Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Act Rules Bills
    Condition under which losses can be carried forward and set off against future profits : Clause 119 ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Treatment of losses incurred in the activity of owning and maintaining race horses : Clause 115 of I...
    Act Rules Bills
    Structured mechanism for treatment of losses from specified businesses in Clause 114 of the Income T...
    Act Rules Bills
    Understanding the Tax Treatment of Speculation Losses in Clause 113 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sec...
    Act Rules Bills
    Legal Frameworks for losses and unabsorbed depreciation Carry Forward in Co-operative Bank Mergers a...
    Act Rules Bills
    Strategic Disinvestment and Tax Benefits in Clause 117 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 VS. Section 72AA...
    Act Rules Bills
    Analysis of Tax Provisions in Corporate Amalgamations Clause 116 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Se...
    Act Rules Bills
    Understanding the Business Loss Carry Forward Provisions in Clause 112 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Understanding the Carry Forward of House Property Losses in Clause 110 of Income Tax bill, 2025 Vs. ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Addresses the set-off of losses under various heads of income In Clause 109 of Income Tax Bill, 2025...
    Act Rules Bills
    Understanding Loss Set-Off or carry forward and set-off of losses in Clause 108 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Act Rules Bills
    Tax treatment of amounts borrowed or repaid through instruments like hundis in Clause 106 of the Inc...
    Act Rules Bills
    Taxation of Unexplained Expenditures in Clause 105 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 69C of Incom...
    Act Rules Bills
    Addressing the issue of undisclosed income through unexplained assets In Clause 104 of the Income Ta...
    Act Rules Bills
    Understanding the Legal Framework for Unexplained Investments in Clause 103 of the Income Tax Bill, ...
    Act Rules Bills
    A Deep Dive into Unexplained Asset in Clause 104 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 69A of Income ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Understanding Unexplained Investments Taxation in Clause 103 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 69...
    Act Rules Bills
    Curb tax evasion through Unexplained Credits (i.e. unaccounted money or fictitious entries in financ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Income Apportionment in AOPs and BOIs in Clause 309 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 67A of ...
    Act Rules Bills
    Comprehensive Analysis of Total Income in Clause 101 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 66 of ...
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Notes
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Loss carryforward restrictions: ownership or constitution changes can bar set-off unless continuity conditions and specified exceptions apply.
Clause 119 conditions the permissibility of carrying forward and setting off past losses where ownership or constitution changes occur: it denies set-off for losses attributable to retired or deceased partners upon firm reconstitution, disallows successors (other than by inheritance) from using predecessor losses, and restricts non-public companies from setting off prior losses after shareholding changes unless continuity conditions including original beneficial owner control or start-up safeguards are met; specified exceptions and ongoing compliance requirements are provided.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Ring fenced treatment of racehorse losses restricts cross setoff and permits carry forward only within the same activity.
Clause 115 creates a ring fenced regime: losses from the specified activity of owning and maintaining race horses cannot be set off against other income; unabsorbed losses may be carried forward and set off only against income from the same activity, subject to continuation of the activity and defined temporal limits and eligibility definitions.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Restriction on loss set-off: specified business losses may be offset only against profits of other specified businesses.
Losses from a specified business are restricted to set-off only against profits of other specified businesses in the same year; unabsorbed losses may be carried forward and set off exclusively against profits of specified businesses in subsequent years. The provision relies on defined terms for "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss," confines tax incentives to their intended category to prevent cross-business erosion of the tax base, and requires segregated record-keeping to ensure compliance.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Set-off of speculation losses confined to speculation profits; carry forward limited and prioritised before other allowances.
Clause 113 confines adjustment of losses from a speculation business to profits of another speculation business in the same year; permits carry forward of unabsorbed speculation losses to subsequent years for set off only against speculation business profits within a limited statutory period; requires that unabsorbed speculation losses be set off before certain carried forward allowances; and defines both speculation business (including a deeming rule for share trading to that extent) and specified exceptions to that classification.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Carry forward and set off of losses preserved for successor co operative banks, subject to specified conditions and penalties.
Successor co operative banks may set off predecessor accumulated business losses and unabsorbed depreciation in amalgamations as if the amalgamation had not occurred; in demergers directly related tax attributes transfer wholly to the resulting bank while non relatable attributes are apportioned by asset distribution. Application requires continuity of banking business, retention and use of fixed assets, and genuine continuation of operations; failure to meet conditions renders previously allowed set offs taxable in the year of non compliance. Clause 118 adds a Central Government power to prescribe further conditions to ensure genuine business purposes.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation: successor may utilise predecessor tax attributes subject to a limited carry forward period.
Clause 117 deems accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of specified predecessor entities to be those of the amalgamated entity when amalgamations involve banking companies, corresponding new banks, or government companies under Central Government sanctioned schemes, including cases following strategic disinvestment; successor entities may utilize these tax attributes in the year of amalgamation but are subject to a limited carry forward period and prescribed compliance and reporting requirements.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Treatment of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation allows continuity on corporate reorganisations subject to compliance conditions.
Clause 116 permits continuity of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation on amalgamation, demerger and related reorganisations by deeming the transferor's tax attributes to be those of the transferee or successor, subject to conditions such as asset retention and business continuity. It limits transfers in strategic disinvestment to amounts existing when public sector status ceased, allocates losses in demergers according to transferred undertakings or retained assets, extends treatment to successor entities including LLPs, and empowers the Central Government to prescribe conditions; non compliance attracts tax liabilities for successor entities.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Carry forward of business losses allows set off against future business income, prioritised before other carried allowances.
Clause 112 permits carry forward and set off of unabsorbed business losses-defined as losses under "Profits and gains of business or profession" excluding speculation losses-against future business or professional profits, mandates that such losses be set off before any other carried forward allowances, and limits the period during which losses may be carried forward, aligning with the existing temporal framework.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Carry forward of house property loss - allows head-specific set off against future house property income, time-limited.
Clause 110 permits unabsorbed losses under the head "Income from house property" to be carried forward and set off only against future income from the same head, subject to a statutory time limitation, and defines "unabsorbed loss from house property" as losses not set off against other income heads in the relevant year.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Set-off of losses: new limits bar using business and capital losses to reduce salary and other non-capital income.
Clause 109 permits set-off of losses under any income head except capital gains against income from other heads in the same year, subject to limits: business losses cannot be set off against salary income; house property losses are set off against other heads only up to a capped amount; and capital gains losses cannot be set off against non-capital income. The clause thus confines capital losses within their category and imposes head-specific restrictions requiring careful tax planning and record-keeping.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Set-off of losses under the same head: clarifies offset rules for capital and non-capital income, refining capital gains set-off.
Clause 108 permits set-off of a loss from any source against income from any other source under the same head (excluding capital gains), while treating capital gains losses separately: long-term capital losses may be set off only against other long-term capital gains, and short-term capital losses may be set off against gains from any capital asset, thereby requiring accurate classification of assets and records to effect permissible intra-head offsets.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Deemed income from informal credit instruments: non account payee transactions treated as taxable, prompting formalisation of payments.
Clause 106 and Section 69D deem amounts borrowed or repaid through hundis, negotiable instruments, or Board specified modes to be the income of the borrower or repayer when not transacted by account payee cheque, with provisions capturing interest where applicable and safeguards to prevent double taxation once an amount has been treated as income.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Unexplained expenditure treated as income increases tax exposure when taxpayers fail to satisfactorily explain expenditure sources.
Clause 105 deems unexplained expenditure as income when an assessee fails to provide a satisfactory explanation, confers evaluative power on the Assessing Officer to judge adequacy of explanations, and disallows any deduction for amounts so deemed; Section 69C operates similarly but uses permissive language and contains a deduction proviso, reflecting comparable objectives to prevent tax evasion while differing in textual strictness and potential administrative effect.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Unexplained asset rules now include virtual digital assets, expanding deeming powers where explanations are unsatisfactory.
Where an asset is unrecorded or its recorded amount is less than actual value and the assessee fails to provide a satisfactory explanation, Clause 104 and Section 69B treat the unexplained excess as deemed income for the year of discovery; Clause 104 expressly adds virtual digital assets, while both provisions vest the Assessing Officer with discretion to accept or reject explanations, creating valuation and verification challenges.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Unexplained investments treated as income when taxpayer fails to satisfactorily explain source, shifting burden to taxpayer and empowering assessing officer discretion.
Clause 103 deems unrecorded investments or amounts exceeding recorded investment as income if the assessee fails to provide a satisfactory explanation to the Assessing Officer; the provision places the evidential burden on the assessee and employs a deeming mechanism to include unexplained amounts in taxable income. Section 69B applies the same explanation-and-deeming approach to investments, bullion, jewellery and other valuable articles where recorded amounts are less than actual expenditure, relying on Assessing Officer evaluation to determine whether excess amounts are to be treated as income.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Unexplained assets treated as deemed income: inclusion of virtual digital assets broadens taxable asset coverage and disclosure obligations.
Clause 104 deemsthe value of assets not recorded, or under recorded, in an assessee's books to be taxable income where the assessee fails to provide a satisfactory explanation; it expressly includes virtual digital assets and places onus on the assessee to prove the nature and source, leaving determination of adequacy to the Assessing Officer.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Unexplained investments deemed income under deeming provision; imposes explanation burden and increased tax scrutiny on taxpayers.
Clause 103 treats investments not recorded in the assessee's books, and amounts exceeding recorded investments, as unexplained unless the assessee provides a satisfactory explanation; such unexplained investments are deemed income for the relevant tax year, subject to the Assessing Officer's evaluation under the clause's deeming provision.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Unexplained credits: dual-party explanation requirement leads to inclusion of unexplained book credits as taxable income.
Unexplained credits are chargeable to income when sums in an assessee's books lack satisfactory explanation, with the assessing officer determining adequacy. Loans and borrowings require satisfactory explanations from both the assessee and the creditor; share application money, share capital and share premium in closely held companies similarly demand corroboration from the company and the named contributor. Venture capital funds and companies receive a specific exemption, while the provision overall increases recordkeeping and evidentiary burdens and enhances tax authority scrutiny.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Income apportionment in AOPs and BOIs: structured deduction and allocation of member remuneration and interest for tax computation.
Both Clause 309 and Section 67A set out a structured method for computing a member's share in an AOP/BOI: deduct interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration from total AOP/BOI income, apportion the residual among members by entitlement and treat apportioned shares under the same heads of income; where apportioned results are profitable the remuneration is added back, and where loss it is adjusted; interest on capital borrowed by a member for investment is deductible under Profits and gains of business or profession; "paid" means actually paid or incurred per the accounting method used.
Act Rules Bills
Show AI Summary
Total income aggregation requires inclusion of exempt receipts to protect the tax base and prevent erosion through exclusions.
Clause 101 mandates that computation of Total income include income exempt under the identified sub part of Chapter provisions, converting such exempt receipts into an affirmative component of total income to protect the tax base and prevent erosion from otherwise excluded income streams.

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Notes

Back

All TMI Notes

Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Comprehensive Review of the Tonnage Tax Scheme : Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961

10 May, 2025

Contents
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Clause 226 Tonnage tax scheme.

Income Tax Bill, 2025

1. Introduction

Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961 both address the computation and taxation of income for shipping companies under the specialized "tonnage tax scheme." The tonnage tax regime represents a significant policy choice, designed to encourage the growth and competitiveness of the Indian shipping industry by providing a simplified and predictable method of income computation, distinct from the traditional net profit-based taxation.

This commentary provides a comprehensive analysis of Clause 226(7), including its context, objectives, detailed provisions, practical implications, and a comparative evaluation with the existing Section 115VF. The analysis draws attention to the legislative intent, interpretive nuances, and possible areas of convergence and divergence between the two regimes.

2. Objective and Purpose

2.1 Legislative Intent

The core objective of both Clause 226(7) and Section 115VF is to provide a favorable and simplified tax regime for shipping companies, recognizing the unique nature of their business operations. The tonnage tax scheme (TTS) enables qualifying shipping companies to compute their taxable income based on the net tonnage of ships operated, rather than on actual profits, thereby offering certainty, reducing compliance burden, and enhancing international competitiveness.

This approach aligns with international best practices, especially in jurisdictions with significant maritime interests, and is a response to the global mobility of shipping operations. The legislative intent is to make India an attractive base for shipping companies, reduce the risk of profit shifting, and ensure a stable revenue stream for the exchequer.

2.2 Policy Considerations and Historical Background

The tonnage tax regime was first introduced in India through Chapter XII-G (Sections 115V to 115VZC) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, effective from assessment year 2005-06. The regime was modeled after similar schemes in Europe and Asia, aiming to arrest the declining trend of Indian ships in global trade and to counter the flight of shipping companies to more tax-friendly jurisdictions.

The Income Tax Bill, 2025 seeks to modernize and consolidate tax provisions, including those relating to tonnage tax, and Clause 226(7) is part of this effort to provide clarity and continuity to the shipping sector.

3. Detailed Analysis of Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

3.1 Structure and Key Provisions

Clause 226(7) reads as follows:

Subject to the other provisions of this Part,-
  1. the tonnage income, shall be-
    1. computed as per section 227; and
    2. deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession"; and
  2. the relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) shall not be chargeable to tax.

This provision is embedded within a comprehensive framework (Clause 226(1)-(6)), which sets out the scope, eligibility, and procedural requirements of the tonnage tax scheme. Sub-clause (7) specifically addresses the computation and taxability of "tonnage income" and the exemption of "relevant shipping income."

3.2 Breakdown and Interpretation

  • Computation as per Section 227:

    Clause 226(7)(a)(i) mandates that the "tonnage income" must be computed in accordance with Section 227. Although Section 227 is not reproduced here, it is expected to lay down the methodology for calculating notional income based on net tonnage, similar to the detailed computation mechanism u/s 115VG of the 1961 Act. This ensures that the tonnage tax scheme remains formulaic and not profit-based.

  • Deemed Profits:

    Clause 226(7)(a)(ii) provides that the tonnage income so computed shall be deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession." This legal fiction is critical, as it allows the tonnage income to be taxed under the regular business income head, while separating it from actual accounting profits. This approach simplifies tax administration and provides certainty to taxpayers.

  • Exclusion of Relevant Shipping Income:

    Clause 226(7)(b) stipulates that "the relevant shipping income referred to in section 228(1) shall not be chargeable to tax." This means that once a shipping company opts for the tonnage tax scheme, and its income is computed on a notional basis, the actual income derived from shipping operations (as defined in Section 228(1)) is excluded from the tax base, preventing double taxation and ensuring the integrity of the tonnage tax regime.

3.3 Legislative Safeguards

Clause 226(7) is "subject to the other provisions of this Part," indicating that the computation and exemption are not absolute but are contingent on compliance with the broader eligibility, option, and procedural requirements set out in the preceding and succeeding clauses. This includes the need for a valid option (as per Section 231), qualifying ship criteria, and the separation of tonnage tax business from other activities.

3.4 Ambiguities and Interpretive Issues

While the language of Clause 226(7) is largely clear, potential ambiguities may arise concerning:

  • The precise scope of "relevant shipping income" u/s 228(1), especially if the definition is expanded or altered from the 1961 Act.
  • Interaction with other tax provisions, such as Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) or provisions relating to international shipping income.
  • Procedural safeguards to prevent abuse or misclassification of income.

4. Practical Implications

4.1 Impact on Stakeholders

  • Shipping Companies:

    The tonnage tax scheme continues to offer shipping companies a predictable, low-compliance, and competitive tax regime. By taxing notional income based on net tonnage, companies are insulated from volatile profits and complex accounting adjustments. The exclusion of actual relevant shipping income from tax further incentivizes participation in the scheme.

  • Tax Authorities:

    The regime simplifies tax administration, reduces litigation over allowable expenses and depreciation, and provides a stable revenue stream. However, tax authorities must remain vigilant against attempts to misclassify income or artificially inflate qualifying tonnage.

  • Regulators and Policy Makers:

    The continuity of the tonnage tax regime signals policy stability, which is critical for long-term investment decisions in shipping. However, there remains a need for periodic review to ensure that the scheme remains aligned with international developments and does not become a vehicle for tax avoidance.

4.2 Compliance and Procedural Aspects

Companies must ensure strict compliance with the eligibility conditions, option procedures, and record-keeping requirements. The separation of tonnage tax business from other activities requires robust internal controls and accounting segregation. Any deviation may result in loss of scheme benefits and reversion to standard profit-based taxation.

5. Comparative Analysis with Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961

5.1 Textual Comparison

Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961 states:

Subject to the other provisions of this Chapter, the tonnage income shall be computed in accordance with section 115VG and the income so computed shall be deemed to be the profits chargeable under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" and the relevant shipping income referred to in sub-section (1) of section 115V-I shall not be chargeable to tax.

A side-by-side comparison reveals that Clause 226(7) essentially mirrors the substance of Section 115VF, with only minor differences in cross-references (i.e., Section 227 vs. Section 115VG; Section 228(1) vs. Section 115V-I(1)), which are a result of the restructuring and renumbering in the new Bill.

5.2 Substantive Parity

  • Computation Mechanism:

    Both provisions anchor the computation of tonnage income to a separate section (Section 227/115VG), which prescribes the detailed methodology. The legal fiction of "deemed profits" is maintained in both, ensuring continuity in the tax treatment.

  • Exclusion of Actual Shipping Income:

    Both provisions categorically exclude the actual "relevant shipping income" from tax once the tonnage tax scheme is opted for, thereby avoiding double taxation and maintaining the integrity of the notional income approach.

  • Conditional Applicability:

    The phrase "subject to the other provisions of this Part/Chapter" is present in both, underscoring that the benefit is not unconditional but subject to compliance with eligibility, option, and procedural requirements.

5.3 Differences and Evolution

  • Reorganization and Modernization:

    The Income Tax Bill, 2025 reorganizes and modernizes tax provisions, including tonnage tax, for clarity and accessibility. While the substantive content is unchanged, the new structure may facilitate easier reference and compliance.

  • Potential for Expanded Definitions:

    The Bill provides an opportunity to update definitions and computation methods to reflect changes in shipping practices (e.g., inclusion of inland vessels, slot/space charters). Any such changes would be reflected in the cross-referenced sections (Section 227, 228), and not in Clause 226(7) directly.

5.4 International Context and Comparison

The Indian tonnage tax regime, as reflected in both the 1961 Act and the 2025 Bill, is consistent with international models prevalent in the UK, EU, Singapore, and other maritime jurisdictions. The legal fiction of "deemed profits" and the exclusion of actual income are standard features globally, designed to provide certainty and prevent disputes over expense allocation and transfer pricing.

5.5 Potential Issues and Conflicts

  • Interaction with Other Tax Provisions:

    Issues may arise regarding the interaction of tonnage tax provisions with MAT, transfer pricing, or anti-avoidance rules. The legislative framework must ensure that the notional nature of tonnage income is respected across other tax computations.

  • Ambiguity in Definitions:

    Any change in the definition of "qualifying ship," "relevant shipping income," or "operating a ship" could have significant implications. The Bill's approach to these definitions must be carefully harmonized with the intent and structure of the tonnage tax regime.

6. Conclusion

Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a continuation and reaffirmation of the tonnage tax regime for shipping companies, as established under Section 115VF of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The provision maintains the core features of notional income computation, legal fiction of deemed profits, and exclusion of actual shipping income, thereby ensuring policy continuity and stability for the shipping sector. The restructuring in the Bill does not alter the substantive rights or obligations of taxpayers but may enhance clarity and compliance.

For stakeholders, the regime remains attractive and internationally competitive, but careful attention must be paid to compliance, evolving definitions, and the interaction with other tax provisions. Periodic review and judicial clarification may be warranted to address emerging issues and to ensure that the regime continues to serve its intended purpose without being susceptible to abuse.


Full Text:

Clause 226 Tonnage tax scheme.

Topics

Acts Income Tax