1982 (9) TMI 99

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st. yr. 1978-79, the previous year of which ended on 31st March, 1978. 2. The only ground taken in this appeal states that the CIT(A) erred in setting aside the ITO's order granting relief u/s 80J of the IT Act, 1961, and directing the ITO to recompute the relief in the light of the Supreme Court decision to be delivered in future. 3. The assessee is a private limited company. It was entitle....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with the contention of the assessee and set aside the decision of the ITO on the point with a direction to compute the relief u/s 80J in accordance with the final decision of the Supreme Court, which was expected very shortly. 5. Shri D.R. Chawla, the ld. representative for the department, urged that the CIT(A) erred in its decision. According to him, the CIT(A) should have decided the matter ....