Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    NewsBill
    Extending the period of filing revised return
    NewsBill
    Scope of filing of updated return in the case of reduction of losses – reg.
    NewsBill
    Allowing the filing of updated return after issuance of notice of reassessment
    NewsBill
    Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers - Disclosure Scheme, 2026 (FAST-DS 2026)
    NewsBill
    Relaxation of conditions for prosecution under the Black Money Act
    NewsBill
    Rationalization of prosecution proceedings
    NewsBill
    Rationalizing the period of block in case of other persons
    NewsBill
    Referencing the time limit to complete block assessment to the initiation of search or requisition
    NewsBill
    Rationalisation of Penalties into Fee
    NewsBill
    Imposition of penalty for under-reporting or misreporting of income within Assessment Order
    NewsBill
    ​​​​​​​Increase in maximum amount of penalty in section 46...
    NewsBill
    Rationalisation of tax rate under section 195 and penalty under section 443 in respect of certain In...
    NewsBill
    Expanding the scope of immunity from penalty or prosecution under section 440 of the Act
    NewsBill
    ​​​​​​​Expanding the scope of immunity from imposition of ...
    NewsBill
    Deductions in respect of dividends received and distributed by certain cooperative societies
    NewsBill
    Widening scope of deduction under section 149 by including ancilliary activities of cattle feed and ...
    NewsBill
    Inclusion of Cooperatives registered under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 in the defini...
    NewsBill
    Amendment of section 169 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 relating to providing effect to advance pricing...
    NewsBill
    Exemption to a foreign company on any income arising in India by way of procuring data centre servic...
    NewsBill
    Allowing expenditure on prospecting of critical minerals as deduction
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Revised income-tax returns: filing window extended to 12 months; fee proposed for revisions after nine months.
    The proposal increases the time limit for filing a revised income-tax return from nine to twelve months from the end of the relevant tax year to allow those who file belated returns late to still revise returns; a fee is proposed for revised returns filed after nine months, with corresponding amendments and staggered commencement dates across the two income-tax statutes applying to the relevant tax and assessment years.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Updated tax returns may be allowed when a taxpayer reduces a previously claimed loss, per proposed Finance Bill changes.
    Section 263(6) permits an updated return within 48 months but bars updated returns that are returns of loss, limits reductions in tax liability or increases in refund, and restricts filing during or after assessment, reassessment, search, survey or prosecution. The Finance Bill, 2026 proposes to amend section 263(6) to allow filing an updated return where the taxpayer reduces the amount of loss claimed in a duly filed return of loss, and to make parallel amendments to the Income-tax Act, 1961.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Updated tax returns allowed in response to reassessment notices, with extra tax payable and penalty exclusion for that income.
    Permits furnishing an updated return in response to a reassessment notice within the notice period, precludes alternative filing in response to that notice, maintains existing restrictions on updated returns, and requires payment of prescribed additional income tax; where filed in pursuance of the notice an extra 10% of aggregate tax and interest is payable and that income will not form the basis for penalty.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign asset disclosure scheme for small taxpayers offers a time-bound window with tax/fee and limited immunity.
    The proposed FAST-DS 2026 provides a time bound window for small taxpayers to declare undisclosed foreign assets and foreign sourced income, requires payment of tax or a fee based on nature and source of acquisition, and grants limited immunity from penalty and prosecution under the Black Money Act for matters covered by the declaration, while excluding cases involving prosecution or proceeds of crime; the scheme is included in the Finance Bill, 2026 (Clauses 114-128) and will commence from a date notified by the Central Government.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Relaxation of prosecution under the Black Money Act excludes small-value foreign assets from sections 49 and 50.
    The Finance Bill proposes that sections 49 and 50 of the Black Money Act will not apply to foreign assets (other than immovable property) where the aggregate value does not exceed twenty lakh rupees, thereby excluding prosecution for minor or inadvertent nondisclosures and aligning prosecution exposure with the Act's penalty framework; the amendment is to have retrospective effect from 1 October 2024.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget 2026 27 proposes decriminalisation of tax offences, replacing rigorous terms with graded simple imprisonment and fines.
    Amendments to sections 473-485 and 494 recast many penalties from rigorous to simple imprisonment, cap most maximum terms at two years (with lower terms for subsequent offences), introduce fines in lieu of or alongside imprisonment, and adopt a tiered penalty structure tied to amounts of tax evaded-higher tiers permitting up to two years' simple imprisonment, intermediate tiers up to six months, and lower tiers limited to fines-while fully decriminalising selected offences and creating specific carve outs for certain TDS/TCS categories.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget change limits block assessment period for third parties when undisclosed income pertains to a single tax year.
    Section 295 currently requires that seized material relating to undisclosed income of a person other than the specified person be handed to that person's AO and that the other person undergo block assessment with the same block period; the Finance Bill proposes amending Section 295(2) to limit the period of block for such third parties, particularly where the undisclosed income pertains to a single tax year, with effect for searches or requisitions initiated on or after 1 April 2026.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget 2026-27 proposes using initiation of search as the trigger for block assessment and extending the period to eighteen months.
    The amendment replaces the last search authorization date with the initiation of search (or requisition) as the reference for computing the block-assessment limitation period and increases that period from twelve months to eighteen months, effective for searches or requisitions initiated on or after 1 April 2026.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Penalties for certain compliance failures converted into graded fees with specified caps, effective April 1, 2026.
    Select penalties for technical compliance failures are converted into prescribed graded fees: audit-reporting failures replaced by fees of Rs. 75,000 and Rs. 1,50,000 depending on delay; failure to furnish accountant reports for international or specified domestic transactions replaced by fees of Rs. 50,000 and Rs. 1,00,000; and failure to furnish statements of financial transactions or reportable accounts is converted into a fee with an introduced upper limit of Rs. 1,00,000 for the post-notice daily levy. The amendments take effect from the tax year beginning 1 April, 2026.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget changes penalty process: under-reporting penalties imposed within assessment order; interest charged post-appeal, effective April 2027.
    Penalties for under-reporting or misreporting are to be imposed within the assessment order to avoid multiple proceedings; consequential amendments align penalty, dispute resolution and recovery provisions. Interest under the tax recovery provision will be charged only after an appellate order by the first appellate authority or tribunal in appeals from dispute resolution forum orders.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Increase in penalty for failing to comply with tax information requests from business premises to strengthen compliance.
    Amendment to section 466 raises the maximum penalty for non-compliance with section 254 information directions from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 25,000, to enhance deterrence and voluntary compliance. The enhanced sanction is to be imposed by specified tax officers and takes effect from 1 April 2026, applying to tax year 2026-27 and subsequent years.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Tax on unexplained income cut to 30% and penalty treatment moved into the misreporting under reporting regime.
    The proposal reduces the special tax charge on income determined as unexplained under sections 102-106 from 60% to 30% by amending section 195 and omits the standalone 10% penalty under section 443, subsuming penalty treatment into the under reporting/misreporting regime of section 439(11); the changes take effect from 1 April 2026 for tax year 2026-27 and thereafter.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget expands taxpayer immunity to misreporting cases, allowing settlement by paying additional tax in lieu of penalty.
    Section 440 is to be amended to allow immunity from penalty and prosecution where under reporting arises from misreporting, subject to existing eligibility and procedural conditions. Immunity requires payment of additional income tax equal to 100% of the tax on such income; for income determined as unexplained credits/investments/assets the additional tax payable for immunity is 120%. The amendment is effective 1 April 2026 for tax year 2026 27 onward.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Amendment expands tax immunity to cover under reporting that results from misreporting, subject to existing procedural conditions.
    Amendment extends the existing immunity from penalty and prosecution to cases where under reporting of income results from misreporting, subject to existing conditions: payment of tax and interest within the demand period, no appeal against the assessment, timely filing of an immunity application within one month, and assessing officer decision on the application within three months.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Cooperative societies: deduction allowed on dividends from other cooperatives in new tax regime; limited federal cooperative relief.
    Deduction is extended to dividends received by cooperative societies from other cooperative societies in the new tax regime, limited to amounts distributed to members. Notified federal cooperatives may claim a temporary deduction for dividends from companies for three years, restricted to investments made by the federal cooperative on or before 31.01.2026 and distributed to members. The amendment is effective from 1 April 2026 and applies to the tax year 2026-27 and subsequent years.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Union Budget expands deduction to include cattle feed and cotton seeds under section 149(2)(b) for primary co operative societies.
    Amendment expands section 149(2)(b) to permit full deduction of profits and gains of a primary co-operative society where members supply cattle feed and cotton seeds to a federal co-operative society, Government, local authority, Government company, or corporation engaged in the same business, applying from the tax year beginning 1 April 2026.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Inclusion of multi-state co-operative societies in the co-operative society definition for tax purposes from April 2026.
    Amendment expands the statutory definition of co-operative society to expressly include societies registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, thereby bringing multi state registered cooperatives within the legal category subject to provisions applicable to co-operative societies under the Act.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Advance pricing agreements now allow associated enterprises to file modified returns within three months for covered tax years.
    Where income is modified as a result of an advance pricing agreement entered into with any person, that person or any associated enterprise may furnish a return or modified return limited to the agreement, within three months from the end of the month in which the agreement was entered into, in respect of tax years covered by such agreement entered on or after 1 April 2026 for tax years beginning 1 April 2026 and subsequent tax years.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Exemption for foreign companies on income from procuring data centre services if routed through an Indian reseller.
    A foreign company is exempt from Indian tax on income arising from procuring data centre services from a specified data centre, provided services to India users are routed through an Indian reseller; a specified data centre must be set up under an approved scheme notified by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and be owned and operated by an Indian company; the exemption applies from the tax year beginning 1 April 2026 through the tax year ending 31 March 2047.
    NewsBill
    Show AI Summary
    Prospecting of critical minerals now qualifies for deferred tax deduction over ten years under expanded schedule provisions.
    The schedule is amended to add critical minerals so that expenditure on prospecting and exploration of those minerals qualifies for the statutory deferred deduction available to resident taxpayers, with such expenses deductible over ten years from the year of commercial production and covering costs incurred in that year and up to four preceding years.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 110 "Carry forward and set off of loss from house property." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      1 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed loss from house property. It confines set-off of carried losses to future income from house property and limits carry forward to eight subsequent tax years. It affects taxpayers with losses under the head "Income from house property" and the income-tax administration; effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 110 is in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) under the heading "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The clause addresses the treatment of losses arising under the head "Income from house property." The clause contains three subsections. Subsection (1) mandates carry forward of the unabsorbed loss and restricts set-off to income from house property in subsequent years. Subsection (2) prescribes the temporal limit for carry forward ("not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed"). Subsection (3) defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" as the loss computed under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for that tax year. Context: Not stated in the document beyond the clause text. Coverage: losses under "Income from house property" only.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The clause applies where a loss is computed under the specific head "Income from house property" for a tax year but is not wholly set off against income under other heads in that year. Such unabsorbed loss shall be carried forward to the subsequent tax year and may be set off only against income from house property computed for that subsequent tax year. This process may be continued ("and so on") subject to the overall temporal limit. The carry-forward is restricted to a maximum of eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The clause also supplies a definition: "unabsorbed loss from house property" means the loss under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for the said tax year.

      Interpretation

      The textual intent is to limit cross-head utilization of house property losses and to preserve them for future house property income. The restriction "set off only against income from house property" indicates a legislative policy that losses originating in the house property head are to be ring-fenced to similar income streams, preventing their absorption against other types of income in subsequent years. The "and so on" phrase signals iterative carry forward until the loss is fully absorbed or the eight-year ceiling is reached. The definition in subsection (3) signals that the clause applies only where the loss remains, in whole or in part, after application of set-off rules u/s 107 for that tax year.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any specific provisos, exceptions, or special cases (for example, treatment on transfer of property, amalgamation, or conversion of business) are not included in the clause text provided. No proviso concerning modification, waiver, or alternative treatment is present.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Tax year T1 - loss from house property = Rs X; set off against other heads u/s 107 = Rs Y; residual unabsorbed loss = Rs (X-Y). In tax year T2, the unabsorbed loss Rs (X-Y) may be set off only against house property income for T2. (All numeric specifics Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If after set-off in year T2 some residual loss remains, it may be carried forward to T3 and set off only against house property income in T3, continuing up to eight succeeding tax years from T1.

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly references section 107 for the definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" - suggesting interplay with the provisions governing intra-year set-off of losses. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are mentioned in the clause. Any interpretive interaction with other sections of the income tax statute (beyond section 107) is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 110 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Structural wording and terminology: The Act's Section 110 (Document 1) uses the phrasing "Where for any tax year, loss computed under the head 'Income from house property' cannot be wholly set off against the income under any other head as per section 109," and specifies carry forward and iterative set-off mechanics in two subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b). The Bill's Clause 110 (Document 2) refers to "The unabsorbed loss from house property for any tax year" and defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3).
      • Definition provision: Clause 110 (Bill) expressly defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3). Section 110 (Act) does not include an explicit definition clause for that term in the provided text.
      • Reference to set-off against other heads: The Act's text explicitly references section 109 for the prior set-off rule ("as per section 109"). The Bill's clause refers to set-off u/s 107 in its definition of "unabsorbed loss" (subsection (3)). Thus each version cross-references a different section number in the provided texts.
      • Division of carry-forward operation: The Act separates the carry-forward rule and the mechanics into (1)(a) (set off only against income from house property) and (1)(b) (if not wholly set off carry forward further). The Bill states the rule in one sentence and uses "and so on" to indicate repetition; it is simpler and the iterative mechanism is not broken into discrete clauses.
      • Temporal phrasing for time-limit: Both texts limit carry forward to eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The Act states "No loss shall be carried forward under this section for more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the loss was first computed." The Bill states, "not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed." Substantively the time-limit appears identical.

      Practical impact of each difference

      • Presence of explicit definition in the Bill: Clause 110's explicit definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" clarifies the reference point for what may be carried forward and avoids interpretive ambiguity about whether partial set-off against other heads at the same year affects carry forward. The Act's omission of an explicit definition in the provided text may require reliance on other sections or ordinary meaning to determine the same concept, potentially creating minor drafting uncertainty.
      • Different cross-references (section 109 vs section 107): The Act's reference to section 109 and the Bill's reference to section 107 (in the definition) may reflect renumbering or a substantive difference in the set-off scheme elsewhere in the code. Practically, if the referenced section differs in content, taxpayers and departments must consult the correct cross-referenced provision to determine prior set-off rules; mismatches could cause compliance errors until clarified.
      • Drafting clarity and enforcement: The Act's division into (a) and (b) more explicitly mandates that carry-forward losses are only to be set off against house property income and that any remainder must be carried forward, reducing interpretive questions. The Bill's compact wording accomplishes the same effect but with less granular punctuation; in practice both convey the same operational outcome but the Act's structure may be marginally clearer for compliance and adjudication.
      • No substantive change to the eight-year limit: Both texts impose the same eight-year ceiling; therefore, no practical change arises on the temporal limit for carry forward.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must track the computation year of house property losses and the portion that remains unabsorbed after application of section 107 in that year, since only the unabsorbed portion qualifies for carry forward. Misapplication of set-off against non-house-property income in subsequent years would be contrary to the explicit limitation and could attract reassessment risk. Record-keeping to evidence prior-year set-off u/s 107 is essential.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Maintain clear records of yearwise computation of house property loss, particulars of set-off applied u/s 107 in the year of computation, and yearwise set-off against house property income in subsequent years showing progressive absorption. Documentation demonstrating the origin year of the loss will be necessary to enforce the eight-year limit and to support position in assessments or appeals.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 110 confines carry-forwarded house property losses to set-off only against future house property income.
      • Carry forward is permitted for up to eight tax years immediately succeeding the year of computation.
      • The clause defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" by cross-reference to set-off u/s 107 for the year of computation.
      • No exceptions, provisos, or interactions with other statutory mechanisms (beyond section 107) are specified in the clause.
      • Taxpayers must carefully document the computation and set-off chronology to comply and to preserve the ability to claim carry forward within the eight-year window.

      Full Text:

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax