Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Maximum Marginal Rate and Surcharge for Discretionary Trusts: ITAT Special Bench Clarifies Slab-Base...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Classification of Quicklime under the Customs Tariff: CESTAT Bangalore's Reaffirmation of HSN-Based ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of Reassessment Notices Post-Ashish Agarwal and TOLA: Limitation and Sanction u/ss 149 and ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Seizure, Provisional Release and Limitation: Supreme Court on the Interplay of Sections 110(2), 110A...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Prima Facie Adjustments v. Substantive Adjudication: Procedural Boundaries in Return Processing (CPC...
    Survey, Unaccounted Stock (Eye-Estimates) and the Limits of Section 130: Statutory Primacy of Sectio...
    Input Tax Credit Abuse (ITC Fraud) and Judicial Review: Delhi High Court on Natural Justice, RUDs an...
    Writ Jurisdiction and Statutory Appeal in GST Fraud Investigations: A Judicial Re-affirmation
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 11(3) Post-Amendment, Accumulated Income and the Sixth Year: Legal Interpretation, Procedura...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Form No.10B & Section 119(2)(b): Condonation of Delay in Tax Exemption Claims: Principles, Precedent...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Regulatory Ambit of Import of Second-Hand Electronic Capital Goods: Classification, Exemption and Pr...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 195, DTAAs and Software Licences: A Practical Framework for Withholding Tax
    Provisional Attachment under GST: Draconian Powers, Statutory Time-Bars and the Rule of Law: Interpr...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 263 Revisited: Jurisdictional Boundaries Where AO Takes a Plausible View on 80G Claims
    Case LawsCustoms
    Provisional Release in Customs Law: Balancing Revenue Protection and Commercial Fairness - A Compara...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Conditional Re-export and Revenue Safeguards: Judicially Crafted Remedies in Customs Adjudication
    GST Limitation Regime vs Executive Notifications: Judicial Review of Time-Limit Notifications under ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Section 11(3) After Finance Act, 2022: Utilization of Accumulated Income - Deemed Income, Vesting an...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    When Can an ITAT Reopen a Decision? Distinguishing Prior Binding Precedent from Subsequent Case-Law
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment and Jurisdiction: Reconciling JAO Roles with NFAC u/ss 144B & 151A (JAO / FAO)
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Discretionary trusts taxed at maximum marginal rate must have surcharge computed under slab and threshold rules, not automatically at top rate.
    For private discretionary trusts taxed at the maximum marginal rate under sections 164/167B, the term denotes the highest basic slab rate under the Finance Act, but surcharge on that tax must be computed according to the Finance Act's slab- and threshold-based surcharge provisions; if the trust's total income does not cross the statutory surcharge threshold, no surcharge is leviable despite basic tax being at the top slab rate.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Quicklime classification: impure lime falls under specific tariff heading, not high purity calcium oxide, per HSN purity standard.
    The imported material, chemically tested as impure calcium oxide (about 92.2% CaO with mineral impurities), is classifiable under Heading 2522 10 00 as Quicklime. Chapter Note 1 to Chapter 25 must be read contextually and does not disqualify quicklime from Chapter 25 where the tariff text and HSN Explanatory Notes expressly contemplate calcined quicklime. Heading 2825 is confined to chemically pure calcium oxide (approximately 98% CaO) and its residuary sub-heading cannot displace the specific Heading 2522 unless that purity threshold and absence of impurities are met.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reassessment notices: surviving-time computation under COVID-era relief and new limitation rules renders late notices time-barred.
    The court held that in transitional reassessment cases the appropriate sanctioning authority is determined by when the original three-year expiry fell within the COVID-era relief window, so approval by the ordinarily specified authority for within-three-year cases suffices; limitation is governed by a two-step surviving-time computation measured from the original notice as of the relief-window terminal date, excluding stayed periods and the time allowed to reply, and any later notice issued beyond that surviving time is time-barred under the substituted limitation regime read with the time-relief statute and the legal-fiction continuity.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Seizure of goods: six month statutory limit for issuing show cause notice is mandatory despite provisional release.
    The six month limit in Section 110(2) for issuing a show cause notice after seizure under Section 110(1) is mandatory; only a single six month extension under the first proviso is permissible. Provisional release under Section 110A does not suspend, extend or neutralise that time bar. The 2018 second proviso making the six month rule inapplicable where provisional release is ordered is a substantive change and does not validate pre amendment seizures prolonged without notice.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Prima facie adjustments cannot decide debatable legal claims in return processing; contested deductions require scrutiny procedures.
    When a claimed deduction depends on timely deposit of employee welfare contributions and the legal question is debatable or pending higher adjudication, summary processing adjustments cannot be used to resolve the dispute; such matters require scrutiny or reassessment procedures and the validity of any processing-stage action must be judged by the law and facts existing at the time of processing.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Survey discovered unaccounted stock must be assessed under sections 35(6) and 73/74, not via section 130.
    Tax liability for unaccounted goods found in a survey must be determined under section 35(6) read with sections 73/74 of the GST Act; section 130 cannot be used to quantify tax or levy penalty in such cases. The statutory cross reference to sections 73/74 requires adherence to their procedural safeguards, and quantification based solely on eye estimates during survey is insufficient without proper weighment or verification.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit fraud: writ relief limited where appeals exist; hearings and raw RUDs generally suffice absent prejudice.
    The High Court held that writ jurisdiction must be exercised with restraint in complex ITC fraud matters appealable under Section 107; at least one personal hearing and provision of RUDs as collected by the Department generally suffice absent demonstrable prejudice; detailed allocation of penal liability under Sections 73/74/75(13)/122 requires adjudicatory or appellate factfinding and cannot be resolved in writ proceedings.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Writ jurisdiction limited where statutory appeal exists for fact intensive GST fraud investigations; appellate forum preferred for evidentiary disputes.
    The High Court reaffirmed that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is generally inappropriate where a statutory appeal exists for fact intensive GST investigations alleging fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit through fake invoices. Courts should confine review to jurisdictional defects or breaches of natural justice; detailed evidentiary disputes involving voluminous Relied Upon Documents, recorded statements and transaction chains are better resolved by the specialised appellate forum, which should hear appeals on merits and avoid dismissing on limitation grounds where appropriate.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Prospectivity of tax amendments: changes to accumulation rules apply from their effective date, not to prior accruals.
    Interpretation of section 11(3) concludes that, under the pre-amendment text, accumulated charitable funds could be applied in the year immediately following the five-year accumulation period; the 2022/2023 amendment removing that year was treated as prospective under the presumption against retrospective tax imposition. Separately, corrections by the Centralised Processing Centre under section 143(1) are confined to mechanistic errors and should not resolve debatable substantive questions of statutory interpretation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay in tax exemption claims should favor substantive rights over mere technical filing defects when bona fide.
    Equitable application of the Condonation Power requires authorities to admit late Form No.10B filings when short delays or credible explanations would otherwise strip claimants of substantive exemption rights; procedural defects such as digital-signature technicalities must be tested against documentary e-filing evidence and substantial compliance, while administrative safeguards permit subsequent verification of the audit report.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Imported second hand MFDs meeting HSE technical criteria can be exempt from BIS registration and obtain conditional provisional release.
    Where importers produce prima facie evidence that imported second hand MFDs meet the Highly Specialized Equipment (HSE) criteria (limited units per model and physical thresholds such as weight >80 kg), those devices are exempt from compulsory BIS registration under the CRO and fall within the FTP residuary category for second hand capital goods; accordingly, provisional release may be granted on conditions (bond/guarantee and document verification) without prejudice to final adjudication.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Royalty characterisation for software determines withholding-non exclusive copies/licenses generally not subject to TDS unless income is chargeable.
    Payments for off the shelf/shrink wrapped software or hardware embedded software that constitute a resale of a copyrighted article or a grant of a non exclusive, restricted licence for internal use do not ordinarily constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) or typical DTAA provisions; withholding under section 195 arises only where the non resident's receipts are chargeable to tax in India (e.g., due to a PE or transfer of substantive copyright rights), and retrospective domestic amendments cannot be used to impose past withholding obligations on payors who lacked notice of the expanded definition.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional attachment limits: fixed statutory expiry prevents re-issuance of lapsed attachment orders on same property.
    A provisional attachment under the CGST scheme automatically ceases on expiry of the statutory time limit; once it has lapsed by operation of law, tax authorities have no power to re issue or renew a fresh provisional attachment over the same property on substantially the same grounds, and any such fresh order is void. Procedural rules or executive instructions cannot be used to circumvent this statutory safeguard and must be aligned with the primary legislation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisional jurisdiction cannot overturn a plausible assessment on charitable deductions where donation conditions are met.
    Tribunals held that Explanation 2 limiting CSR expenditure as a business deduction operates within the business income chapter and does not ipso facto bar claims under the donations regime; specific statutory exceptions indicate Parliament's choice to restrict only certain items. A mandatory CSR outlay does not automatically negate donation character where there is no material return, provided donee approval and documentary evidence are established. On revisional power, section 263 cannot be invoked to overturn an assessing officer's tenable, precedent backed view where enquiries were made; revision is justified only if the AO's conclusion is legally untenable or there was no inquiry.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional release of seized imports permitted subject to proportionate security, favouring bonds over bank guarantees before adjudication.
    Provisional release under Section 110 is permitted subject to proportionate protections: payment of duties as self-assessed; payment of a substantive portion (commonly fifty percent) of any departmental differential; and execution of enforceable bonds for the balance. Bank guarantees or cash security for speculative fines prior to adjudication are often disproportionate and may be replaced by bonds, though deliberate mis-declaration, concealment or prohibited imports justify stricter protective measures.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Conditional re-export of detained imports permitted when revenue is secured by enforceable financial guarantees and timelines.
    Courts may permit re-export of detained imports where the anticipated departmental remedy is monetary, provided the importer furnishes enforceable financial safeguards-typically a bond quantifying revenue exposure and a bank guarantee for a calibrated portion of the redetermined value-and complies with prescribed timelines; such orders are without prejudice to the Department's right to complete investigations, adjudicate, assess differential duties, and impose penalties.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Force majeure causation in GST limitation: proximate cause and mandatory council recommendation govern valid time limit extensions.
    Section 168A empowers executive modification of GST limitation periods but operates as delegated legislation subject to strict construction: valid exercise requires (i) a qualifying force majeure event, (ii) inability to complete prescribed actions, and (iii) proximate causation by that event; GST Council recommendation is a mandatory precondition and GIC substitution or post-facto ratification does not cure statutory defect.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Accumulated trust income: Tribunal rulings treat the 2022 amendment as prospective, preserving the prior six year utilisation window.
    Two Tribunal benches held that the Finance Act, 2022 amendment to the accumulation provision is prospective; accumulations made before 1 April 2022 remain governed by the prior law including the additional one year grace, and utilisation within that six year window cannot be taxed for AY 2023 24. The Tribunals relied on the presumption against retrospectivity, the Finance Bill memorandum stating an effective date of 1 April 2023, and fairness doctrines to conclude Parliament did not intend to curtail vested rights retroactively.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tribunal recall power limited: later judicial overruling alone cannot reopen finalized tax orders under review rules.
    The tribunal's power to amend is limited to rectifying a mistake apparent from the record existing at the time of the original order or to taking into account contemporaneous binding precedent not placed before it; a subsequent overruling or clarification by a superior court cannot alone justify recall, in light of the explanatory bar in Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC and related authorities.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Concurrent jurisdiction between JAO and faceless authorities affirmed; JAO may initiate reassessment followed by faceless assessment.
    The faceless scheme and RMS produce information that may be surfaced to the JAO, permitting the JAO to conduct the pre-notice inquiry and form satisfaction to issue a notice initiating reassessment; thereafter records may be transmitted for faceless assessment via automated allocation, embodying a two-stage model that preserves both JAO initiation authority and central faceless assessment.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 205 "Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      4 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 205 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) sets conditions for concessional tax treatment under specified clauses (sections 199, 200, 201, 203 and 204) by prescribing that total income be computed without specified deductions/exemptions, and by laying down eligibility conditions and administrative safeguards. It matters to companies and co-operative societies seeking concessional tax rates under the cited provisions, and to revenue authorities supervising compliance. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      The provision sits within the Bill's "New tax regime" and is a statutory hook for concessions referenced in sections 199(1)(c)(i)(C), 200(1)(a)(iii), 201(3)(a)(iii), 203(1)(a)(ii) and 204(3)(a)(ii). Clause 205 prescribes how "total income" is to be computed for these purposes by excluding certain deductions or exemptions (narrowly identifying sections from the principal Act such as sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49 and 144). It also sets eligibility conditions for assessees claiming rates u/s 201 (and allied provisions), empowers the Board (with Central Government approval) to issue guidelines to address difficulties in meeting conditions, includes parliamentary laying requirements for such guidelines, and gives the Assessing Officer (AO) a power to recharacterise profits where inter-party arrangements produce more than ordinary profits. Definitions and specific exclusions to the meaning of "manufacture or production" are provided.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 205 operates in three principal veins: (1) mechanical computation rule for "total income" when concessional clauses apply; (2) eligibility conditions for availing the concessional computation; and (3) administrative/assessorial powers to adjust profits and to issue guidelines. The listed provisions that must not be allowed as deductions or exemptions for computing total income are: section 33(8) (as prescribed), section 45(3)(a)/(b)/(c), section 46, section 47(1)(a), section 48, section 49 and section 144. The clause then sets four conditions (sub-section (2)(a)-(d)) concerning origin of the business (no split-up/reconstruction except subject to section 140(4) carve-out), restriction on used plant/machinery (with a 20% value cap and permitted foreign-used machinery exception), prohibition on using buildings previously used as hotels/convention centres (in respect of which section 80-ID deduction was claimed), and limitation of business activity to manufacture/production (plus related research/distribution). The AO is authorised, for purposes of section 201, to determine deemed profits where related-party or other arrangements yield more than ordinary profits, and where such arrangements involve a specified domestic transaction (section 164), the arm's length principle (section 173(a)) applies.

      Interpretation

      The text manifests a legislative intent to restrict the scope of preferential taxation by (a) mandating computation of total income without several specific deductions or exemptions, and (b) placing qualitative/quantitative conditions on the nature and origin of the business and on the use of assets. The inclusion of an AO power to determine "profits as may be reasonably deemed" and to apply arm's length principles for specified domestic transactions indicates an intent to deter related-party arrangements engineered to obtain concessional rates. The Board-with-Central-Government guideline mechanism is intended to provide administrative flexibility to resolve difficulties in meeting the enumerated conditions.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      The Bill contains explicit carve-outs: businesses formed by re-establishment/reconstruction/revival pursuant to section 140(4) are permitted; foreign-used machinery imported into India that was not previously used in India and in respect of which no depreciation had been allowed is exempted as "permitted machinery or plant used outside India"; and the 20% cap permits limited use of previously used machinery/plant. The definition of "manufacture or production" explicitly excludes certain activities (e.g., development of computer software, mining, conversion of marble blocks into slabs, bottling of gas into cylinders, printing of books or production of cinematograph films) and allows the Central Government to notify other exclusions.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: A domestic company set up by splitting an existing undertaking would be ineligible to claim the concessional computation unless it qualifies as a re-establishment within section 140(4). (Derived from sub-section (2)(a).)
      • Example 2: An assessee imports second-hand machinery that was used outside India and had never been used in India; no depreciation was previously claimed for that machinery anywhere - it falls within "permitted machinery or plant used outside India." (Derived from sub-section (6)(b)(ii) as numbered in the Bill.)
      • Example 3: A group arranges intra-group transactions yielding above-ordinary profits; the AO may determine deemed excess profits and treat that excess as income chargeable u/s 201 at the specified concessional rate, applying arm's length pricing if the transaction is a specified domestic transaction. (Derived from sub-section (5).)

      Interplay

      The clause cross-references multiple provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961: sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49, 80-ID(6) meanings for "hotel" and "convention centre," section 140(4) for revival/reconstruction carve-out, section 164 for specified domestic transactions, section 173(a) for arm's length price, and section 116(13)(e) for "unabsorbed depreciation." It also references the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for the meaning of "Unit." The Board's guideline power requires previous approval of the Central Government and is subject to parliamentary laying (procedural oversight). No rules or notifications beyond these cross-references are reproduced in the Bill text.

      Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

      • Sunset clause for issuance of guidelines: The Bill (Document 2) contained an express time-limit: "No guideline under sub-section (2) shall be issued after the expiration of two years from the 1st April, 2026." The Act (Document 1) omits this proviso and instead provides procedural parliamentary laying (now placed as sub-section (3) in the Act).
        • Practical impact: removal of the two-year sunset in the Act gives the Board-with-Central-Government approval continuing discretion to issue guidelines beyond 1 April 2028; administrative flexibility is increased and industry may face an indefinite period of potential guideline issuance.
      • Locus and scope of assessing officer power: In the Bill the provision conferring power on the Assessing Officer to determine deemed excess profits is located in sub-section (5) and explicitly applies "for the purposes of section 201." The Act places a substantively similar provision in sub-section (4) and expressly states it applies "for the purposes of sections 201 and 204."
        • Practical impact: in the Act the assessing officer's power to compute deemed profits is extended to both sections 201 and 204, broadening the circumstances where the AO may attribute excess profits and charge them at the specified concessional rates; taxpayers facing assessments u/s 204 may therefore be subject to these transfer-pricing style adjustments.
      • Reordering and numbering: Substantive topics (guidelines, parliamentary laying, AO powers, definitions) are presented in different sub-section order between the Bill and the Act.
        • Practical impact: reordering does not change substance (aside from the differences above) but may affect ease of reference.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Claimants of concessional taxation must ensure the business is not a prohibited re-creation of an existing business (absent section 140(4) coverage), must monitor the provenance and aggregate value of previously used machinery (20% ceiling), must avoid using buildings previously qualifying u/s 80-ID for hotel/convention centre deductions, and must ensure their activity falls within the statutory definition of manufacture/production (subject to enumerated exclusions). Related-party arrangements should be structured mindful of the AO's power to recharacterise profits and apply arm's length pricing for specified domestic transactions.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: taxpayers should retain documentary evidence proving origin of business (formation/reconstruction records), invoices and import documentation for foreign-used machinery (showing non-use in India and date of import), valuation records demonstrating the 20% threshold calculation, and contemporaneous transfer-pricing/arm's-length documentation for intra-group transactions to counter AO adjustments. Evidence of prior claims of section 80-ID deductions for buildings will be relevant.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 205 prescribes that, for certain concessional tax clauses, total income must be computed ignoring specific deductions/exemptions listed in the text.
      • Eligibility is conditioned on non-splitting/reconstruction (with a narrow section 140(4) exception), limits on previously used machinery (20% value cap), prohibition on certain previously used buildings, and restriction to manufacturing/production (with enumerated exclusions).
      • The Board may issue guidelines (with Central Government approval) to resolve difficulties in meeting these conditions; such guidelines must be laid before Parliament.
      • The Assessing Officer is empowered to determine and charge as income profits deemed to be in excess of ordinary profits where related arrangements inflate profits; arm's length principles apply to specified domestic transactions.
      • Extensive cross-references to existing Income-tax Act provisions and the SEZ Act indicate interaction with transfer-pricing, depreciation, and past incentives (section 80-ID).

      Full Text:

      Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax