Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    competitive taxation structure for shipping companies : Clause 228(14) and (15) of the Income Tax Bi...
    Simplified and concessionary method of taxation based on the net tonnage of qualifying ships, rather...
    computation of tonnage income where ships are jointly operated or where multiple companies are invol...
    Computation of Taxable income of the shipping companies based on Tonnage: Clause 227(1)-(6) of the I...
    Comprehensive Review of the Tonnage Tax Scheme : Clause 226(7) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Sect...
    Presumptive Taxation for Shipping Companies : Clause 226(2)-(6) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 and Sec...
    Examination of "Qualifying Ship" : Clause 235(i) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115VD of t...
    Defining the Qualifying Company under India's Tonnage Tax Regime : Clause 235(h) of the Income Tax B...
    Continuity and Change in India's Tonnage Tax Regime : Clause 226(1) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Navigating Special Tax Regimes for Shipping : Clause 225 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 11...
    Interpreting Special Provisions for Shipping Companies : Clause 235 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs....
    Special Tax Regimes for Investment Funds : Clause 224 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115UB of ...
    special taxation regime for business trusts such as (REITs)/(InvITs) Clause 223 of the Income Tax Bi...
    Special Provisions Relating to Pass-Through Entities in Venture Capital Structures : Clause 222 of I...
    Enforcement and Recovery of Tax on Accreted Income : Clause 352(8) & (9) of the Income Tax Bill, 202...
    Changing Landscape of Interest on Delayed Payment of Tax on Accreted Income : Clause 352(7) of Incom...
    Reforming the Exit Tax Regime for non-profit organizations (NPOs) or charitable institutions : Claus...
    Comprehensive Review of Taxation, Reporting, and Compliance for Securitisation Trusts : Clause 221 o...
    Definitions, Scope, and Impact on the MAT/AMT Regime : Clause 206(19) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 V...
    Reducing tax avoidance by curbing the excessive use of deductions and exemptions by corporate and se...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Allocation of shared costs and depreciation: apportionment on reasonable basis and fair proportion affects tonnage tax computations.
    Clause 228(14) requires common costs attributable to the tonnage tax business to be allocated on a reasonable basis, with taxpayers maintaining records to support apportionment. Clause 228(15) requires depreciation for assets other than qualifying ships to be apportioned on a fair proportion determined by the Assessing Officer with reference to actual use. Both provisions mirror Section 115VJ, vesting discretion in the AO and preserving the objective of preventing tax arbitrage while increasing documentation and compliance burdens.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax regime: clarifies qualifying shipping income, market value inter company valuation, and related party anti avoidance adjustments.
    Tonnage tax applies to qualifying shipping income measured by net tonnage, defined as profits from specified core shipping activities and prescribed incidental activities; incidental income above a prescribed threshold is excluded. Inter business transfers must be computed at market value, with assessing officer power to use reasonable bases in exceptional cases. Related party arrangements producing more than ordinary profits may be adjusted to reasonable levels. The Central Government may exclude activities or set limits by notification subject to parliamentary laying. Losses in tonnage computation are ignored.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Allocation of tonnage income: proportional or independent computation affects tax treatment of jointly operated qualifying ships.
    Computation of tonnage income for jointly operated qualifying ships follows a two-step approach: where participating companies' shares are definite and ascertainable, income is allocated proportionately to each company; where shares are not definite and ascertainable, tonnage income for each operator is computed as if it were the sole operator. The rule aligns taxation with economic interest, creates documentary and compliance incentives, functions as an anti-avoidance measure, and may interact with cross-border tax rules, requiring clearer guidance on "definite and ascertainable" shares and documentation standards.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax regime: ships' taxable income computed by daily tonnage rates and aggregation, excluding deductions.
    Clause 227(1)-(6) prescribes a ship wise tonnage tax: each qualifying ship's tonnage income equals its daily tonnage income multiplied by qualifying days, with daily rates set by a four tier slab linked to certified net tonnage. Tonnage includes certified physical tonnage and prescribed deemed tonnage for slot and sharing arrangements, rounded to the nearest hundred tons. A non obstante clause bars any deductions or set offs, making the computed tonnage income the exclusive tax base under the Part.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax scheme: deemed tonnage income treated as business profits, excluding actual shipping income under eligibility conditions.
    Clause 226(7) mandates that tonnage income be computed under a separate formulaic provision and be deemed to be the profits chargeable under business income, while expressly excluding the actual "relevant shipping income" from tax once the tonnage computation applies; these effects are conditional on compliance with the Part's eligibility, option, separation, and record keeping requirements.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax scheme: elective presumptive taxation for shipping income, requiring separate accounting and exclusive computation under qualifying criteria.
    The tonnage tax scheme is an elective presumptive regime requiring eligible companies operating qualifying ships to compute profits from that business exclusively under the tonnage basis; the tonnage tax business is treated as a separate business with independent computation and accounting, and companies not opting or ineligible must compute shipping profits under the normal provisions of the Act.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Qualifying ship definition governs tonnage tax eligibility by tying registration, certification, and operational use to tax benefit access.
    The definition of qualifying ship in Clause 235(i) requires three operative conditions for tonnage tax eligibility: a minimum net tonnage, registration under the relevant shipping statute or an authorised foreign licence, and a valid certificate evidencing net tonnage. It lists explicit exclusions-vessels providing services normally provided on land, fishing vessels, factory ships, pleasure crafts, harbour and river ferries, offshore installations-and disqualifies vessels used for fishing beyond a specified threshold in a tax year, anchoring eligibility in maritime regulatory certification and operational use.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Place of effective management central to qualifying company status, restricting tonnage tax benefits to genuinely India-managed shipping firms.
    The qualifying company for the tonnage tax regime must satisfy four cumulative conditions: be an Indian company; have its place of effective management in India-defined to include decisions made by executives as well as the board; own at least one qualifying ship; and have its main object as operating ships. Clause 235(h) consolidates these criteria within a broader definitional framework and references updated maritime legislation to clarify eligibility and reduce interpretive disputes.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax eligibility defined by operation status: owners and charterers qualify, long term bareboat lessors excluded.
    Clause 226(1) treats a company as operating a ship or inland vessel if it owns or charters a vessel, including partial charters such as slot, space, or joint charters, and excludes companies that have chartered out vessels on bareboat charter or bareboat charter cum demise terms for periods exceeding three years, thereby distinguishing operational risk bearing operators from passive, long term financiers for purposes of the tonnage tax scheme.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax regime: option to compute shipping income on a tonnage basis with deeming treatment as business profits.
    Clause 225 creates a self-contained tonnage tax regime for companies operating qualifying ships, allowing an option to compute income under its Part with a deeming provision treating that income as profits and gains of business; key operational questions concern the definition of qualifying ships, the option's exercise and lock-in mechanics, and interaction with loss set-off, allowances, and other tax measures.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tonnage tax definitions: expanded, self-contained eligibility rules broaden coverage and tighten residency and exclusion tests.
    Clause 235 consolidates and expands tonnage tax definitions by explicitly including inland vessels, embedding a detailed qualifying company test requiring Indian residency, ownership of qualifying ships, principal shipping business, and a specified place of effective management; it also defines qualifying ship with tonnage, registration/licensing and certification requirements and enumerated exclusions to prevent abuse.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation preserves investor-level tax treatment of investment fund income while ring-fencing fund-level losses.
    Clause 224 restates a pass-through regime: income from investments in a regulated fund is taxed in the hands of unit holders as if held directly, while business income remains taxable at the fund level. Business losses are ring fenced at the fund; other losses pass through subject to holding period conditions and transitional attribution of legacy losses to unit holders. Income retained by the fund is deemed credited to unit holders at year end and prescribed statements must be furnished to unit holders and tax authorities to secure transparency and enforcement.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation for business trusts preserves income character and shifts tax consequences to unit holders with reporting duties.
    The clause establishes a statutory pass-through mechanism under which income distributed by business trusts is deemed to retain its original character and proportion in the hands of unit holders, while subjecting the trust's total income to tax at the maximum marginal rate subject to specified withholding provisions; it also deems certain scheduled categories of distributed income taxable on distribution, carves out specified statutory exceptions, and imposes prescribed reporting obligations on payers to unit holders and tax authorities.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation of venture capital income taxes investors as if invested directly, with reporting and deemed-credit safeguards.
    Pass-through taxation requires that income arising to investors from venture capital companies or funds be taxed in the investor's hands as if invested directly, with the fund and payer furnishing prescribed statements to investors and tax authorities; undistributed income is deemed credited to investors at year-end in proportion to entitlement, while income already included on an accrual basis is not taxed again on actual payment; specified investment funds are excluded and key terms are defined in the schedule.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Tax on accreted income: transferees and officers may be deemed assessees in default, with liability limited to asset value.
    Clause 352(8) deems the specified person (NPO) and its principal officer or trustee to be assessee in default for unpaid tax on accreted income and applies all recovery provisions of the Act; it also deems a transferee of assets in specified dissolution cases to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. Clause 352(9) limits the transferee's liability to the extent the asset received is capable of meeting the liability, ensuring proportionality in recovery.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Accreted income interest compels prompt tax payment and creates joint personal liability for trustees and principal officers.
    Clause 352(7) imposes simple interest for delayed payment of tax on accreted income, with joint and several liability on the specified person and the principal officer or trustee; interest is computed monthly (any part-month treated as a full month) using an explicit formula, and liable persons are deemed assessee in default to enable statutory recovery mechanisms.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Exit tax on accreted income expands triggers and fixes final levy after prescribed valuation and procedural safeguards.
    A tax on accreted income charges NPOs additional income tax at the maximum marginal rate when specified events occur; accreted income equals aggregate fair market value of assets less total liabilities on a specified date, computed under prescribed valuation methods, with exclusions as prescribed. The Assessing Officer must afford a hearing before ordering tax, the bill sets a detailed table of triggering events and payment timelines, and the tax payment is final with no further credit or deduction allowed.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Pass-through taxation for securitisation trust income preserves investor-level taxation while mandating reporting and deemed-accrual rules.
    Clause 221 establishes a pass-through taxation regime for income from securitisation trusts, preserving the character and proportion of underlying income in the hands of investors, deeming unpaid accruals as credited on the last day of the tax year to prevent deferral, requiring prescribed statements to investors and tax authorities, and preventing double taxation by excluding income already taxed on accrual from subsequent inclusion on actual payment.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Minimum alternate tax definitions shape MAT/AMT computation and Ind AS transition treatment, narrowing tax arbitrage opportunities.
    Clause 206(19) supplies granular definitions aligning MAT/AMT computation with Ind AS convergence, insolvency law and cross statutory terms. Key terms include adjudicating authority (IBC), convergence date, transition amount with specified exclusions, net worth, company classifications, securities, tribunal, unit (IFSC) and year of convergence. These definitions phase in Ind AS transition impacts, harmonize tax and insolvency treatment, clarify eligibility for concessional AMT rates, and reduce tax arbitrage and interpretive disputes compared with the narrower definitions in Section 115JF.
    Act RulesBills
    Show AI Summary
    Minimum alternate tax exclusions: narrow MAT/AMT to specified taxpayers including life insurers, alternative regime opters, presumptive and small taxpayers.
    Clause 206(18) narrows MAT/AMT applicability by exempting companies with life insurance income, taxpayers who opt for specified alternative tax regimes, persons taxed under special or presumptive computation sections, specified funds identified in the Schedule, and non corporate persons whose adjusted total income falls below the statutory threshold; the exclusions reflect sectoral accounting differences, aim to promote concessional regimes and financial competitiveness, and reduce compliance burdens while requiring clear definitions and anti abuse safeguards.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Structured mechanism for treatment of losses from specified businesses in Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Comparison with Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      10 April, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 114 Set off and carry forward of losses from specified business.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, both address the treatment of losses from specified businesses. These statutory provisions are crucial for taxpayers engaged in certain business activities, as they determine how losses can be offset against profits and carried forward to future tax years. Understanding the nuances of these provisions is essential for legal practitioners and taxpayers alike, as they impact tax planning and compliance. Clause 114 is a proposed update in the Income Tax Bill, 2025, aiming to refine the rules regarding the set-off and carry forward of losses from specified businesses. Section 73A, on the other hand, has been part of the Indian tax landscape since its insertion by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009, effective from April 1, 2010. This commentary explores the objectives, implications, and practical applications of these provisions, highlighting the differences and similarities between them.

      Objective and Purpose

      The primary objective of both Clause 114 and Section 73A is to provide a structured mechanism for the treatment of losses incurred in specified businesses. These provisions ensure that losses from such businesses are not indiscriminately set off against profits from other sources, thereby maintaining a level of integrity in tax calculations and preventing potential revenue loss to the government. Clause 114 aims to align with contemporary business practices and economic realities by updating the framework for loss set-off and carry forward. It seeks to provide clarity and consistency in the treatment of specified business losses, ensuring that taxpayers engaged in these businesses can plan their tax obligations with certainty. Section 73A was introduced to address similar concerns, providing a clear framework for the treatment of losses from specified businesses u/s 35AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This section was designed to promote investment in certain sectors by offering tax incentives, while also ensuring that the benefits are applied consistently across taxpayers.

      Detailed Analysis

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      1. Set-off of Losses:- Clause 114(1) stipulates that any loss computed from a specified business during a tax year can only be set off against profits and gains from another specified business in the same tax year. This provision restricts the set-off to within the same category of business, preventing cross-category adjustments.

      2. Carry Forward of Unabsorbed Losses:- Unabsorbed losses from specified businesses can be carried forward to subsequent tax years. These losses can only be set off against profits from specified businesses in future years. This ensures continuity in the treatment of losses and allows businesses to utilize losses over time.

      3. Definitions:- Clause 114(3) defines key terms such as "specified business" and "unabsorbed loss from the specified business." The definition of "specified business" refers to activities listed in Section 46, while "unabsorbed loss" refers to losses not fully set off in the current tax year.

      Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

      1. Set-off of Losses:- Similar to Clause 114, Section 73A(1) states that losses from specified businesses can only be set off against profits from other specified businesses. This maintains the integrity of tax calculations by restricting set-offs within the same business category.

      2. Carry Forward of Unabsorbed Losses:- Section 73A(2) allows for the carry forward of unabsorbed losses to future assessment years. These losses can be set off against profits from specified businesses in subsequent years, with provisions for further carry forward if necessary.

      3. Reference to Section 35AD:- Section 73A specifically refers to specified businesses u/s 35AD, which includes capital-intensive sectors like infrastructure, cold chain facilities, and warehousing for agricultural produce. This linkage emphasizes the intention to promote investment in these sectors through targeted tax incentives.

      Practical Implications

      The provisions in both Clause 114 and Section 73A have significant implications for businesses engaged in specified activities. By restricting the set-off of losses to within the same category of business, these provisions prevent the erosion of tax bases through cross-business adjustments.

      This ensures that tax incentives are applied consistently and transparently. For taxpayers, understanding these provisions is crucial for effective tax planning. Businesses must maintain accurate records of profits and losses for each specified business, ensuring compliance with the set-off and carry forward rules. Failure to adhere to these rules can result in penalties and increased tax liabilities.

      Comparative Analysis

      While Clause 114 and Section 73A share similar objectives and structures, there are notable differences:

      1. Scope of Specified Business:- Clause 114 refers to "specified business" as defined in Section 46 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, whereas Section 73A refers to businesses u/s 35AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961. This difference in scope may lead to variations in the businesses covered under each provision.

      2. Legislative Context:- Clause 114 is part of a broader effort to update and streamline the Income Tax Act, reflecting changes in the economic and business landscape. Section 73A, however, was introduced as part of specific tax incentives for capital-intensive sectors.

      3. Potential for Future Amendments:- As a proposed bill, Clause 114 may undergo changes during the legislative process, potentially altering its provisions or scope. Section 73A, being an established part of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is more stable but may still be subject to amendments through Finance Acts.

      Conclusion

      Clause 114 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 73A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, play vital roles in the tax treatment of specified business losses. By providing clear rules for the set-off and carry forward of these losses, they ensure the consistent application of tax incentives and prevent revenue loss through indiscriminate adjustments. While both provisions share similar objectives, the differences in scope and legislative context highlight the need for careful analysis and understanding by taxpayers and legal practitioners. As the Income Tax Bill, 2025, progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders should remain vigilant for potential changes that may impact the application of Clause 114.


      Full Text:

      Clause 114 Set off and carry forward of losses from specified business.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax