Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Comparative Legal Analysis of Aadhaar Intimation Fee Provisions : Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Compliance Fee for Delay in Furnishing Statements and Certificates : Clause 429 of Income Tax Bill, ...
    Fee for Delay in Income Tax Return Filing under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 428 of the Income Tax...
    Fee for Default in Furnishing Statements of TDS/TCS : Clause 427 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Legal and Practical Implications of Charging Interest on Excess Refunds under the Income Tax Regime ...
    Modernizing Interest Provisions for Advance Tax : Clause 425 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Modernizing Interest Liability for Advance Tax Defaults : Clause 424 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs...
    Interest for Defaults in Furnishing Return of Income : Clause 423 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Government's Rights to Recover Tax Arrears : Clause 421 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 232...
    Delegated Powers in Indian Tax Law : Clause 532 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 231 of the ...
    Legal and Practical Perspectives on Tax Clearance for Departing Individuals under Indian Tax Law : C...
    Uniform Recovery Mechanisms in Indian Tax Law : Clause 419 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section ...
    International Tax Recovery Mechanisms under Indian Law : Clause 418 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Evaluating the Mechanism for Income Tax Recovery via State Governments in India : Clause 417 of the ...
    Garnishee Proceedings and Tax Recovery : Clause 416 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 226 of ...
    Analysis of Stay and Amendment Provisions in Tax Recovery: Clause 415 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 v...
    Validity and Amendment of Tax Recovery Certificates : Clause 413(4) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Jurisdiction and Procedure for Tax Recovery : Clause 414 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 22...
    Evolution and Implications of Tax Recovery Provisions in India : Clause 413 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Legal and Practical Aspects of Penalty for Tax Default under the New and Old Income Tax Laws : Claus...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Aadhaar intimation fee imposed for belated compliance, payable on late intimation through subordinate legislation.
    Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 prescribes an administrative fee for failure to intimate Aadhaar by the prescribed date: the fee is payable at the time of belated intimation, is to be set by subordinate rules subject to a statutory ceiling, and operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act. The provision delegates essential operational elements-prescribed date, fee quantum, and collection mechanism-to rule-making while retaining a maximum cap and signalling continuity with the existing compliance approach.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for delay in furnishing statements requires payment before submission and is capped at the amount concerned.
    Clause 429 imposes an administrative fee for failure to deliver or furnish prescribed statements or certificates by scientific research and charitable institutions, accruing daily and capped at the amount in respect of which the failure occurred; payment of the fee is required before the delayed document or certificate may be filed, and the levy operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Late filing fee for income tax returns: income linked penalties retained, alongside other liabilities and administrative discretion.
    Clause 428 imposes a fee where a person required to furnish a return under Section 263 fails to file within the prescribed time, with an income linked structure: a higher fee for those above a specified income threshold and a capped lower fee otherwise; the clause operates without prejudice to interest, penalties, or prosecution and retains administrative discretion through "not exceeding" wording for the lower slab.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements requires pre payment before filing and is capped by tax liability.
    Clause 427 imposes a statutory fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements as triggered by section 393(3)(b), prescribing a fixed per day charge for each day of delay, capped at the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and requiring payment of the fee before delivery of the delayed statement; the provision operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act and mirrors the substantive structure of Section 234E while omitting explicit commencement and detailed procedural rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on excess refunds: Bill imposes interest from refund grant to regular assessment, with reduction if appellate orders confirm refund.
    Clause 426 charges simple interest on refunds granted under section 270(1) that exceed amounts determined on regular assessment, with interest computed from the date of grant to the date of regular assessment. Assessments under section 279 are deemed "regular assessment" for this purpose. Interest is reduced where appellate or revisionary orders ultimately validate the refund in whole or part. The clause mirrors Section 234D's core mechanics but changes cross-references and lacks an explicit retrospective application, raising transitional and interpretational concerns.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest for deferment of advance tax simplified to lump-sum rates, changing computation and compliance implications.
    Clause 425 prescribes lump-sum interest rates on shortfalls in advance tax instalments tied to specified due dates and percentage targets, retains partial compliance safe-harbours and exemptions for certain unpredictable income categories provided tax is paid by the final instalment, and defines the tax base for interest by allowing deductions for TDS/TCS and specified tax credits; it shifts from monthly computation to a simplified tabled regime while leaving interpretive gaps around new cross-references and treatment of early rectification of shortfalls.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on advance tax: default triggers automatic monthly interest until assessment or regular assessment is completed.
    Clause 424 establishes interest for failure to pay advance tax or where advance payments are below the prescribed benchmark, charging monthly interest from the first April following the tax year until determination of total income or completion of regular assessment. Interest is computed on net assessed tax after reductions for TDS/TCS, foreign tax reliefs and specified credits. The clause clarifies interpretative points about regular assessments, excludes certain additional income-tax from the assessed base, allows reduction of interest upon pre-assessment payment, and prescribes additional interest on increments arising from reassessment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on late tax returns: monthly interest applied under new provision with clarified computation and adjustment mechanism.
    A formulaic charging provision imposes simple monthly interest on tax due where returns are filed late or not filed, with a matrix of scenarios specifying for each the starting date, ending date and tax base for interest computation. The clause mandates adjustment of interest following appellate or revisional orders to reflect the final tax, permits reduction by previously paid interest and credits, excludes certain additional taxes from the tax base, and deems specified first time assessments as regular assessments for interest purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Government's right to recover tax arrears preserved, allowing concurrent statutory and civil recovery remedies.
    Clause 421 preserves the Government's right to recover tax arrears by methods beyond the statutory recovery modes, expressly allowing reliance on any other law for recovery and the institution of civil suits; it authorises assessing officers or the Government to pursue such alternative or concurrent remedies notwithstanding that recovery under the tax statute is being undertaken.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Delegated legislative power to frame broad tax schemes may permit statutory modification, raising oversight and legal certainty concerns.
    Clause 532 grants the Central Government a broad power to frame schemes for any purpose under the Income Tax Act by notification, aiming to eliminate taxpayer interface where technologically feasible and to optimise resources; it permits notifications to disapply or modify statutory provisions to implement schemes, validates amendment of existing schemes under the 1961 Act, and requires notifications to be laid before Parliament, raising questions about the scope of delegated legislation and safeguards for legal certainty and taxpayer rights.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax clearance certificate requirement conditions departure to secure tax liabilities and imposes carrier liability for non-compliance.
    Clause 420 requires a tax clearance certificate or an undertaking from an employer/payer before certain non-domiciled persons who earn Indian-source income may depart, excepting tourists; domiciled persons must furnish prescribed information (including PAN) and may be restricted from leaving if the tax authority records reasons and obtains senior approval. Owners or charterers of ships and aircraft are vicariously liable for departures without clearance, and the Board may make rules for implementation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery of ancillary tax liabilities: non tax sums become recoverable using the same arrears procedures and enforcement tools.
    Clause 419 provides that any sum imposed by way of interest, fine, penalty, or any other sum payable under the Act shall be recoverable in the manner provided in this Part for the recovery of arrears of tax, thereby subjecting ancillary monetary liabilities to the same procedural recovery tools as tax arrears.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Mutual tax recovery enables cross-border enforcement by domestic authorities acting on foreign tax collection requests under treaty terms.
    Clause 418 creates a mutual tax recovery framework under international agreements: foreign authorities may send a certificate to the central tax board to be executed by the Tax Recovery Officer against residents or property in India in the same manner as domestic tax arrears, with recovered sums remitted net of expenses; conversely, the TRO may forward domestic recovery certificates to the Board for action abroad when the assessee is a foreign resident or has foreign property, with the Board acting pursuant to the terms of the relevant agreement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery through State Government: central income tax may be collected with local taxes when entrusted, expanding local enforcement.
    Recovery through State Government permits State Governments, upon entrustment under Article 258(1), to direct that central income tax be recovered in specified areas with, and as an addition to, municipal taxes or local rates by the same person and in the same manner as local taxes, creating a legal mechanism to integrate central tax enforcement into local recovery machinery while raising concerns about procedural safeguards, accounting, and dispute-resolution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Third-party recovery enabling garnishee notices and conversion of non-compliant payers into defaulters for tax arrears enforcement.
    Clause 416 empowers the Assessing Officer and the Tax Recovery Officer to use alternative recovery modes pre- and post-certificate, including recovery from salary with statutory protection for exempt portions, a comprehensive third-party recovery regime through notices to debtors or asset holders (including joint holders, objection and indemnity mechanisms, discharge on compliance, and conversion of non-compliant recipients into assessees in default), court-application for funds held in judicial custody, and distraint and sale of movable property subject to prescribed manner and supervisory approval.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Stay of tax recovery: TRO must pause enforcement and amend or cancel certificates to reflect appellate reductions.
    Clause 415 requires the Tax Recovery Officer to grant time for payment and automatically stay recovery during that period; when a demand is reduced on appeal or other proceeding the TRO must stay recovery to the extent of the reduction while further proceedings are pending and must amend or cancel the recovery certificate once the reduction is final, establishing a mandatory, real-time mechanism to align enforcement with appellate outcomes and protect taxpayers from unjust recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Finality of tax recovery certificates: TRO may cancel or correct certificates while assessees are barred from challenging them.
    Clause 413(4) empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to cancel a recovery certificate "if, for any reason, he considers it necessary so to do" and to correct "any clerical or arithmetical mistake"; Clause 413 as a whole bars the assessee from disputing the certificate's correctness at the recovery stage, while the correction power is limited to mechanical errors and procedural safeguards such as notice or recorded reasons are not specified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Recovery Officer jurisdiction clarified: transferable recovery certificates enable inter jurisdictional enforcement subject to prescribed certification.
    Clause 414 sets the rule for which Tax Recovery Officer may effect recovery: the TRO where the assessee carries on business or has a principal place of business, and the TRO where the assessee resides or any of the assessee's movable or immovable property is situated. It permits transfer of recovery certificates between TROs when assets span jurisdictions or recovery cannot be effected locally, authorises the receiving TRO to act as if the certificate were its own, and requires certification in the prescribed form to ensure procedural integrity.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax recovery certificate empowers administrative enforcement and bars collateral challenges to expedite arrears collection.
    Clause 413 empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to draw up a prescribed-form certificate under signature specifying arrears and to initiate recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable property, arrest, or appointment of a receiver. It permits parallel recovery proceedings, allows administrative cancellation or correction of certificates, and bars the assessee from disputing the correctness of the certificate at the recovery stage. Clause 413 expands recoverable property to include certain intra-family transfers made without adequate consideration from 1 June 1973, preserving liability for arrears predating a minor transferee's majority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for tax default: discretionary but capped enforcement with mandatory hearing and refund if liability is set aside.
    An assessee defaulting on tax payment is liable to a discretionary penalty in addition to arrears and interest, with the Assessing Officer empowered to impose successive penalties for continuing default. Aggregate penalties are capped at the amount of tax in arrears. Procedural safeguards mandate a reasonable opportunity of being heard and exemption where good and sufficient reasons are shown. Payment of tax before penalty does not extinguish liability, but penalty is cancelled and refunded if the tax liability is finally reduced to nil.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 228 "Relevant shipping income and exclusion from book profit." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      6 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 228 Relevant shipping income and exclusion from book profit.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      The document is Clause 228 of the Income-tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) which sets out the concept of "relevant shipping income" for a tonnage tax company and provides for exclusion of such income from the company's book profit for specified tax computations. It matters to shipping companies electing or eligible for tonnage taxation, tax authorities (Assessing Officers), and advisors in maritime and corporate taxation. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 228 forms part of a Part dealing with special provisions relating to income of shipping companies within the Income Tax Bill, 2025. It defines "relevant shipping income" for a "tonnage tax company", lists core and incidental activities, prescribes limits for incidental income, empowers the Central Government to exclude or limit certain activities by notification, and directs treatment of transfers between tonnage and non-tonnage businesses, allocation of common costs and depreciation, and the exclusion of the relevant shipping book profit or loss from book profit for purposes of section 206. Definitions provided in the Clause include "pooling arrangement" and "contract of affreightment" (see sub-section (4)). Other definitional details and broader contextual definitions (e.g., "tonnage tax company", "qualifying ship", "turnover") are Not stated in the document.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      • The clause defines "relevant shipping income" (sub-section (1)) as the aggregate of:
        • profits from core activities (sub-section (3)); and
        • profits from incidental activities (sub-section (7)).
      • Sub-section (2) places a threshold limitation: incidental incomes in aggregate exceeding 0.25% of turnover from core activities shall be excluded from relevant shipping income and taxed under other provisions of the Act.
        • Core activities (sub-section (3)) comprise:
        • activities from operating qualifying ships; and
      • specified ship-related or inland-vessel-related activities including:
        • (i) shipping contracts - earnings from pooling arrangements and contracts of affreightment; and
        • (ii) specified shipping trades - passenger ship on-board/on-shore activities (fares; food and beverages consumed on-board) and container shipping operations such as slot/space/joint charters, feeder services and container box leasing.
      • Sub-section (4) defines "pooling arrangement" and "contract of affreightment". Sub-section (5) empowers the Central Government to exclude any activity referred to in sub-section 3(b) or prescribe limits to their inclusion in core activities by notification, with parliamentary laying and modification procedure specified in sub-section (6).
      • Sub-section (7) provides that incidental activities are those incidental to the core activities and "as prescribed for the purpose." Sub-section (8) disapplies this Part to income from non-qualifying ships - such income to be computed under other provisions of the Act.
      • Sub-sections (9)-(12) deal with related-party or non-arm's-length transfers between tonnage tax business and other businesses, market value adjustment, Assessing Officer's power to adopt reasonable basis where computation under (9) is exceptionally difficult, and ability to make adjustments where arrangements produce more than ordinary profits because of close connection or other reasons.
      • Sub-section (13) states that any loss in relevant shipping income shall be ignored for the purposes of computing tonnage income under this Part. Sub-sections (14) and (15) require reasonable allocation of common costs and allocation of depreciation for non-exclusive assets respectively. Sub-section (16) provides that the book profit or loss from the relevant shipping activities shall be excluded from the company's book profit for the purposes of section 206.

      Interpretation

      The clause adopts a purposive construction typical of sector-specific tax regimes: identify the operational income that is to be governed by tonnage-tax treatment (core and incidental); ring-fence (via the 0.25% threshold) peripheral income to prevent excessive unrelated trading from benefiting; and enable administrative adjustments to counter non-arm's-length transfers or artificial arrangements. The express inclusion of specific shipping trades and the definitional treatment of pooling and affreightment indicate legislative intent to capture customary shipping revenue streams within the tonnage regime. Where precise valuation is impracticable, the Assessing Officer is given discretionary power to adopt a reasonable basis - an administrative safeguard. The provision to exclude book profit/loss from section 206 computations indicates an aim to avoid double-counting or misaligned computation where tonnage rules produce separate tax outcomes.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Carve-outs and conditions explicitly stated:

      • Incidental income exceeding 0.25% of turnover from core activities is excluded from relevant shipping income (sub-section (2)).
      • Income from non-qualifying ships is excluded from this Part and computed under other provisions (sub-section (8)).
      • Losses in relevant shipping income are ignored for tonnage income computation (sub-section (13)).
      • Central Government may exclude or prescribe limits by notification (sub-section (5)); such notifications are subject to parliamentary laying and possible modification/annulment under sub-section (6).

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A tonnage tax company earns freight from qualifying ships and incidental revenue from sale of on-board merchandise equal to 0.1% of core turnover. Under the Clause, such incidental revenue remains part of relevant shipping income (since <= 0.25%).
      • Example 2: If incidental revenues aggregate to 0.5% of core turnover, the excess 0.25% is excluded from relevant shipping income and taxed under general provisions (per sub-section (2)).
      • Example 3: A company transfers fuel stored for tonnage business to a non-tonnage business at book value materially below market. Under sub-section (9)-(11), the Assessing Officer will compute relevant shipping income as if the transfer occurred at market value, or adopt a reasonable basis if exceptional difficulties arise.

      Interplay

      Explicit interaction: sub-section (16) links with section 206 (computation/use of book profit). The Clause prescribes that relevant shipping book profit or loss is to be excluded from book profit for section 206 purposes. Other cross-references - for example, to definitions such as "qualifying ship", "tonnage tax company", or procedural rules - are Not stated in the document. References to notifications and parliamentary laying follow standard legislative procedure but do not identify subordinate rules or forms; those are Not stated in the document.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas grounded in the Clause: ensuring correct segregation of core vs incidental activities; monitoring incidental income relative to the 0.25% threshold; documenting transfers between tonnage and other business at market value or maintaining supporting valuations to withstand AO scrutiny under sub-section (9)-(11); contemporaneous allocation methods for shared costs and depreciation in mixed-use assets per sub-sections (14)-(15).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: maintain detailed accounts of core activity turnover to calculate the 0.25% threshold; contracts and agreements (pooling arrangements, contracts of affreightment) and terms; market value evidence for inter-business transfers; allocation methodology documentation for common costs and depreciation; and contemporaneous justification where Assessing Officer is required to adopt or review "reasonable basis".

      Key Takeaways

      • The Clause defines "relevant shipping income" as profits from enumerated core and incidental shipping activities for tonnage tax purposes.
      • Incidental income exceeding 0.25% of core turnover is excluded from the tonnage tax measure and taxed under general provisions.
      • Core activities specifically include qualifying ship operations and listed ship-related trades (pooling, contracts of affreightment, passenger on-board revenue, container shipping services).
      • Transfers between tonnage and non-tonnage businesses are to be tested against market value; Assessing Officer may adopt reasonable basis where computation is exceptionally difficult.
      • Losses in relevant shipping income are ignored for tonnage income computation; common costs and depreciation for non-exclusive assets must be reasonably allocated.
      • The book profit/loss from relevant shipping activities is expressly to be excluded from the company's book profit for section 206 computations.
      • The Central Government retains power to exclude or limit inclusion of listed activities by notification subject to parliamentary procedure.

      Differences between Clause 228 of the Income-tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) and Section 228 of the Income-tax Act, 2025

      Comparison based solely on the provided documents reveals primarily drafting and one substantive cross-reference change:

      • Drafting/wording changes: Minor phrasing differences appear in sub-section (4) introductory wording ("In sub-section..." vs "For the purposes of sub-section...") and in sub-section (7) ("as prescribed for the purpose" vs "as may be prescribed for the purpose"). These are stylistic and do not materially change scope.
      • Substantive cross-reference change: Clause 228 (Bill) sub-section (16) refers to "the purposes of section 206" generally; Section 228 (Act) refers more specifically to "the purposes of section 206(1)(c)".
        • Practical impact: the Act's more specific cross-reference narrows the provision's structural application to a particular sub-clause of section 206 (presumably the clause dealing with a particular computation of book profit). This narrows the operational effect and reduces ambiguity as to which part of section 206 the exclusion applies to. The Bill's broader reference could be read to exclude from multiple or all computations u/s 206; the enacted text confines the exclusion to a specific sub-provision. Any further implications depend on the content of section 206(1)(c), which is Not stated in the document.
      • Other provisions, thresholds, definitions and AO powers remain substantively the same between the two texts provided.

      Practical impact of the differences

      • Operational certainty: The Act's specific reference to section 206(1)(c) provides greater precision on which book-profit computation the exclusion affects; taxpayers and tax authorities will have clearer guidance for compliance and assessment. Exact consequences depend on section 206(1)(c)'s scope (Not stated in the document).
      • Administrative effect: Minor drafting changes do not materially alter Assessing Officer powers or taxpayer obligations under the Clause as presented in the Bill. The main compliance tasks-segregation of incomes, valuation on transfers, allocation of costs-remain required under both texts.

      Full Text:

      Section 228 Relevant shipping income and exclusion from book profit.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax