1997 (9) TMI 137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0.5 per cent, 207 fully paid-up redeemable bonds of the face value of Rs. 100 of Repropack. In his WT return, the assessee declared the value of such shares and bonds as per report of the registered valuer and the said report was also filed before the AO at the time of assessment proceedings. The AO did not accept the value declared as per the registered valuer's report and made his own valuation and enhanced the value of the unquoted shares of Repropack held by the assessee. 2. On appeal, the Dy. CWT(A) held that the value shown by the assessee was duly supported by the valuation report of the registered valuer who had correctly valued the unquoted shares of Repropack. He accordingly, allowed the appeal of the assessee. 3. Shri S.S. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... valuation of the asset in question to the Valuation Officer and it will not be open to him to decide the question of valuation on his own. Hence, the AO did not act in accordance with the binding Departmental circular and the value as declared by the assessee deserves to be accepted. In support of his contention, he relied upon the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Raj Paul Oswal vs. CWT (1988) 67 CTR (P&H) 60 : (1988) 171 ITR 489 (P&H). 5. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the facts on records. The vital issue involved in this appeal by the Revenue is with regard to the valuation of right to receive unquoted shares and bonds of Repropack. The value of the said shares and bonds was shown by the as....