Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Comparative Legal Analysis of Aadhaar Intimation Fee Provisions : Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Compliance Fee for Delay in Furnishing Statements and Certificates : Clause 429 of Income Tax Bill, ...
    Fee for Delay in Income Tax Return Filing under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 428 of the Income Tax...
    Fee for Default in Furnishing Statements of TDS/TCS : Clause 427 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Legal and Practical Implications of Charging Interest on Excess Refunds under the Income Tax Regime ...
    Modernizing Interest Provisions for Advance Tax : Clause 425 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Modernizing Interest Liability for Advance Tax Defaults : Clause 424 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs...
    Interest for Defaults in Furnishing Return of Income : Clause 423 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Government's Rights to Recover Tax Arrears : Clause 421 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 232...
    Delegated Powers in Indian Tax Law : Clause 532 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 231 of the ...
    Legal and Practical Perspectives on Tax Clearance for Departing Individuals under Indian Tax Law : C...
    Uniform Recovery Mechanisms in Indian Tax Law : Clause 419 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section ...
    International Tax Recovery Mechanisms under Indian Law : Clause 418 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Evaluating the Mechanism for Income Tax Recovery via State Governments in India : Clause 417 of the ...
    Garnishee Proceedings and Tax Recovery : Clause 416 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 226 of ...
    Analysis of Stay and Amendment Provisions in Tax Recovery: Clause 415 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 v...
    Validity and Amendment of Tax Recovery Certificates : Clause 413(4) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Jurisdiction and Procedure for Tax Recovery : Clause 414 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 22...
    Evolution and Implications of Tax Recovery Provisions in India : Clause 413 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Legal and Practical Aspects of Penalty for Tax Default under the New and Old Income Tax Laws : Claus...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Aadhaar intimation fee imposed for belated compliance, payable on late intimation through subordinate legislation.
    Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 prescribes an administrative fee for failure to intimate Aadhaar by the prescribed date: the fee is payable at the time of belated intimation, is to be set by subordinate rules subject to a statutory ceiling, and operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act. The provision delegates essential operational elements-prescribed date, fee quantum, and collection mechanism-to rule-making while retaining a maximum cap and signalling continuity with the existing compliance approach.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for delay in furnishing statements requires payment before submission and is capped at the amount concerned.
    Clause 429 imposes an administrative fee for failure to deliver or furnish prescribed statements or certificates by scientific research and charitable institutions, accruing daily and capped at the amount in respect of which the failure occurred; payment of the fee is required before the delayed document or certificate may be filed, and the levy operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Late filing fee for income tax returns: income linked penalties retained, alongside other liabilities and administrative discretion.
    Clause 428 imposes a fee where a person required to furnish a return under Section 263 fails to file within the prescribed time, with an income linked structure: a higher fee for those above a specified income threshold and a capped lower fee otherwise; the clause operates without prejudice to interest, penalties, or prosecution and retains administrative discretion through "not exceeding" wording for the lower slab.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements requires pre payment before filing and is capped by tax liability.
    Clause 427 imposes a statutory fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements as triggered by section 393(3)(b), prescribing a fixed per day charge for each day of delay, capped at the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and requiring payment of the fee before delivery of the delayed statement; the provision operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act and mirrors the substantive structure of Section 234E while omitting explicit commencement and detailed procedural rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on excess refunds: Bill imposes interest from refund grant to regular assessment, with reduction if appellate orders confirm refund.
    Clause 426 charges simple interest on refunds granted under section 270(1) that exceed amounts determined on regular assessment, with interest computed from the date of grant to the date of regular assessment. Assessments under section 279 are deemed "regular assessment" for this purpose. Interest is reduced where appellate or revisionary orders ultimately validate the refund in whole or part. The clause mirrors Section 234D's core mechanics but changes cross-references and lacks an explicit retrospective application, raising transitional and interpretational concerns.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest for deferment of advance tax simplified to lump-sum rates, changing computation and compliance implications.
    Clause 425 prescribes lump-sum interest rates on shortfalls in advance tax instalments tied to specified due dates and percentage targets, retains partial compliance safe-harbours and exemptions for certain unpredictable income categories provided tax is paid by the final instalment, and defines the tax base for interest by allowing deductions for TDS/TCS and specified tax credits; it shifts from monthly computation to a simplified tabled regime while leaving interpretive gaps around new cross-references and treatment of early rectification of shortfalls.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on advance tax: default triggers automatic monthly interest until assessment or regular assessment is completed.
    Clause 424 establishes interest for failure to pay advance tax or where advance payments are below the prescribed benchmark, charging monthly interest from the first April following the tax year until determination of total income or completion of regular assessment. Interest is computed on net assessed tax after reductions for TDS/TCS, foreign tax reliefs and specified credits. The clause clarifies interpretative points about regular assessments, excludes certain additional income-tax from the assessed base, allows reduction of interest upon pre-assessment payment, and prescribes additional interest on increments arising from reassessment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on late tax returns: monthly interest applied under new provision with clarified computation and adjustment mechanism.
    A formulaic charging provision imposes simple monthly interest on tax due where returns are filed late or not filed, with a matrix of scenarios specifying for each the starting date, ending date and tax base for interest computation. The clause mandates adjustment of interest following appellate or revisional orders to reflect the final tax, permits reduction by previously paid interest and credits, excludes certain additional taxes from the tax base, and deems specified first time assessments as regular assessments for interest purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Government's right to recover tax arrears preserved, allowing concurrent statutory and civil recovery remedies.
    Clause 421 preserves the Government's right to recover tax arrears by methods beyond the statutory recovery modes, expressly allowing reliance on any other law for recovery and the institution of civil suits; it authorises assessing officers or the Government to pursue such alternative or concurrent remedies notwithstanding that recovery under the tax statute is being undertaken.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Delegated legislative power to frame broad tax schemes may permit statutory modification, raising oversight and legal certainty concerns.
    Clause 532 grants the Central Government a broad power to frame schemes for any purpose under the Income Tax Act by notification, aiming to eliminate taxpayer interface where technologically feasible and to optimise resources; it permits notifications to disapply or modify statutory provisions to implement schemes, validates amendment of existing schemes under the 1961 Act, and requires notifications to be laid before Parliament, raising questions about the scope of delegated legislation and safeguards for legal certainty and taxpayer rights.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax clearance certificate requirement conditions departure to secure tax liabilities and imposes carrier liability for non-compliance.
    Clause 420 requires a tax clearance certificate or an undertaking from an employer/payer before certain non-domiciled persons who earn Indian-source income may depart, excepting tourists; domiciled persons must furnish prescribed information (including PAN) and may be restricted from leaving if the tax authority records reasons and obtains senior approval. Owners or charterers of ships and aircraft are vicariously liable for departures without clearance, and the Board may make rules for implementation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery of ancillary tax liabilities: non tax sums become recoverable using the same arrears procedures and enforcement tools.
    Clause 419 provides that any sum imposed by way of interest, fine, penalty, or any other sum payable under the Act shall be recoverable in the manner provided in this Part for the recovery of arrears of tax, thereby subjecting ancillary monetary liabilities to the same procedural recovery tools as tax arrears.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Mutual tax recovery enables cross-border enforcement by domestic authorities acting on foreign tax collection requests under treaty terms.
    Clause 418 creates a mutual tax recovery framework under international agreements: foreign authorities may send a certificate to the central tax board to be executed by the Tax Recovery Officer against residents or property in India in the same manner as domestic tax arrears, with recovered sums remitted net of expenses; conversely, the TRO may forward domestic recovery certificates to the Board for action abroad when the assessee is a foreign resident or has foreign property, with the Board acting pursuant to the terms of the relevant agreement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery through State Government: central income tax may be collected with local taxes when entrusted, expanding local enforcement.
    Recovery through State Government permits State Governments, upon entrustment under Article 258(1), to direct that central income tax be recovered in specified areas with, and as an addition to, municipal taxes or local rates by the same person and in the same manner as local taxes, creating a legal mechanism to integrate central tax enforcement into local recovery machinery while raising concerns about procedural safeguards, accounting, and dispute-resolution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Third-party recovery enabling garnishee notices and conversion of non-compliant payers into defaulters for tax arrears enforcement.
    Clause 416 empowers the Assessing Officer and the Tax Recovery Officer to use alternative recovery modes pre- and post-certificate, including recovery from salary with statutory protection for exempt portions, a comprehensive third-party recovery regime through notices to debtors or asset holders (including joint holders, objection and indemnity mechanisms, discharge on compliance, and conversion of non-compliant recipients into assessees in default), court-application for funds held in judicial custody, and distraint and sale of movable property subject to prescribed manner and supervisory approval.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Stay of tax recovery: TRO must pause enforcement and amend or cancel certificates to reflect appellate reductions.
    Clause 415 requires the Tax Recovery Officer to grant time for payment and automatically stay recovery during that period; when a demand is reduced on appeal or other proceeding the TRO must stay recovery to the extent of the reduction while further proceedings are pending and must amend or cancel the recovery certificate once the reduction is final, establishing a mandatory, real-time mechanism to align enforcement with appellate outcomes and protect taxpayers from unjust recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Finality of tax recovery certificates: TRO may cancel or correct certificates while assessees are barred from challenging them.
    Clause 413(4) empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to cancel a recovery certificate "if, for any reason, he considers it necessary so to do" and to correct "any clerical or arithmetical mistake"; Clause 413 as a whole bars the assessee from disputing the certificate's correctness at the recovery stage, while the correction power is limited to mechanical errors and procedural safeguards such as notice or recorded reasons are not specified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Recovery Officer jurisdiction clarified: transferable recovery certificates enable inter jurisdictional enforcement subject to prescribed certification.
    Clause 414 sets the rule for which Tax Recovery Officer may effect recovery: the TRO where the assessee carries on business or has a principal place of business, and the TRO where the assessee resides or any of the assessee's movable or immovable property is situated. It permits transfer of recovery certificates between TROs when assets span jurisdictions or recovery cannot be effected locally, authorises the receiving TRO to act as if the certificate were its own, and requires certification in the prescribed form to ensure procedural integrity.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax recovery certificate empowers administrative enforcement and bars collateral challenges to expedite arrears collection.
    Clause 413 empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to draw up a prescribed-form certificate under signature specifying arrears and to initiate recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable property, arrest, or appointment of a receiver. It permits parallel recovery proceedings, allows administrative cancellation or correction of certificates, and bars the assessee from disputing the correctness of the certificate at the recovery stage. Clause 413 expands recoverable property to include certain intra-family transfers made without adequate consideration from 1 June 1973, preserving liability for arrears predating a minor transferee's majority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for tax default: discretionary but capped enforcement with mandatory hearing and refund if liability is set aside.
    An assessee defaulting on tax payment is liable to a discretionary penalty in addition to arrears and interest, with the Assessing Officer empowered to impose successive penalties for continuing default. Aggregate penalties are capped at the amount of tax in arrears. Procedural safeguards mandate a reasonable opportunity of being heard and exemption where good and sufficient reasons are shown. Payment of tax before penalty does not extinguish liability, but penalty is cancelled and refunded if the tax liability is finally reduced to nil.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of section 226 "Tonnage tax scheme." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      6 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 226 Tonnage tax scheme.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      This document is the Old Version of Clause 226 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, which sets out the tonnage tax scheme for shipping companies. It matters because it prescribes when a company is regarded as operating a ship for tonnage-tax purposes, and it prescribes separate computation rules and the requirement of an option u/s 231. Who is affected: companies operating qualifying ships (and, to the extent the text elsewhere indicates, potentially inland vessels). Effective date/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 226 forms part of the Bill's Part dealing with "Special provisions relating to income of shipping companies" and interacts with sections 227, 228(1) and the option procedure in section 231. The clause defines the meaning of "operating a ship" for the Part, sets out that a tonnage tax company shall compute profits from qualifying shipping business under the tonnage tax scheme, treats the tonnage business as a separate business, requires separate computation of profits, makes the scheme available only if an option is exercised u/s 231, and clarifies tax treatment of tonnage income and relevant shipping income. Definitions/explanations: the clause provides that "operating a ship" includes operation of ships whether owned or chartered, and includes cases where even a part of the ship or inland vessel has been chartered in under arrangements such as slot charter, space charter or joint charter. Not stated in the document: any technical definition of "qualifying ship," "tonnage income" beyond cross-reference to sections 227 and 228, or precise procedural details for making the option u/s 231.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Coverage: Clause 226 applies to companies engaged in operating ships and establishes the availability and mechanics of the tonnage tax scheme for such activity. Ingredients/elements: (1) the clause sets out who is "regarded as operating a ship" - that is, operation of a ship whether owned or chartered and inclusion of partial charter arrangements (slot/space/joint charter). (2) If a company qualifies as a tonnage tax company engaged in operating qualifying ships, it must compute profits from that business under the tonnage tax scheme. (3) The tonnage tax business is a separate business distinct from other activities of the company. (4) Profits from the tonnage business are to be computed separately. (5) The scheme applies only where an option u/s 231 is made. (6) If a company is not covered by the scheme or has not made the option, profits from the shipping business shall be computed under the other provisions of the Act. (7) Subject to other provisions of the Part, the tonnage income is to be computed as per section 227 and "deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head 'Profits and gains of business or profession'", and the relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) shall not be chargeable to tax.

      Interpretation

      The clause signals a legislative intent to provide an elective, self-contained tax computation regime for qualifying shipping operations, distinct from general profit computation. The textual structure emphasises separability (distinct business, separate computation) and voluntariness (option u/s 231). The inclusion of charter-in arrangements (including partial charters such as slot or space charters) indicates a purposive effort to capture commercial shipping practices within the scheme's scope. Not stated in the document: explicit legislative policy rationale, rates, or formulae - these are to be found in cross-referenced sections.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Carve-outs and conditions stated: companies that have not opted for the scheme u/s 231 or are not covered by the scheme must compute shipping profits under the general provisions of the Act. Not stated in the document: any qualifying tests for a "tonnage tax company," thresholds, disqualifying events, or transitional arrangements. Not stated in the document: duration or locking-in rules for the option (if any), penalties or anti-avoidance rules specific to the scheme.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A company operates a fleet of qualifying ocean-going ships and elects the tonnage scheme u/s 231. Its profits from the tonnage business will be computed u/s 227 and treated as profits chargeable under business/profession, with relevant shipping income u/s 228(1) not chargeable. Not stated in the document: the numeric computation method or rates.
      • Example 2: A company carries on shipping operations but does not make the option u/s 231. Its shipping profits will be computed under the Act's general provisions (i.e., not under the tonnage scheme). Not stated in the document: whether the company may later opt in and any lock-in period.
      • Example 3: A company charters in parts of vessels through slot or space charters and conducts operations. Those arrangements are explicitly included within the clause's ambit so that such income may fall within the tonnage tax computation if the company qualifies and opts in. Not stated in the document: whether partial charter arrangements produce pro rata tonnage computations or any allocation rule.

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly cross-references sections 227 (computation of tonnage income), 228(1) (relevant shipping income), and section 231 (option mechanism). The document does not set out the content of those sections; therefore interpretation of the tonnage scheme requires reading those cross-referenced provisions. Not stated in the document: interactions with other Parts of the Act, rules, notifications, or international tax provisions (e.g., treaty implications).

      Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

      • Express inclusion of inland vessels in clause (1)(a): Document 1 (Section 226, Income-tax Act, 2025) expressly reads "if it operates any ship or inland vessel, as the case may be, whether owned or chartered by it..."; Document 2 (Clause 226 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - Old Version) reads "if it operates any ship whether owned or chartered by it..." and only later refers to "the ship or inland vessel, as the case may be" in the inclusory phrase.
        • Practical impact: The Act's final text (Document 1) makes the statutory scope unmistakably inclusive of inland vessels at the primary predicate (i.e. the act of operating a ship/inland vessel). This reduces ambiguity and clarifies that companies operating inland vessels are within the tonnage scheme's ambit. Affected parties: operators of inland vessels, compliance advisors and tax authorities. Consequence: more immediate application to inland navigation operators and clearer eligibility/registration and computation obligations under the tonnage tax scheme.
      • Minor drafting/formatting differences: Document 2 contains an additional explanatory sentence after the clause text ("Clause 226 of the Bill seeks to provide for tonnage tax scheme and defines that a company operating ships and giving the manner of computation of income under tonnage tax scheme for a tonnage tax company for its tonnage income.") which is an extrinsic note and not substantive law.
        • Practical impact: None on substantive tax liabilities; only aids reader comprehension in the Bill version.
      • No other substantive differences are apparent in the operative subsections (2)-(7): both texts impose separate computation of tonnage profits, require an option u/s 231, and provide that relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) shall not be chargeable to tax where the tonnage scheme applies.
        • Practical impact: Continuity in the scheme's mechanics; operators and tax administrators can rely on the same core structure in both drafts.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: companies operating ships must determine whether they qualify for the tonnage regime and whether to exercise the option u/s 231. Failure to correctly separate tonnage business profits from other business profits or to exercise the option when intended may result in incorrect tax treatment. Not stated in the document: penalties or specific compliance forms.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: the statutory requirement to treat the tonnage business as separate and to compute profits separately implies a need for clear accounting segregation of revenue, expenses and allocations relating to tonnage operations versus other business activities. Not stated in the document: precise documentary or books-and-records prescriptions.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 226 establishes an elective tonnage tax regime for companies operating qualifying ships that requires separate business treatment and separate computation of tonnage profits.
      • The scheme applies only if an option is made u/s 231; absent the option, general provisions govern computation.
      • The clause expressly includes chartered ships and partial charter arrangements (e.g., slot/space/joint charters) within "operating a ship."
      • Tonnage income is to be computed u/s 227 and is deemed to be profits chargeable under "Profits and gains of business or profession."
      • Relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) is not chargeable to tax where the tonnage scheme applies.
      • The clause requires clear accounting segregation of tonnage business, implying attendant compliance and record-keeping responsibilities.
      • Not stated in the document: precise rates, formulae, qualifying criteria for "qualifying ships," procedural details of the option, lock-in periods, or penalty provisions.

      Full Text:

      Section 226 Tonnage tax scheme.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax