Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Transformations in Tax Deduction and Collection Compliance and Reporting in India : Clause 397(1) of...
    Reform of Tax Deduction and Collection Certificates : Clause 395(4) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Step forward in the rationalization and modernization of recovery of tax collection under Tax law in...
    Evolution, Enforcement, and Relief Mechanisms in TDS/TCS Defaults : Clause 398 of Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Centralised and Automated Processing of TDS/TCS Statements : Clause 399 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    The Transformation of TDS/TCS Compliance and Reporting Obligations : Clause 397(3) of the Income Tax...
    Principles of Tax Deduction Credit in Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 390(5)-(6) of Income Tax Bill, ...
    Ensuring Tax Base Integrity in Indian Income Taxation : Clause 396 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. ...
    Streamlining TDS Exemptions in India's Income Tax Laws - Clause 393(6) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Lower Deduction Certificates under Indian Tax Law : Commentary on Clause 395(1) of Income Tax Bill, ...
    Analysis of Tax Deduction at Source on Securities Income of FIIs and Specified Funds under Indian Ta...
    Recasting Tax Deduction at Source on Cross-Border Investment Income : Clause 393(2)[Table S. No. 13 ...
    Legal and Practical Implications for TDS on Offshore Fund Investments : Clause 393(2) [Table: S.No. ...
    Modernizing Withholding Tax on Non-Resident Unit Income : Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No. 10] and Clause ...
    Exemption from Tax Deduction at Source for Specified Entities (Government, RBI, Corporation and Mutu...
    Grossing Up Mechanisms in Indian TDS Law : Clause 393(10) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 1...
    Changing Landscape of TDS on Payments to Non-Residents in Indian Tax Law : Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No...
    Ensure the tax compliance and transparency regarding the income distributed by partnership firms to ...
    Comprehensive Analysis of TDS on Virtual Digital Assets Transfer : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(iv)]...
    Practical implications of TDS on non-monetary or indirect forms of income : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.N...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDCAN requirement modernisation centralises TAN/PAN linkage and reporting, tightening compliance and correction procedures.
    Clause 397 requires persons deducting or collecting tax to apply for and, once allotted, quote a Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TDCAN) in all prescribed documents; it consolidates deduction and collection numbers, sets out statutory carve-outs and government-notified exemptions, integrates PAN linkage and consequences for non-furnishing, and centralises payment, reporting and correction mechanisms including procedures for non-resident payments and government offices.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS/TCS certificate obligation requires deductors and collectors to issue prescribed certificates enabling tax credit and digital reporting.
    Clause 395(4) requires every person deducting or collecting tax at source to issue a certificate to the deductee/collectee specifying the amount of tax deducted or collected, the rate, and any other prescribed particulars within a prescribed period; employers who pay tax on behalf of employees must similarly furnish a certificate confirming payment to the Central Government. The clause covers both TDS and TCS, delegates format and timing to subordinate rules, and anticipates digital and harmonized implementation while leaving rectification, duplicate issuance and penalty mechanics to rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Non-exclusivity of source-based tax collection allows authorities to pursue additional recovery methods when payments are provisional.
    Clause 390(4) states that taxes paid by deduction or collection at source, advance payments and specified payments operate in addition to any other mode of tax collection to discharge the liability for income assessed for a tax year, preserving the tax authority's power to pursue alternative recovery measures where such anticipatory payments are provisional, insufficient, or incorrect while allowing credit or refund for any excess.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS/TCS enforcement: deeming of defaulting deductors as assessees in default triggers interest, charge on assets, and conditioned relief.
    Clause 398 deems persons required to deduct or collect tax, including principal officers and specified collectors, to be an assessee in default where tax is not deducted, not collected, or not paid to the government; relief is available if the recipient files a return, includes the relevant sum, pays the tax due and the deductor/collector furnishes a prescribed accountant's certificate. Interest is prescribed for the periods between deductibility, deduction and payment, unpaid tax plus interest is a statutory charge on assets, time limits for default orders are specified, and penalty requires satisfaction of lack of good and sufficient reasons.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Centralised TDS/TCS processing: automated, time bound framework mandates intimation within a year and covers correction statements.
    Clause 399 creates an automated framework for processing TDS and TCS statements, including correction statements, requiring rectification of arithmetical errors and adjustment of apparent incorrect claims, computation of interest and fee, determination of net payable or refundable amounts after adjusting prior payments, issuance of a formal intimation to the deductor/collector, and grant of any refund due; it also mandates that intimations be sent within a year from the end of the tax year and empowers the Board to make a centralised processing scheme.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS/TCS compliance: expanded reporting and verified statement obligations, including cross-border and below-threshold payment reporting.
    Clause 397(3) requires persons responsible for deduction or collection of tax, and certain employers, to pay amounts to the credit of the Central Government within prescribed time and to submit verified statements in prescribed form and manner; it mandates reporting of payments to non-residents whether or not chargeable, requires special statements for government payments without challans, permits correction statements within six years, obliges reporting of below-threshold interest payments by specified entities, and makes collectors who fail to collect liable to pay the tax.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax credit for source deductions ensures remitted taxes are treated as payment on behalf of the relevant taxpayer and allocated by rule.
    Clause 390(5) treats sums remitted as tax paid on behalf of the person from or in respect of whose income such tax was deducted or collected, and Clause 390(6) empowers the Board to make rules for allocating that credit to such persons or to others and for specifying the tax year for which credit is allowed, extending the scope beyond conventional TDS/TCS to include specified pre-payments and leaving operational detail to subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax deducted is income received: gross receipts included for tax computation with credit for foreign withholding.
    Clause 396 deems amounts deducted under the relevant withholding chapter and income tax deducted abroad (where credit is allowed) to be income received for computing an assessee's taxable income, with specified carve out exceptions; this preserves gross income inclusion while permitting credit for taxes withheld and raises interpretative issues about the chapter's scope, the stated exceptions, cross border withholding and transitional treatment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS nil-declaration prevents withholding when estimated total income is below taxable threshold, subject to prescribed declaration and reporting.
    Clause 393(6) permits certain recipients to avoid TDS by furnishing a prescribed written declaration that their estimated total income for the year yields nil tax; upon a valid declaration the payer must not deduct tax on specified payments and must forward a copy to tax authorities, subject to the condition that aggregate such incomes do not exceed the basic exemption limit and to general anti evasion consequences for false declarations.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Lower Deduction Certificates: streamlined TDS/TCS certification requiring AO satisfaction and binding certificate rates.
    Clause 395(1) creates a mechanism for Lower Deduction Certificates allowing taxpayers to apply for lower or nil deduction of tax at source; the Assessing Officer must issue a certificate when satisfied on objective material, the deductor must apply the specified rate until the certificate's validity, and procedural details, scope, validity periods and ancillary measures are to be provided by rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on securities income: clarified withholding rules, treaty relief mechanics, and exemptions for capital gains and exempt fund receipts.
    Clause 393 establishes a tabular TDS regime on income from securities, distinguishing taxable securities income from capital gains and exempt receipts. Clause 393(2) prescribes withholding entries for Foreign Institutional Investors with rates referenced to an interpretative note and a 10% rate for specified funds, subject to documentation for treaty benefits. Clause 393(4) consolidates exemptions by excluding capital gains payable to foreign investors and exempt income of specified funds from TDS, aiming to avoid unnecessary withholding and refund procedures.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Deduction at Source clarifies withholding obligations on cross border bond and GDR payments to non residents, including DTAA interaction.
    Clause 393(2) Table S. No. 13 and 14 requires withholding on payments to non residents of interest or dividends and long term capital gains from bonds and GDRs referred to in section 209, mandates deduction at the earlier of credit or payment by any person responsible for the payment, prescribes fixed concessional withholding rates, integrates general TDS machinery including declarations and higher deduction for missing PAN, and preserves DTAA relief and exceptions where income is not chargeable.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on offshore fund income and capital gains: withholding at credit or payment, with higher exit withholding and treaty considerations.
    Clause 393(2) requires any person paying income in respect of specified units or long term capital gains on transfer of such units to deduct tax at source at the prescribed rates at the time of credit or payment, without any monetary threshold; the provision cross refers to definitions in section 208, deems credits to suspense accounts as payment for TDS, and is subject to subsections dealing with exceptions, declarations and specified exclusions, while raising interpretative issues on definitions, treaty interaction, gross up obligations and transitional treatment compared with the prior Section 196B regime.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Withholding tax on non-resident unit income: consolidation preserves treaty relief and UTI exemption under prescribed conditions.
    Clause 393 consolidates TDS on income in respect of units paid to non-residents: Clause 393(2) requires deduction by any payer on units of specified mutual funds and specified companies paid to non-resident individuals and foreign companies at rates per Note 2 with DTAA benefits subject to prescribed documentation; Clause 393(4) exempts income on Unit Trust of India units payable to NRIs and non-resident HUFs subject to prescribed conditions and FEMA compliance, thereby retaining the legacy UTI carve-out while delegating exemption details to subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS exemption for specified public entities prevents withholding on interest, dividends and other income, simplifying payer compliance.
    Clause 393(5) provides an overriding TDS exemption for payments to the Government, the Reserve Bank of India, statutorily tax exempt corporations established by or under a Central Act, and mutual funds specified in Schedule VII, covering interest, dividends (in respect of securities or shares owned by or in which they have full beneficial interest) and any other income accruing or arising to them, with the non obstante language ensuring the exemption prevails over other withholding obligations.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Grossing-up requirement preserves tax base where payer bears recipient's tax liability, altering TDS computation and compliance.
    Clause 393(10) mandates a grossing-up requirement where the payer bears the recipient's tax: taxable income must be increased so that, after deduction of tax at the rates provided in the Chapter (including applicable surcharge and cess), the net amount equals the contractual payment. The clause applies to TDS payments under the Chapter except specified salary cases, covers residents and non residents, and requires use of the applicable DTAA rate when beneficial. Key practical issues include computation of add ons, allocation across composite payments, currency fluctuation effects, and contract drafting to evidence net of tax obligations.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on payments to non-residents: a table-based framework modernizes withholding obligations and aligns rates with treaty benefits.
    Clause 393(2) Table S.No.17 imposes a residuary TDS obligation on interest (excluding specified categories) and any other sum chargeable under the Act, excluding salaries, payable to non-residents or foreign companies; deduction is by "any person" at the earlier of credit or payment at the "rates in force," with treaty rates available subject to procedural compliance, and operates alongside exemptions, lower/nil deduction certificates, suspense-account deeming rules and grossing-up anti-avoidance provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on partner payments: mandatory withholding on specified firm-to-partner payments with prescribed threshold and compliance duties.
    Mandatory withholding applies to sums in the nature of salary, remuneration, commission, bonus or interest paid or credited (including to the capital account) by a firm to a partner, deductible at ten per cent at the earlier of credit or payment, with a per-partner annual threshold exemption and declaration-based non-deduction mechanisms; the firm bears the deduction obligation and normal TDS procedures apply.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on virtual digital assets imposes withholding obligations with targeted exemptions for small-value and small-taxpayer transfers.
    The Bill requires withholding on any benefit or perquisite arising from business or profession whether cash or non-cash, obliges the provider to deduct tax and, if consideration is wholly or partly in kind with insufficient cash, to ensure tax payment before release. A parallel VDA withholding regime mandates deduction on transfers of virtual digital assets with specified exemptions for small-value transactions and small taxpayers, similar safeguards for non-cash consideration, and procedural rules addressing timing, aggregation and crediting for compliance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on non-monetary benefits: providers must withhold tax on in-kind and indirect business advantages, affecting compliance and valuation.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(iv)] and section 194R require the provider of any benefit or perquisite arising from business or profession to deduct tax at source on the value or aggregate value of such benefits, covering cash and non-cash advantages, with specified thresholds and exemptions for smaller providers; the Bill consolidates this obligation, clarifies anti-overlap treatment with other TDS provisions, links timing of deduction to credit or payment, and preserves reliance on administrative guidance for valuation and operational issues.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 282 "Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These texts reproduce Clause/Section 282 of the Income Tax Bill/Act, 2025, setting time limits for issuance of notices u/ss 280 and 281 (notices and show-cause notices in cases of income escaping assessment). The provisions delineate outer limits (four years; up to six years in specified circumstances) and a one-year minimum waiting period. The rule affects taxpayers, assessing officers and the Department; effective/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: references within the text are to sections 280 and 281 of the same enactment (Procedure for assessment). The provision governs temporal jurisdiction to issue notices where income is alleged to have escaped assessment. Definitions: the text does not supply definitions (for example, of "relevant tax year", "books of account", "other documents", "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" or "Assessing Officer"). Not stated in the document. Scope: applies to notices u/ss 280 (notice to assess) and 281 (notice to show cause) for the relevant tax year; sets both outer and inner temporal cut-offs and an exception where certain evidentiary thresholds are met or information indicates escaped income likely aggregating to fifty lakh rupees or more.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause/Section 282 provides a three-part temporal scheme.

      • Clause (1) - Notices u/s 280 (presumably a notice initiating proceedings for assessment of escaped income): barred after four years and three months from the end of the relevant tax year, unless a narrower exception in (1)(b) applies. A secondary window permits issuance between four years and three months and six years and three months only where the Assessing Officer possesses books of account or other documents/evidence related to an asset, expenditure, transaction or entry which shows that income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (2) - Notices u/s 281 (notice to show cause): barred if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant tax year, unless the case falls under (2)(b). An extended window up to six years is allowed where, as per information with the Assessing Officer, the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (3) - A minimum waiting period: no notice u/s 280 or 281 shall be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The provision seeks to balance finality for taxpayers with the Department's interest in pursuing substantial cases of escaped income. The four-year rule (and four-year rule with three months for section 280) provides a general limitation period; the extension to six years is conditional on the presence of evidence or information indicating significant escaped income (threshold: fifty lakh rupees). The separate one-year bar suggests a cooling-off or administrative window during which notices cannot be issued, possibly to allow other processes (filing, assessment) to conclude; however, the document does not explain the policy reasons. Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The text contains two express exceptions/provisos:

      • For section 280 - the extension up to six years applies only where the Assessing Officer "has in his possession" (in the Act text) books of account or other documents or evidence related to an asset/expenditure/transaction/entry showing escaped income likely amounting to Rs. 50,00,000 or more.
      • For section 281 - the extension up to six years applies where, "as per the information with the Assessing Officer", the escaped income amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs. 50,00,000 or more. The text does not require possession of the documents; it requires information indicating the quantum.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tax year ending 31 March 2025. Under clause (2)(a), a notice u/s 281 cannot be issued after 31 March 2029 (four years). However, if on 1 April 2028 the Assessing Officer has information that escaped income of Rs. 60 lakh is likely, a notice can still be issued up to 31 March 2031 (six years). These dates are illustrative arithmetic consistent with the text; the document does not provide calendar examples. Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: For section 280, the four years and three months cut-off: for the same year ending 31 March 2025, the ordinary bar would apply after 30 June 2029; but between 1 July 2029 and 30 June 2031 a notice may be issued only if the AO has in his possession books/documents showing escaped income of at least Rs. 50 lakh. The document does not define the nature of acceptable documents. Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Interaction with other provisions: the text refers to sections 280 and 281. The clause differentiates tests for extension between those two sections: possession of documentary evidence is expressly required for section 280 extension, whereas for section 281 an information-based standard suffices. The provision does not reference any Rules, Notifications or Circulars. Not stated in the document: any linkage to penalty provisions, prosecution timelines, or assessment/revision provisions; nor any transitional or retrospective application rules.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers should note that general finality arises at four years (or four years and three months for section 280), but the Department can reopen or issue notices up to six years where the threshold of Rs. 50 lakh is met. The divergence in the evidentiary standard between section 280 and 281 is material: possession of documentary evidence is required for section 280; for section 281, information in the AO's possession may suffice. This affects where and when taxpayers must preserve books and documents and when to expect notices.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Given the statutory reliance on "books of account or other documents or evidence" (for section 280) and "information with the Assessing Officer" (for section 281), stakeholders should preserve contemporaneous records that establish the nature, quantum and timing of assets, expenditures and transactions. The text, however, does not specify formats, retention periods beyond the statutory timelines, or proof standards for "possession" or "information". Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause/Section 282 establishes a general four-year limitation for notices u/ss 280 and 281, with differing technical adjustments.
      • Section 280 is subject to a four-years-and-three-months outer limit; extension up to six years and three months requires the AO to have "in his possession" books/documents/evidence showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • Section 281 has a four-year cut-off; extension up to six years is permissible where, per the information with the AO, escaped income is or is likely to be Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • A mandatory minimum: no notice u/s 280 or 281 can be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.
      • The text does not define key terms, explain thresholds' rationale, describe evidentiary standards, or state effective date or transitional rules. Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 282 (Bill, Old Version)Section 282 (Income-tax Act, 2025)Practical Impact
      Form/SourcePresented as Clause 282 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); accompanied by a brief explanatory line: "Clause 282 of the Bill provides for time limit for notices..."Presented as Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text).Substantive wording largely identical; enactment confirms legislative finality. The explanatory note in the Bill is removed in the Act; no substantive legal effect.
      Phrasing regarding AO's materials (section 280)States the AO "has books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."States the AO "has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."The Act adds "in his possession", which emphasises physical or constructive control of documents by the AO at the time of issuing the notice. This could affect whether third-party information or mere leads suffice for a section 280 extension; the Act language arguably tightens the requirement to actual possession, potentially raising a procedural threshold for the Department.
      Minor temporal wordingUses same temporal markers (four years; four years and three months; up to six years).Same.No practical change.
      Explanatory sentenceIncludes a one-line explanatory sentence summarising purpose.Does not include that explanatory sentence, but otherwise identical.Cosmetic only; no change in operative law.

      Concluding Observations

      The enacted Section 282 and the Bill's Clause 282 are substantively congruent. The main drafting divergence is the Act's insertion of "in his possession" for the section 280 exception; this may be significant in practice as it highlights an evidentiary/possession requirement for the extended six-year window u/s 280. Otherwise, the provision sets a two-tier limitation approach (general four-year rule; extendable to six years in substantial cases of escaped income) and a one-year minimum bar, with a monetary threshold of fifty lakh rupees. The text omits definitions, evidentiary standards, procedural rules for proving "possession" or "information", effective date, and transitional provisions. Not stated in the document.


      Full Text:

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax