Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ To Call / Whatsapp, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Suppressed sales records can establish tax liability, while taxpayer-initiated remands cannot worsen an appellant's position.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rule 56(10) creates a rebuttable presumption of maintenance for a registered person's records, even when found away from registered premises. Records linked to a trader by their contents, custody and an admission can establish suppressed sales on a balance of probabilities. Section 74 applies to deliberate suppression with intent to evade tax, attracting a penalty equal to tax; a shortfall or bona fide mistake alone is insufficient. Enhancement-notice requirements do not apply where the fresh determination reduces the original demand covered by the notice. An appellant-initiated remand cannot worsen the appellant's position: the earlier appellate determination caps tax, penalty and interest accrued up to that determination, while statutory .........