Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Comparative Analysis of Tax Recovery and Default Provisions : Clause 411 of the Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Streamlining Advance Tax Credit in Indian Tax Legislation : Clause 410 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Analyzing the Deeming Provisions for Advance Tax Default : Clause 409 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 v...
    Evolution and Implications of Advance Tax Instalment Provisions : Clause 408 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Assessing Officer's Powers and Taxpayer Rights in Advance Tax : Clause 407 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Reforming Advance Tax Obligations : Clause 406 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 210 of the I...
    Comparative Legal Analysis of Advance Tax Computation: Clause 405 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. S...
    Understanding Advance Tax Thresholds : Clause 404 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 208 of th...
    Significant provision governing the liability for the payment of advance tax in India : Clause 403 o...
    Legal and Practical Implications of PAN Non-Compliance : Clause 397(2) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Centralized Processing of Tax Deduction and Collection Statements : Clause 399 of Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Evolution of Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number : Clause 397(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Evolution and Implications of TDS/TCS Default Provisions : Clause 398 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Innovations in TDS/TCS Reporting and Compliance : Clause 397(3) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section...
    Legislative framework of collection of tax at source (TCS) and issuance of certificates in India : C...
    Navigating the New Landscape of Tax Collection at Source : Clause 394 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Reforming PAN Compliance : Clause 397(2) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 206AA of the Incom...
    Transforming Tax Reporting and Compliance in India : Clause 397(3) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sect...
    Safeguarding Taxpayers from Double Taxation : Clause 401 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 20...
    Correct identification of the "person responsible for payment" : Clause 402(27) of the Income Tax Bi...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax default and recovery: rules on payment timelines, interest adjustment, waiver procedures, and deferment during appeals.
    Clause 411 sets the conditions for payment of tax on a notice of demand, the deemed default trigger for coercive recovery, and AO powers to shorten payment periods, extend time or allow instalments. It prescribes interest on unpaid demands with adjustment where liabilities change, prevents overlapping interest charges, allows time bound waiver or reduction of interest for hardship with a hearing requirement, permits deferment of default treatment during appeals on conditions, and protects remittance restricted foreign income from being treated as default.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax credit ensures payments are applied to the relevant tax year and credited in regular assessment.
    Sums paid or recovered as advance tax, excluding penalty and interest, shall be treated as payment of tax for the income of the tax year in which payable, and credit for such advance tax must be given to the assessee in the regular assessment; the clause covers voluntary payments and recoveries and ties credit to the relevant tax year, while procedural mechanisms, definition of tax year, and treatment on reassessment are left to subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax default: three independent triggers establish deemed default and activate statutory consequences for noncompliance.
    Clause 409 deems a taxpayer in default for advance tax where the taxpayer fails to: pay an instalment specified by an Assessing Officer by the due date; send an intimation of revised liability to the Assessing Officer by the date an unpaid instalment becomes due; or pay advance tax based on the taxpayer's own estimate of current income. The clause frames these three independent triggers as grounds for deeming default, thereby activating statutory consequences such as interest, penalties, and recovery measures.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax instalment schedule: staged payments and a single-instalment rule for presumptive taxpayers streamline compliance and revenue flow.
    Clause 408 requires assessees to pay advance tax in staged instalments during the tax year, with progressive minimum thresholds and specified due dates, and treats amounts paid on or before the last day of the tax year as advance tax. It provides a single-instalment exception for presumptive taxpayers and cross-references the statutory computation provision for determining current income, while updating terminology and certain cross-references that will require harmonisation with other provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax orders: AO may require payment based on the higher of assessed or returned income, with taxpayer estimation rights.
    Clause 407 authorises the Assessing Officer to order advance tax from persons already assessed, specifying a specified sum-the higher of the latest assessed income or subsequently returned income-and an instalment schedule, with such orders and any amendments requiring accompanying notices of demand and adherence to prescribed timing and procedural safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax self assessment: Bill emphasizes taxpayer initiated instalments and mid year revision, shifting reliance onto voluntary compliance.
    Clause 406 requires every person liable to pay advance tax to self assess and remit instalments based on the specified sum, defined as the assessee's estimate of current income, calculated by the cross referenced methodology and paid by statutory due dates; taxpayers may increase or reduce subsequent instalments to accord with revised estimates, while the clause itself does not set out administrative order powers.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax computation: formula-based method clarifies net tax after TDS/TCS credits and tightens credit conditions.
    Clause 405 adopts a formulaic computation of advance tax: A = B - C, where B is tax on the "specified sum" and C is TDS/TCS deductible only if the income is included in the specified sum and the deductor/collector has actually credited/paid or received/debited the income post deduction/collection. Net agricultural income is included by reference to assessing officer orders or the assessee's estimate as applicable. The clause modernises drafting and omits the prior HUF specific provision, raising potential gaps.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax liability retained; payable during the tax year when computed tax meets the statutory threshold, preserving continuity.
    Clause 404 requires payment of advance tax during the tax year when the amount of tax "as computed under this Part" for that year reaches the statutory threshold, linking liability to the year of income accrual, incorporating deductions, exemptions and set offs in computation, and using the threshold to exclude small liabilities from procedural advance payments.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Advance tax liability clarified: pay tax on current income during the tax year, with a narrow senior citizen exemption.
    Clause 403 requires payment of advance tax during the tax year on an assessee's current income, defined as the total income chargeable to tax for that tax year, and exempts resident individuals aged sixty or above who have no income under "Profits and gains of business or profession." The provision replaces earlier temporal terms with "tax year" and references mechanisms within "this Part," indicating structural reorganization and necessitating clear definitions and transitional guidance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    PAN non compliance increases withholding and collection rates and invalidates declarations, expanding PAN obligations to both TDS and TCS.
    Clause 397(2) mandates furnishing and quoting of PAN by deductees and collectees, invalidates certain declarations and applications where PAN is absent, and requires deductors/collectors to apply prescribed higher rates of TDS and TCS in the absence of PAN. The clause covers both TDS and TCS, provides exemptions for specified non resident scenarios and specified payments, caps TDS on certain rent payments at the last month's rent, and emphasizes comprehensive documentation and reporting obligations to enhance traceability and enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Centralized processing of withholding statements enables automated determination and intimation of amounts payable or refundable.
    Centralized processing creates an automated, unified mechanism for TDS and TCS statements, including correction statements, requiring rectification of arithmetical errors and apparent incorrect claims, computation of interest and fees on adjusted amounts, adjustment against prior payments, issuance of an intimation within one year from the end of the tax year, and grant of refunds; the Board may establish a centralized processing scheme and must address interpretive gaps such as the undefined scope of "incorrect claim apparent" and the tax year/financial year distinction.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number mandated for deductors and collectors to enhance tracking and reporting under the new bill
    Clause 397(1) requires every person responsible for deducting or collecting tax to apply for and, when allotted, quote a Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TDCAN) in all prescribed TDS/TCS documents; it prevents duplication, allows prescribed timelines and forms, and provides targeted exemptions including notified persons and categories cross referenced to other provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed assessee in default: consolidated TDS/TCS consequences including interest, asset charge, and conditional relief.
    Clause 398 deems persons required to deduct or collect tax who fail to deduct, collect, or remit to be assessee in default, subject to interest, recovery and a statutory charge on assets. A conditional exception applies where the payee has reported and paid the income tax and an accountant's certificate in the prescribed form is furnished; interest is bifurcated between pre-collection and post-collection periods and must be paid before filing the relevant statement. The clause sets a limitation period for default orders and requires satisfaction of good and sufficient reasons before penalties are imposed.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS/TCS reporting modernization: unified mandates for remittance, verified statements, non-resident reporting and six-year corrections.
    Clause 397(3) mandates that every person responsible for deduction or collection, including employers and designated government officers, remit deducted or collected tax to the Central Government within prescribed timelines and furnish verified statements in prescribed forms; it requires the prescribed authority to issue statements to buyers/licensors/lessees, mandates reporting of payments to non-residents irrespective of taxability, recognises a six-year correction window for statement amendments, compels specified financial institutions to file statements for certain payments, and preserves liability where tax collection fails.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Lower TCS certificates permit reduced collection when taxpayer income justifies it, with mandatory certified issuance and electronic processes.
    Clause 395(3) permits buyers, licensees or lessees to apply to the Assessing Officer for collection of tax at a lower rate where the AO is satisfied that the applicant's total income justifies lower collection; the AO issues a certificate specifying the reduced rate and validity, subject to rules and to cancellation after hearing. Clause 395(4) requires every person deducting or collecting tax to issue a certificate to the deductee or collectee specifying the amount, rate and other prescribed particulars within prescribed timelines, with electronic issuance anticipated.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax collection at source: consolidated TCS framework aligns rates, preserves declaration exemptions and prevents double collection.
    Clause 394 consolidates TCS rules into a table specifying liable collectors, receipt categories, tiered rates and timing (earlier of debit or payment), retains a declaration based exemption for residents using goods for manufacturing/processing/production or power generation with prescribed duplicate filings and reporting, incorporates anti overlap safeguards preventing double collection on remittance and tour package transactions, and adopts existing definitions for forest produce while omitting certain granular definitions and the lower/nil TCS certificate mechanism pending further rulemaking.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    PAN furnishing requirement: higher withholding rates apply where PAN is not provided, with specified carve-outs for non-residents.
    Clause 397(2) requires recipients and payers of amounts subject to TDS/TCS to furnish and quote a valid PAN; failure to do so triggers withholding or collection at enhanced statutory rates, invalidates declarations or applications for lower or nil deduction absent PAN, and mandates PAN disclosure in all transactional documents, while providing specified exemptions for certain non-residents and a cap on TDS for rent in defined cases.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS/TCS reporting obligations expanded: mandatory electronic payment, verified statements, correction window and liability for non-collection.
    Clause 397(3) requires prompt payment of tax deducted or collected to the Central Government and the furnishing of verified statements in prescribed forms and manner. It expands reporting to include payments to non-residents, special procedures for government remittances without challans, and interest payments below thresholds by specified entities. The clause permits correction statements within six years and imposes liability to pay where tax is not collected, while delegating operational details to prescribed authorities and mandating electronic filing and verification.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Bar against direct demand protects assessees from paying tax already deducted at source, placing recovery obligations on the deductor.
    A statutory bar prevents authorities from calling an assessee to pay tax to the extent tax has been deducted at source: Clause 401 of the 2025 Bill mirrors Section 205 of the 1961 Act by protecting the assessee where tax was actually deducted, limiting liability "to the extent" of deduction and leaving recovery, penalties, and prosecution against the deductor for any non deposit.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Person responsible for paying: allocation of TDS/TCS duties to payers, principal officers, authorised remitters and government payors.
    Clause 402(27) designates the person responsible for paying for TDS/TCS according to payment type and payer status: employers (and company principal officers) for salaries; payers (and company principal officers) for interest and other chargeable sums; authorised persons for remittances to NRIs; payers for reporting payments to non-residents irrespective of chargeability; and drawing and disbursing officers (or the actual payor) for government payments, with cross-references to FEMA and updated agent definitions.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 282 "Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These texts reproduce Clause/Section 282 of the Income Tax Bill/Act, 2025, setting time limits for issuance of notices u/ss 280 and 281 (notices and show-cause notices in cases of income escaping assessment). The provisions delineate outer limits (four years; up to six years in specified circumstances) and a one-year minimum waiting period. The rule affects taxpayers, assessing officers and the Department; effective/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: references within the text are to sections 280 and 281 of the same enactment (Procedure for assessment). The provision governs temporal jurisdiction to issue notices where income is alleged to have escaped assessment. Definitions: the text does not supply definitions (for example, of "relevant tax year", "books of account", "other documents", "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" or "Assessing Officer"). Not stated in the document. Scope: applies to notices u/ss 280 (notice to assess) and 281 (notice to show cause) for the relevant tax year; sets both outer and inner temporal cut-offs and an exception where certain evidentiary thresholds are met or information indicates escaped income likely aggregating to fifty lakh rupees or more.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause/Section 282 provides a three-part temporal scheme.

      • Clause (1) - Notices u/s 280 (presumably a notice initiating proceedings for assessment of escaped income): barred after four years and three months from the end of the relevant tax year, unless a narrower exception in (1)(b) applies. A secondary window permits issuance between four years and three months and six years and three months only where the Assessing Officer possesses books of account or other documents/evidence related to an asset, expenditure, transaction or entry which shows that income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (2) - Notices u/s 281 (notice to show cause): barred if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant tax year, unless the case falls under (2)(b). An extended window up to six years is allowed where, as per information with the Assessing Officer, the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (3) - A minimum waiting period: no notice u/s 280 or 281 shall be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The provision seeks to balance finality for taxpayers with the Department's interest in pursuing substantial cases of escaped income. The four-year rule (and four-year rule with three months for section 280) provides a general limitation period; the extension to six years is conditional on the presence of evidence or information indicating significant escaped income (threshold: fifty lakh rupees). The separate one-year bar suggests a cooling-off or administrative window during which notices cannot be issued, possibly to allow other processes (filing, assessment) to conclude; however, the document does not explain the policy reasons. Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The text contains two express exceptions/provisos:

      • For section 280 - the extension up to six years applies only where the Assessing Officer "has in his possession" (in the Act text) books of account or other documents or evidence related to an asset/expenditure/transaction/entry showing escaped income likely amounting to Rs. 50,00,000 or more.
      • For section 281 - the extension up to six years applies where, "as per the information with the Assessing Officer", the escaped income amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs. 50,00,000 or more. The text does not require possession of the documents; it requires information indicating the quantum.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tax year ending 31 March 2025. Under clause (2)(a), a notice u/s 281 cannot be issued after 31 March 2029 (four years). However, if on 1 April 2028 the Assessing Officer has information that escaped income of Rs. 60 lakh is likely, a notice can still be issued up to 31 March 2031 (six years). These dates are illustrative arithmetic consistent with the text; the document does not provide calendar examples. Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: For section 280, the four years and three months cut-off: for the same year ending 31 March 2025, the ordinary bar would apply after 30 June 2029; but between 1 July 2029 and 30 June 2031 a notice may be issued only if the AO has in his possession books/documents showing escaped income of at least Rs. 50 lakh. The document does not define the nature of acceptable documents. Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Interaction with other provisions: the text refers to sections 280 and 281. The clause differentiates tests for extension between those two sections: possession of documentary evidence is expressly required for section 280 extension, whereas for section 281 an information-based standard suffices. The provision does not reference any Rules, Notifications or Circulars. Not stated in the document: any linkage to penalty provisions, prosecution timelines, or assessment/revision provisions; nor any transitional or retrospective application rules.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers should note that general finality arises at four years (or four years and three months for section 280), but the Department can reopen or issue notices up to six years where the threshold of Rs. 50 lakh is met. The divergence in the evidentiary standard between section 280 and 281 is material: possession of documentary evidence is required for section 280; for section 281, information in the AO's possession may suffice. This affects where and when taxpayers must preserve books and documents and when to expect notices.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Given the statutory reliance on "books of account or other documents or evidence" (for section 280) and "information with the Assessing Officer" (for section 281), stakeholders should preserve contemporaneous records that establish the nature, quantum and timing of assets, expenditures and transactions. The text, however, does not specify formats, retention periods beyond the statutory timelines, or proof standards for "possession" or "information". Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause/Section 282 establishes a general four-year limitation for notices u/ss 280 and 281, with differing technical adjustments.
      • Section 280 is subject to a four-years-and-three-months outer limit; extension up to six years and three months requires the AO to have "in his possession" books/documents/evidence showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • Section 281 has a four-year cut-off; extension up to six years is permissible where, per the information with the AO, escaped income is or is likely to be Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • A mandatory minimum: no notice u/s 280 or 281 can be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.
      • The text does not define key terms, explain thresholds' rationale, describe evidentiary standards, or state effective date or transitional rules. Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 282 (Bill, Old Version)Section 282 (Income-tax Act, 2025)Practical Impact
      Form/SourcePresented as Clause 282 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); accompanied by a brief explanatory line: "Clause 282 of the Bill provides for time limit for notices..."Presented as Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text).Substantive wording largely identical; enactment confirms legislative finality. The explanatory note in the Bill is removed in the Act; no substantive legal effect.
      Phrasing regarding AO's materials (section 280)States the AO "has books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."States the AO "has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."The Act adds "in his possession", which emphasises physical or constructive control of documents by the AO at the time of issuing the notice. This could affect whether third-party information or mere leads suffice for a section 280 extension; the Act language arguably tightens the requirement to actual possession, potentially raising a procedural threshold for the Department.
      Minor temporal wordingUses same temporal markers (four years; four years and three months; up to six years).Same.No practical change.
      Explanatory sentenceIncludes a one-line explanatory sentence summarising purpose.Does not include that explanatory sentence, but otherwise identical.Cosmetic only; no change in operative law.

      Concluding Observations

      The enacted Section 282 and the Bill's Clause 282 are substantively congruent. The main drafting divergence is the Act's insertion of "in his possession" for the section 280 exception; this may be significant in practice as it highlights an evidentiary/possession requirement for the extended six-year window u/s 280. Otherwise, the provision sets a two-tier limitation approach (general four-year rule; extendable to six years in substantial cases of escaped income) and a one-year minimum bar, with a monetary threshold of fifty lakh rupees. The text omits definitions, evidentiary standards, procedural rules for proving "possession" or "information", effective date, and transitional provisions. Not stated in the document.


      Full Text:

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax