Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Comparative Legal Analysis of Aadhaar Intimation Fee Provisions : Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Compliance Fee for Delay in Furnishing Statements and Certificates : Clause 429 of Income Tax Bill, ...
    Fee for Delay in Income Tax Return Filing under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 428 of the Income Tax...
    Fee for Default in Furnishing Statements of TDS/TCS : Clause 427 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Legal and Practical Implications of Charging Interest on Excess Refunds under the Income Tax Regime ...
    Modernizing Interest Provisions for Advance Tax : Clause 425 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sectio...
    Modernizing Interest Liability for Advance Tax Defaults : Clause 424 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs...
    Interest for Defaults in Furnishing Return of Income : Clause 423 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. S...
    Government's Rights to Recover Tax Arrears : Clause 421 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 232...
    Delegated Powers in Indian Tax Law : Clause 532 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 231 of the ...
    Legal and Practical Perspectives on Tax Clearance for Departing Individuals under Indian Tax Law : C...
    Uniform Recovery Mechanisms in Indian Tax Law : Clause 419 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section ...
    International Tax Recovery Mechanisms under Indian Law : Clause 418 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Evaluating the Mechanism for Income Tax Recovery via State Governments in India : Clause 417 of the ...
    Garnishee Proceedings and Tax Recovery : Clause 416 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 226 of ...
    Analysis of Stay and Amendment Provisions in Tax Recovery: Clause 415 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 v...
    Validity and Amendment of Tax Recovery Certificates : Clause 413(4) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Jurisdiction and Procedure for Tax Recovery : Clause 414 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 22...
    Evolution and Implications of Tax Recovery Provisions in India : Clause 413 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Legal and Practical Aspects of Penalty for Tax Default under the New and Old Income Tax Laws : Claus...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Aadhaar intimation fee imposed for belated compliance, payable on late intimation through subordinate legislation.
    Clause 430 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 prescribes an administrative fee for failure to intimate Aadhaar by the prescribed date: the fee is payable at the time of belated intimation, is to be set by subordinate rules subject to a statutory ceiling, and operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act. The provision delegates essential operational elements-prescribed date, fee quantum, and collection mechanism-to rule-making while retaining a maximum cap and signalling continuity with the existing compliance approach.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for delay in furnishing statements requires payment before submission and is capped at the amount concerned.
    Clause 429 imposes an administrative fee for failure to deliver or furnish prescribed statements or certificates by scientific research and charitable institutions, accruing daily and capped at the amount in respect of which the failure occurred; payment of the fee is required before the delayed document or certificate may be filed, and the levy operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Late filing fee for income tax returns: income linked penalties retained, alongside other liabilities and administrative discretion.
    Clause 428 imposes a fee where a person required to furnish a return under Section 263 fails to file within the prescribed time, with an income linked structure: a higher fee for those above a specified income threshold and a capped lower fee otherwise; the clause operates without prejudice to interest, penalties, or prosecution and retains administrative discretion through "not exceeding" wording for the lower slab.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements requires pre payment before filing and is capped by tax liability.
    Clause 427 imposes a statutory fee for default in furnishing TDS/TCS statements as triggered by section 393(3)(b), prescribing a fixed per day charge for each day of delay, capped at the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and requiring payment of the fee before delivery of the delayed statement; the provision operates without prejudice to other consequences under the Act and mirrors the substantive structure of Section 234E while omitting explicit commencement and detailed procedural rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on excess refunds: Bill imposes interest from refund grant to regular assessment, with reduction if appellate orders confirm refund.
    Clause 426 charges simple interest on refunds granted under section 270(1) that exceed amounts determined on regular assessment, with interest computed from the date of grant to the date of regular assessment. Assessments under section 279 are deemed "regular assessment" for this purpose. Interest is reduced where appellate or revisionary orders ultimately validate the refund in whole or part. The clause mirrors Section 234D's core mechanics but changes cross-references and lacks an explicit retrospective application, raising transitional and interpretational concerns.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest for deferment of advance tax simplified to lump-sum rates, changing computation and compliance implications.
    Clause 425 prescribes lump-sum interest rates on shortfalls in advance tax instalments tied to specified due dates and percentage targets, retains partial compliance safe-harbours and exemptions for certain unpredictable income categories provided tax is paid by the final instalment, and defines the tax base for interest by allowing deductions for TDS/TCS and specified tax credits; it shifts from monthly computation to a simplified tabled regime while leaving interpretive gaps around new cross-references and treatment of early rectification of shortfalls.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on advance tax: default triggers automatic monthly interest until assessment or regular assessment is completed.
    Clause 424 establishes interest for failure to pay advance tax or where advance payments are below the prescribed benchmark, charging monthly interest from the first April following the tax year until determination of total income or completion of regular assessment. Interest is computed on net assessed tax after reductions for TDS/TCS, foreign tax reliefs and specified credits. The clause clarifies interpretative points about regular assessments, excludes certain additional income-tax from the assessed base, allows reduction of interest upon pre-assessment payment, and prescribes additional interest on increments arising from reassessment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on late tax returns: monthly interest applied under new provision with clarified computation and adjustment mechanism.
    A formulaic charging provision imposes simple monthly interest on tax due where returns are filed late or not filed, with a matrix of scenarios specifying for each the starting date, ending date and tax base for interest computation. The clause mandates adjustment of interest following appellate or revisional orders to reflect the final tax, permits reduction by previously paid interest and credits, excludes certain additional taxes from the tax base, and deems specified first time assessments as regular assessments for interest purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Government's right to recover tax arrears preserved, allowing concurrent statutory and civil recovery remedies.
    Clause 421 preserves the Government's right to recover tax arrears by methods beyond the statutory recovery modes, expressly allowing reliance on any other law for recovery and the institution of civil suits; it authorises assessing officers or the Government to pursue such alternative or concurrent remedies notwithstanding that recovery under the tax statute is being undertaken.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Delegated legislative power to frame broad tax schemes may permit statutory modification, raising oversight and legal certainty concerns.
    Clause 532 grants the Central Government a broad power to frame schemes for any purpose under the Income Tax Act by notification, aiming to eliminate taxpayer interface where technologically feasible and to optimise resources; it permits notifications to disapply or modify statutory provisions to implement schemes, validates amendment of existing schemes under the 1961 Act, and requires notifications to be laid before Parliament, raising questions about the scope of delegated legislation and safeguards for legal certainty and taxpayer rights.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax clearance certificate requirement conditions departure to secure tax liabilities and imposes carrier liability for non-compliance.
    Clause 420 requires a tax clearance certificate or an undertaking from an employer/payer before certain non-domiciled persons who earn Indian-source income may depart, excepting tourists; domiciled persons must furnish prescribed information (including PAN) and may be restricted from leaving if the tax authority records reasons and obtains senior approval. Owners or charterers of ships and aircraft are vicariously liable for departures without clearance, and the Board may make rules for implementation.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery of ancillary tax liabilities: non tax sums become recoverable using the same arrears procedures and enforcement tools.
    Clause 419 provides that any sum imposed by way of interest, fine, penalty, or any other sum payable under the Act shall be recoverable in the manner provided in this Part for the recovery of arrears of tax, thereby subjecting ancillary monetary liabilities to the same procedural recovery tools as tax arrears.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Mutual tax recovery enables cross-border enforcement by domestic authorities acting on foreign tax collection requests under treaty terms.
    Clause 418 creates a mutual tax recovery framework under international agreements: foreign authorities may send a certificate to the central tax board to be executed by the Tax Recovery Officer against residents or property in India in the same manner as domestic tax arrears, with recovered sums remitted net of expenses; conversely, the TRO may forward domestic recovery certificates to the Board for action abroad when the assessee is a foreign resident or has foreign property, with the Board acting pursuant to the terms of the relevant agreement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Recovery through State Government: central income tax may be collected with local taxes when entrusted, expanding local enforcement.
    Recovery through State Government permits State Governments, upon entrustment under Article 258(1), to direct that central income tax be recovered in specified areas with, and as an addition to, municipal taxes or local rates by the same person and in the same manner as local taxes, creating a legal mechanism to integrate central tax enforcement into local recovery machinery while raising concerns about procedural safeguards, accounting, and dispute-resolution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Third-party recovery enabling garnishee notices and conversion of non-compliant payers into defaulters for tax arrears enforcement.
    Clause 416 empowers the Assessing Officer and the Tax Recovery Officer to use alternative recovery modes pre- and post-certificate, including recovery from salary with statutory protection for exempt portions, a comprehensive third-party recovery regime through notices to debtors or asset holders (including joint holders, objection and indemnity mechanisms, discharge on compliance, and conversion of non-compliant recipients into assessees in default), court-application for funds held in judicial custody, and distraint and sale of movable property subject to prescribed manner and supervisory approval.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Stay of tax recovery: TRO must pause enforcement and amend or cancel certificates to reflect appellate reductions.
    Clause 415 requires the Tax Recovery Officer to grant time for payment and automatically stay recovery during that period; when a demand is reduced on appeal or other proceeding the TRO must stay recovery to the extent of the reduction while further proceedings are pending and must amend or cancel the recovery certificate once the reduction is final, establishing a mandatory, real-time mechanism to align enforcement with appellate outcomes and protect taxpayers from unjust recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Finality of tax recovery certificates: TRO may cancel or correct certificates while assessees are barred from challenging them.
    Clause 413(4) empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to cancel a recovery certificate "if, for any reason, he considers it necessary so to do" and to correct "any clerical or arithmetical mistake"; Clause 413 as a whole bars the assessee from disputing the certificate's correctness at the recovery stage, while the correction power is limited to mechanical errors and procedural safeguards such as notice or recorded reasons are not specified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax Recovery Officer jurisdiction clarified: transferable recovery certificates enable inter jurisdictional enforcement subject to prescribed certification.
    Clause 414 sets the rule for which Tax Recovery Officer may effect recovery: the TRO where the assessee carries on business or has a principal place of business, and the TRO where the assessee resides or any of the assessee's movable or immovable property is situated. It permits transfer of recovery certificates between TROs when assets span jurisdictions or recovery cannot be effected locally, authorises the receiving TRO to act as if the certificate were its own, and requires certification in the prescribed form to ensure procedural integrity.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax recovery certificate empowers administrative enforcement and bars collateral challenges to expedite arrears collection.
    Clause 413 empowers the Tax Recovery Officer to draw up a prescribed-form certificate under signature specifying arrears and to initiate recovery by attachment and sale of movable and immovable property, arrest, or appointment of a receiver. It permits parallel recovery proceedings, allows administrative cancellation or correction of certificates, and bars the assessee from disputing the correctness of the certificate at the recovery stage. Clause 413 expands recoverable property to include certain intra-family transfers made without adequate consideration from 1 June 1973, preserving liability for arrears predating a minor transferee's majority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for tax default: discretionary but capped enforcement with mandatory hearing and refund if liability is set aside.
    An assessee defaulting on tax payment is liable to a discretionary penalty in addition to arrears and interest, with the Assessing Officer empowered to impose successive penalties for continuing default. Aggregate penalties are capped at the amount of tax in arrears. Procedural safeguards mandate a reasonable opportunity of being heard and exemption where good and sufficient reasons are shown. Payment of tax before penalty does not extinguish liability, but penalty is cancelled and refunded if the tax liability is finally reduced to nil.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 114 "Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      2 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) prescribes that losses computed from a "specified business" may be set off only against profits and gains of other specified businesses and that any unabsorbed loss may be carried forward and set off solely against future profits of specified businesses. The provision matters to taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses and to tax administration implementing set-off/carry-forward rules. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 114 interacts with the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and cross-references "specified business" as referred to in section 46. The clause falls under the Part titled "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The provision governs inter-year treatment of losses arising from businesses designated as "specified business." Definitions provided within the clause (sub-section (3)) include:

      • "specified business" - any specified business referred to in section 46;
      • "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" - any loss computed in respect of a specified business carried on by the assessee during the tax year which has not been, or is not wholly, set off under sub-section (1) for that tax year.

      Coverage: Losses computed from specified businesses carried on by the assessee during any tax year; set-off is restricted to profits and gains of other specified businesses in the same year and, if unabsorbed, to profits and gains of specified businesses in subsequent years.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 114 provides a two-fold rule:

      • Sub-section (1): Any loss computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee during any tax year shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for that tax year.
      • Sub-section (2): The unabsorbed loss for a tax year shall be carried forward to subsequent years and set off only against profits and gains of any specified business computed for those subsequent tax years, iteratively ("and so on").

      Definitions in sub-section (3) delineate the meaning of "specified business" (via cross-reference to section 46) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" (as a residue not set off under sub-section (1)).

      Interpretation

      The clause's textual intent is to ring-fence losses arising from specified businesses so that such losses cannot be set off against non-specified business income; they are usable only against profits from other specified businesses in the same or subsequent years. The presence of a definitional sub-section suggests legislative intent to ensure internal consistency and to enable precise identification of losses that qualify for the rule. The phrase "only against" is restrictive and signals a textual limitation rather than a permissive guideline.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any provisos, exemptions, or conditions permitting broader set-off (for example, against other heads of income) are not provided in Clause 114. Any exceptions must be sought elsewhere in the Bill or Act.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Assessee A carries on Specified Business X in tax year T and incurs a loss of INR 10 lakh. In the same year, A earns profits of INR 6 lakh from Specified Business Y. Under Clause 114(1), A may set off INR 6 lakh of the loss against the profits of Y; the unabsorbed INR 4 lakh is an "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" and is carried forward per Clause 114(2) to be set off only against future profits of any specified business.
      • Example 2: Assessee B has a loss from Specified Business X in year T but has taxable income from non-specified business activities in year T. Clause 114(1) precludes setting off the specified-business loss against non-specified business profits in year T; the loss may only be set-off against profits of other specified businesses in that year or carried forward per Clause 114(2).

      Interplay

      The clause expressly relies on the definition of "specified business" as referred to in section 46; therefore its operation depends on the scope of section 46. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are referenced in the clause excerpt. Potential interpretive dependency: precise identification of what constitutes a specified business will determine the reach of the set-off restriction and the categories of profits against which carry-forward losses may be applied.

      Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

      Document 1 (Section 114, Income-tax Act, 2025) and Document 2 (Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)) present substantially similar substantive restrictions on set-off and carry forward of losses from a "specified business," but they differ in form, detail and definitional clarity.

      • Definitions: Document 2 expressly defines "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" in a subsection (3). Document 1 omits these definitions in the text shown and instead cross-references "specified business, referred to in section 46."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's explicit definitions remove ambiguity about terminology within Clause 114 itself; reliance on cross-reference (Document 1) requires reading section 46 for precise scope.
      • Expression of set-off rule: Document 2 states losses "shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for the said tax year." Document 1 states the loss "shall be set off only against profits and gains of another specified business."
        • Practical impact: Substantively similar; Document 2 emphasises the requirement to compute profits and gains "for the said tax year" and refers explicitly to the assessee's carrying on of the business, which frames application to the assessee-year context.
      • Carry forward mechanics: Document 1 provides a two-clause iterative mechanism in sub-section (2) with subclauses (i) and (ii) describing carry forward and further set-off across years. Document 2 has a single sub-section (2) stating that "unabsorbed loss ... shall be carried forward ... and shall be set off only against the profits and gains of any specified business ... and so on."
        • Practical impact: Both impose carry forward limited to specified business profits in subsequent years; Document 1's subclauses are more granular in procedural description, whereas Document 2 is more concise.
      • Assessee-centric language: Document 2 explicitly frames losses as "computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee, during any tax year." Document 1 does not use the phrase "carried on by the assessee" in the excerpt.
        • Practical impact: The Bill version makes express that the provision applies to losses from specified businesses actually carried on by the assessee in that year, clarifying the territorial subject of the rule.
      • Terminology of residual loss: Document 2 introduces the defined term "unabsorbed loss from the specified business;" Document 1 uses plain language "so much of the loss not so set off or the whole loss ... shall be carried forward."
        • Practical impact: The defined term in Document 2 aids drafting precision and facilitates cross-references elsewhere in legislation and subordinate instruments.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk: Taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses must segregate profits and losses arising from specified businesses from other income heads to ensure proper application of the restricted set-off. Failure to segregate may result in erroneous set-off and subsequent adjustments.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The text implies recording of computation of losses "computed in respect of a specified business" and contemporaneous evidence of profits of other specified businesses in the same and subsequent years. Documentation showing that a loss arises from a specified business (as per section 46) will be necessary to justify application of this section; however, specific record formats or timeframes are not prescribed in the clause.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 114 restricts set-off of losses from specified businesses to profits of specified businesses only.
      • Unabsorbed losses may be carried forward and set off against future profits of specified businesses only.
      • The Bill-text includes express definitions for "specified business" (by cross-reference) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business," improving drafting precision.
      • Clause 114 is an assessee-centric rule-losses must arise from specified businesses "carried on by the assessee" in a tax year.
      • No provisos or exceptions permitting set-off against non-specified business income are present in the clause excerpt.
      • Practical compliance requires segregation of specified-business computations and retention of records demonstrating classification and computation of losses/profits.
      • Full scope and application depend on the definition and scope of "specified business" as provided in section 46.

      Full Text:

      Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax