Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Retrospective Amendments and the Doctrine of Vested Rights: A Judicial Perspective
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Upholding Equality: HC Strikes Down Discriminatory Circular on Charitable Trust Approvals
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Judicial Review of Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) Orders: Navigating the Boundaries
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Assessee's Lackadaisical Conduct Leads to Dismissal of Income Tax Appeal
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Navigating the Faceless Appeal Scheme: Lessons from the Judgement on Delayed Filing and Deduction u/...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Unraveling the Maze of Round-Tripping: The Doctrine of "Source of Source" in Share Capital Transacti...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Upholding the Transfer of Assessment Proceedings u/s 127: A Judicial Perspective
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Share Premium Addition u/s 68: Demystifying Share Premium Transactions
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Navigating the Intricacies of Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(c): Fairness in Tax Administration
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Scope and Limitations under Income Tax Act
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Navigating the Complexities of Search and Seizure Assessments: Unraveling the Intricacies of Section...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Interpreting Section 80G Provisions: ITAT's Stance on Charitable Institution Registration
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Interpreting the Scope and Limits of Sections 153A and 153C: A Judicial Perspective
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Section 153C and the Necessity of AO's Satisfaction: A Detailed Judicial Analysis
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Royalty or Business Income? High Court Clarifies Taxation of Remittances against Software Purchase
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Complexities
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Faceless Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment: Validity of Notice Issued by the Jurisdictional A...
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Court Upholds Deduction for Operational Hotel under Section 35AD Despite Administrative Delays
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Landmark Ruling: Leasing Businesses Entitled to Depreciation Benefits
    Case Laws Income Tax
    Court Decision on Convertible Debentures Expenses : Revenue or Capital Expenditure?
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Vested rights preserved against retrospective tax amendments; filings made before enactment remain effective for settlement consideration.
The court addressed whether a retrospective Finance Act amendment prohibiting settlement applications from a specified date could divest a taxpayer who filed earlier of its vested right to have the application considered. It held that retrospective legislation cannot take away rights already accrued by actions completed before enactment unless clearly intended; that section 119 confers time-extension power but cannot impose new substantive eligibility conditions; and that administrative delay by revenue does not justify denying access where an application was already filed.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Reasonable classification principle: differential deadline for charitable trust tax recognition cannot lack rational basis or equality protection.
A departmental circular extended a filing deadline for tax recognition to mitigate hardship but excluded newly formed charitable trusts without offering reasons; the exclusion lacked an intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the circular's object, making the differential treatment arbitrary and ultra vires the constitutional guarantee of equality, requiring the excluded applications to be treated as within time and decided on merits.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
ITSC jurisdiction extends beyond application disclosures, while full and true disclosure and narrow judicial review govern settlement oversight.
The Income Tax Settlement Commission may inquire into and decide issues disclosed in the application and any other matters relating to the case as reflected in the Commissioner's report or uncovered by further inquiry; full and true disclosure is mandatory and amendments or contradictory positions that undermine that requirement are impermissible, yet contesting taxability before the Commission does not automatically negate disclosure; judicial review is limited to statutory contravention, prejudice, fraud, bias or malice, while sufficiency of materials placed before the Commission is generally beyond routine court scrutiny.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Delay condonation denied where litigant's evasive conduct and non participation failed to constitute sufficient cause for appeal filing.
The court refused condonation of delay for filing an appeal where a best judgment assessment treated cash bank deposits as unexplained after the assessee failed to file returns or participate in proceedings; reliance on transition to a faceless e filing regime and lack of alerts was held insufficient, as the assessee's evasive and habitual non participation did not amount to sufficient cause warranting condonation under the applicable doctrine.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Sufficient cause for delay in filing appeals rejected where faceless scheme migration did not excuse prolonged inaction.
The court held that migration to a faceless appeal system did not, without persuasive evidence, constitute sufficient cause to condone a lengthy delay in filing an appeal, finding the explanation reflective of litigant inaction rather than unavoidable impediment. On tax deduction, the court applied authority that a non-obstante clause does not negate the employer's obligation to deposit employees' statutory contributions by the due date as a condition for claiming the deduction, and treated the appeal as meritless and barred by limitation.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Source of source doctrine used to pierce the corporate veil where share capital appears round tripped among related entities.
The assessee must prove identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of investors under section 68; examination extends to the true origin of funds where bank records show circular transfers, related party directorships, lack of business operations, and arbitrary share premium, permitting lifting the corporate veil and application of the source of source doctrine to treat such receipts as not satisfactorily explained.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Transfer of assessment proceedings for coordinated investigations and administrative convenience upheld where procedural safeguards and factual links exist.
The judgment explains that transfers of assessment proceedings pursuant to the statutory transfer power may be justified for coordinated enquiries and administrative convenience, provided the decision is not capricious or mala fide. Authorities must afford an opportunity to be heard and consider objections; where factual indicia exist - for example, disclosed transactions such as unsecured loans with searched persons - centralisation can be sustained. The convenience of the assessee is relevant but subservient to effective adjudication and tax collection, and transfers supported by procedural compliance and factual nexus are not arbitrary.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Burden of proof in share premium cases: failure to prove investor identity and genuineness sustains addition under section 68.
The assessment of share premium under section 68 requires the assessee to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of investors who subscribe at a premium. The court scrutinised disparate allotments made on consecutive days, examined subscribing companies' financials, and applied the doctrine of "source of source" restrictively, holding that incorporation papers or bank payments alone do not discharge the burden. Absent cogent evidence tracing funds to lawful origin and demonstrating commercial rationale for large premiums, additions under section 68 are supportable.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Strict construction of penalty provisions prevents penalty where taxpayer disclosed omitted income before assessment notice.
The legal focal point is whether Section 271(1)(c) can be invoked where an assessee disclosed omitted income and paid differential tax before initiation of reassessment. Penal provisions require strict construction, and Explanation 1 treats a pre-notice satisfactory explanation and admission of additional income as accepted, precluding characterization as concealment. Additionally, a penalty notice must specify the particular ground for proceeding; failure to do so renders the notice defective and undermines the basis for penalty.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Scope of reassessment: AO may address newly noticed income but remains constrained by the recorded reasons for reopening.
Where the AO has recorded reasons to believe income escaped assessment, the AO may assess or reassess issues that come to notice during reassessment, but if no additions or modifications are ultimately made in respect of the issues that formed the basis for reopening, the AO cannot make additions or modifications relating solely to other matters that were part of the original assessment. Explanation 3 applies only after reassessment power is validly invoked and cannot be used to deviate from or supplant the recorded reasons.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Corroboration requirement for search statements: unsupported search statements cannot sustain additions without linked incriminating material and fair cross examination.
Additions for alleged accommodation entries cannot rest solely on statements recorded during search operations; such statements require corroboration by material found in the search that is specifically linked to the assessee. The assessing officer must articulate a factual nexus between seized group material and the assessee, and procedural fairness-including provision of relevant statements and opportunity for cross-examination-is essential. Cure provisions do not validate jurisdictional defects arising from absence of requisite notice or lack of incriminating material.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Registration under Section 80G: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration regardless of prior commencement of activities.
The Tribunal held that institutions granted provisional approval under the First Proviso to Section 80G(5) are entitled to apply for final registration under the proviso's final-registration clause, and that the relevant date of commencement is to be counted from activities undertaken after grant of provisional registration; a prior commencement of activities before provisional grant cannot alone justify rejection of a final-approval application.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Search assessment provisions under Sections 153A and 153C override ordinary reassessment time limits; asset-threshold verification required.
The judgment holds that search-triggered assessment provisions function as non-obstante clauses displacing ordinary reassessment time limits, distinguishes the enduring liability to tax from the temporal right to assess, prescribes that block periods are computed from the year of search (or date of receipt of seized records for non-searched persons), and treats the asset-represented income threshold as a mandatory, aggregable precondition requiring the assessing officer's recorded satisfaction.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Seized-material nexus under Section 153C: AO must form reasoned satisfaction before reopening assessments for specific years.
Section 153C requires the Assessing Officer to form a reasoned satisfaction that seized material during a search has a bearing on an assessee's total income before initiating assessments; mere discovery is insufficient, and the AO must identify specific assessment years, map incriminating material year-wise, and record reasons to justify abatement or reopening.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Royalty classification of software payments: remittances for software purchases are not treated as royalty under established precedent.
Where distribution agreements or End User License Agreements do not grant any proprietary interest or a right to use copyright, payments for acquiring computer software are not to be characterised as royalty; this conclusion follows controlling precedent and DTAA considerations and renders an Assessing Officer's contrary classification inconsistent with the correct legal interpretation.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Reopening assessments: procedural compliance and substantive escapement requirements determine validity of reassessment notices.
The judgment examines validity of notices under Section 148, holding that TOLA does not apply retrospectively for the assessment year at issue and notices issued after the statutory cutoff cannot be back-dated. Notices barred by the limitation in Section 149(1) are ineffective. Procedural prerequisites - notably issuance of a Document Identification Number and issuance through automated allocation by the faceless centre rather than direct action by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer - are mandatory. Substantively, reopening requires escapement of income in the form of an asset, expenditure, transaction, event, or book entry; a mere change of opinion or dispute over an ordinarily allowed deduction does not meet that threshold.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Faceless assessment: issuance of section 148 reopening notices by jurisdictional assessing officers inconsistent with faceless regime.
The faceless assessment framework under Section 151A and the Scheme dated 29 March 2022 allocates exclusive jurisdiction to either the Faceless Assessment Officer or the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for issuance of reopening notices and assessments; actions by an authority outside its assigned jurisdiction are inconsistent with the faceless regime and cause prejudice to the taxpayer as a matter of law.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Deduction eligibility for operational hotels affirmed despite administrative delay in star classification, focusing on substantive compliance.
The court addressed entitlement to a deduction under Section 35AD(5)(aa) where a hotel began operations and generated income in the relevant year and a timely application for star classification was submitted, but formal certification was delayed due to administrative inspections; the court applied a purposive construction to allow the deduction when substantive operational conditions were satisfied and delay was not the assessee's fault.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Depreciation entitlement for leasing companies where contractual ownership and business use are established, allowing higher depreciation rates.
A lessor retains entitlement to depreciation where lease terms demonstrate exclusive ownership rights, repossession power, return obligations and inspection rights, and where the asset is used in the course of the lessor's leasing business; actual physical use by the lessor is not required. Leasing activity that functionally equates to hiring can qualify assets for an enhanced rate of depreciation despite registration in the lessee's name.
Case Laws Income Tax
Show AI Summary
Revenue classification of debenture issuance expenses upheld as revenue expenditure despite later conversion into equity.
Expenses incurred to issue convertible debentures that are raised to provide working capital are to be treated as revenue expenditure because classification depends on the purpose and usage of the expenditure, and future conversion into shares does not change its revenue character.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Comparison of Section 205 "Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

4 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

Clause 205 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) sets conditions for concessional tax treatment under specified clauses (sections 199, 200, 201, 203 and 204) by prescribing that total income be computed without specified deductions/exemptions, and by laying down eligibility conditions and administrative safeguards. It matters to companies and co-operative societies seeking concessional tax rates under the cited provisions, and to revenue authorities supervising compliance. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

The provision sits within the Bill's "New tax regime" and is a statutory hook for concessions referenced in sections 199(1)(c)(i)(C), 200(1)(a)(iii), 201(3)(a)(iii), 203(1)(a)(ii) and 204(3)(a)(ii). Clause 205 prescribes how "total income" is to be computed for these purposes by excluding certain deductions or exemptions (narrowly identifying sections from the principal Act such as sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49 and 144). It also sets eligibility conditions for assessees claiming rates u/s 201 (and allied provisions), empowers the Board (with Central Government approval) to issue guidelines to address difficulties in meeting conditions, includes parliamentary laying requirements for such guidelines, and gives the Assessing Officer (AO) a power to recharacterise profits where inter-party arrangements produce more than ordinary profits. Definitions and specific exclusions to the meaning of "manufacture or production" are provided.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

Clause 205 operates in three principal veins: (1) mechanical computation rule for "total income" when concessional clauses apply; (2) eligibility conditions for availing the concessional computation; and (3) administrative/assessorial powers to adjust profits and to issue guidelines. The listed provisions that must not be allowed as deductions or exemptions for computing total income are: section 33(8) (as prescribed), section 45(3)(a)/(b)/(c), section 46, section 47(1)(a), section 48, section 49 and section 144. The clause then sets four conditions (sub-section (2)(a)-(d)) concerning origin of the business (no split-up/reconstruction except subject to section 140(4) carve-out), restriction on used plant/machinery (with a 20% value cap and permitted foreign-used machinery exception), prohibition on using buildings previously used as hotels/convention centres (in respect of which section 80-ID deduction was claimed), and limitation of business activity to manufacture/production (plus related research/distribution). The AO is authorised, for purposes of section 201, to determine deemed profits where related-party or other arrangements yield more than ordinary profits, and where such arrangements involve a specified domestic transaction (section 164), the arm's length principle (section 173(a)) applies.

Interpretation

The text manifests a legislative intent to restrict the scope of preferential taxation by (a) mandating computation of total income without several specific deductions or exemptions, and (b) placing qualitative/quantitative conditions on the nature and origin of the business and on the use of assets. The inclusion of an AO power to determine "profits as may be reasonably deemed" and to apply arm's length principles for specified domestic transactions indicates an intent to deter related-party arrangements engineered to obtain concessional rates. The Board-with-Central-Government guideline mechanism is intended to provide administrative flexibility to resolve difficulties in meeting the enumerated conditions.

Exceptions/Provisos

The Bill contains explicit carve-outs: businesses formed by re-establishment/reconstruction/revival pursuant to section 140(4) are permitted; foreign-used machinery imported into India that was not previously used in India and in respect of which no depreciation had been allowed is exempted as "permitted machinery or plant used outside India"; and the 20% cap permits limited use of previously used machinery/plant. The definition of "manufacture or production" explicitly excludes certain activities (e.g., development of computer software, mining, conversion of marble blocks into slabs, bottling of gas into cylinders, printing of books or production of cinematograph films) and allows the Central Government to notify other exclusions.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: A domestic company set up by splitting an existing undertaking would be ineligible to claim the concessional computation unless it qualifies as a re-establishment within section 140(4). (Derived from sub-section (2)(a).)
  • Example 2: An assessee imports second-hand machinery that was used outside India and had never been used in India; no depreciation was previously claimed for that machinery anywhere - it falls within "permitted machinery or plant used outside India." (Derived from sub-section (6)(b)(ii) as numbered in the Bill.)
  • Example 3: A group arranges intra-group transactions yielding above-ordinary profits; the AO may determine deemed excess profits and treat that excess as income chargeable u/s 201 at the specified concessional rate, applying arm's length pricing if the transaction is a specified domestic transaction. (Derived from sub-section (5).)

Interplay

The clause cross-references multiple provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961: sections 33(8), 45(3), 46, 47(1)(a), 48, 49, 80-ID(6) meanings for "hotel" and "convention centre," section 140(4) for revival/reconstruction carve-out, section 164 for specified domestic transactions, section 173(a) for arm's length price, and section 116(13)(e) for "unabsorbed depreciation." It also references the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for the meaning of "Unit." The Board's guideline power requires previous approval of the Central Government and is subject to parliamentary laying (procedural oversight). No rules or notifications beyond these cross-references are reproduced in the Bill text.

Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

  • Sunset clause for issuance of guidelines: The Bill (Document 2) contained an express time-limit: "No guideline under sub-section (2) shall be issued after the expiration of two years from the 1st April, 2026." The Act (Document 1) omits this proviso and instead provides procedural parliamentary laying (now placed as sub-section (3) in the Act).
    • Practical impact: removal of the two-year sunset in the Act gives the Board-with-Central-Government approval continuing discretion to issue guidelines beyond 1 April 2028; administrative flexibility is increased and industry may face an indefinite period of potential guideline issuance.
  • Locus and scope of assessing officer power: In the Bill the provision conferring power on the Assessing Officer to determine deemed excess profits is located in sub-section (5) and explicitly applies "for the purposes of section 201." The Act places a substantively similar provision in sub-section (4) and expressly states it applies "for the purposes of sections 201 and 204."
    • Practical impact: in the Act the assessing officer's power to compute deemed profits is extended to both sections 201 and 204, broadening the circumstances where the AO may attribute excess profits and charge them at the specified concessional rates; taxpayers facing assessments u/s 204 may therefore be subject to these transfer-pricing style adjustments.
  • Reordering and numbering: Substantive topics (guidelines, parliamentary laying, AO powers, definitions) are presented in different sub-section order between the Bill and the Act.
    • Practical impact: reordering does not change substance (aside from the differences above) but may affect ease of reference.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk areas: Claimants of concessional taxation must ensure the business is not a prohibited re-creation of an existing business (absent section 140(4) coverage), must monitor the provenance and aggregate value of previously used machinery (20% ceiling), must avoid using buildings previously qualifying u/s 80-ID for hotel/convention centre deductions, and must ensure their activity falls within the statutory definition of manufacture/production (subject to enumerated exclusions). Related-party arrangements should be structured mindful of the AO's power to recharacterise profits and apply arm's length pricing for specified domestic transactions.
  • Record-keeping/evidence: taxpayers should retain documentary evidence proving origin of business (formation/reconstruction records), invoices and import documentation for foreign-used machinery (showing non-use in India and date of import), valuation records demonstrating the 20% threshold calculation, and contemporaneous transfer-pricing/arm's-length documentation for intra-group transactions to counter AO adjustments. Evidence of prior claims of section 80-ID deductions for buildings will be relevant.

Key Takeaways

  • Clause 205 prescribes that, for certain concessional tax clauses, total income must be computed ignoring specific deductions/exemptions listed in the text.
  • Eligibility is conditioned on non-splitting/reconstruction (with a narrow section 140(4) exception), limits on previously used machinery (20% value cap), prohibition on certain previously used buildings, and restriction to manufacturing/production (with enumerated exclusions).
  • The Board may issue guidelines (with Central Government approval) to resolve difficulties in meeting these conditions; such guidelines must be laid before Parliament.
  • The Assessing Officer is empowered to determine and charge as income profits deemed to be in excess of ordinary profits where related arrangements inflate profits; arm's length principles apply to specified domestic transactions.
  • Extensive cross-references to existing Income-tax Act provisions and the SEZ Act indicate interaction with transfer-pricing, depreciation, and past incentives (section 80-ID).

Full Text:

Section 205 Conditions for tax on income of certain companies and co-operative societies.

Topics

Acts Income Tax