Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1982 (6) TMI 93

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... said to be a question of law arising out of the Tribuanal's consolidated order dt 20th March, 1982 in ITA Nos. 239 240 and 674/ Chandi /80 to the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee was the owner of only 1/3rd share in the Chandigarh property during the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ok the assessee's share at 78% and that of his wife at 22% the basis for which was their contribution towards investment on the construction of the said building. According to the assessee, he threw his share as long as on 20th November, 1970 in the common potch of his HUF and then had an oral family settlement between him, his wife and son, according to which they agreed to be equal shares as ten....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... yr. 1973-74 his assessment in respect of 1/3 rd share of the said property income was made as a substantive assessment. 5. The dispute of share in the said property was carried in a civil court by Smt. Satwant Kaur and Sh. Deshvir Singh on 19th May, 1973 and the same came to be adjudicated by the Addl. Sub Judge Class III, Patiala, on 14th June, 1973 who held that Smt. Satwant Kaur and Sh. Des....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the question whether the decree of a Civil Court is collusive and as the revenue could not prove that the same is collusive the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the assessee's share was only 1/3rd. 7. At the time when this reference application came to be heard, the ld. Deptl. Rep. Mrs. Sudha Sharma without coming out for any reasons asked for adjournment but the ld. counsel for the assess....