1986 (2) TMI 83

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t was filed on 28th March, 1981. The assessee had filed an application for extension of time upto 31st July, 1980 to which no reply was sent. The ITO has imposed the penalty for nine months of delay. The ITO has passed most stereotyped order and shows no application of mind whatsoever. In para-3 it has been stated that there is no reply from the assessee's but in the very next sentence the reply o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the case of CIT vs. Janta Trading Co. (1983) 37 CTR (Bom) 203. 3. At the time of hearing before us the learned Counsel for the assessee pointed out that in the assessee's return of refund claim was made to the extent of Rs. 46,175 and actually tax computation as per assessment order entitles the assessee to a refund of Rs. 27,879. 4. The ld. departmental representative has relied upon the ....