Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Digital Annual Information Transformation in Tax Administration : Clause 510 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Crypto-Asset Reporting Obligations under Indian Tax Law : Clause 509 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Evolving Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Clause 508 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section ...
    Transparency and Taxation in Media Production : Clause 507 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Disclosure Norms for Indian Concerns in Cross-Border Transactions : Clause 506 of the Income Tax Bil...
    Statutory Reporting by Non-Resident Liaison Offices : Clause 505 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Procedural Safeguards for Assessment of Discontinued Businesses : Clause 504 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Continuity of Tax Proceedings after Partition or Dissolution : Clause 503 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
    Analysis of Authentication of Notices in Indian Income Tax Legislation : Clause 502 of Income Tax Bi...
    Legal and Practical Dimensions of Service of Notices under Indian Tax Law : Clause 501 of the Income...
    Power to provisionally attach property during tax proceedings : Clause 500 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Voidable Transfers in Tax Law : Clause 499 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 281 of the Incom...
    Changing Face of Criminal Procedure in Income Tax Offence Prosecution : Clause 498 of Income Tax Bil...
    Procedural Reform in Tax Offence Trials : Clause 497 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 280C o...
    Jurisdictional Framework for Tax Prosecutions : Clause 496 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Designation and functioning of Special Courts for the trial of offences under the proposed legislati...
    Legal Protections against Unauthorized Disclosure in Indian Tax Law : Clause 494 of Income Tax Bill,...
    Proof of Official Entries in Tax Prosecutions : Clause 493 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Comparative Review of Non-Cognizable Offences in Indian Income Tax Legislation : Clause 492 of the I...
    Safeguards and Procedures in Income Tax Prosecution : Clause 491 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Annual Information Statement: statutory digital disclosure enabling taxpayers to verify and reconcile reported financial data.
    The provision requires upload of an Annual Information Statement into the assessee's registered electronic filing account by the prescribed income tax authority or an authorised person, in the prescribed form, manner and time, containing such information as is in the possession of the authority; specifics of content, format and timelines are left to subordinate rules, and the clause confines AIS data to information already held by the authority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Crypto-asset reporting obligations require prescribed entities to file periodic transaction statements and correct inaccuracies promptly.
    Clause 509 creates a statutory obligation for prescribed reporting entities to furnish periodic statements on crypto-asset transactions to the income-tax authority in a prescribed form and manner; it provides time-bound notice-and-cure procedures for defective or non-filed statements, mandates prompt self-correction of inaccuracies, and empowers rule-making for registration, record-keeping and due diligence including KYC.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Obligation to furnish financial transaction statements expands reporting duties and mandates due diligence, thresholds, and correction procedures.
    Clause 508 requires prescribed persons to furnish statements of specified financial transactions and reportable accounts, with rules determining scope, thresholds, form and timing. It mandates registration, record maintenance and due diligence for identifying reportable accounts, sets timelines for rectification of defective statements and correction of inaccuracies, and permits the Board and Central Government to prescribe differential thresholds and procedural details; unrectified defects or failures are treated as inaccurate information, invoking consequences under the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reporting obligations for media producers require disclosure of substantial payments to enhance transparency and tax oversight.
    Clause 507 requires persons producing cinematograph films or engaging in specified entertainment activities during any part of a tax year to furnish prescribed statements to income-tax authorities identifying payments made or due to each engaged person that exceed the aggregate reporting threshold; it defines inclusive categories of specified activities, delegates timing, form and manner to subordinate rules (including electronic filing and standardized formats), and emphasizes reporting both actual payments and accrued liabilities to enhance transparency and tax oversight.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Disclosure obligations for indirect transfers require Indian concerns to furnish prescribed information to tax authorities.
    Clause 506 requires an Indian concern, where a foreign company's shares or interests derive substantial value from Indian assets held through that concern, to furnish prescribed information and documents within prescribed periods and manners to the prescribed income-tax authority to enable determination of income arising in India under the indirect transfer regime. The clause mirrors Section 285A's substantive obligations, defers detailed compliance requirements to rules, and aligns with operational specifics exemplified by Rule 114DB regarding form, timelines, documentary breadth, retention, and group-filing.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory reporting by liaison offices requires a fixed sixty day post tax year filing to strengthen compliance and oversight.
    Clause 505 requires every non-resident having a liaison office established under RBI/FEMA to deliver a prescribed statement of the office's activities to the Assessing Officer within sixty days from the end of the tax year, with the form and particulars to be specified by delegated legislation and non-compliance subject to general penalty provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Service of notice for discontinued businesses allows authorities to serve former members or principal officers to proceed with assessment.
    Clause 504 permits the Assessing Officer, where an assessment is to be made under section 320, to serve a notice on the person whose income is to be assessed, any person who was a member of a firm or association of persons at the time of its discontinuance, or the principal officer of a company; such notice may contain all or any of the requirements included in a notice under section 268(1), and the Act's provisions shall apply as if the notice were issued under that sub section.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Service of notice after partition preserves tax proceedings by enabling notice on designated former managers or adult members.
    Clause 503 secures continuation of tax proceedings after a HUF's total partition or a firm's dissolution by allowing service of notices for pre disruption income on the last manager of the HUF (or, if deceased, all adults who were members immediately before partition) and on any adult partner or member of a dissolved firm or association; a formal finding of partition or dissolution by the Assessing Officer triggers application and minors are excluded from service.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Authentication of notices: statutory deeming of validity where designated authority details appear, enabling electronic and paper issuance.
    Clause 502 requires notices and documents to be signed and issued in paper form or communicated electronically as per prescribed procedures, deems documents authenticated where the name and office of a designated income-tax authority are printed, stamped or written thereon, and defines designated authorities as those authorized by the Board to issue such authenticated documents, thereby centralizing authorization while delegating procedural detail to subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Service of notices: modernised electronic and prescribed modes expand tax communication obligations and board rule making.
    Clause 501 prescribes authorised modes for serving statutory tax communications-post or Board approved courier, CPC methods for summons, electronic records under the IT Act, and other prescribed means-while empowering the CBDT to designate addresses (including electronic mail addresses) for service and to prescribe additional modes. It supplies a comprehensive, technology neutral definition of electronic mail covering messages and attachments, thereby modernising and clarifying the law of service and reducing ambiguities present in the earlier statutory cross references.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional attachment powers protect revenue by allowing property restraint pending tax proceedings, subject to guarantees and time limits.
    Clause 500 empowers the Assessing Officer to provisionally attach assessee property during assessment, reassessment or specified penalty proceedings subject to prior written approval of a defined Competent Authority, execution in the prescribed manner, and a default six month duration extendable for recorded reasons within statutory limits; it permits substitution of a bank guarantee equal to fair market value (or a lower amount if objectively sufficient), mandates valuation by a Valuation Officer, sets timelines for revocation upon guarantee receipt, and prescribes invocation, application and release mechanics for guarantees.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Voidable asset transfers: transfers during tax proceedings can be voided against tax claims, with exceptions for bona fide transferees.
    Clause 499 renders charges or transfers of assets void against tax claims when effected during proceedings or after completion but before service of recovery notice, covering transfers by sale, mortgage, gift, exchange or any other mode and an expansive list of assets including virtual digital assets. Exceptions protect transfers made for adequate consideration without notice and those with prior permission of the Assessing Officer, while stock in trade is excluded; the clause updates procedural references and preserves core safeguards from the predecessor provision.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Application of new criminal procedure code aligns tax prosecutions under updated procedures, altering prosecutor status and qualification requirements.
    Clause 498 applies the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to Special Court proceedings under the Income Tax Bill, deeming the person conducting the prosecution to be a Public Prosecutor and enabling the Central Government to appoint Special Public Prosecutors. Appointments require an experienced advocate with "special knowledge of law", and appointees are treated as Public Prosecutors within the BNSS definition, thereby importing BNSS powers, duties and procedural rules to tax prosecutions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Summons case classification: minor tax offences must be tried by Special Courts under the new criminal procedure framework.
    Clause 497 requires that offences under the Income Tax Bill punishable with imprisonment not exceeding two years, or with fine, or with both, be tried as summons cases by a Special Court, overriding contrary BNSS provisions and applying the BNSS summons-case procedure accordingly.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Exclusive jurisdiction of Special Courts centralises tax prosecutions, with cognizance only on authorised complaints.
    Clause 496 mandates exclusive trial of income tax offences by designated Special Courts, subject to actual designation for relevant areas or classes of cases, and contains a non obstante provision giving it overriding effect over the general criminal procedure code. Cognizance by a Special Court is restricted to complaints filed by authorities authorised under the Act. Transitional rules preserve continuity by allowing designated courts to continue existing and future trials and permitting non designated courts to finish pending matters; the clause cross references the Bill's procedural provision to align competence within the reorganised statute.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Special Courts designation enables focused, consolidated trials for tax offences and aligns procedure with the new criminal code.
    Clause 495 empowers the Central Government, after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, to notify one or more courts of Judicial Magistrate of the first class as Special Courts for specified areas, cases or classes of cases to try offences under the Income Tax Bill, 2025; it permits these Special Courts to try related offences joined at the same trial under the applicable criminal procedure and updates procedural references to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, while preserving the core scheme of Section 280A.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Unauthorized disclosure by public servants criminalised; prosecution requires Central Government sanction and carries imprisonment and fine.
    Clause 494 criminalises unauthorized furnishing of taxpayer information or production of documents by a public servant in contravention of the Bill's secrecy provision, prescribes imprisonment and fine, and requires prior sanction of the Central Government before prosecution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Admissibility of official tax records: certified copies allowed as evidence, easing prosecution while preserving challenge rights.
    Clause 493 mandates that entries in records or documents in the custody of an income-tax authority "shall be admitted in evidence" in prosecution proceedings under the chapter and permits proof either by production of the original records or by production of a certified copy signed by the custodian stating it is a true copy and that the originals are in its custody. The clause covers varied formats of records, limits application to criminal proceedings under the chapter, and preserves courts' power to test genuineness and require originals where fairness demands.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Non-cognizable classification of specified tax offences requires magistrate sanction before arrest or investigation, limiting summary enforcement.
    Clause 492 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 designates specified income tax offences as non-cognizable for purposes of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by means of a non-obstante provision. As a result, arrest cannot be effected without a magistrate-issued warrant and investigations into those offences require prior magistrate authorization, imposing judicial gatekeeping at the threshold of criminal proceedings and constraining unilateral police action in tax enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Prior sanction for tax prosecution centralises oversight, enables compounding, and restricts arbitrary criminal initiation against taxpayers.
    Clause 491 makes prior sanction by designated senior officers a precondition to prosecution for specified tax offences, authorises senior regional heads and the Board to issue directions, permits compounding of offences at any stage by senior officials, bars prosecution where specified penalties have been reduced or waived, and affirms that statements or documents given to tax authorities remain admissible notwithstanding an expectation of penalty reduction or compounding.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 282 "Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      These texts reproduce Clause/Section 282 of the Income Tax Bill/Act, 2025, setting time limits for issuance of notices u/ss 280 and 281 (notices and show-cause notices in cases of income escaping assessment). The provisions delineate outer limits (four years; up to six years in specified circumstances) and a one-year minimum waiting period. The rule affects taxpayers, assessing officers and the Department; effective/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: references within the text are to sections 280 and 281 of the same enactment (Procedure for assessment). The provision governs temporal jurisdiction to issue notices where income is alleged to have escaped assessment. Definitions: the text does not supply definitions (for example, of "relevant tax year", "books of account", "other documents", "income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment" or "Assessing Officer"). Not stated in the document. Scope: applies to notices u/ss 280 (notice to assess) and 281 (notice to show cause) for the relevant tax year; sets both outer and inner temporal cut-offs and an exception where certain evidentiary thresholds are met or information indicates escaped income likely aggregating to fifty lakh rupees or more.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause/Section 282 provides a three-part temporal scheme.

      • Clause (1) - Notices u/s 280 (presumably a notice initiating proceedings for assessment of escaped income): barred after four years and three months from the end of the relevant tax year, unless a narrower exception in (1)(b) applies. A secondary window permits issuance between four years and three months and six years and three months only where the Assessing Officer possesses books of account or other documents/evidence related to an asset, expenditure, transaction or entry which shows that income chargeable to tax, which has escaped assessment, amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (2) - Notices u/s 281 (notice to show cause): barred if four years have elapsed from the end of the relevant tax year, unless the case falls under (2)(b). An extended window up to six years is allowed where, as per information with the Assessing Officer, the income chargeable to tax which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to fifty lakh rupees or more.
      • Clause (3) - A minimum waiting period: no notice u/s 280 or 281 shall be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent and interpretive principles indicated by the text: The provision seeks to balance finality for taxpayers with the Department's interest in pursuing substantial cases of escaped income. The four-year rule (and four-year rule with three months for section 280) provides a general limitation period; the extension to six years is conditional on the presence of evidence or information indicating significant escaped income (threshold: fifty lakh rupees). The separate one-year bar suggests a cooling-off or administrative window during which notices cannot be issued, possibly to allow other processes (filing, assessment) to conclude; however, the document does not explain the policy reasons. Not stated in the document.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The text contains two express exceptions/provisos:

      • For section 280 - the extension up to six years applies only where the Assessing Officer "has in his possession" (in the Act text) books of account or other documents or evidence related to an asset/expenditure/transaction/entry showing escaped income likely amounting to Rs. 50,00,000 or more.
      • For section 281 - the extension up to six years applies where, "as per the information with the Assessing Officer", the escaped income amounts to or is likely to amount to Rs. 50,00,000 or more. The text does not require possession of the documents; it requires information indicating the quantum.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tax year ending 31 March 2025. Under clause (2)(a), a notice u/s 281 cannot be issued after 31 March 2029 (four years). However, if on 1 April 2028 the Assessing Officer has information that escaped income of Rs. 60 lakh is likely, a notice can still be issued up to 31 March 2031 (six years). These dates are illustrative arithmetic consistent with the text; the document does not provide calendar examples. Not stated in the document.
      • Example 2: For section 280, the four years and three months cut-off: for the same year ending 31 March 2025, the ordinary bar would apply after 30 June 2029; but between 1 July 2029 and 30 June 2031 a notice may be issued only if the AO has in his possession books/documents showing escaped income of at least Rs. 50 lakh. The document does not define the nature of acceptable documents. Not stated in the document.

      Interplay

      Interaction with other provisions: the text refers to sections 280 and 281. The clause differentiates tests for extension between those two sections: possession of documentary evidence is expressly required for section 280 extension, whereas for section 281 an information-based standard suffices. The provision does not reference any Rules, Notifications or Circulars. Not stated in the document: any linkage to penalty provisions, prosecution timelines, or assessment/revision provisions; nor any transitional or retrospective application rules.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers should note that general finality arises at four years (or four years and three months for section 280), but the Department can reopen or issue notices up to six years where the threshold of Rs. 50 lakh is met. The divergence in the evidentiary standard between section 280 and 281 is material: possession of documentary evidence is required for section 280; for section 281, information in the AO's possession may suffice. This affects where and when taxpayers must preserve books and documents and when to expect notices.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Given the statutory reliance on "books of account or other documents or evidence" (for section 280) and "information with the Assessing Officer" (for section 281), stakeholders should preserve contemporaneous records that establish the nature, quantum and timing of assets, expenditures and transactions. The text, however, does not specify formats, retention periods beyond the statutory timelines, or proof standards for "possession" or "information". Not stated in the document.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause/Section 282 establishes a general four-year limitation for notices u/ss 280 and 281, with differing technical adjustments.
      • Section 280 is subject to a four-years-and-three-months outer limit; extension up to six years and three months requires the AO to have "in his possession" books/documents/evidence showing escaped income of Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • Section 281 has a four-year cut-off; extension up to six years is permissible where, per the information with the AO, escaped income is or is likely to be Rs. 50 lakh or more.
      • A mandatory minimum: no notice u/s 280 or 281 can be issued within one year from the end of any tax year.
      • The text does not define key terms, explain thresholds' rationale, describe evidentiary standards, or state effective date or transitional rules. Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Two Versions and Practical Impact

      TopicClause 282 (Bill, Old Version)Section 282 (Income-tax Act, 2025)Practical Impact
      Form/SourcePresented as Clause 282 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version); accompanied by a brief explanatory line: "Clause 282 of the Bill provides for time limit for notices..."Presented as Section 282 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (enacted text).Substantive wording largely identical; enactment confirms legislative finality. The explanatory note in the Bill is removed in the Act; no substantive legal effect.
      Phrasing regarding AO's materials (section 280)States the AO "has books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."States the AO "has in his possession books of account or other documents or evidence related to any asset..."The Act adds "in his possession", which emphasises physical or constructive control of documents by the AO at the time of issuing the notice. This could affect whether third-party information or mere leads suffice for a section 280 extension; the Act language arguably tightens the requirement to actual possession, potentially raising a procedural threshold for the Department.
      Minor temporal wordingUses same temporal markers (four years; four years and three months; up to six years).Same.No practical change.
      Explanatory sentenceIncludes a one-line explanatory sentence summarising purpose.Does not include that explanatory sentence, but otherwise identical.Cosmetic only; no change in operative law.

      Concluding Observations

      The enacted Section 282 and the Bill's Clause 282 are substantively congruent. The main drafting divergence is the Act's insertion of "in his possession" for the section 280 exception; this may be significant in practice as it highlights an evidentiary/possession requirement for the extended six-year window u/s 280. Otherwise, the provision sets a two-tier limitation approach (general four-year rule; extendable to six years in substantial cases of escaped income) and a one-year minimum bar, with a monetary threshold of fifty lakh rupees. The text omits definitions, evidentiary standards, procedural rules for proving "possession" or "information", effective date, and transitional provisions. Not stated in the document.


      Full Text:

      Section 282 Time limit for notices u/ss 280 and 281.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax