Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (12) TMI 186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mber (J)]. - The Revenue is aggrieved with Order-in-Appeal No. 353/02, dated 27-5-2002. The Commissioner in the impugned order has noted that Revenue has not established the under-invoicing of the product and the assessee having received the extra amount. He has noted that the Managing Partner has resiled from the statement promptly and there was corroborative, direct or circumstantial evidence to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....initial statement of the Managing Partner stating that he has received extra amount, is sufficient to prove the charge of undervaluation. 3. The learned Counsel submits that there is no ground to substantiate the statement of the Managing Partner. The Managing Partner resiled from the statement and there was no other evidence to establish flow back of the said extra money. Hence order is in ter....