1977 (11) TMI 70

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vision, Bangalore comcluded under the Karnataka ST Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the years 1969-70, 1970-71 and 1971-72. All the three cases are clubbed together and disposed of under this common order as the points involved for consideration are similar. 2. The revisional authority has observed that the appellant filed three applications under s. 21(1) of the Act requestin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pposed to facts and circumstances of the case. The assessing authority is not justified in not granting adjournments. The turnovers estimated are arbitrary and baseless. The appellant was a manufacturer of car seats and covers, but he never dealt in automobile parts or accessories. The turnover estimated are arbitrary and baseless. The revisional authority was not justified in dismissing the revis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant has not respondent to the several notices issued. Hence, the assessing authority was forced to conclude the assessments and the revisional authority was justified in dismissing the revision petitions. 5. We have examined the records and heard both the parties. The only point for consideration in all the three appeals is : Whether the revisional authority was justified in dismissing th....