Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 118 "Carry forward and set off of losses and unabsorbed depreciation in busine...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 115 "Set off and carry forward of losses from specified activity." between the...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 114 "Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified busi...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 113 "Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of speculation" b...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 112 "Carry forward and set off of business loss." between the Income-Tax Act, ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 111 "Carry forward and set off of loss from Capital gains." between the Income...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 110 "Carry forward and set off of loss from house property." between the Incom...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 108 "Set off of losses under same head of income." between the Income-Tax Act,...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 106 "Amount borrowed or repaid through negotiable instrument, hundi, etc." bet...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 105 "Unexplained expenditure." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) an...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 104 "Unexplained asset." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 103 "Unexplained investments." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) an...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 102 "Unexplained credits." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and th...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 99 "Income of individual to include income of spouse, minor child, etc." betwe...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 93 "Deduction" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 92 "Income from other sources." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) a...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 90 "Meaning of "adjusted", "cost of improvement" and "cost of acquisition." be...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 88 "Exemption of capital gains on transfer of assets in cases of shifting of i...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 87 "Exemption of capital gains on transfer of assets in cases of shifting of i...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 86 "Capital gains on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged in c...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Carry-forward of predecessor losses: successor bank may set off losses as if reorganisation had not occurred, subject to continuity conditions.
    Section 118 permits successor or resulting co operative banks to carry forward and set off predecessor accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation on amalgamation or demerger "as if the business reorganisation had not taken place," subject to the Act's set-off and depreciation rules. Demergers transfer directly attributable losses to the resulting undertaking and require pro rata apportionment of non direct losses by asset distribution. Qualification depends on continuity of banking activity and specified fixed asset holding thresholds, deemed tax year splitting, prescribed/notified conditions, and denial of set offs as taxable income upon non compliance.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Ring-fencing of race-horse losses restricts set-off to stake-money income and allows limited carry forward period.
    Losses from owning and maintaining race horses are ring-fenced and may be set off only against income from the same specified activity (stake money). Unabsorbed losses may be carried forward for set-off solely against future stake-money income in years when the assessee carries on the specified activity, subject to a limited carry-forward period after which unabsorbed amounts expire. Definitions narrow the scope of eligible income and losses.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Set-off restriction for specified business losses limits use to profits of other specified business activities only.
    Losses computed in respect of a specified business carried on by the assessee in a tax year may be set off only against profits and gains of other specified business activities for that year; any portion not so set off is an unabsorbed loss that may be carried forward and set off only against profits and gains of specified businesses in subsequent years.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Speculation loss ring fencing: losses only offset against speculation profits with limited carry forward and priority in set off.
    Losses from speculation business may be set off only against speculation business profits; any unabsorbed speculation business loss is carried forward and set off only against future speculation business profits, subject to a statutory temporal limitation and applied before certain other carried forward allowances. A deeming rule treats companies buying and selling shares of other companies as carrying on speculation business to that extent, subject to carve outs where specified income heads or principal business activities prevail.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Carry forward of unabsorbed business loss limited to set off only against business profits, with a temporal carry forward limit.
    Unabsorbed business loss (loss under Profits and gains of business or profession excluding speculation loss not absorbed under inter head set off) shall be carried forward and may be set off only against business or profession profits in subsequent years; any amount not so set off is carried forward iteratively, subject to a limit of not more than eight succeeding tax years, and such unabsorbed loss is to be given effect before allowing set off of specified carried forward allowances.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Carry forward of capital losses: limited temporal carry forward with distinct set off rules for long term and short term losses.
    A statutory regime prescribes distinct set off rules for losses under the head Capital gains: short term capital losses may be set off against gains from any other capital asset, long term capital losses only against gains from other long term assets, and any residual loss after intra year set off qualifies for carry forward but only for a limited number of succeeding tax years; the Bill defined this residual as an unabsorbed capital loss, whereas the enacted provision omits that label but retains equivalent practical effect.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Carry-forward restriction of house property losses confines set-off to future house property income with a time-limited ceiling.
    Residual losses computed under Income from house property that are not wholly absorbed by intra-year set-off qualify as unabsorbed loss from house property and may be carried forward, to be set off only against future house property income in subsequent years until the loss is absorbed or the statutory temporal limit expires; the clause defines the qualifying unabsorbed loss by reference to prior application of intra-year set-off rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capital gains set-off rules restrict long-term losses to long-term gains while short-term losses offset any capital gains.
    Section 108 separates general intra-head set-off (excluding capital gains) from specific capital gains rules: long-term capital losses are only set off against other long-term capital gains in the same year, while short-term capital losses may be set off against gains from any capital asset, with classification and computation governed by the capital gains framework.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deeming rule for non-account-payee instruments treats amounts (including interest) as taxable income in the year of transaction.
    Amounts (including interest) borrowed or repaid through a negotiable instrument, a hundi, or any mode specified by the Board shall be deemed to be the income of the borrower or repayer for the tax year of the transaction; transactions effected by an account payee cheque are excluded, and sub-section (2) prevents re-assessment of the same amount under that sub-section on repayment.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained expenditure deemed income, disallowing deduction when source is not satisfactorily explained by assessing officer.
    Section 105 deems expenditure to be income when the assessee offers no explanation of its source or offers an explanation the Assessing Officer deems unsatisfactory; the deemed amount cannot be claimed as a deduction under the Act, the deeming may apply to part of an expenditure, and the provision contains no definitions, procedural safeguards, evidentiary standards, or appeal mechanisms.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained asset: acquisition expenditure governs deeming as income when taxpayers give no satisfactory explanation on source.
    An unexplained asset found to belong to an assessee, or where the asset measure exceeds recorded books, may be deemed income for the year if the assessee offers no explanation or an explanation unsatisfactory to the Assessing Officer; the enacted text measures the asset by the amount expended in acquiring such asset and expressly includes virtual digital assets, while leaving valuation mechanics, evidential burdens, and procedural standards unspecified.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained investments deemed income when not recorded or inadequately explained to the assessing officer.
    Section 103 deems the value of investments to be income in the tax year where an investment is not recorded in the assessee's books of account, if any, or where the Assessing Officer finds the amount exceeds recorded entries, and the assessee either offers no explanation or an explanation that is not satisfactory in the opinion of the Assessing Officer.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained credits: credited sums may be taxed if explanations are absent or unsatisfactory, shifting evidentiary burden to taxpayers and counterparties.
    Section 102 allows sums found credited in an assessee's books to be charged as income where no explanation is given or the explanation is not satisfactory to the Assessing Officer. It places special deeming requirements on loans/borrowings and certain private company receipts, requiring the person in whose name the credit stands to provide a satisfactory explanation to the Assessing Officer, while excluding specified venture capital funds from those counterparty requirements.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Clubbing of family income risks expanding under revised spouse professional-income wording, increasing compliance and valuation complexities.
    Section 99 requires inclusion in an individual's total income of amounts arising to a spouse, son's wife, minor child, or where property is converted into HUF property; it prescribes exclusions for certain minor child earnings, a proportionate apportionment formula for assets invested in business or partnership, deems income to include loss, preserves a temporal carve out for conversions on or before 31 December 1969, and identifies documentation and valuation consequences where Bill wording diverges on spouse professional income carve outs, third party benefit attribution and the denominator reference date for apportionment.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deductions under Section 93 clarify allowable expenses and caps for income from other sources, with key exclusions.
    Section 93 prescribes allowable deductions in computing income from other sources, including reasonable commissions for realising dividends and interest, cross-referenced expense allowances applied "so far as may be," capped deductions for family pension depending on tax computation method, revenue expenditures wholly and exclusively laid out, a single fixed-percentage deduction for a specified income class with no other deductions permitted, and sub-section rules denying deductions for a defined dividend class while limiting interest deductions for certain dividend or unit incomes.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Income from other sources determines taxability of miscellaneous receipts and prescribes valuation, thresholds, and exemptions.
    Section 92 creates a residuary head, Income from other sources, taxing miscellaneous receipts not chargeable under other heads and listing illustrative categories (dividends, winnings, specified insurance proceeds, interest, hire income, forfeited advances, compensation interest, termination payments, business trust distributions). It prescribes valuation and computation methods, monetary thresholds for gratuitous receipts with enumerated exceptions (relatives, marriage, inheritance, specified non profits, non transfer transactions), and cross references to other statutory definitions and procedures affecting payment modes and valuation challenges.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Cost of acquisition rules clarify valuation and allocation for capital gains, with special treatment for intangibles and pre-existing equity holdings.
    The provision defines cost of improvement and cost of acquisition for capital gains, treating improvements to specified intangibles as nil, excluding deductible expenditures, and reducing acquisition cost by prior depreciation on goodwill. It prescribes allocation rules for acquisitions by purchase, allotment, bonus, subscription and renunciation, and provides alternative valuation anchors-including an option to adopt a historic fair market value, exchange quotes, net asset value and the Cost Inflation Index-for certain pre-existing and unlisted equity holdings.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Exemption of capital gains for relocation to SEZs: reinvestment within prescribed window defers taxation, subject to deposit and scheme compliance
    Exemption applies to capital gains from transfer of assets when shifting an industrial undertaking from an urban area to a Special Economic Zone, functioning as a reinvestment relief if gains are applied to acquire or construct specified new assets in the SEZ within one year before to three years after transfer. Unutilised amounts must be deposited with a specified institution by the return filing due date and later utilised under a notified scheme; any portion unutilised after three years is charged as income. Cost basis of the new asset is adjusted for subsequent transfers within three years.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capital gains exemption on industrial relocation: reinvestment in new assets prevents taxation, subject to deposit and proof rules.
    A reinvestment linked exemption for capital gains applies where assets used in an industrial undertaking situated in a urban area are transferred as part of shifting the undertaking outside urban limits. The assessee must, within one year before or three years after transfer, acquire specified new assets or incur notified scheme expenses; reinvestment equal to or exceeding the gain prevents charging of the gain, shortfalls are charged as income, and unutilised proceeds must be deposited under a notified scheme with proof filed by the return due date.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capital gains relief for reinvestment into residential property requires timely deposit and triggers recapture if proceeds remain unutilised.
    Provision grants a proportionate exemption from long term capital gains where individuals/HUFs reinvest proceeds from sale of a non residential long term asset into one residential house in India, subject to purchase/construction time windows. Unutilised proceeds must be deposited under a notified scheme by the return filing due date with proof; recapture applies if deposits are not used within three years. The enacted text ties deposit triggers to net consideration, shortens the disqualification window for subsequent purchases, and imposes monetary caps and heightened compliance obligations.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 311 "Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      11 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 311 Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 311 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) (hereafter "Clause 311 (Bill)"), concerning taxation where members' shares in an association of persons (AOP) or body of individuals (BOI) are indeterminate or known. This matters to AOPs/BOIs, their members and the tax department because it prescribes the rate at which such aggregate entities are taxed in absence or presence of identifiable member shares. Effective date or enactment timing: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 311 (Bill) addresses the charge of income-tax on associations of persons and bodies of individuals. It mirrors and is substantively comparable to Section 311 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Document 1). Coverage: taxation of the total income of an AOP/BOI depending on whether individual members' shares in whole or part of the income are indeterminate/unknown or determinate/known. Definitions or explanatory notes: Not stated in the document beyond the deeming provision in sub-section (3) concerning when shares are to be treated as indeterminate or unknown.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 311 prescribes the method of charging tax on the total income of an association of persons or body of individuals when the individual members' shares in whole or part of that income are either indeterminate/unknown or determinate/known.

      Ingredients/elements derived from the text:

      • Trigger 1 (sub-section 1): Where member shares in whole or any part of the income are indeterminate or unknown.
      • Consequence under Trigger 1: Either (a) tax on the total income of the association/body at the maximum marginal rate; or (b) where any member's total income is chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate, tax on the total income at that higher rate.
      • Trigger 2 (sub-section 2): Where member shares in whole or any part of the income are determinate or known.
      • Consequences under Trigger 2: (a) If a member's total income excluding his share from the AOP/BOI exceeds the maximum non-taxable amount under the Finance Act for the relevant year, the association/body's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate; (b) If any member(s) is/are chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate, the portions of the AOP/BOI income relatable to those members are taxed at the higher rate(s) and the balance at the maximum marginal rate.
      • Deeming provision (sub-section 3): Shares shall be deemed indeterminate/unknown if they are indeterminate/unknown at formation or at any time thereafter.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The clause seeks to prevent rate-arbitrage or avoidance by ensuring that where individual entitlement cannot be ascertained, the AOP/BOI is taxed at the highest applicable personal rate (maximum marginal rate) unless a member's own total income attracts an even higher rate. Where shares are known, the clause aims at equitable allocation: members who are already taxed at higher personal rates bear tax on the income attributable to them at those higher rates; remaining income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. The statute signals an intent to protect the revenue and align taxation of aggregate entities with members' rates in transparent cases. No legislative history or policy rationale beyond the text is stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The clause contains operational distinctions rather than explicit provisos: the principal carve-outs are (i) where a member's own total income is taxed at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate then the higher rate applies to the AOP/BOI total income under the indeterminate scenario; and (ii) where shares are known, portions related to higher-rate members are taxed at their rates. Threshold conditions (e.g., definition of "maximum marginal rate") and procedural details are not provided in the clause. Specific exceptions beyond these allocations: Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: An AOP's internal profit sharing is not recorded and member shares are unknown; the AOP's total income will be taxed at the maximum marginal rate unless a member's total personal income is taxed at a higher rate, in which case that higher rate applies. (This follows directly from sub-section (1)(a)/(b).)
      • Example 2: Member shares are formalized. A member's other taxable income exceeds the non-taxable limit under the Finance Act for the year; the AOP's total income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. (Follows sub-section (2)(a).)
      • Example 3: Shares known; one member is taxed at a higher rate than the maximum marginal rate. The portion of AOP income attributable to that member is taxed at the higher rate; remaining AOP income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate. (Follows sub-section (2)(b)(i) & (ii).)

      Interplay

      Interaction with other legislation or administrative instruments: Clause 311 explicitly references "the Finance Act of the relevant year" for determining the "maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax" in relation to a member. Beyond that cross-reference, the text does not mention rules, notifications or circulars. Practical application will therefore require recourse to the Finance Act and possibly to other provisions of the Income-tax law for rate definitions and aggregator rules. Specific cross-references to Rules/Notifications/Circulars: Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Clause 311 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) and Section 311 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      • Structural ordering: Clause 311 (Bill) places the scenario where shares are indeterminate/unknown as sub-section (1) with alternative (a)/(b); Section 311 (Act) states a primary rule in sub-section (1) (tax at maximum marginal rate) and then in sub-section (2) provides the exception when a member's individual rate is higher.
        • Practical impact: No substantive change in outcome; only syntactic/organizational difference that may affect ease of reading but not tax consequence.
      • Reference to exempt threshold language: Clause 311(2)(a) refers to "the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax in the case of that member under the Finance Act of the relevant year"; Section 311(3)(a) refers to "the maximum amount which is not chargeable to, tax" (text broken) but context indicates the exempt threshold.
        • Practical impact: Clause 311's phrasing more precisely links the exemption amount to the Finance Act of the relevant year; Section 311's language is slightly less explicit. Practically this clarifies that current year exemption limits under the Finance Act govern the test for applying maximum marginal rate to the AOP/BOI.
      • Sub-section numbering and cross-referencing differences: Section 311 (Act) contains an express sub-section (2) dealing with cases where a member's total income is chargeable at a rate higher than the maximum marginal rate and then a separate sub-section (3) dealing with determinate shares with sub-clauses (a)/(b). Clause 311 (Bill) presents indeterminate shares in sub-section (1), determinate in sub-section (2), and the deeming provision in (3).
        • Practical impact: No substantive change; differences are organizational only but could affect citation precision during debate or drafting amendments.
      • Terminology concerning "maximum marginal rate": Both documents use the term; neither defines it.
        • Practical impact: Because both texts leave the term undefined within the clause, reliance on external provisions (e.g., Finance Act) will be necessary. Clause 311 explicitly ties the taxability test for a member's exempt threshold to the Finance Act; Section 311 is less explicit. This renders Clause 311 marginally clearer for application.
      • Overall substantive effect: The charge mechanics are consistent between the two texts: (i) if shares unknown -> tax the AOP/BOI at maximum marginal rate or higher rate if any member's total income is taxed at a higher rate; (ii) if shares known -> test each member's other income against exempt threshold and apportion taxation between portions attributable to higher-rate members and remaining income taxed at maximum marginal rate.
        • Practical impact: No change in the underlying tax policy; Clause 311 (Bill) and Section 311 (Act) are materially aligned, with only drafting and phrasing differences that affect interpretive clarity rather than substantive tax outcomes.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Entities should maintain and be able to produce contemporaneous documentation evidencing the distribution/sharing pattern among members. Where shares are not determinable, the AOP/BOI faces taxation at the maximum marginal rate which may be higher than typical corporate or aggregate rates. If any member has a higher personal tax rate, the AOP/BOI may attract that higher rate on its total income in indeterminate cases.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The clause's dichotomy between determinable and indeterminate shares places a premium on records establishing members' shares from formation and thereafter. Evidence of written partnership/AOP/BOI agreements, minutes, accounting records allocating income, and communications showing entitlements will be material to avoid the indeterminate classification. The clause's deeming rule shows that indeterminacy at formation or at any later time is sufficient to invoke the indeterminate regime.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 311 governs taxation of an AOP/BOI's total income based on whether members' shares are determinable.
      • If shares are indeterminate/unknown, the AOP/BOI's income is taxed at the maximum marginal rate or at any higher rate applicable to a member's total income.
      • If shares are known, test each member's other income against the non-taxable threshold under the Finance Act; portions attributable to higher-rate members taxed at their rates, balance at maximum marginal rate.
      • The clause contains a deeming provision that treats indeterminacy at formation or thereafter as sufficient to trigger the indeterminate regime.
      • Clause 311 (Bill) and Section 311 (Act) are substantively aligned; differences are mostly drafting and cross-reference clarifications, notably the Bill's explicit reference to the Finance Act for the exemption limit.

      Full Text:

      Section 311 Charge of tax where shares of members in association of persons or body of individuals unknown, etc.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax