Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Detention and Confiscation of Inter-State Consignments: Territorial Limits on State GST Officers - J...
    Common Show Cause Notices across Multiple Financial Years: Scope of Sections 73 and 74 and Limitatio...
    Input Tax Credit Eligibility under the CGST Act: Supplier Tax Non-Payment and Recipient ITC Claims: ...
    Actionable Claims, Contingent Winnings and Gross Valuation in GST on Gaming Transactions
    Invocation of Extended Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act: Foundational Facts, Prima Facie ...
    Assignment of Leasehold Rights in Industrial Plots under the CGST Act: Distinguishing Lease Services...
    Service of GST Show Cause Notices and Orders through the Common Portal: Validity of Service, Hearing...
    News GST
    Bill-To Ship-To E-Way Bill Compliance, Portal Closure and Transit Controls: GST E-Way Bills: Rule 13...
    E-Way Bill Requirements Under Rule 138: GST E-Way Bill Framework for Movement of Goods, Transit Docu...
    Case Laws Customs
    Limits of Website Upload (of Notifications) as Notice for Delegated Legislation Where the Parent Sta...
    Case Laws Indian Laws
    Illegality of Arrest and Remand for Non-Supply of Written Grounds: The Two-Hour Pre-Remand Standard ...
    When Trademark Ownership Controversies Fall Outside Insolvency Adjudication: Application of the 'Nex...
    Locus Standi - Intervention by Homebuyer Societies in Insolvency Proceedings: Statutory Limits under...
    News Bill
    Rates of income-tax in respect of income liable to tax for the assessment year 2026-27 for the purpo...
    News Bill
    Tax rates under section 115BAC of the Income-tax Act, 1961
    News Bill
    Individual, HUF, association of persons, body of individuals, artificial juridical person.
    News Bill
    Co-operative Societies
    News Bill
    Firms
    News Bill
    Local authorities
    News Bill
    Companies
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Territorial GST jurisdiction limits detention and confiscation of inter-State consignments when the intercepting State lacks fiscal nexus.
Physical presence of goods in an intermediate State therefore does not alone create authority to detain, seize, penalise or confiscate. Cross-empowerment is functional and taxpayer-linked, preserving the single-interface administrative structure without creating geographically unlimited enforcement power. Where verification establishes that both origin and destination lie outside the intercepting State, the officer may verify documents, identify and record apparent discrepancies, and communicate them to the proper officers of the consignor and consignee, but lacks coercive jurisdiction over a pure transit supply.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Consolidated GST show cause notices may cover multiple financial years, while each demand component remains independently subject to limitation.
Sections 73 and 74 do not expressly bar a common show cause notice covering multiple tax periods or financial years. The expressions "for any period" and "such periods" support consolidation, while financial-year references in the limitation provisions govern the deadline for adjudication orders rather than the scope of notice issuance. Each component demand must independently satisfy applicable limitation requirements. Section 74 requires disclosed material supporting fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts to evade tax; its extended limitation is not automatic.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Supplier tax payment remains a substantive input tax credit condition, requiring reversal and allowing re-availment after compliance.
Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act makes actual payment of tax to the Government a substantive condition for input tax credit. The conditions under Section 16(2) operate cumulatively, and invoice reflection, receipt of supplies, or supplier return filing do not independently establish tax payment. Section 41 requires reversal of credit where the supplier has not paid tax, with re-availment allowed after payment. Rule 37A prescribes reversal and re-availment where the supplier fails to furnish the corresponding GSTR-3B within the prescribed period.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
GST valuation of stake-based gaming treats committed stakes as consideration for taxable actionable claims, irrespective of skill.
GST on stake-based gaming applies to the supply of actionable claims where money or money's worth is committed to an uncertain outcome in an organised betting or gambling arrangement. Skill in the underlying game does not remove the stake-based character of the transaction. Participants acquire contingent beneficial interests in pooled movable property, and committed stakes become consideration for participation. The platform is the supplier where it controls pooling, participation, gameplay and payouts. Gross stake valuation applies unless a statutory deduction is authorised, with specialised valuation mechanisms governing online gaming and casinos.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Extended GST limitation requires disclosed prima facie material linking tax shortfall to fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression.
Section 74 permits extended GST limitation only where available material supports a rational prima facie view that a tax shortfall, erroneous refund or wrongful credit arose by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. Final proof is not required at initiation, but suspicion or bare statutory labels are insufficient. Prior scrutiny, audit, inspection or pre-notice communications may provide the factual foundation if actually communicated and linked to the notice. The notice and final order must preserve fair opportunity, disclose the material basis, and remain within the grounds stated.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Complete assignment of industrial leasehold rights can fall outside GST when it transfers the entire proprietary estate.
A complete assignment of an industrial lessee's entire leasehold interest, together with the building on the plot, is distinguished from leasing, renting, or sub-leasing. Where the assignor retains no reversionary interest or continuing right to earn rent, the consideration is for transfer of proprietary rights constituting benefits arising out of land. Schedule II classification of an original lease as a service does not govern the subsequent absolute assignment. Section 7(2), read with Schedule III, excludes a qualifying transfer of immovable-property benefits from the scope of supply.
Case Laws GST
Show AI Summary
Common Portal service requires effective access to complete GST notices and orders, preserving hearing rights and appellate limitation.
GST service through the Common Portal is an express statutory mode, but portal availability must be distinguished from effective service of an adjudicatory communication. Rule 142 preserves the distinction between a substantive show cause notice or order and its electronic summary in FORM GST DRC-01 or DRC-07. Electronic summaries do not, without more, demonstrate communication of complete allegations, grounds, facts and reasons. Portal-based service must be assessed by statutory compliance, accessibility of the complete communication, and the taxpayer's real opportunity to respond, particularly where appellate limitation is involved.
News GST
Show AI Summary
E-way bill compliance strengthens traceability through Ship-To GSTIN capture, voluntary closure, and disciplined transit controls.
Rule 138 and Rule 138A require pre-movement e-way bill generation, carriage of the prescribed invoice or challan documents, and distance-based validity, with cancellation confined to cases where goods are not transported as declared. The portal advisory adds mandatory Ship-To GSTIN capture in Bill-To/Ship-To transactions and a voluntary post-delivery closure facility, while circular guidance treats transporter godowns as an additional place of business when declared by the recipient. Enforcement under Section 129 and Section 130 distinguishes detention for transit contravention from confiscation linked to intent to evade tax, and minor e-way bill defects are described as technical lapses rather than automatic proof of evasion.
Act Rules GST
Show AI Summary
E-way bill compliance under GST rules governs prior movement information, transit documents, validity, cancellation, and special goods regimes.
Rule 138 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 governs the e-way bill system for movement of goods and requires prior electronic information before movement begins in specified cases, generally where consignment value exceeds fifty thousand rupees. The rule allocates responsibility for Part A and Part B of FORM GST EWB-01 among registered persons, authorised transporters, e-commerce operators, courier agencies and fallback transporters, while also covering special cases such as job work, handicraft goods, consolidated movement and transport by road, rail, air or vessel. Rule 138A specifies the documents that must accompany the conveyance, Rule 138 provides validity, cancellation and exemption rules, and Rule 138F creates a special intra-State regime for notified precious goods.
Case Laws Customs
Show AI Summary
Import regulation: Gazette publication is required before a notification binds importers; website uploads do not suffice for enforceability.
Publication in the Official Gazette is a condition precedent to the enforceability of notifications under Section 3 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; website uploads cannot substitute for Gazette promulgation. Internal references to the "date of this Notification" must be read as the Gazette publication date, and where a notification incorporates paragraph 1.05(b) of the Foreign Trade Policy, transitional protection applies if its objective conditions (LC established before imposition, timely registration, shipment within validity) are satisfied.
Case Laws Indian Laws
Show AI Summary
Arrest communication: written grounds generally required; oral only temporarily, written copy at least two hours before remand.
The obligation to communicate grounds of arrest applies across statutes and, as a rule, must be met by supplying written grounds in a language the arrestee understands. In exceptional exigencies oral communication at arrest is permissible temporarily, but a written copy must be provided within a reasonable time and no later than two hours before production for remand; remand papers must include the grounds and explain any delay. Non compliance renders the arrest and remand illegal, though authorities may seek fresh custody after supplying written grounds with reasons for earlier non supply.
Case Laws IBC
Show AI Summary
Trademark ownership disputes in insolvency require a clear nexus to CIRP; complex title issues belong to full proceedings.
A disputed trademark cannot be declared an asset of the corporate debtor in summary CIRP proceedings absent a demonstrable nexus with insolvency; where title turns on contested private transactions and rival claims, the approved resolution plan governs stakeholders and summary disposition that effectively alters plan rights is impermissible. Avoidance conclusions require properly pleaded applications, material and notice; absent these safeguards, invoking preferential or undervalued transaction provisions in collateral proceedings violates natural justice.
Case Laws IBC
Show AI Summary
Homebuyer societies' intervention in insolvency is limited; representation must follow authorised representative routes post-admission.
Locus standi under the IBC is stage-sensitive: pre-admission proceedings are in personam and participation is confined to the applicant and corporate debtor, while post-admission proceedings are in rem and allow broader standing subject to statutory channels. Individual allottees recognised as financial creditors must be represented through the Code's authorised-representation mechanisms rather than by separate societies asserting membership rights, and inherent tribunal powers cannot create substantive participatory rights absent statutory basis.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Income-tax rates for assessment year 2026-27 remain unchanged; schedule placement for advance tax and salary TDS is preserved.
Tax rates for assessment year 2026-27 remain unchanged and continue to be prescribed either in specific sections of the Income-tax Act (including concessional regimes for domestic companies, cooperative societies and the alternate individual regime) or in the First Schedule. Rates formerly listed in Part III of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 2025 - used for advance tax computation, TDS from salaries and charging tax payable in certain cases - are reclassified as Part I of the First Schedule for AY 2026-27.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Tax rates under section 115BAC prescribe slab rates up to 30% with surcharge tiers and caps on dividend and capital gains.
Section 115BAC(1A) sets default slab rates for certain resident taxpayers ranging from nil up to 30% above Rs.24,00,000; these apply unless an option under section 115BAC(6) is exercised. Income-tax under clause (1A)(iii) is subject to surcharge tiers (10%, 15%, 25%) based on total-income thresholds, with the surcharge on dividend income and specified capital gains capped at 15% and a 15% cap also for associations of persons consisting only of companies. Marginal relief is available.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Individual tax rates set in the Finance Bill 2026: progressive slabs with higher nil thresholds for senior residents.
The Finance Bill 2026 prescribes progressive income-tax slabs for individuals, HUFs, associations of persons, bodies of individuals and artificial juridical persons: nil up to Rs. 2,50,000; 5% on Rs. 2,50,001-5,00,000; 20% on Rs. 5,00,001-10,00,000; 30% above Rs. 10,00,000; with higher nil thresholds for resident senior citizens (Rs. 3,00,000 for 60-79 years; Rs. 5,00,000 for 80+), and states these rates mirror the prior year.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Co-operative societies: the Finance Bill preserves the existing three-band income-tax rate structure (10%, 20%, 30%).
Specified income-tax rates for co-operative societies are set out in Paragraph B of Part I-A of the First Schedule to the Finance Bill. The Bill retains the existing three-band structure: 10% on income up to the first band, 20% on the middle band, and 30% on income above the top band, thereby preserving the prior rate structure for co-operative societies.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Firms' income-tax rate unchanged at 30% under the Finance Bill, specified in Paragraph C of Part I-A.
The Finance Bill specifies the income-tax rate for firms in Paragraph C of Part I A of the First Schedule, maintaining the rate at 30%.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Local authorities: income-tax rate remains 30% under Paragraph D of Part I-A of the First Schedule in the Finance Bill.
The Finance Bill specifies the income-tax rate for local authorities in Paragraph D of Part I-A of the First Schedule, fixing the rate at 30% and maintaining continuity for that taxpayer category.
News Bill
Show AI Summary
Union Budget corporate tax: 25% for smaller domestic firms, 30% generally, 35% for non-domestic, plus surcharge and 4% cess.
Domestic companies with turnover or gross receipts up to Rs. 400 crore are taxed at 25%; other domestic companies at 30%; non-domestic companies at 35% on income other than that chargeable at special rates. Surcharge rates are unchanged, with the surcharge not applying to income of a specified fund and with a 25% cap on surcharge for persons under the referenced preferential regime for income above Rs. 5 crore (excluding dividend income and certain capital gains). Marginal relief is provided where surcharge applies. A 4% Health and Education Cess applies on income-tax inclusive of surcharge, with no marginal relief for the cess.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Evolution of TDS on Interest on Securities : Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(i)] & 393(4)[Table: S.No. 6] of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 193 of Income Tax Act, 1961

21 June, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Clause 393 Tax to be deducted at source.

Income Tax Bill, 2025  

Introduction

The mechanism of Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) on interest on securities has long been a pivotal feature of the Indian income tax framework, serving as a tool for early tax collection and compliance monitoring. Section 193 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has, for decades, governed the deduction of tax on interest on securities paid to residents. With the introduction of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, there is a comprehensive attempt to consolidate, rationalize, and modernize TDS provisions. This commentary focuses on Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(i)] and Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 6] of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, providing a detailed analysis of their scope, operation, and implications, and compares them with the existing regime u/s 193 of the 1961 Act.

Objective and Purpose 

The legislative intent behind TDS provisions on interest on securities is threefold:

  1. Ensuring Advance Tax Collection: By mandating deduction at source, the law seeks to ensure that tax is collected at the earliest possible stage, reducing the risk of evasion or default.
  2. Widening the Tax Base: TDS acts as a check on the reporting of income, compelling both payers and recipients to account for such income in their returns.
  3. Administrative Efficiency: Centralizing the collection of tax at the point of payment simplifies compliance monitoring for the tax authorities.

The 2025 Bill aims to further these objectives by refining the categories of exempted payments, updating threshold limits, and harmonizing the language and structure of the law.

Detailed Analysis of Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(i)] and Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 6] of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

I. Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(i)] - TDS on Interest on Securities

  1. Scope of Coverage:
    The provision applies to "any person" responsible for paying to a resident "any income by way of interest on securities." This is a broad formulation, capturing all payers, irrespective of their status (government, company, institution, or individual), provided the payment is to a resident.
  2. Threshold Limit:
    The threshold for deduction is set at Rs. 10,000 in the aggregate during the tax year. No TDS is required if the total interest paid or credited does not exceed this amount.
  3. Rate and Timing:
    TDS is to be deducted at the "rates in force" at the time of credit or payment, whichever is earlier. This aligns with the general principle of TDS timing under the Act.
  4. Reference to Exemptions (Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 6]):
    The operation of this clause is subject to the exemptions enumerated in sub-section (4), which are critical for understanding the practical application of the TDS requirement.

II. Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 6] - Exemptions from TDS on Interest on Securities

This sub-section provides a table of circumstances where no TDS is required, specifically referencing S.No. 5(i) of the main table. The exemptions are as follows:

  1. Interest Payable on Specified Instruments:
    • National Development Bonds
    • Debentures issued by specified institutions, authorities, or persons as notified by the Central Government
    • Any security of the Central or State Government, other than:
      • 8% Savings (Taxable) Bonds, 2003
      • 7.75% Savings (Taxable) Bonds, 2018
      • Floating Rate Savings Bonds, 2020 (Taxable)
      • Any other security as notified by the Central Government
  2. Interest Payable to Specified Entities:
    • Life Insurance Corporation of India, in respect of securities owned or with full beneficial interest
    • General Insurance Corporation of India or any of the four companies formed under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972, in respect of securities owned or with full beneficial interest
    • Any other insurer, in respect of securities owned or with full beneficial interest
    • A "business trust", in respect of any securities, by a special purpose vehicle referred to in Schedule V (Table: Sl. No. 3)

Comparative Analysis with Section 193 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

1. Thresholds and Rates

  • Threshold: Both the 2025 Bill and Section 193 now prescribe a Rs. 10,000 threshold for deduction, reflecting an alignment and rationalization of limits.
  • Rate: Both refer to "rates in force," ensuring that TDS rates are dynamically linked to the prevailing rates as notified in the Finance Act or relevant notifications.

2. Scope and Wording

  • Payer: Both regimes apply to "any person" responsible for payment, maintaining a broad net.
  • Payee: The focus remains on payments to residents. Non-resident payments are governed by separate provisions (e.g., Section 195 in the 1961 Act; separate tables in the 2025 Bill).

3. Timing of Deduction

Both provisions require deduction at the earlier of credit or payment, including credit to suspense accounts. This is a critical anti-avoidance feature, ensuring that TDS cannot be deferred by crediting to intermediary accounts.

4. Exemptions and Carve-Outs

This area reveals both continuity and modernization:

  1. Instrument-Based Exemptions:
    • Both laws exempt interest on National Development Bonds, certain notified debentures, and most government securities, except for specified taxable bonds (8%, 7.75%, Floating Rate, or as notified).
    • The 2025 Bill consolidates these exemptions into a more streamlined table, referencing the power of the Central Government to notify further exemptions, mirroring the approach in Section 193.
  2. Entity-Based Exemptions:
    • Interest payable to LIC, GIC, specified insurers, and business trusts is exempt in both regimes, with wording modernized in the 2025 Bill for clarity and to reflect the evolution of financial products (e.g., explicit reference to "business trusts").
  3. Additional Exemptions in Section 193:
    • Section 193 contains some nuanced exemptions (e.g., for certain Gold Bonds held by individuals, subject to value limits and declarations) that are not expressly replicated in the 2025 Bill's main table, possibly reflecting the obsolescence of some instruments.
    • Section 193 includes a specific exemption for interest on debentures of widely held companies paid to individuals/HUFs (up to Rs. 10,000, paid by account payee cheque). The 2025 Bill appears to focus on "interest on securities" more generally, with such nuances likely subsumed under broader exemptions or addressed elsewhere.

5. Procedural and Compliance Aspects

  • Declaration for Non-Deduction: Both laws permit individuals and certain entities to file declarations for non-deduction if their estimated total income is below the taxable limit (Section 197A in the 1961 Act; Clause 393(6) in the 2025 Bill), though the procedural mechanics have been modernized in the Bill.
  • Reporting and Delivery: The 2025 Bill explicitly requires the payer to deliver the declaration to the tax authority by the 7th of the following month, emphasizing timely compliance.

6. Modernization and Rationalization

  • The 2025 Bill's approach is to consolidate and clarify, grouping exemptions and obligations in structured tables, and removing archaic references (e.g., to now-defunct bonds or obsolete procedural requirements).
  • The Bill provides for the Central Government's power to notify new exemptions, ensuring the law remains adaptable to changes in financial products and market realities.

7. Potential Ambiguities and Issues

  • Definition of "Interest on Securities": Both laws rely on the definition in the main Act, but as financial instruments evolve, the possibility of interpretative disputes remains (e.g., whether certain hybrid instruments qualify).
  • Overlap with Other Provisions: The Bill's structure attempts to minimize overlaps by clarifying precedence (e.g., if tax is deducted under one provision, it is not to be deducted again under another).
  • Notification Power: Both regimes vest significant discretion in the Central Government to notify further exemptions, which can lead to uncertainty if not exercised transparently and timeously.

Practical Implications

For Payers (Issuers of Securities, Government, Companies, etc.)

  • The Rs. 10,000 threshold simplifies compliance for small interest payments, reducing the administrative burden.
  • The need to track aggregate payments across the year, and to apply the correct rate at the right time, remains a key compliance obligation.
  • Entities paying interest on exempted instruments or to exempted entities must maintain proper documentation to justify non-deduction.
  • The obligation to process declarations for non-deduction and to report them to tax authorities is reinforced under the new regime.

For Recipients (Investors, Insurers, Trusts, Individuals)

  • Investors in exempt instruments or entities (e.g., LIC, GIC, business trusts) benefit from direct receipt of full interest without TDS, improving cash flows.
  • Individuals and HUFs with low income can avoid TDS by filing requisite declarations, though must ensure aggregate receipts do not exceed the taxable threshold.
  • Business trusts and insurers continue to enjoy favorable treatment, reflecting policy support for long-term savings and financial stability.

For Tax Authorities

  • The consolidation and simplification of exemptions and thresholds should improve monitoring and reduce disputes.
  • The explicit reporting requirements for declarations and the emphasis on timely deduction and deposit of TDS provide clearer audit trails.

Comparative Table: Key Features

Feature Section 193 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Clause 393(1)[Table: S.No. 5(i)] and Clause 393(4)[Table: S.No. 6]

of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

Threshold Rs. 10,000 (recently increased) Rs. 10,000
Rate Rates in force Rates in force
Exempt Instruments Detailed list, with periodic notifications Consolidated table, with notification power
Exempt Entities LIC, GIC, insurers, business trusts, etc. Same, with modernized language
Procedural Requirements Declarations, reporting, suspense account rule Declarations, reporting, suspense account rule
Modernization Layered, historical, some obsolete references Consolidated, streamlined, adaptable

Conclusion

The TDS regime on interest on securities, as updated in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, largely continues the policy and structural framework of Section 193 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, with notable improvements in clarity, consolidation, and adaptability. The alignment of threshold limits, the clear statement of exempted instruments and entities, and the emphasis on procedural compliance reflect a mature and responsive legislative approach. While the core principles remain unchanged, the 2025 Bill's structure is more user-friendly and future-proof, positioning the TDS framework to better handle the complexities of modern financial markets. Stakeholders should welcome the rationalization, though continued vigilance is required to ensure that the notification powers are exercised with transparency, and that the law adapts to evolving financial instruments without ambiguity.


Full Text:

Clause 393 Tax to be deducted at source.

Topics

Acts Income Tax