Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1977 (2) TMI 26

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction of its application under s. 146 of IT Act, 1961. The assessee filed its return showing an income of Rs. 47,560. The ITO on 29th July, 1974 issued notice under s. 142(1) and 143(2) alongwith which he issued a questionnaire to the assessee. The notice was served upon the assessee on 30th July, 1974 and the assessee was asked to comply with these notices on 20th Aug., 1974. The assessee filed i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....80,000. The assessee made an application under s. 146 of the IT Act. The ITO, mentioning the various dates when the time was allowed to the assessee under s. 142(1) of the Act, stated that the assessee could not adduce any reasons which prevented him from complying with the terms and conditions of the notice under s. 142(1) of the Act. He, accordingly, rejected the application of the assessee. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he firm. The partners of the firm were assessed in Calcutta and they were also residing there. Hence the assessee could not obtain the particulars as desired by the ITO within a short time. The assessee urged that firstly there was no non-compliance of notice under s. 142(1) and 143(2) even if it is held that the assessee was in default, the assessee was prevented from reasonable cause because it ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... required to furnish the detail on the basis of the notice of the ITO dt. 29th July, 1974. He was also required to file the desired particulars on or before 20th Aug., 1974. This is a fact that the assessee did not comply with the notice on 20th Aug., 1974, but, however, before the completion of the assessment, the assessee filed its written reply on 18th Sept., 1974. The order sheet of the ITO ha....