Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1984 (3) TMI 141

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rmination of this issue, the facts which are relevant and have to be taken into consideration lie in a narrow compass as under. 2. The assessee is admittedly a co-operative society having the business of banking. In other words, it is a banking co-operative society and the income from this business of the assessee is exempt under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'). During the previous year which ended on 30-6-1978, the assessee debited to its account a sum of Rs. 30,000 as provision for loss from bad and doubtful debts. When the assessment was taken up by the ITO, he added back this sum in computing the taxable total income of the assessee as the assessee had income from miscellaneous receipts shown in the profi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....other hand, the learned departmental representative contended that this is a case where the assessee has to prove that it is engaged in carrying on the business from which the income is exempt and since there are heads of income other than the income which is exempt, the disallowance made by the authorities below and added to the taxable income has full justification in view of the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Central Land Mortgage Bank Ltd. v. CIT [1975] 100 ITR 472. 6. After careful consideration of the rival submissions and on perusal of the authority cited on behalf of the revenue, I find no justification for what has been done by the authorities below. The reasons for this are ....