in the documents supplied: Not stated in the document.

Illustrations

  • Example 1 (nil taxable regular income): A registered non-profit has regular income of 1,000,000 in a tax year and applies or accumulates 850,000 (85%) for charitable or religious purposes in that same tax year as per the Part. Under the provision, taxable regular income = nil.
  • Example 2 (taxable regular income computed): A registered non-profit has regular income of 1,000,000 but applies only 600,000 in the tax year for charitable purposes and accumulates none. Under the provision, taxable regular income = 85% of 1,000,000 reduced by 600,000 = 850,000 - 600,000 = 250,000.
  • Example 3 (aggregation of application and accumulation): A registered non-profit has regular income 1,000,000, applies 500,000 and accumulates 200,000 in that tax year for charitable purposes. Total applied or accumulated = 700,000 (<85%); taxable regular income = 850,000 - 700,000 = 150,000.

Interplay

The provision expressly references sections 341 and 342 (in the enacted text) as the governing provisions for application and accumulation. Any rules, notifications, circulars, or further clarifications about what constitutes application u/s 341 or accumulation u/s 342: Not stated in the document. Interaction with other Parts of the Act beyond the stated sections (e.g., treatment of accumulated funds in later years, restrictions on application, or conditions for approval): Not stated in the document.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: The enacted text reduces an ambiguity present in the Bill by expressly linking application to section 341 and accumulation to section 342. This reduces interpretive risk about which section governs "application" versus "accumulation". Assessing officers and taxpayers will rely on the separate regimes in sections 341 and 342 to determine whether funds have been validly applied or validly accumulated within the tax year.
  • Calculation mechanics: Taxable regular income is not simply the shortfall from 85% but explicitly 85% of regular income less amounts applied/accumulated in that tax year as per the Part. Practitioners must therefore compute 85% of regular income first, and then subtract qualifying amounts applied/accumulated, rather than, for example, computing net income then applying 85%.
  • Record-keeping/evidence: While the documents do not set forms or procedural requirements, the reliance on sections 341 and 342 implies that documentation showing compliance with those sections will be material to claim nil status or to substantiate deductions from the 85% base. Specific records required: Not stated in the document.

Key Takeaways

  • The provision establishes a two-step rule: nil taxable regular income when 85% or more of regular income is applied/accumulated for charitable/religious purposes in the tax year; otherwise taxable regular income equals 85% of regular income reduced by applicable applied/accumulated amounts.
  • The enacted text clarifies that "application" is governed by section 341 and "accumulation" by section 342; the Bill's older text was less precise on this point.
  • Computation is anchored to 85% of regular income; amounts applied/accumulated in the same tax year under the Part are then deducted from that 85% figure to arrive at taxable regular income.
  • This drafting clarification reduces interpretive uncertainty between application and accumulation and focuses attention on compliance with sections 341 and 342.
  • Details about definitions, recordkeeping, timing rules, and procedural requirements u/ss 341/342 are not contained in the documents and remain necessary to implement the provision.

Differences Between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

Topic Clause 336 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Section 336 of the Income-tax Act, 2025
Reference to application vs accumulation Uses the phrase "applied or accumulated u/s 342" in one instance and omits an explicit reference to section 341; this conflates or omits the separate statutory bases for application and accumulation. Uses the phrase "applied as per provisions of section 341 or accumulated u/s 342", explicitly distinguishing application (s.341) from accumulation (s.342).
Clarity Ambiguous as to which section governs "application". Clear linkage: application -> s.341; accumulation -> s.342.
Practical impact Creates potential for disputes over whether an amount claimed as "applied" need satisfy s.341 or could be governed by s.342; raises compliance risk and administrative uncertainty. Reduces ambiguity; taxpayers and authorities must assess qualification under the appropriate section (341 or 342), thereby narrowing interpretive disputes and guiding evidence and documentation requirements toward the relevant section.

Action Points

  • Registered non-profit organisations should review their disbursement and accumulation practices to ensure they meet the conditions of section 341 for application and section 342 for accumulation, because the enacted text expressly ties the tax outcome to compliance with those sections.
  • Tax advisors and in-house counsel should prepare documentation demonstrating that applied or accumulated amounts comply with the relevant section, given that the computation subtracts only amounts applied/accumulated "as per the provisions of this Part".
  • Tax officers should apply the separate tests in sections 341 and 342 when verifying claims u/s 336 rather than treating application and accumulation as governed by a single rule.

Full Text:

Section 336 Taxable regular income

Topics

Acts Income Tax