Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1982 (8) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....O exercised his jurisdiction under s. 154 of the Act for rectification of his order. Accordingly, he rectified the assessment which resulted in enhancement of the assessment, in views of the fact that the ITO withdrew the deduction of Rs. 2,695 as income resulting in a loss and Rs. 3,569 paid on account of brokerage allowed in the earlier year.  In appeal, the action of the ITO was challenged, but of no use to the assessee since the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 3. The assessee being further aggrieved has preferred this appeal.  Shri M.N. Joshi, ld. counsel for the assessee, in support of the appeal, contends inter alia, that no specific notice under s. 154 of the Act is issued to the assessee. He relies on the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cally stating therein that why the allowance made at the time of completion of the assessment which are detailed below shod be withdrawn, and to show this cause, the ITO must fix the definite date, time and place for the appearance of the assessee before him. If the assessee did not appear before the ITO either in person or through his representative, then, the ITO is at liberty to pass ex parte order under s. 154, but he cannot do so if the notice issued is not specific and definite as is stated above. 6. We have gone through the notice as issued by the ITO as stated above, but this notice did not show that the ITO has informed the assessee that why an action under 154 should not be taken in the case of the assessee for the year under c....