Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Legal and Practical Implications of TDS on Goods Purchases in India : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(i...
    Compliance relief for a specific class of senior citizens : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(iii)] of th...
    Legal Framework for TDS on E-commerce in India : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(v)] and Clause 393(4)[...
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 5] & Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 18] of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Contractual and Professional Payments : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 6(ii)]...
    Legal and Practical Implications of TDS on Interest Withholding Tax on Foreign Borrowings : Clause 3...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Securitisation Trust Distributions : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 4(iv)] an...
    Legal Commentary on TDS Provisions for Investment Funds : Clause 393(1) [Table: S.No. 4(iii)], Claus...
    Evolving Tax Deduction at Source Framework for Business Trusts in India : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No....
    Transitioning TDS on Infrastructure Debt Fund Interest : Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No. 5] of the Income...
    Tax Deduction at Source on Land Acquisition Compensation : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(iii)] and Cl...
    Transformation of TDS Provisions on Income from Units : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 4(i)] and 393(4)[...
    Clear, consolidated, and modernized framework of TDS on payments relating to professional and techni...
    Evolution of TDS Provisions for Real Estate Development Agreements : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(ii...
    Expand and rationalize the scope of TDS on rental payments : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 2(ii)] of In...
    Analysis of TDS on Immovable Property Transfers : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(i)] of the Income Tax...
    Evolution of TDS on Rent: Implications, Continuities, and Reforms : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 2(i) ...
    Comparative Legal Analysis of TDS on Commission and Brokerage : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 1(ii)] an...
    Unifying TDS on Lottery-Related Payments : Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 4] of the Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Harmonizing TDS Provisions for National Savings Instruments in India : Clause 393(3)[S.No. 6] of the...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on purchase of goods: buyer withholding required, with precedence rules to avoid overlap with other withholding provisions.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 8(ii)] imposes a TDS obligation on the buyer to deduct tax on purchases of goods from resident sellers once aggregate purchases from a seller in a financial year exceed the specified threshold, with deduction due at credit or payment, and a broad exclusionary clause preventing application where tax is deductible or collectible under any other provision of the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on specified senior citizens centralises tax deduction at banks, relieving return filing when tax is correctly deducted at source.
    Specified banks are required to compute a specified senior citizen's total income after allowing Chapter VIII deductions and rebate, deduct tax at rates in force with a nil threshold, and remit TDS; an express precedence clause ensures this provision overrides other TDS provisions. The mechanism centralises compliance with banks obtaining declarations, maintaining evidence and records, thereby relieving eligible senior citizens from return filing provided the bank correctly applies deductions and remits tax.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on e-commerce: operators must withhold on gross platform-facilitated sales, with a small-seller exemption on conditions.
    E-commerce operators must withhold TDS on the gross amount of sales or services facilitated through their platforms, with withholding due at the earlier of credit or payment and including direct buyer payments as deemed payments by the operator. Deductions apply on a gross basis without netting fees, exclude operator receipts for unrelated services such as advertising, and take precedence over other TDS provisions. Individual and HUF participants with annual turnover below the legislated threshold who furnish PAN or Aadhaar are exempt from withholding.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on large cash withdrawals: deduction at payment with exemptions for banks and regulated intermediaries, non filer rule absent here.
    Clause 393(3) requires banks, co operative societies engaged in banking and post offices to deduct two per cent TDS at the time of cash payment where aggregate withdrawals from one or more accounts of a recipient exceed prescribed thresholds, with a higher threshold for co operative societies; Clause 393(4) exempts payments to the Government, banks, post offices, regulated business correspondents and authorised white label ATM operators. The Bill mirrors the existing framework but, in the extracted text, omits an explicit non filer regime and express central government notification powers, creating potential operational and interpretive uncertainty.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on high-value payments by individuals/HUFs expands withholding obligations for contractual, professional and commission disbursements.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 6(ii)] requires TDS by individuals or HUFs (not otherwise liable under specified TDS entries) on payments to a resident for carrying out work (including supply of labour), fees for professional services, or commission/brokerage (excluding insurance commission) where aggregate payments to the payee in a tax year exceed a prescribed threshold; deduction is at the time of credit or payment and the clause is integrated into a tabular TDS framework necessitating aggregation, with definitions and certain procedural relaxations left to rules or guidance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on interest for foreign borrowings consolidated under new clause, keeping concessional framework but raising definitional and transition issues.
    Clause 393(2) consolidates concessional TDS treatment for interest to non residents on foreign currency borrowings, rupee denominated bonds and IFSC listed bonds, aligning mechanics and cut off windows with Section 194LC while differing in presentation and reliance on external definitions; Central Government approval remains a condition for specified instruments and drafting gaps on limits, definitions and transitional treatment may require subordinate rules to avoid interpretive disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on securitisation trust distributions: uniform 10% for residents, treaty rates for non-residents, no threshold.
    Clause 393 mandates TDS on distributions by a securitisation trust: Clause 393(1) imposes 10% TDS on any income paid to resident investors with no threshold, deducted at the earlier of credit or payment by the trust; Clause 393(2) requires withholding on non-resident investors at rates in force, permitting treaty relief. Both provisions treat credits (including to suspense accounts) as TDS events and require trusts to maintain documentation of payee status and treaty claims.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on investment fund distributions: withholding applies, with treaty relief and exemptions for non taxable income.
    TDS on distributions by investment funds requires withholding at applicable resident and non resident rates at the earlier of credit or payment, excluding any portion of income that is statutorily exempt. Funds must determine and segregate taxable versus exempt portions of mixed income, apply treaty or domestic rates for non residents upon proper documentation, and maintain records to support exemptions or reduced rates, while coordinating these obligations with other TDS provisions to avoid double deduction.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on business trust distributions: differentiated resident/non resident rates and SPV contingent exemptions under the Income Tax Bill, 2025.
    Clause 393 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 mandates 10% TDS on distributed income to resident unitholders, differentiated rates for non-resident unitholders (including lower rates for certain interest-type distributions and "rates in force" for others), and exempts specified distributions from TDS where the underlying SPV has not opted for the concessional tax regime, thereby tying withholding obligations to the SPV's tax-regime choice.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on infrastructure debt fund interest: concessional withholding retained for non-resident investors, deducted at credit or payment.
    Clause 393(2)[Table: S.No. 5] retains a concessional TDS regime for any income by way of interest paid by an infrastructure debt fund listed in Schedule VII to a non resident (including foreign companies), requiring deduction at source at the specified concessional rate at the earlier of credit or payment, with no monetary threshold, and integrated within the Bill's harmonised TDS framework that addresses procedural rules, exceptions, grossing up, and interaction with double taxation treaties.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on land acquisition compensation maintained; threshold and RFCTLARR Act exemptions preserved, procedural consolidation introduced.
    Clause 393 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 mandates TDS at 10% on any sum in the nature of compensation or enhanced compensation, or consideration or enhanced consideration, for compulsory acquisition of immovable property (other than agricultural land), when amounts paid or credited to a resident exceed Rs. 5,00,000 in a financial year; Clause 393(4) exempts awards or agreements exempt from income-tax under the RFCTLARR Act, and deduction is required at the earlier of payment or credit.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on mutual fund distributions: withholding required at source with exclusion for capital gains, subject to threshold rules.
    Clause 393 consolidates TDS on income from units of specified mutual funds and analogous instruments, requiring deduction by any payer at the prescribed rate at the time of credit or payment, subject to an aggregate threshold, while expressly excluding receipts that are of the nature of capital gains; the provision retains deeming rules for suspense accounts and links to cross referenced exemptions and schedules for definitions, thereby centralising administrative obligations and necessitating payer systems to characterise payments and aggregate receipts for threshold application.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on professional and technical services clarified: consolidated rates, threshold and personal-payment exemption streamline withholding obligations.
    Clause 393(1) requires TDS by a specified person on resident payments for professional services, technical services, director's fees (non-salary), royalty and related sums, with distinct lower rates for certain technical, cinematographic and call-centre payments and a higher rate for other cases, deductible at the earlier of payment or credit and applicable only above the prescribed threshold. Clause 393(4) exempts individuals and HUFs from TDS where payments are made exclusively for personal purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on monetary consideration under development agreements - deduction at credit or payment with no threshold.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(ii)] requires TDS on any monetary consideration under agreements referred to in section 67(14), applying to any payer, excluding in-kind consideration, with deduction at the earlier of credit or payment, no monetary threshold, and an explicit rule that where both general immovable property TDS and S.No. 3(ii) apply, deduction is to be made only under S.No. 3(ii).
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on rent expanded to include equipment and furnished premises, increasing withholding scope and compliance for individuals and HUFs.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 2(ii)] expands TDS on rent by subjecting payments for use of land, buildings, furniture, fittings, machinery, plant and equipment to withholding by specified persons where monthly payments exceed the threshold; it prescribes asset based rates and requires deduction at the earlier of credit or payment for the last month of the tax year or tenancy, while providing a declaration mechanism for nil deduction and procedural reliefs for small non business payers.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on immovable property transfers requires deduction on the higher of consideration or stamp duty value at payment or credit.
    Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 3(i)] requires TDS on transfers of immovable property (excluding agricultural land) where either the consideration or the stamp duty value exceeds the threshold. The transferee is the payer required to deduct tax at a fixed percentage of the higher of consideration or stamp duty value, with deduction at the time of credit or payment. Aggregation of amounts across multiple transferees and transferors applies, and the table provides tie breaker rules and specific exclusions such as compulsory acquisition.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on rent: payer-based uniform and differentiated withholding alters withholding obligations and REIT exemption treatment.
    Clause 393 requires TDS on rent to residents where monthly rent exceeds the threshold, with deduction at the earlier of credit or payment. Non-specified payers withhold at a uniform low rate for all asset types, while specified persons withhold at differentiated rates for machinery/plant/equipment versus land/building/furniture/fittings. The Bill maintains an exemption from TDS for payments to REITs in respect of directly owned real estate assets and preserves rules treating suspense-account credits as payment for withholding purposes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on commission and brokerage: Bill preserves current threshold and rate and maintains targeted exemptions for telecom franchisees.
    Clause 393(1) mandates that a specified person deduct TDS at two percent on resident commission or brokerage payments (excluding insurance commission) when aggregate payments exceed the statutory threshold, with deduction at the earlier of credit or payment and anti avoidance deeming for suspense accounts. Clause 393(4) preserves a targeted exemption for certain telecom franchisee payments, maintaining continuity with existing sectoral relief and reducing compliance burdens.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on lottery-related payments: unified withholding on commissions and prizes with harmonized threshold and deduction rate.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 4] consolidates TDS on payments to persons engaged in stocking, distributing, purchasing or selling lottery tickets, requiring any person making payments of commission, remuneration or prize to deduct tax at the earlier of credit or payment; it includes a deeming fiction treating credits to suspense or intermediary accounts as credit to the payee and imposes standard deductor duties of deposit, certification and return-filing, while leaving aggregation rules and characterization of complex incentive structures unclear.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    TDS on national savings withdrawals: mandatory deduction at source with defined threshold and exemptions for individuals and heirs.
    Clause 393(3)[Table: S.No. 6] requires any person responsible for paying amounts referred to in section 80CCA(2)(a) to deduct income-tax at the rate of 10% at the time of payment where the amount or aggregate amount paid during the tax year exceeds Rs. 2,500; the Table under sub-section (4), Sl. No. 19, exempts payments made to an assessee who is an individual and to the heirs of an assessee, and payers must deposit TDS, file returns, and issue certificates in accordance with the procedural framework.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 110 "Carry forward and set off of loss from house property." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      1 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed loss from house property. It confines set-off of carried losses to future income from house property and limits carry forward to eight subsequent tax years. It affects taxpayers with losses under the head "Income from house property" and the income-tax administration; effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 110 is in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) under the heading "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The clause addresses the treatment of losses arising under the head "Income from house property." The clause contains three subsections. Subsection (1) mandates carry forward of the unabsorbed loss and restricts set-off to income from house property in subsequent years. Subsection (2) prescribes the temporal limit for carry forward ("not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed"). Subsection (3) defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" as the loss computed under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for that tax year. Context: Not stated in the document beyond the clause text. Coverage: losses under "Income from house property" only.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The clause applies where a loss is computed under the specific head "Income from house property" for a tax year but is not wholly set off against income under other heads in that year. Such unabsorbed loss shall be carried forward to the subsequent tax year and may be set off only against income from house property computed for that subsequent tax year. This process may be continued ("and so on") subject to the overall temporal limit. The carry-forward is restricted to a maximum of eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The clause also supplies a definition: "unabsorbed loss from house property" means the loss under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for the said tax year.

      Interpretation

      The textual intent is to limit cross-head utilization of house property losses and to preserve them for future house property income. The restriction "set off only against income from house property" indicates a legislative policy that losses originating in the house property head are to be ring-fenced to similar income streams, preventing their absorption against other types of income in subsequent years. The "and so on" phrase signals iterative carry forward until the loss is fully absorbed or the eight-year ceiling is reached. The definition in subsection (3) signals that the clause applies only where the loss remains, in whole or in part, after application of set-off rules u/s 107 for that tax year.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any specific provisos, exceptions, or special cases (for example, treatment on transfer of property, amalgamation, or conversion of business) are not included in the clause text provided. No proviso concerning modification, waiver, or alternative treatment is present.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Tax year T1 - loss from house property = Rs X; set off against other heads u/s 107 = Rs Y; residual unabsorbed loss = Rs (X-Y). In tax year T2, the unabsorbed loss Rs (X-Y) may be set off only against house property income for T2. (All numeric specifics Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If after set-off in year T2 some residual loss remains, it may be carried forward to T3 and set off only against house property income in T3, continuing up to eight succeeding tax years from T1.

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly references section 107 for the definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" - suggesting interplay with the provisions governing intra-year set-off of losses. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are mentioned in the clause. Any interpretive interaction with other sections of the income tax statute (beyond section 107) is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 110 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Structural wording and terminology: The Act's Section 110 (Document 1) uses the phrasing "Where for any tax year, loss computed under the head 'Income from house property' cannot be wholly set off against the income under any other head as per section 109," and specifies carry forward and iterative set-off mechanics in two subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b). The Bill's Clause 110 (Document 2) refers to "The unabsorbed loss from house property for any tax year" and defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3).
      • Definition provision: Clause 110 (Bill) expressly defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3). Section 110 (Act) does not include an explicit definition clause for that term in the provided text.
      • Reference to set-off against other heads: The Act's text explicitly references section 109 for the prior set-off rule ("as per section 109"). The Bill's clause refers to set-off u/s 107 in its definition of "unabsorbed loss" (subsection (3)). Thus each version cross-references a different section number in the provided texts.
      • Division of carry-forward operation: The Act separates the carry-forward rule and the mechanics into (1)(a) (set off only against income from house property) and (1)(b) (if not wholly set off carry forward further). The Bill states the rule in one sentence and uses "and so on" to indicate repetition; it is simpler and the iterative mechanism is not broken into discrete clauses.
      • Temporal phrasing for time-limit: Both texts limit carry forward to eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The Act states "No loss shall be carried forward under this section for more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the loss was first computed." The Bill states, "not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed." Substantively the time-limit appears identical.

      Practical impact of each difference

      • Presence of explicit definition in the Bill: Clause 110's explicit definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" clarifies the reference point for what may be carried forward and avoids interpretive ambiguity about whether partial set-off against other heads at the same year affects carry forward. The Act's omission of an explicit definition in the provided text may require reliance on other sections or ordinary meaning to determine the same concept, potentially creating minor drafting uncertainty.
      • Different cross-references (section 109 vs section 107): The Act's reference to section 109 and the Bill's reference to section 107 (in the definition) may reflect renumbering or a substantive difference in the set-off scheme elsewhere in the code. Practically, if the referenced section differs in content, taxpayers and departments must consult the correct cross-referenced provision to determine prior set-off rules; mismatches could cause compliance errors until clarified.
      • Drafting clarity and enforcement: The Act's division into (a) and (b) more explicitly mandates that carry-forward losses are only to be set off against house property income and that any remainder must be carried forward, reducing interpretive questions. The Bill's compact wording accomplishes the same effect but with less granular punctuation; in practice both convey the same operational outcome but the Act's structure may be marginally clearer for compliance and adjudication.
      • No substantive change to the eight-year limit: Both texts impose the same eight-year ceiling; therefore, no practical change arises on the temporal limit for carry forward.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must track the computation year of house property losses and the portion that remains unabsorbed after application of section 107 in that year, since only the unabsorbed portion qualifies for carry forward. Misapplication of set-off against non-house-property income in subsequent years would be contrary to the explicit limitation and could attract reassessment risk. Record-keeping to evidence prior-year set-off u/s 107 is essential.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Maintain clear records of yearwise computation of house property loss, particulars of set-off applied u/s 107 in the year of computation, and yearwise set-off against house property income in subsequent years showing progressive absorption. Documentation demonstrating the origin year of the loss will be necessary to enforce the eight-year limit and to support position in assessments or appeals.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 110 confines carry-forwarded house property losses to set-off only against future house property income.
      • Carry forward is permitted for up to eight tax years immediately succeeding the year of computation.
      • The clause defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" by cross-reference to set-off u/s 107 for the year of computation.
      • No exceptions, provisos, or interactions with other statutory mechanisms (beyond section 107) are specified in the clause.
      • Taxpayers must carefully document the computation and set-off chronology to comply and to preserve the ability to claim carry forward within the eight-year window.

      Full Text:

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax