Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    News Bills
    Section 194LA - Payment of compensation on acquisition of certain immovable property.
    News Bills
    Definition of “forest produce” rationalised
    News Bills
    Reduction in compliance burden by omission of TCS on sale of specified goods
    News Bills
    Amendments proposed in provisions of Block assessment for search and requisition cases under Chapter...
    News Bills
    Non-applicability of Section 271AAB of the Act
    News Bills
    Amendments proposed in sections 132 and 132B for rationalising provisions
    News Bills
    Time limit to impose penalties rationalised
    News Bills
    Clarification regarding commencement date and the end date of the period stayed by the Court
    News Bills
    Rationalisation of provisions related to carry forward of losses in case of amalgamation
    News Bills
    Rationalisation of transfer pricing provisions for carrying out multi-year arm’s length price dete...
    News Bills
    Removal of higher TDS/TCS for non-filers of return of income
    News Bills
    SOCIO ECONOMIC WELFARE MEASURES - Increase in the limits on the income of the employees for the purp...
    News Bills
    Deduction under section 80CCD for contributions made to NPS Vatsalya
    News Bills
    Exemption to withdrawals by Individuals from National Savings Scheme from taxation
    News Bills
    Annual value of the self-occupied property simplified
    News Bills
    TAX ADMINISTRATION - Obligation to furnish information in respect of crypto-asset
    News Bills
    Increasing time limit available to pass order under section 115VP
    News Bills
    Excluding the period such as court stay etc. for calculating time limit to pass an order
    News Bills
    Exemption from prosecution for delayed payment of TCS in certain cases
    News Bills
    Certain penalties to be imposed by the Assessing Officer
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
News Bills
Show AI Summary
TDS on compensation for compulsory acquisition: deduction threshold raised while the deduction rate is retained, effective next fiscal April.
Section 194LA requires tax deduction at source on compensation or enhanced compensation and consideration for compulsory acquisition of immovable property (other than agricultural land) where amounts in a financial year exceed the prescribed threshold. The Finance Bill, 2025 proposes to raise that threshold while retaining the existing deduction rate and mechanism; the amendment is to take effect from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Definition of forest produce clarified to align with State Acts or Indian Forest Act, narrowing TCS scope to leased produce.
The Finance Bill aligns the definition of forest produce with any State Act or the Indian Forest Act, 1927, to clarify TCS coverage; it confines TCS on "other forest produce" (excluding timber and tendu leaves) to items obtained under a forest lease, and sets TCS at two per cent for timber or other forest produce under lease and two per cent for timber obtained otherwise, effective from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Tax Collection at Source exemption removes duplicate TCS/TDS obligation, streamlining seller and buyer compliance from April 1, 2025.
The Finance Bill proposes omission of the sub section imposing Tax Collection at Source by sellers on sale of specified goods where the buyer is liable to deduct Tax Deduction at Source, to prevent overlapping TCS/TDS obligations and ease compliance; the amendment takes effect from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Block assessment scope expanded to include virtual digital assets; computation, revival and timeline rules updated.
Amendments bring virtual digital asset within the definition of undisclosed income for Chapter XIV-B; add "recomputation", "reference" and "order" to the list of proceedings that may revive if a Chapter XIV-B proceeding is annulled; replace "pending" with assessments "required to be made" for subsequent searches; amend computation rules to recognise undisclosed income declared in return and include returns filed before search or requisition for credit; exclude income from international or specified domestic transactions from block period income; and change the block assessment time limit to twelve months from the end of the quarter of the last authorisation.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Non-applicability of penalty under section 271AAB clarified for searches under section 132 after block assessment introduction.
The amendment provides that section 271AAB shall not apply to an assessee in whose case a search under section 132 was initiated on or after 1 September 2024, aligning the penalty provision with the block assessment regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2024 and removing any ambiguity about applicability; the amendment takes effect from 1 September 2024.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Search and seizure: uniform quarterly-based time limit for retention approvals and updated cross-references for execution definitions.
The Bill amends section 132 to provide that the time limit for taking approval for retention of seized books of account or documents will be one month from the end of the quarter in which the assessment, reassessment or recomputation order is made, addressing administrative difficulties in group search cases. It also modifies Explanation 1 to section 132 to substitute "authorisation" with "authorisations", and updates Explanation 1 to section 132B to reference section 158B for the meaning of "execution of an authorisation for search or requisition".
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Limitation on penalty imposition extended to a uniform quarterly deadline after completion of connected proceedings or receipt of appeals.
The amendment standardises the limitation for imposing penalties under Chapter XXI so that no penalty order may be passed after the expiry of six months from the end of the quarter in which the connected proceedings are completed, the appellate order is received by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, an order of revision is passed, or the notice for imposition of penalty is issued. A consequential amendment updates the cross-reference in section 246A. These changes take effect from 1 April 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Stay period exclusion clarified: computation excludes from date stay granted until certified vacatur received by tax Commissioner.
The amendment excludes from computation of statutory time limits the period beginning on the date a court stay is granted and ending on the date a certified copy of the order vacating that stay is received by the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner or Commissioner (or the Approving Panel where applicable).
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Carryforward of losses limited to eight assessment years for predecessor losses in amalgamations, preventing loss evergreening.
Sections 72A and 72AA are amended to provide that any accumulated loss of an original predecessor entity deemed to be the loss of the successor entity may be carried forward only for eight assessment years immediately succeeding the assessment year in which that loss was first computed for the original predecessor, aligning these provisions with section 72 and preventing evergreening through successive amalgamations.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Multi-year transfer pricing: one ALP can apply to consecutive years, with TPO validation and AO recomputation.
A voluntary multi-year transfer pricing option permits an ALP determined by the TPO for a transaction in a given previous year to apply to similar transactions in the immediately following consecutive years; the assessee must exercise a prescribed option, the TPO must validate it within a set period, and on validation the AO shall recompute total income for those years in conformity with the TPO's ALP while no fresh references for those transactions shall be permitted.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Higher TDS/TCS for non-filers removed, easing withholding obligations and reducing verification and compliance burden for payors.
The proposal omits provisions imposing higher rates of deduction and collection for non-filers of income-tax returns, responding to stakeholder concerns that payors face difficulty verifying filing status and bear increased compliance and capital blockage; the amendment is intended to simplify withholding obligations and reduce verification burdens, effective from the first day of April, 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Perquisite income threshold increase: employer-provided amenities and foreign medical travel may be exempt from perquisite treatment.
Proposed amendment to section 17 would grant rulemaking power to increase the gross total income ceilings for treating employer-provided amenities and benefits as non-perquisites, and to raise the income limit excluding employer-funded foreign medical travel from perquisite treatment; the changes take effect from 1 April 2026 and apply to the subsequent assessment year.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Deduction under Section 80CCD extended to NPS Vatsalya contributions, with withdrawal taxation and partial withdrawal exemption.
Parents or guardians may claim a statutory deduction for amounts paid into a minor's NPS Vatsalya account up to a prescribed ceiling. Amounts for which a deduction is allowed, including any accretions, will be taxed on withdrawal when deposits were made to a minor's account, whereas sums received on account closure due to the minor's death will not be treated as the parent's or guardian's income. Partial withdrawals for defined contingencies are excluded from the parent's or guardian's income to the extent they do not exceed a prescribed percentage of contributions and subject to regulatory conditions.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Exemption for National Savings Scheme withdrawals: qualifying pre-1992 deposits and accrued interest by individuals are excluded from taxation.
Amendment to Section 80CCA exempts withdrawals by individuals of NSS deposits and accrued interest-limited to deposits made before 1 April 1992 for which a deduction was allowed-and applies to withdrawals made on or after 29 August 2024, with retrospective effect from that date.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Annual value of self-occupied property simplified, nil deemed where owner occupies or cannot occupy for any reason.
The annual value of a property used as the owner's residence shall be taken as nil if the owner occupies it for residence or cannot actually occupy it for any reason; the existing restriction limiting this benefit to a specified limited number of houses remains unchanged and the amendment applies prospectively under the Finance Bill.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Obligation to furnish crypto-asset transaction information: reporting entities must file prescribed statements and correct defects promptly.
Proposed section 285BAA mandates that prescribed reporting entities furnish statements of crypto-asset transactions to the prescribed income-tax authority in prescribed form, manner and time, allows the authority to intimate defects and permit rectification within a prescribed period, treats unrectified defects as inaccurate information, enables issuance of notices to require late filers to submit statements, requires disclosure and correction of discovered inaccuracies, and empowers the Central Government to prescribe registration, information maintenance, and due diligence obligations for identification of crypto-asset users or owners; the virtual digital asset definition is also expanded to include crypto-assets relying on cryptographically secured distributed ledgers.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Tonnage tax option timeframe extended - order window lengthened to quarter-end for new applications, easing verification.
The amendment extends the decision period for applications to opt into the tonnage tax scheme: where an application is received on or after 1 April 2025 the Joint Commissioner must pass the written order approving or rejecting the option before the expiry of three months from the end of the quarter in which the application was received, providing additional time for verification, inspections, and an opportunity of being heard.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Limitation for deeming tax-collector default: exclusion of court stay periods aligns time-limit rules with reassessment principles.
The amendment makes the limitation period for deeming a person an assessee in default for failure to collect tax subject to exclusion of periods such as court stays by applying the exclusion and suspension principles of the general reassessment framework to that time limit; the change is to take effect from the first day of April, 2025.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Exemption from prosecution for delayed TCS payment where remittance occurs by prescribed quarterly statement deadline.
Amendment provides that prosecution for failure to pay tax collected at source shall not be instituted if payment has been made to the Central Government on or before the time prescribed for filing the quarterly statement under the proviso to sub section (3) of the tax collected at source provision, thereby conditioning criminal liability on meeting the quarterly statement remittance deadline.
News Bills
Show AI Summary
Penalty authority of Assessing Officer expanded; prior Joint Commissioner approval required for penalties exceeding prescribed statutory limit.
Penalties under specified sections will be levied by the Assessing Officer instead of the Joint Commissioner, subject to the prior approval requirement where penalties exceed the statutory threshold in sub section (2) of section 274; a consequential amendment to clause (n) of sub section (1) of section 246A is proposed. Section 271BB, a penalty tied to an omitted parent provision, is proposed to be omitted. The amendments are to take effect from the first day of April following enactment.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Comparison of Section 114 "Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

2 September, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

Income-tax Act, 2025

At a Glance

Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) prescribes that losses computed from a "specified business" may be set off only against profits and gains of other specified businesses and that any unabsorbed loss may be carried forward and set off solely against future profits of specified businesses. The provision matters to taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses and to tax administration implementing set-off/carry-forward rules. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

Background & Scope

Statutory hooks: Clause 114 interacts with the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and cross-references "specified business" as referred to in section 46. The clause falls under the Part titled "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The provision governs inter-year treatment of losses arising from businesses designated as "specified business." Definitions provided within the clause (sub-section (3)) include:

  • "specified business" - any specified business referred to in section 46;
  • "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" - any loss computed in respect of a specified business carried on by the assessee during the tax year which has not been, or is not wholly, set off under sub-section (1) for that tax year.

Coverage: Losses computed from specified businesses carried on by the assessee during any tax year; set-off is restricted to profits and gains of other specified businesses in the same year and, if unabsorbed, to profits and gains of specified businesses in subsequent years.

Statutory Provision Mode

Text & Scope

Clause 114 provides a two-fold rule:

  • Sub-section (1): Any loss computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee during any tax year shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for that tax year.
  • Sub-section (2): The unabsorbed loss for a tax year shall be carried forward to subsequent years and set off only against profits and gains of any specified business computed for those subsequent tax years, iteratively ("and so on").

Definitions in sub-section (3) delineate the meaning of "specified business" (via cross-reference to section 46) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" (as a residue not set off under sub-section (1)).

Interpretation

The clause's textual intent is to ring-fence losses arising from specified businesses so that such losses cannot be set off against non-specified business income; they are usable only against profits from other specified businesses in the same or subsequent years. The presence of a definitional sub-section suggests legislative intent to ensure internal consistency and to enable precise identification of losses that qualify for the rule. The phrase "only against" is restrictive and signals a textual limitation rather than a permissive guideline.

Exceptions/Provisos

Not stated in the document: any provisos, exemptions, or conditions permitting broader set-off (for example, against other heads of income) are not provided in Clause 114. Any exceptions must be sought elsewhere in the Bill or Act.

Illustrations

  • Example 1: Assessee A carries on Specified Business X in tax year T and incurs a loss of INR 10 lakh. In the same year, A earns profits of INR 6 lakh from Specified Business Y. Under Clause 114(1), A may set off INR 6 lakh of the loss against the profits of Y; the unabsorbed INR 4 lakh is an "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" and is carried forward per Clause 114(2) to be set off only against future profits of any specified business.
  • Example 2: Assessee B has a loss from Specified Business X in year T but has taxable income from non-specified business activities in year T. Clause 114(1) precludes setting off the specified-business loss against non-specified business profits in year T; the loss may only be set-off against profits of other specified businesses in that year or carried forward per Clause 114(2).

Interplay

The clause expressly relies on the definition of "specified business" as referred to in section 46; therefore its operation depends on the scope of section 46. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are referenced in the clause excerpt. Potential interpretive dependency: precise identification of what constitutes a specified business will determine the reach of the set-off restriction and the categories of profits against which carry-forward losses may be applied.

Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

Document 1 (Section 114, Income-tax Act, 2025) and Document 2 (Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)) present substantially similar substantive restrictions on set-off and carry forward of losses from a "specified business," but they differ in form, detail and definitional clarity.

  • Definitions: Document 2 expressly defines "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" in a subsection (3). Document 1 omits these definitions in the text shown and instead cross-references "specified business, referred to in section 46."
    • Practical impact: The Bill's explicit definitions remove ambiguity about terminology within Clause 114 itself; reliance on cross-reference (Document 1) requires reading section 46 for precise scope.
  • Expression of set-off rule: Document 2 states losses "shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for the said tax year." Document 1 states the loss "shall be set off only against profits and gains of another specified business."
    • Practical impact: Substantively similar; Document 2 emphasises the requirement to compute profits and gains "for the said tax year" and refers explicitly to the assessee's carrying on of the business, which frames application to the assessee-year context.
  • Carry forward mechanics: Document 1 provides a two-clause iterative mechanism in sub-section (2) with subclauses (i) and (ii) describing carry forward and further set-off across years. Document 2 has a single sub-section (2) stating that "unabsorbed loss ... shall be carried forward ... and shall be set off only against the profits and gains of any specified business ... and so on."
    • Practical impact: Both impose carry forward limited to specified business profits in subsequent years; Document 1's subclauses are more granular in procedural description, whereas Document 2 is more concise.
  • Assessee-centric language: Document 2 explicitly frames losses as "computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee, during any tax year." Document 1 does not use the phrase "carried on by the assessee" in the excerpt.
    • Practical impact: The Bill version makes express that the provision applies to losses from specified businesses actually carried on by the assessee in that year, clarifying the territorial subject of the rule.
  • Terminology of residual loss: Document 2 introduces the defined term "unabsorbed loss from the specified business;" Document 1 uses plain language "so much of the loss not so set off or the whole loss ... shall be carried forward."
    • Practical impact: The defined term in Document 2 aids drafting precision and facilitates cross-references elsewhere in legislation and subordinate instruments.

Practical Implications

  • Compliance and risk: Taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses must segregate profits and losses arising from specified businesses from other income heads to ensure proper application of the restricted set-off. Failure to segregate may result in erroneous set-off and subsequent adjustments.
  • Record-keeping/evidence: The text implies recording of computation of losses "computed in respect of a specified business" and contemporaneous evidence of profits of other specified businesses in the same and subsequent years. Documentation showing that a loss arises from a specified business (as per section 46) will be necessary to justify application of this section; however, specific record formats or timeframes are not prescribed in the clause.

Key Takeaways

  • Clause 114 restricts set-off of losses from specified businesses to profits of specified businesses only.
  • Unabsorbed losses may be carried forward and set off against future profits of specified businesses only.
  • The Bill-text includes express definitions for "specified business" (by cross-reference) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business," improving drafting precision.
  • Clause 114 is an assessee-centric rule-losses must arise from specified businesses "carried on by the assessee" in a tax year.
  • No provisos or exceptions permitting set-off against non-specified business income are present in the clause excerpt.
  • Practical compliance requires segregation of specified-business computations and retention of records demonstrating classification and computation of losses/profits.
  • Full scope and application depend on the definition and scope of "specified business" as provided in section 46.

Full Text:

Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

Topics

Acts Income Tax