Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 85 "Capital gains not to be charged on investment in certain bonds." between t...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 84 "Capital gains on compulsory acquisition of lands and buildings not to be c...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 78 "Special provision for full value of consideration in certain cases." betwe...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 74 "Special provision for computation of capital gains in case of depreciable ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 73 "Cost with reference to certain modes of acquisition" between the Income-Ta...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 72 "Mode of computation of capital gains" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 70 "Transactions not regarded as transfer" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (a...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 66 "Interpretation" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Incom...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 62 "Maintenance of books of account" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as pass...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 61 "Special provision for computation of income on presumptive basis in respec...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 58 "Special provision for computing profits and gains of business or professio...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 53 "Full value of consideration for transfer of assets other than capital asse...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 52 "Amortisation of expenditure for telecommunications services, amalgamation,...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 51 "Amortisation of expenditure for prospecting certain minerals" between the ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 49 "Site Restoration Fund" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and th...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 48 "Tea development account, coffee development account and rubber development...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 46 "Capital expenditure of specified business" between the Income-Tax Act, 202...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 45 "Expenditure on scientific research" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as p...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 44 "Amortisation of certain preliminary expenses" between the Income-Tax Act, ...
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Comparison of Section 42 "Capitalising impact of foreign exchange fluctuation" between the Income-Ta...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Roll over relief for capital gains: reinvestment in specified long term bonds defers tax subject to time, holding and cap conditions.
    Relief defers tax on long term capital gains from transfer of land or building when reinvested within six months into notified long term bonds, with a statutory investment ceiling and a five year holding requirement; breach by transfer, conversion to money, or borrowing on the bond triggers deeming of previously exempted amounts as taxable long term capital gains and disallows a specified deduction for amounts claimed under the relief.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capital gains deferral for compulsory acquisition where reinvestment in industrial undertaking preserves tax neutrality subject to deposit and timelines.
    Section 84 conditions tax neutrality for capital gains on compulsory acquisition of industrial land/buildings where the assessee reinvests proceeds in a replacement asset within the prescribed reinvestment period; excess proceeds over new-asset cost are charged as income and certain cost-basis adjustments apply for disposals within the reinvestment period. Unutilised proceeds must be deposited in a specified institution and applied per a notified scheme by the return-filing due date, with documentary proof required and residual unutilised amounts charged as income.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed consideration rule: stamp duty value treated as full consideration for capital gains when declared consideration is lower.
    The provision deems the stamp duty value of land or building to be the full value of consideration for section 72 where declared consideration is lower, subject to a date of agreement exception conditioned on prescribed electronic/banking payment modes and a 110% safe harbour allowing actual consideration to prevail when stamp duty value does not exceed 110% of consideration; Assessing Officers may refer valuation claims to a Valuation Officer where the assessee asserts stamp duty value exceeds fair market value and the stamp duty value has not been contested.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deeming of short-term capital gains where transfers from a depreciable block exceed transfer expenses, opening WDV and acquisition cost.
    Section 74 prescribes that when consideration received or accruing in a tax year for transfers of one or more assets in a depreciable block exceeds, after deducting transfer-related expenditure, the opening written-down value of the block and the actual cost of additions during the year, the excess is deemed to be capital gains arising from the transfer of short-term capital assets; if the entire block is transferred in the year, cost of acquisition is the opening WDV plus costs of additions and resulting receipts are similarly deemed short-term capital gains.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed cost of acquisition: prior-owner cost continuity and formulaic apportionment govern non purchase transfers and restructurings.
    Section 73 prescribes deemed cost of acquisition rules for assets received by non-purchase modes: generally continuing the previous owner's cost (adjusted for improvements) and prescribing formulaic apportionment or fair market value bases for corporate reorganisations, mutual fund segregations/consolidations and specified instruments, with application guided by cross-references and delegated definitions.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Indexation of acquisition costs limited to prescribed computation item, narrowing administrative discretion and clarifying taxpayer application.
    Section 72 prescribes that capital gains equal the full value of consideration less specified deductions (transfer expenditures, cost of acquisition and improvements), with indexation applying in prescribed contexts as indexed equivalents; it excludes certain items from deduction, provides cost adjustments for business trust distributions, grants specified entities additional prescribed deductions, and imposes special currency conversion and rupee appreciation rules for non residents, while defining indexed cost calculations by reference to a Cost Inflation Index.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Tax-neutrality for corporate reorganisations, IFSC fund relocations, non-resident transfers and conversions subject to specified conditions.
    Section 70 treats specified transfers as not constituting a transfer for capital gains, rendering many corporate reorganisations, succession transfers, conversions, certain non-resident-to-non-resident transactions and relocations of foreign funds into IFSC-located resultant funds tax-neutral only where qualifying tests - including shareholding continuity, residency/domestic-company status, regulatory registration and non-taxation in the foreign jurisdiction - and documentary conditions are satisfied.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Specified derivative transaction criteria change tax classification and impose documentary and platform compliance obligations for derivative trades.
    The enacted Section 66 narrows and reorders interpretive definitions governing Chapter IV D, alters key terms (including shifting focus from "commodity derivative" to "commodities transaction tax"), moves some enterprise classifications to notification based criteria, and changes successor/predecessor coverage. It also revises the functional tests and documentary preconditions for specified derivative transaction and speculative transaction status - emphasising electronic execution, prescribed platforms/intermediaries and time stamped contract notes with UCI and PAN - thereby creating clear compliance triggers and greater reliance on delegated notifications and rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Maintenance of books of account: record keeping duty for specified professions and businesses; Board to prescribe particulars and retention.
    Section 62 requires maintenance of books and documents to enable computation of total income by specified professions, businesses meeting alternative income or turnover tests, and professions notified by the Board. The Board may prescribe the form, particulars, manner, place and retention periods. The enacted text repositions the Board's notification power into the definition of specified professions, corrects an apparent turnover threshold error for individuals/HUFs, and revises cross references affecting deemed profits carve outs; operational details depend on subsequent rules and the referenced tables.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Presumptive taxation for non resident activities fixes taxable profits on defined receipts and narrows audit relief.
    Section 61 prescribes a presumptive taxation method for six specified non resident activities, fixing taxable profits as percentages of defined receipts (A and B) and supplying definitions and examples for those receipts; it bars deductions or losses against income so computed, prescribes written down value treatment, and permits audit based claims of lower actual profits only where expressly allowed and subject to strict bookkeeping and audit compliance, while the Act narrows those reliefs and clarifies definitional and non application provisions.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Presumptive taxation regime clarified for small businesses and goods carriage operators, altering computation and compliance timing.
    Section 58 creates a presumptive taxation regime for small businesses, goods carriage operations and specified professions, prescribing turnover limits and fixed presumptive computation methods. Taxpayers may elect actual profits but must maintain books and obtain an audit if total income exceeds the basic exemption limit. The enacted text clarifies that receipts received by specified banking or online modes count for a lower percentage only if received during the tax year or before the due date, treats non account payee cheques/bank drafts as cash for cash tests, and expressly excludes goods carriage receipts from aggregation for monetary limits under book keeping/audit rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed consideration: stamp duty value may be treated as full value where declared consideration is lower.
    The provision deems the stamp duty value to be the full value of consideration for transfers of non-capital land or buildings where declared consideration is below stamp duty value, subject to a statutory tolerance that preserves actual consideration if stamp duty value is within a specified margin; agreement date stamp valuations may be used when agreement and registration dates differ provided consideration (or part) was received by specified banking/online modes on or before the agreement date, with determination mechanics governed by cross referenced valuation rules.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Amortisation rules for telecom spectrum and licence fees require time spread deductions and proceeds offset on transfer.
    The section prescribes amortisation in equal instalments for four categories of expenditure-amalgamation/demerger costs, SVR payments, spectrum fees and licence fees-starting from specified initial tax years (event/payment or later of business commencement/payment) and, for spectrum/licence, running co terminous with the life of the right. Transfers of spectrum/licence rights trigger offsetting of proceeds against remaining unallowed expenditure with specified income inclusion rules and a formula for part transfers; amalgamation/demerger transfers to an Indian company preserve the section's application to the successor. Depreciation exclusion and reassessment mechanics for wrongful allowance are also provided.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Amortisation of prospecting expenditure permits staged tax deduction subject to funding reductions, exclusions and audit conditions.
    Amortisation allows an Indian company or resident (other than a company) engaged in prospecting for specified minerals to capitalise qualifying expenditure incurred in the year of commercial production and up to four preceding years, claim periodic instalments after reducing amounts funded by others and realizations (sale, salvage, compensation, insurance), and excluding site/deposit acquisitions and depreciable capital assets; instalments are limited so as not to reduce income from commercial exploitation below nil, unallowed amounts may be carried forward within the overall amortisation period, and audit and prescribed reporting are required for non-company assessees.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Site restoration fund deductions for petroleum operations, with recapture on asset disposals governed by Schedule X.
    Section 49 creates a Site Restoration Fund regime for petroleum and natural gas operations under a Central Government agreement, allowing deductions for deposits to a designated special account or site restoration account with computation governed by Schedule X. Withdrawals or transfers from those accounts are taxable in the year of withdrawal/transfer under Schedule X. The Act removes a clause in the Bill that explicitly deemed a portion of asset cost relatable to prior deductions as business income on sale within a specified holding period, instead delegating disposal and recapture rules to Schedule X.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Recapture on premature disposal reverses deduction for deposits into designated tea, coffee and rubber development accounts, taxing attributable cost on disposal.
    Clause 48 permits a deduction for deposits into designated tea, coffee and rubber development accounts, with computation governed by Schedule IX; withdrawals or transfers are chargeable to tax in the year of transfer/withdrawal as per Schedule IX, and disposal of assets acquired under the scheme within the protective holding period results in deeming that portion of the asset cost attributable to earlier deductions as business income in the year of sale or transfer.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Immediate deduction of capital expenditure for specified businesses, subject to conditions, approvals and an eight-year recapture rule.
    The Act permits an elective immediate deduction of whole capital expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for specified businesses in the year of incurrence (or in year of commencement if pre-commencement cost is capitalised), subject to specified commencement dates, definitions and conditions. The deduction is disallowed where a business is formed by splitting/reconstruction or by transfer of previously used machinery (except a limited de minimis exception), requires specified approvals/notifications for certain sectors, excludes land/goodwill/financial instruments and cash over prescribed limits, and is subject to an eight-year sole-use recapture mechanism with depreciation adjustment.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Scientific research deductions conditional on prescribed authority certification, approval for in-house R&D, and prohibition on duplicate claims.
    The provision allows deductions for capital and revenue expenditure on business-related scientific research, excluding land costs, and deems qualifying pre-commencement salaries, materials and capital costs to the year of commencement if certified by the prescribed authority. In-house R&D deductions are available for prescribed companies with approved facilities and qualifying costs subject to prescribed conditions and documentation. Payments to approved research entities are deductible only for approved programmes and recipients. Non-duplication rules bar claiming the same expenditure under other provisions and exclude parallel asset-based deductions where research deductions have been taken.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Amortisation of preliminary expenses allows spreading eligible start-up costs over successive years subject to statutory cap and compliance conditions.
    The provision permits amortisation of specified preliminary and project-related expenditures by resident Indian assessees through equal annual deductions over five successive tax years beginning with the year the undertaking becomes operational or the year of commencement. Eligible items include feasibility and project reports, market surveys, engineering services, specified legal and registration costs, prospectus and public issue expenses for companies, and other prescribed items not deductible under any other provision. A statutory cap restricts the allowable deduction to a percentage of project cost or capital employed, with project cost tied to actual cost as shown in the books, and procedural conditions require prescribed filings and audited accounts for certain taxpayers.
    Act RulesIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitalising foreign exchange fluctuation adjusts asset cost to reflect exchange-rate differences between acquisition and payment.
    Section 42 requires capitalisation of foreign exchange variation by computing A = B - C, where B is INR paid during the tax year (excluding parts met by others) for asset cost or repayment of foreign-currency borrowings used to acquire the asset, and C is the INR liability corresponding to that payment at acquisition; the variation is added to or deducted from the asset's actual cost, specified capital expenditure categories, or cost of acquisition for set-off purposes, with forward-contract-covered amounts computed at the contract rate.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 110 "Carry forward and set off of loss from house property." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      1 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for the carry forward and set off of unabsorbed loss from house property. It confines set-off of carried losses to future income from house property and limits carry forward to eight subsequent tax years. It affects taxpayers with losses under the head "Income from house property" and the income-tax administration; effective date or decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 110 is in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) under the heading "SET OFF, OR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF LOSSES." The clause addresses the treatment of losses arising under the head "Income from house property." The clause contains three subsections. Subsection (1) mandates carry forward of the unabsorbed loss and restricts set-off to income from house property in subsequent years. Subsection (2) prescribes the temporal limit for carry forward ("not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed"). Subsection (3) defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" as the loss computed under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for that tax year. Context: Not stated in the document beyond the clause text. Coverage: losses under "Income from house property" only.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The clause applies where a loss is computed under the specific head "Income from house property" for a tax year but is not wholly set off against income under other heads in that year. Such unabsorbed loss shall be carried forward to the subsequent tax year and may be set off only against income from house property computed for that subsequent tax year. This process may be continued ("and so on") subject to the overall temporal limit. The carry-forward is restricted to a maximum of eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The clause also supplies a definition: "unabsorbed loss from house property" means the loss under that head which has not been, or is not wholly, set off against income from any other head u/s 107 for the said tax year.

      Interpretation

      The textual intent is to limit cross-head utilization of house property losses and to preserve them for future house property income. The restriction "set off only against income from house property" indicates a legislative policy that losses originating in the house property head are to be ring-fenced to similar income streams, preventing their absorption against other types of income in subsequent years. The "and so on" phrase signals iterative carry forward until the loss is fully absorbed or the eight-year ceiling is reached. The definition in subsection (3) signals that the clause applies only where the loss remains, in whole or in part, after application of set-off rules u/s 107 for that tax year.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Not stated in the document: any specific provisos, exceptions, or special cases (for example, treatment on transfer of property, amalgamation, or conversion of business) are not included in the clause text provided. No proviso concerning modification, waiver, or alternative treatment is present.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Tax year T1 - loss from house property = Rs X; set off against other heads u/s 107 = Rs Y; residual unabsorbed loss = Rs (X-Y). In tax year T2, the unabsorbed loss Rs (X-Y) may be set off only against house property income for T2. (All numeric specifics Not stated in the document.)

      • Example 2: If after set-off in year T2 some residual loss remains, it may be carried forward to T3 and set off only against house property income in T3, continuing up to eight succeeding tax years from T1.

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly references section 107 for the definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" - suggesting interplay with the provisions governing intra-year set-off of losses. No other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are mentioned in the clause. Any interpretive interaction with other sections of the income tax statute (beyond section 107) is Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 110 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 110 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Structural wording and terminology: The Act's Section 110 (Document 1) uses the phrasing "Where for any tax year, loss computed under the head 'Income from house property' cannot be wholly set off against the income under any other head as per section 109," and specifies carry forward and iterative set-off mechanics in two subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b). The Bill's Clause 110 (Document 2) refers to "The unabsorbed loss from house property for any tax year" and defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3).
      • Definition provision: Clause 110 (Bill) expressly defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" in subsection (3). Section 110 (Act) does not include an explicit definition clause for that term in the provided text.
      • Reference to set-off against other heads: The Act's text explicitly references section 109 for the prior set-off rule ("as per section 109"). The Bill's clause refers to set-off u/s 107 in its definition of "unabsorbed loss" (subsection (3)). Thus each version cross-references a different section number in the provided texts.
      • Division of carry-forward operation: The Act separates the carry-forward rule and the mechanics into (1)(a) (set off only against income from house property) and (1)(b) (if not wholly set off carry forward further). The Bill states the rule in one sentence and uses "and so on" to indicate repetition; it is simpler and the iterative mechanism is not broken into discrete clauses.
      • Temporal phrasing for time-limit: Both texts limit carry forward to eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which the loss was first computed. The Act states "No loss shall be carried forward under this section for more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year for which the loss was first computed." The Bill states, "not being more than eight tax years immediately succeeding the tax year in which such loss was first computed." Substantively the time-limit appears identical.

      Practical impact of each difference

      • Presence of explicit definition in the Bill: Clause 110's explicit definition of "unabsorbed loss from house property" clarifies the reference point for what may be carried forward and avoids interpretive ambiguity about whether partial set-off against other heads at the same year affects carry forward. The Act's omission of an explicit definition in the provided text may require reliance on other sections or ordinary meaning to determine the same concept, potentially creating minor drafting uncertainty.
      • Different cross-references (section 109 vs section 107): The Act's reference to section 109 and the Bill's reference to section 107 (in the definition) may reflect renumbering or a substantive difference in the set-off scheme elsewhere in the code. Practically, if the referenced section differs in content, taxpayers and departments must consult the correct cross-referenced provision to determine prior set-off rules; mismatches could cause compliance errors until clarified.
      • Drafting clarity and enforcement: The Act's division into (a) and (b) more explicitly mandates that carry-forward losses are only to be set off against house property income and that any remainder must be carried forward, reducing interpretive questions. The Bill's compact wording accomplishes the same effect but with less granular punctuation; in practice both convey the same operational outcome but the Act's structure may be marginally clearer for compliance and adjudication.
      • No substantive change to the eight-year limit: Both texts impose the same eight-year ceiling; therefore, no practical change arises on the temporal limit for carry forward.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must track the computation year of house property losses and the portion that remains unabsorbed after application of section 107 in that year, since only the unabsorbed portion qualifies for carry forward. Misapplication of set-off against non-house-property income in subsequent years would be contrary to the explicit limitation and could attract reassessment risk. Record-keeping to evidence prior-year set-off u/s 107 is essential.
      • Record-keeping/evidence points: Maintain clear records of yearwise computation of house property loss, particulars of set-off applied u/s 107 in the year of computation, and yearwise set-off against house property income in subsequent years showing progressive absorption. Documentation demonstrating the origin year of the loss will be necessary to enforce the eight-year limit and to support position in assessments or appeals.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 110 confines carry-forwarded house property losses to set-off only against future house property income.
      • Carry forward is permitted for up to eight tax years immediately succeeding the year of computation.
      • The clause defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" by cross-reference to set-off u/s 107 for the year of computation.
      • No exceptions, provisos, or interactions with other statutory mechanisms (beyond section 107) are specified in the clause.
      • Taxpayers must carefully document the computation and set-off chronology to comply and to preserve the ability to claim carry forward within the eight-year window.

      Full Text:

      Section 110 Carry forward and set off of loss from house property.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax