Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1989 (11) TMI 71

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the ITO under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred as the Act, in respect of assessment year 1980-81 is contested. 2. The assessee's loss return of Rs. 11,038 came to be accepted by order dated 22-11-1982. The returned loss was as per the assessee's version, on the ground, that his share of loss from the firm M/s Ravi Solvex amounted to Rs. 56,431. 3. Later t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... also that there was reasonable cause for late filing, levied the penalty of Rs. 4,390. 4. In the first appeal the assessee raised two-fold separate distinct contentions. First that the provisions of section 154/155 of the Act could not be invoked to initiate penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(a) of the Act and second ; that in any case the assessee entertained bona fide belief that there ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er the Act and, therefore, it made no difference if these had not been initiated in the order under section 143(1) of the Act and these came to be initiated in the order under section 154/155 of the Act when the later order has not even been contested as wrongly passed or suffering from any infirmity. 6. As far as the legal contention of Shri Kapur, D.R., is concerned, I accept the same because ....