Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Navigating Through Reimbursement Expenses, DDT Refunds, and Transfer Pricing Adjustments
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Navigating Financial Distress: A Legal Analysis of Progressive Tax Instalment Judgments
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Deciphering Tax Implications on Capital Reduction: Navigating the Complexities of Section 115QA in I...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Interpreting Section 153A: ITAT Delhi's Stand on Incriminating Material in Assessments: Assessments ...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Reaffirming the Bounds of Section 153A: Analysis of Delhi High Court's Approach: Assessment post sea...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Navigating Rectification and Revised Returns: Legal Insights from ITAT Bangalore's Ruling
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Mutual Fund Gains and Deemed Dividends: Analyzing the Delhi High Court's Landmark Judgment
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Reassessing Income under Section 147 Post-Quashment of Sections 153A/153C: The Waiver of Limitation ...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Section 153A of the Income Tax Act: A Critical Analysis of the Supreme Court's Interpretation in the...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Clarity and Precision in Tax Penalty Proceedings: Insights from a High Court Judgment
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Jurisdictional Challenges in Tax Assessments: Insights from a Recent ITAT Decision
    Case Laws Income Tax
    High Court Rules on the Invalidity of Reassessment Notices Issued to a Deceased Person
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Long-Term Capital Gains and Unexplained Cash Credits in Stock Transactions: A Legal Perspective
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Judicial Approach in Transfer Pricing and PE Attribution: Analysis of a Landmark Case: Legal Perspec...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Scrutinizing the Application of Mind in Tax Assessments: Examining the Role of ACIT while granting a...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    TDS Obligations and DTAA: Clarifying Tax Jurisdiction in International Telecom Services
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Distinction Between Business Income and Deemed Income in Income Tax Assessments: Higher rate of tax ...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Analysis of ITAT's Decision on Surplus Stock Taxation
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Validity of Notices / orders without DIN. The Critical Role of Procedural Compliance in Tax Administ...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Tax Exemptions: Capitation Fees in Educational Institutions: A Legal Quagmire
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Transfer pricing adjustments shape ALP analysis and documentation requirements for royalties and management fees.
Dispute involves deductibility of cross border reimbursement payments under Section 37 and whether assessing authorities recorded specific factual findings and afforded fair opportunity before disallowance. Related issues include entitlement to refund of excess Dividend Distribution Tax under the DTAA and the correct application of the Arm's Length Principle-notably choice between TNMM and CUP-for benchmarking royalty and management fees, with emphasis on documentation and comparability analysis.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Instalment payments: courts permit flexible tax instalment schedules for financially distressed corporates while respecting lower court discretion.
The courts endorsed a flexible instalment framework permitting extension and adjustment of tax payment schedules when a corporate taxpayer demonstrates reduced capacity to pay, including temporary reduction of individual instalments with deficits spread over remaining payments. The appellate decision upheld the lower court's discretion, emphasising deference absent clear error and supporting reasonableness and proportionality in accommodating financial distress while preserving eventual recovery of assessed liabilities.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Capital reduction transactions treated outside buyback levy when executed pre amendment; buyback tax not attracted.
The Tribunal held that the capital reduction did not qualify as a buyback for purposes of the buyback tax provision because the transaction was completed before the amendment that broadened the provision's definition; relying on precedents distinguishing capital reduction from buybacks, the Tribunal rejected the revenue's tax avoidance contention and emphasised that the transaction date governs applicability of the amended definition.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Incriminating material requirement: Section 153A assessments require material specific to the assessee, not unrelated third party statements.
Assessments following search operations must be grounded on incriminating material specifically linked to the assessee; material or statements derived from separate or third party search proceedings cannot, alone, serve as incriminating material against an unrelated assessee. Absent assesseespecific incriminating material, additions and disallowances in such assessments lack justification and cannot properly form the basis of adverse tax adjustments.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Admissibility of search statements: corroborative evidence required before additions in post-search tax assessments.
Statements recorded under Section 132(4) have evidentiary value but cannot alone justify additions under Section 153A; corroborative material discovered during the search is required, and taxpayers must be afforded the opportunity to cross-examine and rebut adverse statements before assessments under Section 153A are finalized.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Rectification under Section 154: procedural lapses should not bar correction of apparent errors in tax returns.
Interpretation of Section 154 treats misplacement of figures in an original return as a mistake apparent from the record, qualifying for statutory rectification; a revised return filed as a genuine corrective attempt may be recognised despite procedural lapses, and tax authorities should balance procedural compliance with the need to remedy apparent errors and assist taxpayers in claiming corrections.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Classification of Mutual Fund Gains: affirmed as capital gains, clarifies tests distinguishing business income and scope of deemed dividends.
Classification of gains from mutual fund redemptions turns on intent, transaction frequency, holding period, accounting treatment and the factual matrix to determine capital gains versus business income. Distinguishing genuine capital contributions from transactions that function as distributions is essential before treating receipts as deemed dividends; absent characteristics of a loan or advance against profits, capital infusions should not be recharacterised as dividends.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Reopening assessments under Section 147 requires proper review when Section 150(2) waiver is contested, not clarification.
Reopening of assessments under Section 147 concerns whether the Assessing Officer has a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment and is subject to procedural safeguards including issuance of a statutory notice. Where prior assessments made in consequence of a search under provisions for search-based assessment were quashed, the question arises whether fresh proceedings may be initiated for income not arising from incriminating material found in the search and whether the limitation period can be waived under Section 150(2) to permit issuance of a notice for reassessment.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Scope of assessment post-search: completed assessments permit additions only from incriminating material found during searches.
The Supreme Court clarified that for assessments completed before a search, the Assessing Officer's power to reassess within the retrospective period is constrained: any additions in such completed assessments must be based on incriminating material discovered during the search, thereby limiting use of search powers to matters tied to the unearthed evidence and preventing expansion of assessments on unrelated material.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Specificity in penalty notices: requirement to identify exact charge prevents defective proceedings and safeguards procedural fairness.
Applicability of penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars requires the assessing officer to specify the exact limb under which proceedings are initiated; absence of that specificity renders the penalty notice defective, undermines procedural fairness, and justifies setting aside the penalty, thereby obliging tax authorities to adhere to precise notice requirements when invoking penal provisions.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Jurisdictional validity of tax notice: lack of proper jurisdiction can vitiate assessment proceedings and nullify further action.
The dominant operative point is that a valid scrutiny assessment under Section 143(2) requires issuance by an officer with lawful jurisdiction determined by income thresholds and administrative instructions; failure in jurisdictional competence can render the notice and ensuing assessment proceedings invalid. Procedural fairness-specifically the opportunity to be heard-is a corollary concern, and while issues regarding additions under Section 69A and the tax effect of Section 115BBE are raised, they become academic if the initiation itself is found jurisdictionally flawed.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Validity of reassessment notices: notices issued to a deceased person are void and must be directed to the correct legal entity.
The High Court held that reassessment notices issued in the name of a deceased assessee are null and void, constituting substantive illegality when directed to a non-existent person; the court emphasized that the correct legal entity must be addressed, that the legal heir's communications and filings were material, and that procedural protections and statutory reopening procedures cannot be bypassed due to administrative or IT constraints.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Long-term capital gains preserved where transaction records establish genuineness; mere broker misconduct is insufficient evidence.
The issue is whether gains from sale of low-priced shares are long-term capital gains or unexplained cash credits under Section 68. The authorities suspected accommodation entries via a broker with a tainted history, but transaction documents-bills, bank payments and contract notes-were held to establish genuineness. Mere suspicion of broker misconduct was deemed insufficient without direct evidence linking the assessee to contrived entries; evidentiary standards and fair hearing obligations were decisive.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Permanent establishment attribution: precedent-driven analysis limits taxable profit allocation to where core value is created in digital services.
The principal issue is attribution of profits to a Permanent Establishment for cross-border digital reservation services, requiring a fact-sensitive analysis of where core business activities and value creation occur; judicial reasoning relied on materially similar precedent to determine the appropriate share of revenue attributable to the PE, stressing that a mere business connection or digital presence does not automatically justify full profit allocation to the jurisdiction and that clear tracing of value creation is essential to avoid double taxation.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Application of mind in tax approvals: inadequate ACIT scrutiny under Section 153D can invalidate assessments.
The core issue is whether the ACIT, when granting approval under Section 153D, performed a genuine application of mind by scrutinising assessment records and search material; the Tribunal and High Court found the approval lacked adequate examination, leading to inconsistencies between additions made by the assessing officer and the assessed income, and rendering the assessment unreliable. The matter was treated as factual rather than presenting a substantial question of law.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Royalty characterisation: cross-border telecom payments not taxable as royalty, limiting TDS and extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Payments by an Indian telecom operator to non-resident carriers for interconnectivity and capacity transfers are not to be characterised as royalty under the applicable DTAA and therefore do not attract TDS; DTAA interpretation governs characterization, Indian jurisdiction is limited over extra territorial income where the foreign entities lack a taxable presence, and retrospective amendments do not impose tax on past transactions compliant with the law at the time.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Deemed income classification denied where surrendered receipts are linked to business activities, avoiding higher tax rate.
Where surrendered cash, advances and stock discrepancies identified in a survey are linked to ordinary business activities and the assessee supplies specific explanations of source and nexus, the deeming provisions for unexplained investments and unrecorded ownership do not automatically apply; accordingly the higher-rate taxation applicable to incomes classified as deemed income is inapplicable and the amounts are treated as business income for tax purposes.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Surplus stock classification: accounting linkage to business determines treatment as business income over unexplained investment.
Classification of surplus stock found during a section 133A survey depends on its nexus with ordinary trading and documentary accounting. Where excess inventory is recorded in the stock register and credited to partners' capital account, these accounting entries indicate it forms part of regular business stock and support treatment as business income rather than unexplained investment under section 69B, affecting applicability of special tax treatment under section 115BBE.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
DIN requirement in tax administration: absence of mandatory DIN can invalidate assessment orders unless exceptional circumstances apply.
Failure to quote the mandatory computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) in assessment orders, as required by the CBDT Circular from 1 October 2019, constitutes a procedural defect that can render the order invalid unless the revenue demonstrates that the issuance fell within the Circular's narrowly drawn exceptional circumstances; the Tribunal found such non-compliance in the order dated 15 October 2019 and the High Court affirmed, while the Supreme Court granted interim stay for further consideration.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Capitation fee allegations challenge admissibility and attribution of seized evidence in charitable trust tax exemption inquiries.
Alleged collection of capitation fees by a registered charitable trust threatens its exemption under Section 11; most evidence was seized from employees' residences, invoking the presumption under Section 132(4A) and raising attribution issues. Employee admissions later retracted, similar statement drafting, declarations under the Income Declaration Scheme 2016, and trustees' acknowledgments create contradictory evidentiary threads that complicate admissibility, credibility, and whether the seized funds can be treated as trust income.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Comparison of Section 205 "Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

4 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

Clause 205 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) sets conditions for concessional tax treatment under specified clauses (sections 199, 200, 201, 203 and 204) by prescribing that total income be computed without specified deductions/exemptions, and by laying down eligibility conditions and administrative safeguards. It matters to companies and co-operative societies seeking concessional tax rates under the cited provisions, and to revenue authorities supervising compliance. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

The provision sits within the Bill's "New tax regime" and is a statutory hook for concessions referenced in sections 199(1)(c)(i)(C), 200(1)(a)(iii), 201(3)(a)(iii), 203(1)(a)(ii) and 204(3)(a)(ii). Clause 205 prescribes how "total income" is to be computed for these purposes by excluding certain deductions or exemptions (narrowly identifying sections from the principal Act such as sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49 and 144). It also sets eligibility conditions for assessees claiming rates u/s 201 (and allied provisions), empowers the Board (with Central Government approval) to issue guidelines to address difficulties in meeting conditions, includes parliamentary laying requirements for such guidelines, and gives the Assessing Officer (AO) a power to recharacterise profits where inter-party arrangements produce more than ordinary profits. Definitions and specific exclusions to the meaning of "manufacture or production" are provided.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

Clause 205 operates in three principal veins: (1) mechanical computation rule for "total income" when concessional clauses apply; (2) eligibility conditions for availing the concessional computation; and (3) administrative/assessorial powers to adjust profits and to issue guidelines. The listed provisions that must not be allowed as deductions or exemptions for computing total income are: section 33(8) (as prescribed), section 45(3)(a)/(b)/(c), section 46, section 47(1)(a), section 48, section 49 and section 144. The clause then sets four conditions (sub-section (2)(a)-(d)) concerning origin of the business (no split-up/reconstruction except subject to section 140(4) carve-out), restriction on used plant/machinery (with a 20% value cap and permitted foreign-used machinery exception), prohibition on using buildings previously used as hotels/convention centres (in respect of which section 80-ID deduction was claimed), and limitation of business activity to manufacture/production (plus related research/distribution). The AO is authorised, for purposes of section 201, to determine deemed profits where related-party or other arrangements yield more than ordinary profits, and where such arrangements involve a specified domestic transaction (section 164), the arm's length principle (section 173(a)) applies.

Interpretation

The text manifests a legislative intent to restrict the scope of preferential taxation by (a) mandating computation of total income without several specific deductions or exemptions, and (b) placing qualitative/quantitative conditions on the nature and origin of the business and on the use of assets. The inclusion of an AO power to determine "profits as may be reasonably deemed" and to apply arm's length principles for specified domestic transactions indicates an intent to deter related-party arrangements engineered to obtain concessional rates. The Board-with-Central-Government guideline mechanism is intended to provide administrative flexibility to resolve difficulties in meeting the enumerated conditions.

Exceptions/Provisos

The Bill contains explicit carve-outs: businesses formed by re-establishment/reconstruction/revival pursuant to section 140(4) are permitted; foreign-used machinery imported into India that was not previously used in India and in respect of which no depreciation had been allowed is exempted as "permitted machinery or plant used outside India"; and the 20% cap permits limited use of previously used machinery/plant. The definition of "manufacture or production" explicitly excludes certain activities (e.g., development of computer software, mining, conversion of marble blocks into slabs, bottling of gas into cylinders, printing of books or production of cinematograph films) and allows the Central Government to notify other exclusions.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: A domestic company set up by splitting an existing undertaking would be ineligible to claim the concessional computation unless it qualifies as a re-establishment within section 140(4). (Derived from sub-section (2)(a).)
  • Example 2: An assessee imports second-hand machinery that was used outside India and had never been used in India; no depreciation was previously claimed for that machinery anywhere - it falls within "permitted machinery or plant used outside India." (Derived from sub-section (6)(b)(ii) as numbered in the Bill.)
  • Example 3: A group arranges intra-group transactions yielding above-ordinary profits; the AO may determine deemed excess profits and treat that excess as income chargeable u/s 201 at the specified concessional rate, applying arm's length pricing if the transaction is a specified domestic transaction. (Derived from sub-section (5).)

Interplay

The clause cross-references multiple provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961: sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49, 80-ID(6) meanings for "hotel" and "convention centre," section 140(4) for revival/reconstruction carve-out, section 164 for specified domestic transactions, section 173(a) for arm's length price, and section 116(13)(e) for "unabsorbed depreciation." It also references the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for the meaning of "Unit." The Board's guideline power requires previous approval of the Central Government and is subject to parliamentary laying (procedural oversight). No rules or notifications beyond these cross-references are reproduced in the Bill text.

Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

  • Sunset clause for issuance of guidelines: The Bill (Document 2) contained an express time-limit: "No guideline under sub-section (2) shall be issued after the expiration of two years from the 1st April, 2026." The Act (Document 1) omits this proviso and instead provides procedural parliamentary laying (now placed as sub-section (3) in the Act).
    • Practical impact: removal of the two-year sunset in the Act gives the Board-with-Central-Government approval continuing discretion to issue guidelines beyond 1 April 2028; administrative flexibility is increased and industry may face an indefinite period of potential guideline issuance.
  • Locus and scope of assessing officer power: In the Bill the provision conferring power on the Assessing Officer to determine deemed excess profits is located in sub-section (5) and explicitly applies "for the purposes of section 201." The Act places a substantively similar provision in sub-section (4) and expressly states it applies "for the purposes of sections 201 and 204."
    • Practical impact: in the Act the assessing officer's power to compute deemed profits is extended to both sections 201 and 204, broadening the circumstances where the AO may attribute excess profits and charge them at the specified concessional rates; taxpayers facing assessments u/s 204 may therefore be subject to these transfer-pricing style adjustments.
  • Reordering and numbering: Substantive topics (guidelines, parliamentary laying, AO powers, definitions) are presented in different sub-section order between the Bill and the Act.
    • Practical impact: reordering does not change substance (aside from the differences above) but may affect ease of reference.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Claimants of concessional taxation must ensure the business is not a prohibited re-creation of an existing business (absent section 140(4) coverage), must monitor the provenance and aggregate value of previously used machinery (20% ceiling), must avoid using buildings previously qualifying u/s 80-ID for hotel/convention centre deductions, and must ensure their activity falls within the statutory definition of manufacture/production (subject to enumerated exclusions). Related-party arrangements should be structured mindful of the AO's power to recharacterise profits and apply arm's length pricing for specified domestic transactions.
  • Record-keeping/evidence: taxpayers should retain documentary evidence proving origin of business (formation/reconstruction records), invoices and import documentation for foreign-used machinery (showing non-use in India and date of import), valuation records demonstrating the 20% threshold calculation, and contemporaneous transfer-pricing/arm's-length documentation for intra-group transactions to counter AO adjustments. Evidence of prior claims of section 80-ID deductions for buildings will be relevant.

Key Takeaways

  • Clause 205 prescribes that, for certain concessional tax clauses, total income must be computed ignoring specific deductions/exemptions listed in the text.
  • Eligibility is conditioned on non-splitting/reconstruction (with a narrow section 140(4) exception), limits on previously used machinery (20% value cap), prohibition on certain previously used buildings, and restriction to manufacturing/production (with enumerated exclusions).
  • The Board may issue guidelines (with Central Government approval) to resolve difficulties in meeting these conditions; such guidelines must be laid before Parliament.
  • The Assessing Officer is empowered to determine and charge as income profits deemed to be in excess of ordinary profits where related arrangements inflate profits; arm's length principles apply to specified domestic transactions.
  • Extensive cross-references to existing Income-tax Act provisions and the SEZ Act indicate interaction with transfer-pricing, depreciation, and past incentives (section 80-ID).

Full Text:

Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

Topics

Acts Income Tax