Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Legal and Practical Implications of TDS on Goods Purchases in India : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(i...
    Compliance relief for a specific class of senior citizens : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(iii)] of th...
    Legal Framework for TDS on E-commerce in India : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(v)] and Clause 393(4)[...
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 5] & Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 18] of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Contractual and Professional Payments : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 6(ii)]...
    Legal and Practical Implications of TDS on Interest Withholding Tax on Foreign Borrowings : Clause 3...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Securitisation Trust Distributions : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 4(iv)] an...
    Legal Commentary on TDS Provisions for Investment Funds : Clause 393(1) [Table: S.No. 4(iii)], Claus...
    Evolving Tax Deduction at Source Framework for Business Trusts in India : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No....
    Transitioning TDS on Infrastructure Debt Fund Interest : Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No. 5] of the Income...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Land Acquisition Compensation : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(iii)] and Cl...
    Transformation of TDS Provisions on Income from Units : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 4(i)] and 393(4)[...
    Clear, consolidated, and modernized framework of TDS on payments relating to professional and techni...
    Evolution of TDS Provisions for Real Estate Development Agreements : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(ii...
    Expand and rationalize the scope of TDS on rental payments : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 2(ii)] of In...
    Analysis of TDS on Immovable Property Transfers : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(i)] of the Income Tax...
    Evolution of TDS on Rent: Implications, Continuities, and Reforms : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 2(i) ...
    Comparative Legal Analysis of TDS on Commission and Brokerage : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 1(ii)] an...
    Unifying TDS on Lottery-Related Payments : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 4] of the Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Harmonizing TDS Provisions for National Savings Instruments in India : Clause 393(3)[S.No. 6] of the...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on purchase of goods: buyer withholding required, with precedence rules to avoid overlap with other withholding provisions.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(ii)] imposes a TDS obligation on the buyer to deduct tax on purchases of goods from resident sellers once aggregate purchases from a seller in a financial year exceed the specified threshold, with deduction due at credit or payment, and a broad exclusionary clause preventing application where tax is deductible or collectible under any other provision of the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on specified senior citizens centralises tax deduction at banks, relieving return filing when tax is correctly deducted at source.
    Specified banks are required to compute a specified senior citizen's total income after allowing Chapter VIII deductions and rebate, deduct tax at rates in force with a nil threshold, and remit TDS; an express precedence clause ensures this provision overrides other TDS provisions. The mechanism centralises compliance with banks obtaining declarations, maintaining evidence and records, thereby relieving eligible senior citizens from return filing provided the bank correctly applies deductions and remits tax.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on e-commerce: operators must withhold on gross platform-facilitated sales, with a small-seller exemption on conditions.
    E-commerce operators must withhold TDS on the gross amount of sales or services facilitated through their platforms, with withholding due at the earlier of credit or payment and including direct buyer payments as deemed payments by the operator. Deductions apply on a gross basis without netting fees, exclude operator receipts for unrelated services such as advertising, and take precedence over other TDS provisions. Individual and HUF participants with annual turnover below the legislated threshold who furnish PAN or Aadhaar are exempt from withholding.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on large cash withdrawals: deduction at payment with exemptions for banks and regulated intermediaries, non filer rule absent here.
    Clause 393(3) requires banks, co operative societies engaged in banking and post offices to deduct two per cent TDS at the time of cash payment where aggregate withdrawals from one or more accounts of a recipient exceed prescribed thresholds, with a higher threshold for co operative societies; Clause 393(4) exempts payments to the Government, banks, post offices, regulated business correspondents and authorised white label ATM operators. The Bill mirrors the existing framework but, in the extracted text, omits an explicit non filer regime and express central government notification powers, creating potential operational and interpretive uncertainty.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on high-value payments by individuals/HUFs expands withholding obligations for contractual, professional and commission disbursements.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 6(ii)] requires TDS by individuals or HUFs (not otherwise liable under specified TDS entries) on payments to a resident for carrying out work (including supply of labour), fees for professional services, or commission/brokerage (excluding insurance commission) where aggregate payments to the payee in a tax year exceed a prescribed threshold; deduction is at the time of credit or payment and the clause is integrated into a tabular TDS framework necessitating aggregation, with definitions and certain procedural relaxations left to rules or guidance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on interest for foreign borrowings consolidated under new clause, keeping concessional framework but raising definitional and transition issues.
    Clause 393(2) consolidates concessional TDS treatment for interest to non residents on foreign currency borrowings, rupee denominated bonds and IFSC listed bonds, aligning mechanics and cut off windows with Section 194LC while differing in presentation and reliance on external definitions; Central Government approval remains a condition for specified instruments and drafting gaps on limits, definitions and transitional treatment may require subordinate rules to avoid interpretive disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on securitisation trust distributions: uniform 10% for residents, treaty rates for non-residents, no threshold.
    Clause 393 mandates TDS on distributions by a securitisation trust: Clause 393(1) imposes 10% TDS on any income paid to resident investors with no threshold, deducted at the earlier of credit or payment by the trust; Clause 393(2) requires withholding on non-resident investors at rates in force, permitting treaty relief. Both provisions treat credits (including to suspense accounts) as TDS events and require trusts to maintain documentation of payee status and treaty claims.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on investment fund distributions: withholding applies, with treaty relief and exemptions for non taxable income.
    TDS on distributions by investment funds requires withholding at applicable resident and non resident rates at the earlier of credit or payment, excluding any portion of income that is statutorily exempt. Funds must determine and segregate taxable versus exempt portions of mixed income, apply treaty or domestic rates for non residents upon proper documentation, and maintain records to support exemptions or reduced rates, while coordinating these obligations with other TDS provisions to avoid double deduction.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on business trust distributions: differentiated resident/non resident rates and SPV contingent exemptions under the Income Tax Bill, 2025.
    Clause 393 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 mandates 10% TDS on distributed income to resident unitholders, differentiated rates for non-resident unitholders (including lower rates for certain interest-type distributions and "rates in force" for others), and exempts specified distributions from TDS where the underlying SPV has not opted for the concessional tax regime, thereby tying withholding obligations to the SPV's tax-regime choice.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on infrastructure debt fund interest: concessional withholding retained for non-resident investors, deducted at credit or payment.
    Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No. 5] retains a concessional TDS regime for any income by way of interest paid by an infrastructure debt fund listed in Schedule VII to a non resident (including foreign companies), requiring deduction at source at the specified concessional rate at the earlier of credit or payment, with no monetary threshold, and integrated within the Bill's harmonised TDS framework that addresses procedural rules, exceptions, grossing up, and interaction with double taxation treaties.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on land acquisition compensation maintained; threshold and RFCTLARR Act exemptions preserved, procedural consolidation introduced.
    Clause 393 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 mandates TDS at 10% on any sum in the nature of compensation or enhanced compensation, or consideration or enhanced consideration, for compulsory acquisition of immovable property (other than agricultural land), when amounts paid or credited to a resident exceed Rs. 5,00,000 in a financial year; Clause 393(4) exempts awards or agreements exempt from income-tax under the RFCTLARR Act, and deduction is required at the earlier of payment or credit.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on mutual fund distributions: withholding required at source with exclusion for capital gains, subject to threshold rules.
    Clause 393 consolidates TDS on income from units of specified mutual funds and analogous instruments, requiring deduction by any payer at the prescribed rate at the time of credit or payment, subject to an aggregate threshold, while expressly excluding receipts that are of the nature of capital gains; the provision retains deeming rules for suspense accounts and links to cross referenced exemptions and schedules for definitions, thereby centralising administrative obligations and necessitating payer systems to characterise payments and aggregate receipts for threshold application.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on professional and technical services clarified: consolidated rates, threshold and personal-payment exemption streamline withholding obligations.
    Clause 393(1) requires TDS by a specified person on resident payments for professional services, technical services, director's fees (non-salary), royalty and related sums, with distinct lower rates for certain technical, cinematographic and call-centre payments and a higher rate for other cases, deductible at the earlier of payment or credit and applicable only above the prescribed threshold. Clause 393(4) exempts individuals and HUFs from TDS where payments are made exclusively for personal purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on monetary consideration under development agreements - deduction at credit or payment with no threshold.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(ii)] requires TDS on any monetary consideration under agreements referred to in section 67(14), applying to any payer, excluding in-kind consideration, with deduction at the earlier of credit or payment, no monetary threshold, and an explicit rule that where both general immovable property TDS and S.No. 3(ii) apply, deduction is to be made only under S.No. 3(ii).
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on rent expanded to include equipment and furnished premises, increasing withholding scope and compliance for individuals and HUFs.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 2(ii)] expands TDS on rent by subjecting payments for use of land, buildings, furniture, fittings, machinery, plant and equipment to withholding by specified persons where monthly payments exceed the threshold; it prescribes asset based rates and requires deduction at the earlier of credit or payment for the last month of the tax year or tenancy, while providing a declaration mechanism for nil deduction and procedural reliefs for small non business payers.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on immovable property transfers requires deduction on the higher of consideration or stamp duty value at payment or credit.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(i)] requires TDS on transfers of immovable property (excluding agricultural land) where either the consideration or the stamp duty value exceeds the threshold. The transferee is the payer required to deduct tax at a fixed percentage of the higher of consideration or stamp duty value, with deduction at the time of credit or payment. Aggregation of amounts across multiple transferees and transferors applies, and the table provides tie breaker rules and specific exclusions such as compulsory acquisition.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on rent: payer-based uniform and differentiated withholding alters withholding obligations and REIT exemption treatment.
    Clause 393 requires TDS on rent to residents where monthly rent exceeds the threshold, with deduction at the earlier of credit or payment. Non-specified payers withhold at a uniform low rate for all asset types, while specified persons withhold at differentiated rates for machinery/plant/equipment versus land/building/furniture/fittings. The Bill maintains an exemption from TDS for payments to REITs in respect of directly owned real estate assets and preserves rules treating suspense-account credits as payment for withholding purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on commission and brokerage: Bill preserves current threshold and rate and maintains targeted exemptions for telecom franchisees.
    Clause 393(1) mandates that a specified person deduct TDS at two percent on resident commission or brokerage payments (excluding insurance commission) when aggregate payments exceed the statutory threshold, with deduction at the earlier of credit or payment and anti avoidance deeming for suspense accounts. Clause 393(4) preserves a targeted exemption for certain telecom franchisee payments, maintaining continuity with existing sectoral relief and reducing compliance burdens.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on lottery-related payments: unified withholding on commissions and prizes with harmonized threshold and deduction rate.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 4] consolidates TDS on payments to persons engaged in stocking, distributing, purchasing or selling lottery tickets, requiring any person making payments of commission, remuneration or prize to deduct tax at the earlier of credit or payment; it includes a deeming fiction treating credits to suspense or intermediary accounts as credit to the payee and imposes standard deductor duties of deposit, certification and return-filing, while leaving aggregation rules and characterization of complex incentive structures unclear.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on national savings withdrawals: mandatory deduction at source with defined threshold and exemptions for individuals and heirs.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 6] requires any person responsible for paying amounts referred to in section 80CCA(2)(a) to deduct income-tax at the rate of 10% at the time of payment where the amount or aggregate amount paid during the tax year exceeds Rs. 2,500; the Table under sub-section (4), Sl. No. 19, exempts payments made to an assessee who is an individual and to the heirs of an assessee, and payers must deposit TDS, file returns, and issue certificates in accordance with the procedural framework.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 257 "Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      9 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      The documents are two textual versions of Clause/Section 257 concerning proceedings before income-tax authorities: (1) Section 257 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (final/enacted text as presented) and (2) Clause 257 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version. Both declare proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings and treat income-tax authorities as civil courts for certain statutory purposes. The primary difference is the insertion, in the enacted text, of a limiting phrase in subsection (2) - "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." This matters for taxpayers, tax authorities and courts because it adjusts the scope of civil-court status conferred on income-tax authorities. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Section/Clause 257 is located within the Income-tax Act/Bill, 2025 and references specific provisions of two recently enacted central statutes: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023) - sections 229, 233 and 267 - and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) - section 215 and, in the enacted text, Chapter XXVIII. Coverage: the provision addresses the legal character of proceedings before income-tax authorities by declaring them "judicial proceedings" for certain penal/statutory purposes and by deeming income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for a specified statutory purpose. Definitions or explanations: Not stated in the document beyond the cross-references to the cited sections/Chapter in the other statutes.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Section/Clause 257 contains two subsections. Subsection (1) declares that "any proceeding under this Act before an income-tax authority shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding" for the meaning of sections 229 and 267 and "for the purposes of section 233" of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023). Subsection (2) deems every income-tax authority to be a Civil Court for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023). The enacted text further qualifies subsection (2) by excluding Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The provision thus creates cross-statutory recognition: tax proceedings acquire the legal status of "judicial proceedings" and income-tax authorities acquire "civil court" status for certain specified statutory references.

      Interpretation

      The text indicates a legislative intent to align procedural and evidentiary characterisations of tax proceedings with provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and to confer certain civil-court attributes under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The explicit citation of particular sections suggests a targeted application rather than a wholesale importation of all features of judicial or civil-court status. The insertion of the negative qualification regarding Chapter XXVIII indicates a deliberate limitation to avoid extending civil-court status into that Chapter. The provision does not expressly list the consequences that follow from deeming tax proceedings "judicial proceedings" or income-tax authorities "Civil Courts" beyond the cross-references.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The only express proviso in the enacted version is the carve-out in subsection (2): income-tax authorities are not to be considered civil courts "for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." No other exceptions, thresholds, or conditions are set out in the text. If further exceptions exist in Rules or other provisions, they are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A proceeding before an income-tax authority involving assessment or penalty will be treated as a "judicial proceeding" for the application of sections 229 and 267 and for section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The precise consequences depend on those sections' content (Not stated in the document).
      • Example 2: An income-tax authority exercising powers referenced in section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita will be treated as a Civil Court for that limited purpose. However, any procedural entitlement or sanction located in Chapter XXVIII of that statute cannot be invoked against or by the income-tax authority under this deeming (details of Chapter XXVIII: Not stated in the document).

      Interplay

      The provision expressly interacts with the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by adopting their terminology and conferring specified legal character on tax proceedings and authorities. The enacted text narrows the interaction with the latter Act by excluding Chapter XXVIII. Any interaction with other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between the Bill (Old Version) and the Enacted Section

      Two substantive differences are visible between the texts provided:

      • Non-application carve-out: The enacted Section 257 adds a proviso that income-tax authorities are deemed to be Civil Courts for the purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, "but not for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023." The Bill version included only the deeming to be a Civil Court without this exclusion.

      • Stylistic/enactment status: The Bill is labeled "Clause 257 - Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version"; the enacted text is labeled "Section 257 - Income-tax Act, 2025." This reflects passage into law rather than a substantive textual difference beyond the added exclusion. Any other drafting changes: Not stated in the document.

      Practical impact of each change:

      • The added exclusion narrows the deeming effect by preventing the Civil Court characterization from extending to Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Practically, this limits the rights, remedies, or procedural effects conferred by Chapter XXVIII (whatever those may be under the 2023 statute) from attaching to income-tax authorities; conversely, it preserves those Chapter XXVIII provisions as inapplicable to tax authorities. The specific consequences depend on the subject-matter of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (e.g., special powers, procedures, or sanctions), which the document does not explicate. Therefore the operational impact: narrower application of the Civil Court deeming. Details of Chapter XXVIII's content: Not stated in the document.

      • The change from "Clause" to "Section" signals enactment and legal force; the addition of the exclusion therefore reflects parliamentary intent to circumscribe the practical scope of Civil Court status for tax authorities. Any legislative history or reasons for insertion of the exclusion: Not stated in the document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Tax practitioners should take cognisance that proceedings before income-tax authorities are judicial proceedings for the cited sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; this may affect admissibility of evidence, obligations to maintain records, or procedural safeguards where those sections apply. The enacted exclusion of Chapter XXVIII reduces uncertainty as to whether certain civil-court regimes apply; specific risk implications depend on the content of Chapter XXVIII (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: The deeming as "judicial proceedings" may impose or trigger evidentiary consequences under the referenced sections (for example, penalties for false statements or obstruction under those statutes may apply), so maintaining contemporaneous, accurate records is impliedly important. The text does not prescribe specific record retention timelines or forms (Not stated in the document).

      Key Takeaways

      • Both versions treat proceedings before income-tax authorities as "judicial proceedings" for specified provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
      • Both versions deem income-tax authorities to be "Civil Court[s]" for purposes of section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
      • The enacted Section adds a limitation: income-tax authorities are not to be treated as civil courts for the purposes of Chapter XXVIII of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - a narrowing absent from the Bill's Old Version.
      • The limiting clause reduces potential scope creep and clarifies that certain provisions in Chapter XXVIII do not attach to income-tax authorities by virtue of this deeming.
      • Details as to the substantive consequences flowing from the cited sections or from Chapter XXVIII are Not stated in the document; implications therefore depend on those external texts.

      Full Text:

      Section 257 Proceedings before income-tax authorities to be judicial proceedings.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax