Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 85 "Capital gains not to be charged on investment in certain bonds." between t...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 84 "Capital gains on compulsory acquisition of lands and buildings not to be c...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 78 "Special provision for full value of consideration in certain cases." betwe...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 74 "Special provision for computation of capital gains in case of depreciable ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 73 "Cost with reference to certain modes of acquisition" between the Income-Ta...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 72 "Mode of computation of capital gains" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 70 "Transactions not regarded as transfer" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (a...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 66 "Interpretation" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Incom...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 62 "Maintenance of books of account" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as pass...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 61 "Special provision for computation of income on presumptive basis in respec...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 58 "Special provision for computing profits and gains of business or professio...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 53 "Full value of consideration for transfer of assets other than capital asse...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 52 "Amortisation of expenditure for telecommunications services, amalgamation,...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 51 "Amortisation of expenditure for prospecting certain minerals" between the ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 49 "Site Restoration Fund" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and th...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 48 "Tea development account, coffee development account and rubber development...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 46 "Capital expenditure of specified business" between the Income-Tax Act, 202...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 45 "Expenditure on scientific research" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as p...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 44 "Amortisation of certain preliminary expenses" between the Income-Tax Act, ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 42 "Capitalising impact of foreign exchange fluctuation" between the Income-Ta...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Roll over relief for capital gains: reinvestment in specified long term bonds defers tax subject to time, holding and cap conditions.
    Relief defers tax on long term capital gains from transfer of land or building when reinvested within six months into notified long term bonds, with a statutory investment ceiling and a five year holding requirement; breach by transfer, conversion to money, or borrowing on the bond triggers deeming of previously exempted amounts as taxable long term capital gains and disallows a specified deduction for amounts claimed under the relief.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capital gains deferral for compulsory acquisition where reinvestment in industrial undertaking preserves tax neutrality subject to deposit and timelines.
    Section 84 conditions tax neutrality for capital gains on compulsory acquisition of industrial land/buildings where the assessee reinvests proceeds in a replacement asset within the prescribed reinvestment period; excess proceeds over new-asset cost are charged as income and certain cost-basis adjustments apply for disposals within the reinvestment period. Unutilised proceeds must be deposited in a specified institution and applied per a notified scheme by the return-filing due date, with documentary proof required and residual unutilised amounts charged as income.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed consideration rule: stamp duty value treated as full consideration for capital gains when declared consideration is lower.
    The provision deems the stamp duty value of land or building to be the full value of consideration for section 72 where declared consideration is lower, subject to a date of agreement exception conditioned on prescribed electronic/banking payment modes and a 110% safe harbour allowing actual consideration to prevail when stamp duty value does not exceed 110% of consideration; Assessing Officers may refer valuation claims to a Valuation Officer where the assessee asserts stamp duty value exceeds fair market value and the stamp duty value has not been contested.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deeming of short-term capital gains where transfers from a depreciable block exceed transfer expenses, opening WDV and acquisition cost.
    Section 74 prescribes that when consideration received or accruing in a tax year for transfers of one or more assets in a depreciable block exceeds, after deducting transfer-related expenditure, the opening written-down value of the block and the actual cost of additions during the year, the excess is deemed to be capital gains arising from the transfer of short-term capital assets; if the entire block is transferred in the year, cost of acquisition is the opening WDV plus costs of additions and resulting receipts are similarly deemed short-term capital gains.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed cost of acquisition: prior-owner cost continuity and formulaic apportionment govern non purchase transfers and restructurings.
    Section 73 prescribes deemed cost of acquisition rules for assets received by non-purchase modes: generally continuing the previous owner's cost (adjusted for improvements) and prescribing formulaic apportionment or fair market value bases for corporate reorganisations, mutual fund segregations/consolidations and specified instruments, with application guided by cross-references and delegated definitions.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Indexation of acquisition costs limited to prescribed computation item, narrowing administrative discretion and clarifying taxpayer application.
    Section 72 prescribes that capital gains equal the full value of consideration less specified deductions (transfer expenditures, cost of acquisition and improvements), with indexation applying in prescribed contexts as indexed equivalents; it excludes certain items from deduction, provides cost adjustments for business trust distributions, grants specified entities additional prescribed deductions, and imposes special currency conversion and rupee appreciation rules for non residents, while defining indexed cost calculations by reference to a Cost Inflation Index.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax-neutrality for corporate reorganisations, IFSC fund relocations, non-resident transfers and conversions subject to specified conditions.
    Section 70 treats specified transfers as not constituting a transfer for capital gains, rendering many corporate reorganisations, succession transfers, conversions, certain non-resident-to-non-resident transactions and relocations of foreign funds into IFSC-located resultant funds tax-neutral only where qualifying tests - including shareholding continuity, residency/domestic-company status, regulatory registration and non-taxation in the foreign jurisdiction - and documentary conditions are satisfied.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Specified derivative transaction criteria change tax classification and impose documentary and platform compliance obligations for derivative trades.
    The enacted Section 66 narrows and reorders interpretive definitions governing Chapter IV D, alters key terms (including shifting focus from "commodity derivative" to "commodities transaction tax"), moves some enterprise classifications to notification based criteria, and changes successor/predecessor coverage. It also revises the functional tests and documentary preconditions for specified derivative transaction and speculative transaction status - emphasising electronic execution, prescribed platforms/intermediaries and time stamped contract notes with UCI and PAN - thereby creating clear compliance triggers and greater reliance on delegated notifications and rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Maintenance of books of account: record keeping duty for specified professions and businesses; Board to prescribe particulars and retention.
    Section 62 requires maintenance of books and documents to enable computation of total income by specified professions, businesses meeting alternative income or turnover tests, and professions notified by the Board. The Board may prescribe the form, particulars, manner, place and retention periods. The enacted text repositions the Board's notification power into the definition of specified professions, corrects an apparent turnover threshold error for individuals/HUFs, and revises cross references affecting deemed profits carve outs; operational details depend on subsequent rules and the referenced tables.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Presumptive taxation for non resident activities fixes taxable profits on defined receipts and narrows audit relief.
    Section 61 prescribes a presumptive taxation method for six specified non resident activities, fixing taxable profits as percentages of defined receipts (A and B) and supplying definitions and examples for those receipts; it bars deductions or losses against income so computed, prescribes written down value treatment, and permits audit based claims of lower actual profits only where expressly allowed and subject to strict bookkeeping and audit compliance, while the Act narrows those reliefs and clarifies definitional and non application provisions.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Presumptive taxation regime clarified for small businesses and goods carriage operators, altering computation and compliance timing.
    Section 58 creates a presumptive taxation regime for small businesses, goods carriage operations and specified professions, prescribing turnover limits and fixed presumptive computation methods. Taxpayers may elect actual profits but must maintain books and obtain an audit if total income exceeds the basic exemption limit. The enacted text clarifies that receipts received by specified banking or online modes count for a lower percentage only if received during the tax year or before the due date, treats non account payee cheques/bank drafts as cash for cash tests, and expressly excludes goods carriage receipts from aggregation for monetary limits under book keeping/audit rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed consideration: stamp duty value may be treated as full value where declared consideration is lower.
    The provision deems the stamp duty value to be the full value of consideration for transfers of non-capital land or buildings where declared consideration is below stamp duty value, subject to a statutory tolerance that preserves actual consideration if stamp duty value is within a specified margin; agreement date stamp valuations may be used when agreement and registration dates differ provided consideration (or part) was received by specified banking/online modes on or before the agreement date, with determination mechanics governed by cross referenced valuation rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Amortisation rules for telecom spectrum and licence fees require time spread deductions and proceeds offset on transfer.
    The section prescribes amortisation in equal instalments for four categories of expenditure-amalgamation/demerger costs, SVR payments, spectrum fees and licence fees-starting from specified initial tax years (event/payment or later of business commencement/payment) and, for spectrum/licence, running co terminous with the life of the right. Transfers of spectrum/licence rights trigger offsetting of proceeds against remaining unallowed expenditure with specified income inclusion rules and a formula for part transfers; amalgamation/demerger transfers to an Indian company preserve the section's application to the successor. Depreciation exclusion and reassessment mechanics for wrongful allowance are also provided.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Amortisation of prospecting expenditure permits staged tax deduction subject to funding reductions, exclusions and audit conditions.
    Amortisation allows an Indian company or resident (other than a company) engaged in prospecting for specified minerals to capitalise qualifying expenditure incurred in the year of commercial production and up to four preceding years, claim periodic instalments after reducing amounts funded by others and realizations (sale, salvage, compensation, insurance), and excluding site/deposit acquisitions and depreciable capital assets; instalments are limited so as not to reduce income from commercial exploitation below nil, unallowed amounts may be carried forward within the overall amortisation period, and audit and prescribed reporting are required for non-company assessees.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Site restoration fund deductions for petroleum operations, with recapture on asset disposals governed by Schedule X.
    Section 49 creates a Site Restoration Fund regime for petroleum and natural gas operations under a Central Government agreement, allowing deductions for deposits to a designated special account or site restoration account with computation governed by Schedule X. Withdrawals or transfers from those accounts are taxable in the year of withdrawal/transfer under Schedule X. The Act removes a clause in the Bill that explicitly deemed a portion of asset cost relatable to prior deductions as business income on sale within a specified holding period, instead delegating disposal and recapture rules to Schedule X.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Recapture on premature disposal reverses deduction for deposits into designated tea, coffee and rubber development accounts, taxing attributable cost on disposal.
    Clause 48 permits a deduction for deposits into designated tea, coffee and rubber development accounts, with computation governed by Schedule IX; withdrawals or transfers are chargeable to tax in the year of transfer/withdrawal as per Schedule IX, and disposal of assets acquired under the scheme within the protective holding period results in deeming that portion of the asset cost attributable to earlier deductions as business income in the year of sale or transfer.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Immediate deduction of capital expenditure for specified businesses, subject to conditions, approvals and an eight-year recapture rule.
    The Act permits an elective immediate deduction of whole capital expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for specified businesses in the year of incurrence (or in year of commencement if pre-commencement cost is capitalised), subject to specified commencement dates, definitions and conditions. The deduction is disallowed where a business is formed by splitting/reconstruction or by transfer of previously used machinery (except a limited de minimis exception), requires specified approvals/notifications for certain sectors, excludes land/goodwill/financial instruments and cash over prescribed limits, and is subject to an eight-year sole-use recapture mechanism with depreciation adjustment.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Scientific research deductions conditional on prescribed authority certification, approval for in-house R&D, and prohibition on duplicate claims.
    The provision allows deductions for capital and revenue expenditure on business-related scientific research, excluding land costs, and deems qualifying pre-commencement salaries, materials and capital costs to the year of commencement if certified by the prescribed authority. In-house R&D deductions are available for prescribed companies with approved facilities and qualifying costs subject to prescribed conditions and documentation. Payments to approved research entities are deductible only for approved programmes and recipients. Non-duplication rules bar claiming the same expenditure under other provisions and exclude parallel asset-based deductions where research deductions have been taken.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Amortisation of preliminary expenses allows spreading eligible start-up costs over successive years subject to statutory cap and compliance conditions.
    The provision permits amortisation of specified preliminary and project-related expenditures by resident Indian assessees through equal annual deductions over five successive tax years beginning with the year the undertaking becomes operational or the year of commencement. Eligible items include feasibility and project reports, market surveys, engineering services, specified legal and registration costs, prospectus and public issue expenses for companies, and other prescribed items not deductible under any other provision. A statutory cap restricts the allowable deduction to a percentage of project cost or capital employed, with project cost tied to actual cost as shown in the books, and procedural conditions require prescribed filings and audited accounts for certain taxpayers.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitalising foreign exchange fluctuation adjusts asset cost to reflect exchange-rate differences between acquisition and payment.
    Section 42 requires capitalisation of foreign exchange variation by computing A = B - C, where B is INR paid during the tax year (excluding parts met by others) for asset cost or repayment of foreign-currency borrowings used to acquire the asset, and C is the INR liability corresponding to that payment at acquisition; the variation is added to or deducted from the asset's actual cost, specified capital expenditure categories, or cost of acquisition for set-off purposes, with forward-contract-covered amounts computed at the contract rate.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 114 "Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      2 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) prescribes that losses computed from a "specified business" may be set off only against profits and gains of other specified businesses and that any unabsorbed loss may be carried forward and set off solely against future profits of specified businesses. The provision matters to taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses and to tax administration implementing set-off/carry-forward rules. Effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 114 interacts with the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and cross-references "specified business" as referred to in section 46. The clause falls under the Part titled "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The provision governs inter-year treatment of losses arising from businesses designated as "specified business." Definitions provided within the clause (sub-section (3)) include:

      • "specified business" - any specified business referred to in section 46;
      • "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" - any loss computed in respect of a specified business carried on by the assessee during the tax year which has not been, or is not wholly, set off under sub-section (1) for that tax year.

      Coverage: Losses computed from specified businesses carried on by the assessee during any tax year; set-off is restricted to profits and gains of other specified businesses in the same year and, if unabsorbed, to profits and gains of specified businesses in subsequent years.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 114 provides a two-fold rule:

      • Sub-section (1): Any loss computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee during any tax year shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for that tax year.
      • Sub-section (2): The unabsorbed loss for a tax year shall be carried forward to subsequent years and set off only against profits and gains of any specified business computed for those subsequent tax years, iteratively ("and so on").

      Definitions in sub-section (3) delineate the meaning of "specified business" (via cross-reference to section 46) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" (as a residue not set off under sub-section (1)).

      Interpretation

      The clause's textual intent is to ring-fence losses arising from specified businesses so that such losses cannot be set off against non-specified business income; they are usable only against profits from other specified businesses in the same or subsequent years. The presence of a definitional sub-section suggests legislative intent to ensure internal consistency and to enable precise identification of losses that qualify for the rule. The phrase "only against" is restrictive and signals a textual limitation rather than a permissive guideline.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any provisos, exemptions, or conditions permitting broader set-off (for example, against other heads of income) are not provided in Clause 114. Any exceptions must be sought elsewhere in the Bill or Act.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Assessee A carries on Specified Business X in tax year T and incurs a loss of INR 10 lakh. In the same year, A earns profits of INR 6 lakh from Specified Business Y. Under Clause 114(1), A may set off INR 6 lakh of the loss against the profits of Y; the unabsorbed INR 4 lakh is an "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" and is carried forward per Clause 114(2) to be set off only against future profits of any specified business.
      • Example 2: Assessee B has a loss from Specified Business X in year T but has taxable income from non-specified business activities in year T. Clause 114(1) precludes setting off the specified-business loss against non-specified business profits in year T; the loss may only be set-off against profits of other specified businesses in that year or carried forward per Clause 114(2).

      Interplay

      The clause expressly relies on the definition of "specified business" as referred to in section 46; therefore its operation depends on the scope of section 46. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are referenced in the clause excerpt. Potential interpretive dependency: precise identification of what constitutes a specified business will determine the reach of the set-off restriction and the categories of profits against which carry-forward losses may be applied.

      Differences between the two provisions and practical impact

      Document 1 (Section 114, Income-tax Act, 2025) and Document 2 (Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)) present substantially similar substantive restrictions on set-off and carry forward of losses from a "specified business," but they differ in form, detail and definitional clarity.

      • Definitions: Document 2 expressly defines "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business" in a subsection (3). Document 1 omits these definitions in the text shown and instead cross-references "specified business, referred to in section 46."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's explicit definitions remove ambiguity about terminology within Clause 114 itself; reliance on cross-reference (Document 1) requires reading section 46 for precise scope.
      • Expression of set-off rule: Document 2 states losses "shall be set off only against profits and gains, if any, of any other specified business for the said tax year." Document 1 states the loss "shall be set off only against profits and gains of another specified business."
        • Practical impact: Substantively similar; Document 2 emphasises the requirement to compute profits and gains "for the said tax year" and refers explicitly to the assessee's carrying on of the business, which frames application to the assessee-year context.
      • Carry forward mechanics: Document 1 provides a two-clause iterative mechanism in sub-section (2) with subclauses (i) and (ii) describing carry forward and further set-off across years. Document 2 has a single sub-section (2) stating that "unabsorbed loss ... shall be carried forward ... and shall be set off only against the profits and gains of any specified business ... and so on."
        • Practical impact: Both impose carry forward limited to specified business profits in subsequent years; Document 1's subclauses are more granular in procedural description, whereas Document 2 is more concise.
      • Assessee-centric language: Document 2 explicitly frames losses as "computed from a specified business carried on by the assessee, during any tax year." Document 1 does not use the phrase "carried on by the assessee" in the excerpt.
        • Practical impact: The Bill version makes express that the provision applies to losses from specified businesses actually carried on by the assessee in that year, clarifying the territorial subject of the rule.
      • Terminology of residual loss: Document 2 introduces the defined term "unabsorbed loss from the specified business;" Document 1 uses plain language "so much of the loss not so set off or the whole loss ... shall be carried forward."
        • Practical impact: The defined term in Document 2 aids drafting precision and facilitates cross-references elsewhere in legislation and subordinate instruments.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk: Taxpayers carrying on activities classified as specified businesses must segregate profits and losses arising from specified businesses from other income heads to ensure proper application of the restricted set-off. Failure to segregate may result in erroneous set-off and subsequent adjustments.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The text implies recording of computation of losses "computed in respect of a specified business" and contemporaneous evidence of profits of other specified businesses in the same and subsequent years. Documentation showing that a loss arises from a specified business (as per section 46) will be necessary to justify application of this section; however, specific record formats or timeframes are not prescribed in the clause.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 114 restricts set-off of losses from specified businesses to profits of specified businesses only.
      • Unabsorbed losses may be carried forward and set off against future profits of specified businesses only.
      • The Bill-text includes express definitions for "specified business" (by cross-reference) and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business," improving drafting precision.
      • Clause 114 is an assessee-centric rule-losses must arise from specified businesses "carried on by the assessee" in a tax year.
      • No provisos or exceptions permitting set-off against non-specified business income are present in the clause excerpt.
      • Practical compliance requires segregation of specified-business computations and retention of records demonstrating classification and computation of losses/profits.
      • Full scope and application depend on the definition and scope of "specified business" as provided in section 46.

      Full Text:

      Section 114 Set off and carry forward of losses computed in respect of specified business.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax