Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Doctrine of Reasonable Cause in Tax Penalties : Clause 470 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Voluntary Disclosure and Penalty Waiver under Indian Tax Law : Clause 469 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
    Penalties for Non-Compliance with TDCAN/TAN Requirements : Clause 468 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Penalty Provision for PAN/Aadhaar Non-Compliance in Indian Tax Law : Clause 467 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Penalty Provisions for deterrence against non-cooperation with tax authorities : Clause 466 of Incom...
    Procedural Defaults and Penalties in Indian Tax Law : Clause 465 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Ensuring Compliance Among Tax-Exempt Entities : Clause 464 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section ...
    Professionals(i.e. Accountant, Marchant Banker, Registered Valuer) Accountability under Indian Incom...
    Enforcement of Information Disclosure in Cross-Border Transactions : Clause 462 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Penalty Provisions for Non-Filing and Incorrect Filing of TDS/TCS Statements : Clause 461 of the Inc...
    Enforcement of Reporting Obligations by a non-resident having liaison office : Clause 460 of Income ...
    Penalties for Reporting Non-Compliance by Resident constituent entity of an international group unde...
    Legal Implications of Non-Compliance with Reporting Requirements : Clause 458 of the Income Tax Bill...
    Strengthening Transfer Pricing Enforcement : Clause 457 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 271...
    Compliance and Penalty Mechanisms for Investment Funds under Indian Tax Law : Clause 456 of the Inco...
    Penalties for Inaccurate Financial Reporting under Indian Income Tax Law : Clause 455 of the Income ...
    Penalties for Non-Compliance in Financial Transaction Reporting : Clause 454 of the Income Tax Bill,...
    Penalty Provisions for Non-compliant Loan Repayments in India's Income Tax Law : Clause 453 of the I...
    Mandatory Electronic Payments and Penalty Regimes : Clause 452 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sect...
    Evolving Penalty Regimes for Monetary Transaction Violations : Clause 451 of the Income Tax Bill, 20...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reasonable cause defense protects taxpayers from penalties for bona fide, non culpable defaults and encourages documented compliance.
    Clause 470 creates an exception to specified penalty provisions: no penalty shall be imposed if the assessee proves there was reasonable cause for the failure. It functions as a non obstante provision covering enumerated sections, shifts the burden of proof to the taxpayer, and is aimed primarily at bona fide procedural or technical lapses rather than deliberate violations.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Voluntary disclosure and penalty waiver enable administrative relief when pre detection disclosure, cooperation and payment conditions are met.
    Clause 469 empowers the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to reduce or waive penalties under section 439 where a taxpayer has made a full and true voluntary disclosure before detection, cooperated in assessment and paid or arranged payment of tax or interest; it includes a deeming rule for full disclosure, prior approval safeguards for high value cases, a bar on multiple reliefs, a genuine hardship route with recorded reasons, a twelve month disposal limit, opportunity to be heard, and finality of orders.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to quote TDCAN/TAN: discretionary fixed sanctions apply for non compliance and knowingly false quoting.
    Clause 468 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a fixed monetary penalty for failure to comply with Section 397 and for quoting a false Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number in prescribed documents where the person knows or believes it to be false, making the penalty discretionary and imposing a mens rea requirement for false quoting while not expressly providing for a statutory opportunity of being heard.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    PAN/Aadhaar compliance: new per-default penalty regime distinguishes intentional false quoting from strict liability omissions and extends responsible person liability.
    Clause 467 establishes a per-default penalty regime for non-compliance with section 262, differentiating intentional false PAN/Aadhaar quoting-which requires proof of knowledge or belief-from omissions treated as strict liability, and extends liability to persons responsible for ensuring correct quoting/authentication; it emphasizes authentication and digital e KYC integration while remaining silent on express procedural safeguards such as the opportunity to be heard, creating potential due process and transitional issues.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for non cooperation: new provision allows senior tax officers to impose a moderate monetary penalty without explicit hearing safeguards.
    Clause 466 empowers specified senior tax officers to impose a moderate monetary penalty for failure to comply with section 254, mirroring prior penalty structure in authority and capped quantum but omitting express procedural safeguards such as an opportunity of being heard, defences like reasonable cause, and a requirement to record reasons, thereby raising concerns about procedural fairness and consistency in imposition.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for procedural defaults: fixed and daily fines, capped to tax collectible, with delegated authority to impose them.
    Clause 465 creates a penalty regime for procedural non compliance under the Income Tax Bill, 2025: a fixed penalty for discrete defaults, a daily penalty for continuing defaults, a cap tying certain penalties to the amount of tax deductible or collectible, and specified authorities empowered to impose penalties; it broadens the definition of income tax authority and updates cross references to the restructured Bill, while notably omitting an explicit provision requiring an opportunity to be heard before penalty imposition.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty regime for failure to furnish prescribed statements strengthens compliance under tax exempt reporting obligations.
    A statutory penalty regime targets failure by specified research institutions and charitable funds to furnish prescribed documents, statements, or certificates within prescribed timeframes; penalties fall within a prescribed band and are imposed at the discretion of the Assessing Officer, operating as a civil compliance measure alongside general procedural safeguards and requiring stakeholders to update compliance processes to align with re referenced substantive sections.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Professional accountability: penalty for furnishing incorrect information in professional reports or certificates under the new income tax bill.
    Clause 463 imposes a strict-liability penalty regime on accountants, merchant bankers and registered valuers for furnishing incorrect information in any report or certificate under the Act or rules. It prescribes a fixed per-instance monetary penalty and empowers the Assessing Officer, Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or Commissioner (Appeals) to impose the penalty upon satisfaction that incorrect information was furnished. The clause updates definitional references for valuers, omits an explicit definition of "accountant," and operates without prejudice to other civil or criminal consequences.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish information: fixed sanction for inaccurate or missing cross-border disclosure, raising proportionality concerns.
    Clause 462 penalises any person required to furnish information under section 397(3)(d) who fails to supply such information or furnishes inaccurate information; the Assessing Officer may impose a fixed monetary penalty, the provision mirrors Section 271I in structure and intent, lacks an express reasonable-cause defence or gradation of penalty, and raises interpretative issues as to the scope of "inaccurate information," procedural safeguards, and proportionality in enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish statements: discretionary fines with short grace period where tax is paid and statement filed promptly.
    Clause 461 creates a penalty for failure to deliver statements under section 397(3)(b) or for furnishing incorrect information, authorising the Assessing Officer to impose a discretionary monetary penalty equivalent in range to the existing Section 271H. Clause 461(2) exempts penalty where tax, fee and interest are paid to the Central Government and the statement is filed within a short grace period, thereby balancing deterrence with relief for prompt substantive compliance while leaving procedural safeguards and definitions, such as "incorrect information," unclearly specified.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to submit statements may be imposed by the assessing officer as a daily or capped sanction, discretion preserved.
    Clause 460 permits the Assessing Officer to impose discretionary monetary penalties on any person required to furnish a statement under section 505 for failure to file within the prescribed period, using a two-tier structure of a daily sanction for short-term delay and a capped penalty for longer default, with applicability dependent on the scope of the parent reporting obligation and subject to the general procedural and appellate framework of the tax law.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Reporting penalties: new clause preserves escalating daily fines and a large fixed penalty for inaccurate international tax reports.
    Clause 459 establishes a tiered penalty regime under section 511 for reporting entities: daily penalties for failure to furnish reports, daily penalties for failure to produce information after the allowed period, an escalated daily penalty if default continues after service of a penalty order, and a substantial fixed penalty for furnishing inaccurate information or failing to correct known or discovered inaccuracies. The prescribed authority under section 511 is empowered to impose these penalties, and the clause mirrors Section 271GB in quantum and triggers while raising issues about reasonable cause relief and procedural safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to report transfers of management or control triggers significant compliance and enforcement consequences.
    Clause 458 creates a penalty for failure by an Indian concern to furnish information or documents under section 506, authorising the prescribed income-tax authority to impose either a transaction-value-based penalty where a transaction effects a direct or indirect transfer of management or control, or a fixed monetary penalty otherwise, and otherwise mirrors the substantive framework and enforcement objectives of Section 271GA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer pricing documentation penalty: failure to furnish documents leads to transaction value based penalties and enforcement by tax authorities.
    Failure to furnish prescribed transfer pricing information or documentation for international or specified domestic transactions triggers a transaction value based penalty under Clause 457, enforceable by the Assessing Officer, authorised Transfer Pricing Officer and the Commissioner (Appeals); the clause ties this enforcement directly to the obligations in section 171(2) and raises interpretive issues concerning the meaning of failure, computation of transaction value, overlap with other penalties, and the availability of a reasonable cause defence.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish statements: eligible investment funds face a fixed sanction under the bill; authority may impose it.
    Clause 456 imposes a fixed penalty where an eligible investment fund fails to furnish required statements or information within the prescribed time; the prescribed income-tax authority may direct payment of the fixed sanction. The reporting deadline is set by the substantive eligibility reporting provision; the penalty is discretionary rather than automatic, lacks a graded scale, and does not expressly specify procedural safeguards such as criteria for discretion or an opportunity to be heard.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for inaccurate financial reporting imposes institutional and account-holder liability while enabling recovery of penalties from account holders.
    Clause 455 mandates penalties for persons required to furnish statements of financial transactions or reportable accounts for providing inaccurate information or failing to meet due diligence obligations, and imposes an additional per-account penalty on reporting financial institutions where inaccuracies stem from account-holder-supplied false information; reporting institutions may recover such additional penalties from the responsible account holders by direct recovery or retention of funds, with imposition directed by the prescribed income-tax authority and substantive continuity with the former Section 271FAA.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for failure to furnish financial transaction statements - escalating daily sanctions for continued non-compliance after notice.
    Clause 454 creates a statutory penalty regime for failure to furnish a statement of financial transaction or reportable account, prescribing a daily penalty accruing from the date the filing deadline lapses, with an escalated daily rate where default continues after a formal notice, and vesting discretionary imposition authority in the income-tax authority subject to procedural safeguards and rights to challenge.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Penalty for non-compliant loan repayments: Assessing Officer may impose a penalty equal to the amount repaid for procedural breaches.
    Clause 453 permits the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty equal to any loan, deposit or specified advance repaid in contravention of section 188, applying to all persons and covering repayments made by non-transparent modes. The provision creates strict liability based on procedural breach rather than mens rea, centralizes enforcement with the Assessing Officer, and omits an explicit reasonable-cause defence, raising potential interpretative and transitional issues regarding the scope of specified advances and procedural safeguards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Electronic payment mandate triggers daily penalties for non compliance unless a taxpayer proves good and sufficient reason.
    Clause 452 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a fixed per day monetary penalty for failure to provide prescribed electronic modes of payment under section 187, subject to a saving where the person proves good and sufficient reason for the failure; the provision mirrors the former section 271DB framework but streamlines authority and lacks detailed procedural guidance.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Monetary transaction penalty: discretion to impose a penalty equal to prohibited receipt unless good and sufficient reasons are proved.
    Clause 451 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty equal to the sum received in contravention of section 186 unless the recipient proves good and sufficient reasons; the provision emphasises proportionality, vests discretion in enforcement, omits explicit procedural safeguards and mens rea, and mirrors the substantive penalty quantum and defence in the earlier statutory regime while differing in statutory tone and procedural concision.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 19 "Deductions from salaries" between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      19 August, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 19 Deductions from salaries.

      Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed]

      At a Glance

      Document considered: Clause 19 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version) - provision for deductions from salaries. It matters because it defines which receipts and amounts are deductible/exempt from salary income for income-tax computation, affecting taxpayers (employees), employers (withholding), and the tax department. Effective date/decision date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hooks: Clause 19 sets out deductions under the head "Salaries" and cross-references the Industrial Disputes Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, Civil Pensions (Commutation) Rules and Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021. Context and coverage: The clause enumerates categories of exempt or deductible receipts (tax on employment, standard deduction, various gratuities, commutation of pension, compensation on retrenchment/transfer/closure, voluntary retirement compensation, cash equivalent of leave encashment).

      Definitions: The text supplies operational definitions and computational formulas (e.g., for gratuity: Amount = 1/2 (A x B); definition of A and B), and notes when "salary" includes dearness allowance for specified items. No separate section containing standalone definitions is provided. Where definitions or further clarifications are absent, the document does not state them explicitly.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      The clause operates by providing a Table of specified categories of sums (Serial Nos. 1-14) and the extent of deduction/exemption for each. Major categories: (1) tax on employment (Article 276(2) dues) - entire amount; (2) standard deduction - Rs.75,000 (where tax computed under s.202(1)) or Rs.50,000 otherwise; (3) death-cum-retirement gratuity - entire amount; (4) retiring gratuity under Pension Code/defence regulations - entire; (5) gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - amount limited by s.4(2)/(3) of that Act; (6) other gratuity - minimum of actual received, notified Government limit, and half-month salary per completed year (with formula); (7-9) commutation of pension situations - entire or specified commuted values; (10-11) compensation on retrenchment or under approved schemes - minimums and deemed compensation categories; (12) voluntary retirement payments - minimum of compensation received and Rs.5,00,000; (13-14) encashment of earned leave (central/state government employees: entire; others: restricted by formula and notified caps). Sub-section (2) provides cardinal rules for aggregation, inclusion of dearness allowance, deemed compensation definitions, employer/workman meanings (by reference to Industrial Disputes Act), and conditions for schemes qualifying under serial 12.

      Interpretation

      Legislative intent: The text aims to clarify which employee receipts are to be excluded from taxable salary income and to prescribe computation methods and ceilings. Interpretive principles evident: specificity (itemising categories), cross-referencing to other enactments for computation limits, limiting aggregation across years to prevent cumulative double benefit (A - B formula), and distinguishing government employees from others for certain benefits (e.g., leave encashment). The presence of formulas indicates intent to standardise computation rather than leave it to ad hoc interpretation.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      Carve-outs and conditions include:

      • Gratuity: When multiple gratuities are received in same tax year, aggregate deduction capped at A - B (A = notified limit; B = aggregate earlier exempt amounts).

      • Salary for purposes of certain entries includes dearness allowance if terms so provide, but excludes other allowances/perquisites.

      • Compensation items (10/11) include deemed compensation on closing down/transfer/less favourable terms, subject to categories (i)-(ii)(A)-(C).

      • Voluntary retirement (serial 12): subject to scheme governance (economic viability criteria), single-year allowance limitation and non-duplication if relief u/s 157 has been availed.

      • Leave encashment (serial 14): aggregation cap across employers for same tax year (A - B concept) and foregoing of other allowances for computation.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1 - Gratuity for non-statutory employer: An employee retires having received actual gratuity of Rs.600,000; Central Government notified limit is Rs.500,000; half-month salary per year formula yields Rs.480,000. Deduction allowed = minimum of (600,000; 500,000; 480,000) = Rs.480,000. (All numbers illustrative and consistent with the textual formula.)

      • Example 2 - Leave encashment (non-government employee): Earned leave cash equivalent = Rs.200,000; average monthly salary B = Rs.15,000 so A = 10 x B = Rs.150,000; notified limit - Not stated in the document. Deduction allowed = minimum of (200,000; 150,000; notified limit (Not stated in the document); actual payment received 200,000) = Rs.150,000 (subject to notified limit if lower).

      • Example 3 - Voluntary retirement: Compensation received Rs.800,000; deduction capped at minimum of (compensation; Rs.5,00,000) = Rs.5,00,000.

      Interplay

      The clause expressly interacts with:

      • Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (for statutory gratuity limits under serial 5).
      • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for definitions of employer/workman and calculations under retrenchment-compensation entries).
      • Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021 and Civil Pensions (Commutation) Rules (for pension commutation items).
      • Central Government notifications (for various notified limits referred to as A in aggregation formulas and for the schemes/specified institutions covered under serial 12 and serial 14 caps).

      Other rules/notifications/circulars are referenced in general; specific notification numbers or dates are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 19 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 [As Passed]andClause 19 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Old Version)

      • Ordering and textual phrasing: The As Passed version (Section 19) and the Old Bill (Clause 19) are substantially similar in structure and substantive content. Differences are primarily editorial and phrasing: Section 19 uses slightly different wording in some sub-clauses (for example, placement of clauses, punctuation and clause references such as "having regard to the age of the recipient, the state of his health, the rate of interest and officially recognised tables of mortality" appears integrated differently across clauses 8/8(a)-(b)). Practical impact: None substantial on tax outcomes; mainly drafting clarity improvements in the As Passed text.

      • References to statutory instruments and cross-references: Both documents reference similar Acts and Rules (Industrial Disputes Act, Payment of Gratuity Act, Civil Services pension rules etc.). The As Passed version expressly cites "Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021" in the same manner as the Old Bill, but some parenthetical and footnote-style phrasing is cleaner in the As Passed text. Practical impact: Minimal-no substantive change to the scope of exemptions or eligibility; the As Passed drafting reduces potential ambiguity in cross-references.

      • Computation formulas and examples: Both contain the same formulas (for gratuity/leave salary computation). The As Passed version appears to present the formula for gratuity (Amount = 1/2 (A x B)) with explicit labelling of A and B in the same way as the Old Bill; any minor variation is editorial. Practical impact: None to taxpayers' entitlement computations.

      • Conditions and provisos to serial numbers (e.g., serial 12 schemes and serial 14 aggregation limits): Both texts include the same conditional language, but the Old Bill contains some typographical or parenthetical variations (e.g., punctuation and bracket placements, "inter alia" vs "including, inter alia"). Practical impact: No substantive change in compliance obligations; possible marginal improvement in interpretive clarity in the As Passed text.

      • Terminology consistency: The As Passed text uses more standardised capitalization and consistent references (e.g., "Central Government" capitalised). Practical impact: Administrative/readability benefit; no change in legal effect.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must correctly classify receipts (gratuity, commuted pension, leave encashment, retrenchment compensation, VRS receipts). Misclassification risks incorrect claim and potential reassessment. Aggregation rules (A - B) require tracing of earlier years' exempt amounts - record retention and historical tax filings are necessary.
      • Record-keeping/evidence: Maintain employer letters, scheme documents, calculation sheets (average salary A, completed years B), notifications relied upon for Government limits, proof of prior exemptions claimed (to compute B in A - B), and pension/commutation tables used for determining commuted value.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 19 itemises 14 categories of salary-related receipts and prescribes the extent of deduction/exemption for each.
      • Standard deduction fixed at Rs.75,000 (s.202(1) cases) or Rs.50,000 otherwise.
      • Gratuity and leave encashment deductions are formula-driven and subject to notified caps and aggregation limits to prevent multiple claims across years.
      • Compensation on retrenchment and approved schemes may be fully exempt subject to minimum/notification constraints and qualifying scheme criteria.
      • Pension commutation rules specify fractions (one-third or one-half) and require actuarial commutation determinations (age, health, interest, mortality tables).
      • The clause relies heavily on cross-references to other statutes and Government notifications; those external instruments determine some caps and qualifying entities.
      • Taxpayers and employers must keep contemporaneous documentation and historical tax records to calculate allowable deductions under aggregation formulas.

       


      Full Text:

      Section 19 Deductions from salaries.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax