Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Digital Annual Information Transformation in Tax Administration : Clause 510 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Crypto-Asset Reporting Obligations under Indian Tax Law : Clause 509 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs...
    Evolving Obligations: A Comparative Analysis of Clause 508 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section ...
    Transparency and Taxation in Media Production : Clause 507 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Disclosure Norms for Indian Concerns in Cross-Border Transactions : Clause 506 of the Income Tax Bil...
    Statutory Reporting by Non-Resident Liaison Offices : Clause 505 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Procedural Safeguards for Assessment of Discontinued Businesses : Clause 504 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Continuity of Tax Proceedings after Partition or Dissolution : Clause 503 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
    Analysis of Authentication of Notices in Indian Income Tax Legislation : Clause 502 of Income Tax Bi...
    Legal and Practical Dimensions of Service of Notices under Indian Tax Law : Clause 501 of the Income...
    Power to provisionally attach property during tax proceedings : Clause 500 of the Income Tax Bill, 2...
    Voidable Transfers in Tax Law : Clause 499 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 281 of the Incom...
    Changing Face of Criminal Procedure in Income Tax Offence Prosecution : Clause 498 of Income Tax Bil...
    Procedural Reform in Tax Offence Trials : Clause 497 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 280C o...
    Jurisdictional Framework for Tax Prosecutions : Clause 496 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Designation and functioning of Special Courts for the trial of offences under the proposed legislati...
    Legal Protections against Unauthorized Disclosure in Indian Tax Law : Clause 494 of Income Tax Bill,...
    Proof of Official Entries in Tax Prosecutions : Clause 493 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Comparative Review of Non-Cognizable Offences in Indian Income Tax Legislation : Clause 492 of the I...
    Safeguards and Procedures in Income Tax Prosecution : Clause 491 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Annual Information Statement: statutory digital disclosure enabling taxpayers to verify and reconcile reported financial data.
    The provision requires upload of an Annual Information Statement into the assessee's registered electronic filing account by the prescribed income tax authority or an authorised person, in the prescribed form, manner and time, containing such information as is in the possession of the authority; specifics of content, format and timelines are left to subordinate rules, and the clause confines AIS data to information already held by the authority.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Crypto-asset reporting obligations require prescribed entities to file periodic transaction statements and correct inaccuracies promptly.
    Clause 509 creates a statutory obligation for prescribed reporting entities to furnish periodic statements on crypto-asset transactions to the income-tax authority in a prescribed form and manner; it provides time-bound notice-and-cure procedures for defective or non-filed statements, mandates prompt self-correction of inaccuracies, and empowers rule-making for registration, record-keeping and due diligence including KYC.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Obligation to furnish financial transaction statements expands reporting duties and mandates due diligence, thresholds, and correction procedures.
    Clause 508 requires prescribed persons to furnish statements of specified financial transactions and reportable accounts, with rules determining scope, thresholds, form and timing. It mandates registration, record maintenance and due diligence for identifying reportable accounts, sets timelines for rectification of defective statements and correction of inaccuracies, and permits the Board and Central Government to prescribe differential thresholds and procedural details; unrectified defects or failures are treated as inaccurate information, invoking consequences under the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reporting obligations for media producers require disclosure of substantial payments to enhance transparency and tax oversight.
    Clause 507 requires persons producing cinematograph films or engaging in specified entertainment activities during any part of a tax year to furnish prescribed statements to income-tax authorities identifying payments made or due to each engaged person that exceed the aggregate reporting threshold; it defines inclusive categories of specified activities, delegates timing, form and manner to subordinate rules (including electronic filing and standardized formats), and emphasizes reporting both actual payments and accrued liabilities to enhance transparency and tax oversight.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Disclosure obligations for indirect transfers require Indian concerns to furnish prescribed information to tax authorities.
    Clause 506 requires an Indian concern, where a foreign company's shares or interests derive substantial value from Indian assets held through that concern, to furnish prescribed information and documents within prescribed periods and manners to the prescribed income-tax authority to enable determination of income arising in India under the indirect transfer regime. The clause mirrors Section 285A's substantive obligations, defers detailed compliance requirements to rules, and aligns with operational specifics exemplified by Rule 114DB regarding form, timelines, documentary breadth, retention, and group-filing.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Statutory reporting by liaison offices requires a fixed sixty day post tax year filing to strengthen compliance and oversight.
    Clause 505 requires every non-resident having a liaison office established under RBI/FEMA to deliver a prescribed statement of the office's activities to the Assessing Officer within sixty days from the end of the tax year, with the form and particulars to be specified by delegated legislation and non-compliance subject to general penalty provisions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Service of notice for discontinued businesses allows authorities to serve former members or principal officers to proceed with assessment.
    Clause 504 permits the Assessing Officer, where an assessment is to be made under section 320, to serve a notice on the person whose income is to be assessed, any person who was a member of a firm or association of persons at the time of its discontinuance, or the principal officer of a company; such notice may contain all or any of the requirements included in a notice under section 268(1), and the Act's provisions shall apply as if the notice were issued under that sub section.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Service of notice after partition preserves tax proceedings by enabling notice on designated former managers or adult members.
    Clause 503 secures continuation of tax proceedings after a HUF's total partition or a firm's dissolution by allowing service of notices for pre disruption income on the last manager of the HUF (or, if deceased, all adults who were members immediately before partition) and on any adult partner or member of a dissolved firm or association; a formal finding of partition or dissolution by the Assessing Officer triggers application and minors are excluded from service.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Authentication of notices: statutory deeming of validity where designated authority details appear, enabling electronic and paper issuance.
    Clause 502 requires notices and documents to be signed and issued in paper form or communicated electronically as per prescribed procedures, deems documents authenticated where the name and office of a designated income-tax authority are printed, stamped or written thereon, and defines designated authorities as those authorized by the Board to issue such authenticated documents, thereby centralizing authorization while delegating procedural detail to subordinate rules.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Service of notices: modernised electronic and prescribed modes expand tax communication obligations and board rule making.
    Clause 501 prescribes authorised modes for serving statutory tax communications-post or Board approved courier, CPC methods for summons, electronic records under the IT Act, and other prescribed means-while empowering the CBDT to designate addresses (including electronic mail addresses) for service and to prescribe additional modes. It supplies a comprehensive, technology neutral definition of electronic mail covering messages and attachments, thereby modernising and clarifying the law of service and reducing ambiguities present in the earlier statutory cross references.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional attachment powers protect revenue by allowing property restraint pending tax proceedings, subject to guarantees and time limits.
    Clause 500 empowers the Assessing Officer to provisionally attach assessee property during assessment, reassessment or specified penalty proceedings subject to prior written approval of a defined Competent Authority, execution in the prescribed manner, and a default six month duration extendable for recorded reasons within statutory limits; it permits substitution of a bank guarantee equal to fair market value (or a lower amount if objectively sufficient), mandates valuation by a Valuation Officer, sets timelines for revocation upon guarantee receipt, and prescribes invocation, application and release mechanics for guarantees.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Voidable asset transfers: transfers during tax proceedings can be voided against tax claims, with exceptions for bona fide transferees.
    Clause 499 renders charges or transfers of assets void against tax claims when effected during proceedings or after completion but before service of recovery notice, covering transfers by sale, mortgage, gift, exchange or any other mode and an expansive list of assets including virtual digital assets. Exceptions protect transfers made for adequate consideration without notice and those with prior permission of the Assessing Officer, while stock in trade is excluded; the clause updates procedural references and preserves core safeguards from the predecessor provision.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Application of new criminal procedure code aligns tax prosecutions under updated procedures, altering prosecutor status and qualification requirements.
    Clause 498 applies the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to Special Court proceedings under the Income Tax Bill, deeming the person conducting the prosecution to be a Public Prosecutor and enabling the Central Government to appoint Special Public Prosecutors. Appointments require an experienced advocate with "special knowledge of law", and appointees are treated as Public Prosecutors within the BNSS definition, thereby importing BNSS powers, duties and procedural rules to tax prosecutions.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Summons case classification: minor tax offences must be tried by Special Courts under the new criminal procedure framework.
    Clause 497 requires that offences under the Income Tax Bill punishable with imprisonment not exceeding two years, or with fine, or with both, be tried as summons cases by a Special Court, overriding contrary BNSS provisions and applying the BNSS summons-case procedure accordingly.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Exclusive jurisdiction of Special Courts centralises tax prosecutions, with cognizance only on authorised complaints.
    Clause 496 mandates exclusive trial of income tax offences by designated Special Courts, subject to actual designation for relevant areas or classes of cases, and contains a non obstante provision giving it overriding effect over the general criminal procedure code. Cognizance by a Special Court is restricted to complaints filed by authorities authorised under the Act. Transitional rules preserve continuity by allowing designated courts to continue existing and future trials and permitting non designated courts to finish pending matters; the clause cross references the Bill's procedural provision to align competence within the reorganised statute.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Special Courts designation enables focused, consolidated trials for tax offences and aligns procedure with the new criminal code.
    Clause 495 empowers the Central Government, after consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, to notify one or more courts of Judicial Magistrate of the first class as Special Courts for specified areas, cases or classes of cases to try offences under the Income Tax Bill, 2025; it permits these Special Courts to try related offences joined at the same trial under the applicable criminal procedure and updates procedural references to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, while preserving the core scheme of Section 280A.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Unauthorized disclosure by public servants criminalised; prosecution requires Central Government sanction and carries imprisonment and fine.
    Clause 494 criminalises unauthorized furnishing of taxpayer information or production of documents by a public servant in contravention of the Bill's secrecy provision, prescribes imprisonment and fine, and requires prior sanction of the Central Government before prosecution.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Admissibility of official tax records: certified copies allowed as evidence, easing prosecution while preserving challenge rights.
    Clause 493 mandates that entries in records or documents in the custody of an income-tax authority "shall be admitted in evidence" in prosecution proceedings under the chapter and permits proof either by production of the original records or by production of a certified copy signed by the custodian stating it is a true copy and that the originals are in its custody. The clause covers varied formats of records, limits application to criminal proceedings under the chapter, and preserves courts' power to test genuineness and require originals where fairness demands.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Non-cognizable classification of specified tax offences requires magistrate sanction before arrest or investigation, limiting summary enforcement.
    Clause 492 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 designates specified income tax offences as non-cognizable for purposes of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by means of a non-obstante provision. As a result, arrest cannot be effected without a magistrate-issued warrant and investigations into those offences require prior magistrate authorization, imposing judicial gatekeeping at the threshold of criminal proceedings and constraining unilateral police action in tax enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Prior sanction for tax prosecution centralises oversight, enables compounding, and restricts arbitrary criminal initiation against taxpayers.
    Clause 491 makes prior sanction by designated senior officers a precondition to prosecution for specified tax offences, authorises senior regional heads and the Board to issue directions, permits compounding of offences at any stage by senior officials, bars prosecution where specified penalties have been reduced or waived, and affirms that statements or documents given to tax authorities remain admissible notwithstanding an expectation of penalty reduction or compounding.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 114 "Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      2 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) prescribes that losses computed from a "specified business" may be set off only against profits and gains of other specified businesses and that any unabsorbed loss may be carried forward and set off solely against future profits of specified businesses. The provision matters to taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses and to tax administration implementing set-off/carry-forward rules. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 114 interacts with the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and cross-references "specified business" as referred to in section 46. The clause falls under the Part titled "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The provision governs inter-year treatment of losses arising from businesses designated as "specified business." Definitions provided within the clause (sub-section (3)) include:

      • "specified business" - any specified business referred to in section 46;
      • "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" - any loss computed in respect of a specified business carried on by the assessee during the tax year which has not been, or is not wholly, set off under sub-section (1) for that tax year.

      Coverage: Losses computed from specified businesses carried on by the assessee during any tax year; set-off is restricted to profits and gains of other specified businesses in the same year and, if unabsorbed, to profits and gains of specified businesses in subsequent years.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 114 provides a two-fold rule:

      • Sub-section (1): Any loss computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee during any tax year shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for that tax year.
      • Sub-section (2): The unabsorbed loss for a tax year shall be carried forward to subsequent years and set off only against profits and gains of any specified business computed for those subsequent tax years, iteratively ("and so on").

      Definitions in sub-section (3) delineate the meaning of "specified business" (via cross-reference to section 46) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" (as a residue not set off under sub-section (1)).

      Interpretation

      The clause's textual intent is to ring-fence losses arising from specified businesses so that such losses cannot be set off against non-specified business income; they are usable only against profits from other specified businesses in the same or subsequent years. The presence of a definitional sub-section suggests legislative intent to ensure internal consistency and to enable precise identification of losses that qualify for the rule. The phrase "only against" is restrictive and signals a textual limitation rather than a permissive guideline.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any provisos, exemptions, or conditions permitting broader set-off (for example, against other heads of income) are not provided in Clause 114. Any exceptions must be sought elsewhere in the Bill or Act.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Assessee A carries on Specified Business X in tax year T and incurs a loss of INR 10 lakh. In the same year, A earns profits of INR 6 lakh from Specified Business Y. Under Clause 114(1), A may set off INR 6 lakh of the loss against the profits of Y; the unabsorbed INR 4 lakh is an "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" and is carried forward per Clause 114(2) to be set off only against future profits of any specified business.
      • Example 2: Assessee B has a loss from Specified Business X in year T but has taxable income from non-specified business activities in year T. Clause 114(1) precludes setting off the specified-business loss against non-specified business profits in year T; the loss may only be set-off against profits of other specified businesses in that year or carried forward per Clause 114(2).

      Interplay

      The clause expressly relies on the definition of "specified business" as referred to in section 46; therefore its operation depends on the scope of section 46. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are referenced in the clause excerpt. Potential interpretive dependency: precise identification of what constitutes a specified business will determine the reach of the set-off restriction and the categories of profits against which carry-forward losses may be applied.

      Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

      Document 1 (Section 114, Income-tax Act, 2025) and Document 2 (Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)) present substantially similar substantive restrictions on set-off and carry forward of losses from a "specified business," but they differ in form, detail and definitional clarity.

      • Definitions: Document 2 expressly defines "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" in a subsection (3). Document 1 omits these definitions in the text shown and instead cross-references "specified business, referred to in section 46."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's explicit definitions remove ambiguity about terminology within Clause 114 itself; reliance on cross-reference (Document 1) requires reading section 46 for precise scope.
      • Expression of set-off rule: Document 2 states losses "shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for the said tax year." Document 1 states the loss "shall be set off only against profits and gains of another specified business."
        • Practical impact: Substantively similar; Document 2 emphasises the requirement to compute profits and gains "for the said tax year" and refers explicitly to the assessee's carrying on of the business, which frames application to the assessee-year context.
      • Carry forward mechanics: Document 1 provides a two-clause iterative mechanism in sub-section (2) with subclauses (i) and (ii) describing carry forward and further set-off across years. Document 2 has a single sub-section (2) stating that "unabsorbed loss ... shall be carried forward ... and shall be set off only against the profits and gains of any specified business ... and so on."
        • Practical impact: Both impose carry forward limited to specified business profits in subsequent years; Document 1's subclauses are more granular in procedural description, whereas Document 2 is more concise.
      • Assessee-centric language: Document 2 explicitly frames losses as "computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee, during any tax year." Document 1 does not use the phrase "carried on by the assessee" in the excerpt.
        • Practical impact: The Bill version makes express that the provision applies to losses from specified businesses actually carried on by the assessee in that year, clarifying the territorial subject of the rule.
      • Terminology of residual loss: Document 2 introduces the defined term "unabsorbed loss from the specified business;" Document 1 uses plain language "so much of the loss not so set off or the whole loss ... shall be carried forward."
        • Practical impact: The defined term in Document 2 aids drafting precision and facilitates cross-references elsewhere in legislation and subordinate instruments.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk: Taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses must segregate profits and losses arising from specified businesses from other income heads to ensure proper application of the restricted set-off. Failure to segregate may result in erroneous set-off and subsequent adjustments.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The text implies recording of computation of losses "computed in respect of a specified business" and contemporaneous evidence of profits of other specified businesses in the same and subsequent years. Documentation showing that a loss arises from a specified business (as per section 46) will be necessary to justify application of this section; however, specific record formats or timeframes are not prescribed in the clause.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 114 restricts set-off of losses from specified businesses to profits of specified businesses only.
      • Unabsorbed losses may be carried forward and set off against future profits of specified businesses only.
      • The Bill-text includes express definitions for "specified business" (by cross-reference) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business," improving drafting precision.
      • Clause 114 is an assessee-centric rule-losses must arise from specified businesses "carried on by the assessee" in a tax year.
      • No provisos or exceptions permitting set-off against non-specified business income are present in the clause excerpt.
      • Practical compliance requires segregation of specified-business computations and retention of records demonstrating classification and computation of losses/profits.
      • Full scope and application depend on the definition and scope of "specified business" as provided in section 46.

      Full Text:

      Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax