Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Act Rules Bills
    Tax treatment of the accumulated balance of recognised provident funds (RPFs) : Clause 191 of the In...
    Act Rules Bills
    Streamline, simplify, and update the tax framework applicable to non-residents and foreign companies...
    Act Rules Bills
    Special procedure for calculating tax liability on income discovered during search operations : Clau...
    Act Rules Bills
    Recalibrating Long-Term Capital Gains Taxation : Clause 198 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section...
    Act Rules Bills
    Reforming Long-Term Capital Gains Taxation : Clause 197 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 112...
    Act Rules Bills
    taxation of short-term capital gains (STCG) : Clause 196 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 11...
    Act Rules Bills
    Determination of tax liability which no tax is payable under the provisions of the Act : Clause 190 ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Definition for the operation of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : Clause 184 of Income Tax Bi...
    Act Rules Bills
    Legislative tool curbing aggressive tax planning and abusive tax avoidance Scheme : Clause 183 of th...
    Act Rules Bills
    Procedural Safeguards and the Scope of GAAR : Clause 183 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 100 of...
    Act Rules Bills
    Curbing aggressive tax avoidance strategies : Clause 182 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 99...
    Act Rules Bills
    Continuation and refinement of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule : Clause 181 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Statutory backbone of India's General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : 180 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Act Rules Bills
    "Curbing aggressive tax avoidance strategies" under the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : Clause ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Countering the tax avoidance through codification of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) : Clause...
    Act Rules Bills
    limitation on Debt interest deduction as expenses in cross-border transactions : Clause 177 of Incom...
    Act Rules Bills
    Comprehensive framework for dealing with transactions with any notified jurisdictional areas : Claus...
    Act Rules Bills
    Anti-Avoidance Provisions in Securities Transactions : Clause 175 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Act Rules Bills
    Designed provisions to counteract tax avoidance schemes involving cross-border transactions : Clause...
    Act Rules Bills
    Important Definition within the framework of transfer pricing and anti-avoidance measures : Clause 1...
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Tax on provident fund accumulations: retrospective, year wise recalculation imposed when exemption conditions fail and tax withheld at payment.
Clause 191 charges tax on an accumulated balance of a recognised provident fund when schedule exemption conditions are unmet, directing the Assessing Officer to perform a retrospective, year wise calculation of the notional tax that would have applied had the fund not been recognised and to charge the excess over tax actually paid in the year of payment, with trustees required to withhold tax at source on the taxable portion.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Tax rates for non residents clarified: consolidated withholding regime, gross basis taxation, and filing exemptions streamlined.
Clause 207 consolidates tax treatment of specified Indian source incomes of non residents and foreign companies by prescribing rates for dividends, interest, royalties and fees for technical services, preserving concessional rates for IFSC incomes and infrastructure debt funds, and treating residual income at normal rates. It mandates gross basis taxation by denying deductions under specified sections, excludes specified incomes from deduction computations under Chapter VIII (with an IFSC exception), streamlines approval requirements for royalties and FTS, and exempts non residents from return filing where such incomes alone are subject to prescribed withholding tax.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Block assessment tax imposes a flat punitive rate on total income from search-derived block periods, broadening the tax base.
Clause 192 taxes the total income of the block period as determined under section 294, replacing the narrower concept of "undisclosed income," and prescribes a flat 60% tax rate with applicable surcharge, thereby broadening the tax base for block assessments while aiming to simplify rate and surcharge determinations.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Long-term capital gains taxation recalibrated to a higher concessional rate with STT linkage and IFSC carve-outs.
Clause 198 establishes a revised LTCG regime for transfers of equity shares, equity oriented fund units, and business trust units where STT conditions are met, prescribing a codified concessional tax on specified LTCG with an IFSC exemption for foreign currency trades; it preserves marginal relief for resident individuals and HUFs, restricts the order of applying deductions and rebates against LTCG, defines equity oriented fund investment thresholds and averaging rules, and grants government power to notify exceptions to STT requirements.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Long term capital gains taxation reformed: uniform lower rate, limited indexation grandfathering, and exemption limit relief retained.
Clause 197 restructures long term capital gains taxation by imposing a uniform flat rate for most LTCG, removing indexation except for formulaic transitional relief for land and buildings acquired before the specified cut off, preserving basic exemption relief for resident individuals and HUFs by reducing LTCG by any shortfall in other income, excluding certain equity related instruments from its scope, and requiring deductions to be computed on gross total income excluding LTCG.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Short-term capital gains tax regime tightened: higher flat rate for STT-eligible securities alters investor incentives and compliance obligations.
Clause 196 targets short term capital gains from equity shares, equity oriented fund units and business trust units that are chargeable to STT, imposing a flat tax on such gains while preserving normal taxation of remaining income. It limits concessional treatment to exchange based STT transactions, provides relief by reducing eligible STCG where other income falls below the basic exemption, excludes IFSC foreign currency transactions, and allows Chapter VIII deductions only after reducing gross total income by the specified STCG.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Determination of tax where exempt income is included: deduction at the average tax rate neutralises tax on non chargeable income.
Clause 190 provides that where total income includes income on which no income-tax is payable, the assessee is entitled to a deduction from the tax chargeable equal to the tax computed at the average rate of income-tax on that non-taxable amount; the average rate is derived by dividing total tax by total income and applying that rate to the exempt portion to neutralise any tax attributable to non-chargeable income.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
General Anti Avoidance Rule expansion: new accommodating party concept widens GAAR reach and tightens tax planning scrutiny.
Clause 184 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 largely carries forward Section 102's wide definitions for GAAR-covering arrangement, asset, benefit, connected person, fund, party, step, and tax benefit-while introducing an accommodating party concept to capture third party facilitators, updating cross references and terminology (e.g., "tax year"), and explicitly including permanent establishments and treaty arrangements to strengthen anti avoidance coverage.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
General Anti-Avoidance Rule expanded to permit concurrent or substitutive application, increasing substance-over-form scrutiny.
Clause 183 expands the statutory reach of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) by expressly permitting GAAR to apply "in addition to, or in lieu of" any other basis for determination of tax liability, while maintaining application "as per such guidelines and subject to such conditions, as prescribed." The clause enables authorities to apply a substance-over-form approach, allowing concurrent or exclusive use of GAAR alongside specific anti-avoidance or substantive provisions, and thereby alters the relationship between GAAR and SAARs previously left ambiguous under Section 101.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
General Anti Avoidance Rule: clause makes GAAR an overriding tool but conditions its use on prescribed procedural guidelines.
Clause 183 preserves GAAR's authority to apply "in addition to, or in lieu of" other bases for tax determination, enabling recharacterisation of arrangements based on substantive economic realities. It uniquely conditions GAAR's exercise on "guidelines and...conditions, as prescribed," thereby mandating subordinate guidance to define thresholds, approval processes, taxpayer rights, documentation and timelines, with the intent of reducing arbitrariness and enhancing predictability compared with the earlier framework.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
General Anti-Avoidance Rule: Treat connected and accommodating parties as one, enabling look-through of corporate structures.
Clause 182 authorises treating connected persons as one, disregarding an accommodating party, treating an accommodating party and another party as the same person, and looking through corporate structures to determine whether a tax benefit exists, thereby enabling recharacterisation of arrangements that lack commercial substance and are designed to secure tax advantages.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
General Anti Avoidance Rule: broad authority to recharacterise and deny tax benefits where arrangements lack commercial substance.
Clause 181 empowers tax authorities to neutralise tax benefits from arrangements lacking commercial substance by denying benefits (including treaty benefits) and imposing a range of consequences: disregarding or recharacterising steps or whole arrangements; treating arrangements as not entered into; treating accommodating or connected parties as one; reallocating tax attributes; recharacterising residence or situs; and looking through corporate structures. Clause 181(3) authorises reclassification of equity/debt and capital/revenue character. Rule 10UA limits consequences to the impermissible part of an arrangement, providing proportionality.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Commercial substance test: disregard arrangements whose economic effect differs from form, focusing on round-trips and artificial parties.
An arrangement may be disregarded for tax purposes if it lacks commercial substance, determined by whether the overall economic effect differs materially from its formal steps; key indicators include round-trip financing, an accommodating party, offsetting elements, disguised transactions, relocations made for tax benefit, and arrangements that do not materially affect business risks or cash flows independent of tax. Certain factors-duration, taxes paid, or an exit route-are not alone sufficient to establish substance, and the Bill omits a prior explicit definition of accommodating party, potentially creating interpretive uncertainty.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
GAAR main purpose test targets arrangements primarily motivated by tax benefit, with procedural safeguards for invocation.
Clause 179 defines an impermissible avoidance arrangement under GAAR as one whose main purpose is obtaining a tax benefit and which meets at least one of four tainting conditions: arm's length departure, misuse or abuse of law, lack of commercial substance, or non bona fide means; it creates a rebuttable presumption placing the burden on the taxpayer for impugned steps and is operationalized through Rule 10UB's pre reference notice, Commissioner review, and Approving Panel safeguards.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
General Anti-Avoidance Rule: empowers authorities to disregard abusive arrangements and recharacterise tax consequences subject to safeguards.
Clause 178 codifies GAAR with an overriding non-obstante effect, enabling authorities to declare an arrangement an "impermissible avoidance arrangement" and determine tax consequences, applying to whole arrangements or any step or part, based on tests of commercial substance and main purpose, while procedural safeguards-notice, hearing, and an approving panel-are prescribed to temper broad remedial powers.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Interest deduction limitation restricts deductible interest to a fixed EBITDA ratio with carryforward relief and specified carve-outs.
Limitation on deductible interest in cross border related party financing restricts interest deductions where interest paid or payable by Indian entities to non resident associated enterprises is treated as excess interest, capped by a fixed ratio of the borrower's EBITDA and by interest payable to associated enterprises; disallowed amounts are carry forwardable subject to the same ratio, a deeming rule treats economically supported third party loans as associated enterprise debt, and specified carve outs apply to regulated financial entities and bona fide IFSC Finance Companies under operational rules.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Transactions with non-cooperative jurisdictions: treated as international transactions, triggering transfer pricing scrutiny and denial of deductions.
Clause 176 creates a regime for transactions with persons in notified jurisdictional areas: government notification power; deeming parties as associated enterprises and transactions as international transactions for transfer pricing; disallowance of deductions absent prescribed authorisation and documentation; deeming unexplained receipts as assessable income; and mandatory higher withholding on payments to NJA persons, with broad definitions and anticipated procedural rules similar to Rule 21AC.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Anti-avoidance in securities transactions deems income to the economic owner to prevent dividend and bonus stripping abuse.
Clause 175 establishes a deeming regime that treats dividends and interest received by an interposed holder as the income of the original economic owner where securities are transferred and subsequently reacquired, limits taxpayer liability where similar securities are acquired, apportions income for partial-year beneficial interest holders, provides exceptions if the taxpayer proves absence of avoidance, disallows losses from dividend and bonus stripping within prescribed acquisition and disposal windows, and treats disallowed bonus-related losses as cost adjustments for retained units.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Deeming of income transferred to non-residents prevents tax avoidance by treating economic beneficiaries as taxable residents.
Clause 174 applies where a transfer of assets, before or after commencement, results in income payable to a non-resident, and where the transfer alone or with associated operations confers on any person rights that give the power to enjoy that income. Such income is deemed to be that person's income for all purposes; related capital sums are treated to prevent disguise as non-taxable receipts. Exceptions exist for bona fide commercial transactions, with the taxpayer bearing the burden to satisfy the assessing authority.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Arm's length price principle reaffirmed and clarified in revised transfer pricing definitions, with expanded enterprise and transaction scope.
Clause 173 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 restates and refines transfer pricing definitions: arm's length price as the benchmark between independent parties in uncontrolled conditions; an expansive definition of "enterprise" covering goods, IP, services, contracts, investments and securities (directly or via units/subsidiaries); "permanent establishment" as a fixed place of business; and "transaction" to include informal or non enforceable arrangements. The clause updates the "specified date" cross reference to the Bill's return filing provision and adopts more itemised drafting while maintaining substantive continuity with Section 92F.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Comparison of section 257 "Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

9 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

The documents are two textual versions of Clause/Section 257 concerning proceedings before income-tax authorities: (1) Section 257 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (final/enacted text as presented) and (2) Clause 257 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version. Both declare proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings and treat income-tax authorities as civil courts for certain statutory purposes. The primary difference is the insertion, in the enacted text, of a limiting phrase in subsection (2) - "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." This matters for taxpayers, tax authorities and courts because it adjusts the scope of civil-court status conferred on income-tax authorities. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: Section/Clause 257 is located within the Income-tax Act/Bill, 2025 and references specific provisions of two recently enacted central statutes: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023) - sections 229, 233 and 267 - and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) - section 215 and, in the enacted text, Chapter XXVIII. Coverage: the provision addresses the legal character of proceedings before income-tax authorities by declaring them "judicial proceedings" for certain penal/statutory purposes and by deeming income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for a specified statutory purpose. Definitions or explanations: Not stated in the document beyond the cross-references to the cited sections/Chapter in the other statutes.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

Section/Clause 257 contains two subsections. Subsection (1) declares that "any proceeding under this Act before an income-tax authority shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding" for the meaning of sections 229 and 267 and "for the purposes of section 233" of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023). Subsection (2) deems every income-tax authority to be a Civil Court for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023). The enacted text further qualifies subsection (2) by excluding Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The provision thus creates cross-statutory recognition: tax proceedings acquire the legal status of "judicial proceedings" and income-tax authorities acquire "civil court" status for certain specified statutory references.

Interpretation

The text indicates a legislative intent to align procedural and evidentiary characterisations of tax proceedings with provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and to confer certain civil-court attributes under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The explicit citation of particular sections suggests a targeted application rather than a wholesale importation of all features of judicial or civil-court status. The insertion of the negative qualification regarding Chapter XXVIII indicates a deliberate limitation to avoid extending civil-court status into that Chapter. The provision does not expressly list the consequences that follow from deeming tax proceedings "judicial proceedings" or income-tax authorities "Civil Courts" beyond the cross-references.

Exceptions/Provisos

The only express proviso in the enacted version is the carve-out in subsection (2): income-tax authorities are not to be considered civil courts "for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." No other exceptions, thresholds, or conditions are set out in the text. If further exceptions exist in Rules or other provisions, they are Not stated in the document.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: A proceeding before an income-tax authority involving assessment or penalty will be treated as a "judicial proceeding" for the application of sections 229 and 267 and for section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The precise consequences depend on those sections' content (Not stated in the document).
  • Example 2: An income-tax authority exercising powers referenced in section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita will be treated as a Civil Court for that limited purpose. However, any procedural entitlement or sanction located in Chapter XXVIII of that statute cannot be invoked against or by the income-tax authority under this deeming (details of Chapter XXVIII: Not stated in the document).

Interplay

The provision expressly interacts with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by adopting their terminology and conferring specified legal character on tax proceedings and authorities. The enacted text narrows the interaction with the latter Act by excluding Chapter XXVIII. Any interaction with other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars is Not stated in the document.

Differences between the Bill (Old Version) and the Enacted Section

Two substantive differences are visible between the texts provided:

  • Non-application carve-out: The enacted Section 257 adds a proviso that income-tax authorities are deemed to be Civil Courts for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." The Bill version included only the deeming to be a Civil Court without this exclusion.

  • Stylistic/enactment status: The Bill is labeled "Clause 257 - Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version"; the enacted text is labeled "Section 257 - Income-tax Act, 2025." This reflects passage into law rather than a substantive textual difference beyond the added exclusion. Any other drafting changes: Not stated in the document.

Practical impact of each change:

  • The added exclusion narrows the deeming effect by preventing the Civil Court characterization from extending to Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Practically, this limits the rights, remedies, or procedural effects conferred by Chapter XXVIII (whatever those may be under the 2023 statute) from attaching to income-tax authorities; conversely, it preserves those Chapter XXVIII provisions as inapplicable to tax authorities. The specific consequences depend on the subject-matter of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (e.g., special powers, procedures, or sanctions), which the document does not explicate. Therefore the operational impact: narrower application of the Civil Court deeming. Details of Chapter XXVIII's content: Not stated in the document.

  • The change from "Clause" to "Section" signals enactment and legal force; the addition of the exclusion therefore reflects parliamentary intent to circumscribe the practical scope of Civil Court status for tax authorities. Any legislative history or reasons for insertion of the exclusion: Not stated in the document.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Tax practitioners should take cognisance that proceedings before income-tax authorities are judicial proceedings for the cited sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; this may affect admissibility of evidence, obligations to maintain records, or procedural safeguards where those sections apply. The enacted exclusion of Chapter XXVIII reduces uncertainty as to whether certain civil-court regimes apply; specific risk implications depend on the content of Chapter XXVIII (Not stated in the document).
  • Record-keeping/evidence points: The deeming as "judicial proceedings" may impose or trigger evidentiary consequences under the referenced sections (for example, penalties for false statements or obstruction under those statutes may apply), so maintaining contemporaneous, accurate records is impliedly important. The text does not prescribe specific record retention timelines or forms (Not stated in the document).

Key Takeaways

  • Both versions treat proceedings before income-tax authorities as "judicial proceedings" for specified provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Both versions deem income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • The enacted Section adds a limitation: income-tax authorities are not to be treated as civil courts for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - a narrowing absent from the Bill's Old Version.
  • The limiting clause reduces potential scope creep and clarifies that certain provisions in Chapter XXVIII do not attach to income-tax authorities by virtue of this deeming.
  • Details as to the substantive consequences flowing from the cited sections or from Chapter XXVIII are Not stated in the document; implications therefore depend on those external texts.

Full Text:

Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

Topics

Acts Income Tax